Thunder Offseason Thread
Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
thor19
- Junior
- Posts: 388
- And1: 65
- Joined: Jan 18, 2017
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Adams for brown , and westbrook to knicks for mitchell robinson and frank ntilika day dreaming

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Dadouv47
- Forum Mod - Thunder

- Posts: 13,429
- And1: 7,565
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Hope I'm wrong but I don't see us trading Russ this offseason.
At least I hope we trade Grant (for good value obviously)
At least I hope we trade Grant (for good value obviously)
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
mr570
- Senior
- Posts: 571
- And1: 322
- Joined: Jul 01, 2018
- Location: Springfield, MO
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Well you're all getting what you want.
Also lol at some of you "i DoNt sEE RuSs gEtTiNg TrAdEd StiLl"
Shut up. Bad take. Worst take. He's getting traded. Are they getting anything? Probably not. He's getting traded.
Also lol at some of you "i DoNt sEE RuSs gEtTiNg TrAdEd StiLl"
Shut up. Bad take. Worst take. He's getting traded. Are they getting anything? Probably not. He's getting traded.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Ontario
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,289
- And1: 1,102
- Joined: Aug 31, 2001
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Dadouv47 wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:Zack M wrote:
I've yet to hear any problems between Russ and PG..can you share links?
I mean he wasn’t happy with a team that had George. He’s less likely to be happy now that he’s gone.
No way Presti offered Westbrook to the Raptors without him knowing this. So yeah we know Westbrook wants to leave. Problem is how and where. It's going to be very difficult to trade him right now after having his worst year as a pro since his rookie year (not that I think he's going to be better next year but...)
Russ is still an amazing player despite the fact that the media feeds into a negative narrative about him. I expect there might be more interest in him than people realize, the problem is Russ probably isn't going to want to be in a rebuild he's going to want be in the playoff picture which will make things more difficult.
If you do not know how good a basketball player Gary Payton was just go and stand near him for a little while, there's a good chance he'll come over and tell you. - Ahmad Rashad
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Thundershock88
- Starter
- Posts: 2,301
- And1: 2,234
- Joined: Jul 08, 2015
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
The more I think about it, the more I love it. Presti just got a massive haul for a guy who has already had a major leg injury and 2 elbow surgeries
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Dadouv47
- Forum Mod - Thunder

- Posts: 13,429
- And1: 7,565
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
It's not so much the fact that there isn't a market for Russ but right now he doesn't really fit in any team plans.
If New York had a star for example, it could be a nice spot. But they don't.
The lakers don't have cap space for him.
Celtics just signed Kemba.
If New York had a star for example, it could be a nice spot. But they don't.
The lakers don't have cap space for him.
Celtics just signed Kemba.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Thundershock88
- Starter
- Posts: 2,301
- And1: 2,234
- Joined: Jul 08, 2015
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
mr570 wrote:Well you're all getting what you want.
Also lol at some of you "i DoNt sEE RuSs gEtTiNg TrAdEd StiLl"
Shut up. Bad take. Worst take. He's getting traded. Are they getting anything? Probably not. He's getting traded.
I hope you're right. I really do.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Ontario
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,289
- And1: 1,102
- Joined: Aug 31, 2001
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Could Boston use Russ to replace Kyrie?
If you do not know how good a basketball player Gary Payton was just go and stand near him for a little while, there's a good chance he'll come over and tell you. - Ahmad Rashad
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
- Pillendreher
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,191
- And1: 9,953
- Joined: Jan 25, 2015
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
spearsy23 wrote:Somebody has to play sf this year, don't they?
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
mr570
- Senior
- Posts: 571
- And1: 322
- Joined: Jul 01, 2018
- Location: Springfield, MO
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Thundershock88 wrote:mr570 wrote:Well you're all getting what you want.
Also lol at some of you "i DoNt sEE RuSs gEtTiNg TrAdEd StiLl"
Shut up. Bad take. Worst take. He's getting traded. Are they getting anything? Probably not. He's getting traded.
I hope you're right. I really do.
I was wrong about them getting Horford so my track record isn't great.
I've come to peace with this. I just feel horrible for Russ.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Dadouv47
- Forum Mod - Thunder

- Posts: 13,429
- And1: 7,565
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Ontario wrote:Could Boston use Russ to replace Kyrie?
Kemba says no
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Dadouv47
- Forum Mod - Thunder

- Posts: 13,429
- And1: 7,565
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Presti could be able to stand pat in order to go to the playoffs with this current roster
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
wco81
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,974
- And1: 11,512
- Joined: Jul 04, 2013
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Toronto should have done the deal.
Sure they would have had to take on Westbrook and give up a lot of assets.
But they lose Kawhi for nothing. All those assets they kept won’t come close to Kawhi any time soon.
They would have had Kawhi, PG and WB and if things don’t work out at least KL and PG are on tradeable contracts.
They may still be a 4-8 playoffs seed in the East now. IOW, treadmill.
Sure they would have had to take on Westbrook and give up a lot of assets.
But they lose Kawhi for nothing. All those assets they kept won’t come close to Kawhi any time soon.
They would have had Kawhi, PG and WB and if things don’t work out at least KL and PG are on tradeable contracts.
They may still be a 4-8 playoffs seed in the East now. IOW, treadmill.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Thundershock88
- Starter
- Posts: 2,301
- And1: 2,234
- Joined: Jul 08, 2015
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Dadouv47 wrote:Presti could be able to stand pat in order to go to the playoffs with this current roster
That's my biggest fear.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
thor19
- Junior
- Posts: 388
- And1: 65
- Joined: Jan 18, 2017
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Knicks make sense they have shooters and they want a star of course we will not get rj barrett , if we trade adams to I say get mitchell robinson and frank , dennis smith or allonzo miami want another star, minnesota want a pg , hornets and mj will love Westbrook put I think trading Westbrook depend od two things Sam and if Westbrook want to stay or not
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
mr570
- Senior
- Posts: 571
- And1: 322
- Joined: Jul 01, 2018
- Location: Springfield, MO
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
wco81 wrote:Toronto should have done the deal.
Sure they would have had to take on Westbrook and give up a lot of assets.
But they lose Kawhi for nothing. All those assets they kept won’t come close to Kawhi any time soon.
They would have had Kawhi, PG and WB and if things don’t work out at least KL and PG are on tradeable contracts.
They may still be a 4-8 playoffs seed in the East now. IOW, treadmill.
This deal with the Clips is undoubtedly better than anything Toronto could have given.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
oreojenkins
- Sophomore
- Posts: 214
- And1: 140
- Joined: Jun 26, 2017
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
I think I just keep Adams and Grant at this point unless you get an offer you can't refuse. You still need to field a roster, and they're both good guys to have around. They're both still young. Adams' lack of shooting won't be as big of a deal with Westbrook gone. They shopped Adams and didn't like what they heard back, so no need to dump him just to dump him. Plus, it's a business, and he'll easily be the face of the franchise in the short term during this process. Gotta sell tickets. If we send Russ out, we'll have money to re-up Grant if we so choose. I'd hold on to him at least until the deadline.
The core at this point, to me, is SGA, Adams, Grant (at least temporarily), and Ferguson. Bazley, Diallo, and Burton are developmental guys. Gallo is a nice player for sure, but that's someone who doesn't fit long term. I'd move him for picks/young players ASAP honestly if a deal is there. Don't want him to get hurt. I could see Schroder getting toxic, but not going to give away assets in a rebuild just to dump him, so we're stuck there. Roberson and Patterson = their way to limit the tax penalties.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think we might be pleasantly surprised with the Westbrook return. I desperately want Coby White in a trade, but any combo of Herro/Bam/Winslow, Knicks picks, Jonathan Isaac + Magic pick, etc. There are deals out there with young players and/or picks I think are possible. But if you trade for SGA and he's your guy, you HAVE to give him the keys day 1. Playing him off ball with high-usage Westbrook would be such a mistake.
I'm definitely excited for the new possibilities. Just please don't go the sustainability route and trade some of this Clippers haul for pieces to go around Russ. It's over. Let's move on.
The core at this point, to me, is SGA, Adams, Grant (at least temporarily), and Ferguson. Bazley, Diallo, and Burton are developmental guys. Gallo is a nice player for sure, but that's someone who doesn't fit long term. I'd move him for picks/young players ASAP honestly if a deal is there. Don't want him to get hurt. I could see Schroder getting toxic, but not going to give away assets in a rebuild just to dump him, so we're stuck there. Roberson and Patterson = their way to limit the tax penalties.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think we might be pleasantly surprised with the Westbrook return. I desperately want Coby White in a trade, but any combo of Herro/Bam/Winslow, Knicks picks, Jonathan Isaac + Magic pick, etc. There are deals out there with young players and/or picks I think are possible. But if you trade for SGA and he's your guy, you HAVE to give him the keys day 1. Playing him off ball with high-usage Westbrook would be such a mistake.
I'm definitely excited for the new possibilities. Just please don't go the sustainability route and trade some of this Clippers haul for pieces to go around Russ. It's over. Let's move on.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
- Old Man Game
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,281
- And1: 4,317
- Joined: Jul 15, 2012
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Gut the roster. Keep Westbrook. Let him chuck us to 30 wins.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 19,368
- And1: 19,234
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Old Man Game wrote:Gut the roster. Keep Westbrook. Let him chuck us to 30 wins.
Keeping Russ stunts the development of SGA. I would feel differently if we hadn’t traded for a pg. now that shai is here, he needs to start and Russ needs to go.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 19,368
- And1: 19,234
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Pillendreher wrote:spearsy23 wrote:Somebody has to play sf this year, don't they?
We did just trade for Gallinari. He’s going to be amazing for 28 games.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Return to Oklahoma City Thunder


