Thunder Offseason Thread

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2381 » by ThunderBolt » Sat Jul 6, 2019 11:48 pm

I going to send Pill a combination of Nader, grant and shai jerseys and he’ll be on team rebuild in no time.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,557
And1: 6,812
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2382 » by slick_watts » Sat Jul 6, 2019 11:48 pm

1bigfan13 wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
1bigfan13 wrote:I honestly don't get why so many of you are pissed.

WTF did we have to look forward to with this core of players and with our cap situation?

Basically more of the same. 45-48 win seasons, 6th - 8th seed, and 1st round exit. Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

F' that ****.

I'm glad they're pulling the plug on this experiment. This franchise has been stuck in mud for 3+ years and there was no significant signs of improvement. Unless you're one of those homers who was banking on Andre Roberson's return somehow catapulting this franchise into a contender.


did you read any of this thread before posting.


I read about 2 pages starting at around 5 AM. Page 90-something of the thread.


oh, well i didn't find out until later and the response appeared to be well measured.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,422
And1: 7,561
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2383 » by Dadouv47 » Sat Jul 6, 2019 11:49 pm

ThunderBolt wrote:Who is the best prospect between okogie, culver, hero and bam?


I like Culver but would be happy with any of those. Preferene for Culver or Hero because it's time for OKC to have SG. Presti will be able to draft some athletic PF that can't shoot.
acheema0
Sophomore
Posts: 177
And1: 104
Joined: Oct 24, 2018

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2384 » by acheema0 » Sat Jul 6, 2019 11:49 pm

ThunderBolt wrote:I going to send Pill a combination of Nader, grant and shai jerseys and he’ll be on team rebuild in no time.


send them my way so I can sign them for my good friend first
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2385 » by ThunderBolt » Sat Jul 6, 2019 11:49 pm

Dadouv47 wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:Who is the best prospect between okogie, culver, hero and bam?


I like Culver but would be happy with any of those. Preferene for Culver or Hero because it's time for OKC to have SG. Presti will be able to draft some athletic PF that can't shoot.

I think he did two weeks ago.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
kdthunderup
Rookie
Posts: 1,006
And1: 562
Joined: May 13, 2011
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2386 » by kdthunderup » Sun Jul 7, 2019 12:11 am

wco81 wrote:
Old Man Game wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:I think bigger Conley is a likely scenario.


I could sort of see it. Real big kid. In an earlier era he might have been a SG or even a SF. Pretty shifty with the dribble though and appears able to get to the rim. Nice bounce. Looks like he's got tons of potential on defense given that wingspan.


To be honest, when I watched him play against the Warriors, I wasn't as impressed as Clippers fans, who see a very high ceiling for him, like a perennial all star.

But they've certainly watched more of him than I have and he is very young.

I didn't see explosiveness or shiftiness against the Warriors. Most of the time he tried to force his way into the lane or to the rim, pushing off with his off arm rather than using dribble moves to separate from the defender.

He could push off against smaller guys but not when wings like Klay were on him. He could be crafty against slower big men but a lot of times, he didn't shoot, passed it when his initial move, the push off, was stymied. But it's good that he didn't force shots, which kept up his shooting percentage.

Honestly, I thought of a more slender, younger Jarret Jack.

I think he'll be a good player but don't see being an all star multiple times. But he is very young so he could develop more, grow more.

I agree with some of your sentiments but the main reason many people are high on him is that he is 20 years old, has improved rapidly as player the past few years and has maturity and poise beyond his years. He will no doubt develop and refine his game as the years go on. I disagree very much with Jarret Jack comparison, he is not a chucker and looks to make the right play more often than not.

He should become stronger as the years go on, improve his 3 point shot, tighten handle etc he is already good on the defensive end. He doesn't have one elite skill but he will be a very good all round player which will suit the direction the NBA is heading.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2387 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Jul 7, 2019 12:15 am

One thing we haven’t really discussed is that Presti reportedly didn’t want a toxic situation like happened with New Orleans once George requested a trade. Down to dunk podcast said Russ quit following pg on Instagram. This could have been a disaster next year if Presti didn’t act quick.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
thor19
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 65
Joined: Jan 18, 2017
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2388 » by thor19 » Sun Jul 7, 2019 12:17 am

Thunder Up
Senior
Posts: 616
And1: 197
Joined: Jun 26, 2017
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2389 » by Thunder Up » Sun Jul 7, 2019 12:20 am

why do you guys want to trade Russ to the Heat for trash?
User avatar
1bigfan13
Pro Prospect
Posts: 943
And1: 903
Joined: Jul 08, 2018
     

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2390 » by 1bigfan13 » Sun Jul 7, 2019 12:22 am

spearsy23 wrote:Leave this here then stop posting links. I'm excited for a rebuild, one that I hope is more team oriented with high IQ guys.


This is what I'm most excited about. Once they finally move Westbrook I think we'll finally see an offense built on player and ball movement.
thor19
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 65
Joined: Jan 18, 2017
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2391 » by thor19 » Sun Jul 7, 2019 12:25 am

Thunder Up wrote:why do you guys want to trade Russ to the Heat for trash?

Whay do you want ? Open too ideas
thor19
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 65
Joined: Jan 18, 2017
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2392 » by thor19 » Sun Jul 7, 2019 12:33 am

thor19 wrote:
Thunder Up wrote:why do you guys want to trade Russ to the Heat for trash?

Whay do you want ? Open too ideas

Knicks can give us more, twolves can gives jculver, okogie, kbd, wiggins, j teague , covington, I dont think suns do the trade , lakers dont have anything beside kuzma , hornets, monk, miles bridge, batum, maybe reunite klove westbrook in cavs and orlando are the teams that can be interest in Westbrook
Thunder Up
Senior
Posts: 616
And1: 197
Joined: Jun 26, 2017
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2393 » by Thunder Up » Sun Jul 7, 2019 12:38 am

1bigfan13 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:Leave this here then stop posting links. I'm excited for a rebuild, one that I hope is more team oriented with high IQ guys.


This is what I'm most excited about. Once they finally move Westbrook I think we'll finally see an offense built on player and ball movement.


This would first require a coaching staff that has an idea what offense means, something they haven't had for a decade
User avatar
1bigfan13
Pro Prospect
Posts: 943
And1: 903
Joined: Jul 08, 2018
     

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2394 » by 1bigfan13 » Sun Jul 7, 2019 12:58 am

Thunder Up wrote:
1bigfan13 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:Leave this here then stop posting links. I'm excited for a rebuild, one that I hope is more team oriented with high IQ guys.


This is what I'm most excited about. Once they finally move Westbrook I think we'll finally see an offense built on player and ball movement.


This would first require a coaching staff that has an idea what offense means, something they haven't had for a decade


I think 75% of the problem is the type of players that we've had. Harden, KD, and Westbrook are ISO heavy players at their core.

Warriors fans have been complaining since damn near day 1 about KD screwing up the flow of the Warriors motion offense.

I've also pointed out a few times in the past that Westbrook is extremely lazy when he doesn't have the ball in his hands. Most of the time he just stands and watches when others have the ball. The only time he really hustles is when the ball is in his hands. When he has the ball on offense he's going 100 MPH. When he doesn't have the ball he coasts at 25 MPH.

But I will say this about the coaches. I blame them because they're the ones letting him and previous OKC players get away with that lazy brand of basketball. Rather than hold the players to any sort of standard, Donovan and Brooks pretty much allowed the stars to run the offense as they saw fit with impunity. Too scared to take a stand I guess.
oreojenkins
Sophomore
Posts: 214
And1: 140
Joined: Jun 26, 2017
     

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2395 » by oreojenkins » Sun Jul 7, 2019 12:59 am

Is Gordon, Fournier, Augustin for Westbrook, Grant, and Patterson (give or take) feasible? I've been thinking about it after Slick posted and I kind of like the idea of Gordon.
Balkman32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,825
And1: 808
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2396 » by Balkman32 » Sun Jul 7, 2019 1:21 am

Thunder Up wrote:why do you guys want to trade Russ to the Heat for trash?


I don’t get it. There is no rush to trade the first rookie to ever play for the Thunder. This guy is a first ballot hall of famer. Treat him with some respect.
kdthunderup
Rookie
Posts: 1,006
And1: 562
Joined: May 13, 2011
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2397 » by kdthunderup » Sun Jul 7, 2019 1:24 am

oreojenkins wrote:Is Gordon, Fournier, Augustin for Westbrook, Grant, and Patterson (give or take) feasible? I've been thinking about it after Slick posted and I kind of like the idea of Gordon.

I'd rather guys who are stuck on rookie deals who we can manage and keep for years. Gordon would bounce straight after his deal and doesn't do much for this team in the long term.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2398 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Jul 7, 2019 1:26 am

Balkman32 wrote:
Thunder Up wrote:why do you guys want to trade Russ to the Heat for trash?


I don’t get it. There is no rush to trade the first rookie to ever play for the Thunder. This guy is a first ballot hall of famer. Treat him with some respect.

I respectfully want to trade him. Emotional attachment is stupid. It’s not like he doesn’t still get $40million plus a year if he’s traded. Russ is going to be fine. He didn’t rescue my family from a burning building. He’s a declining basketball player that behaves in an embarrassing way. He doesn’t need to be coddled. I wish him the best but it’s time for both parties to move on.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Thunder Up
Senior
Posts: 616
And1: 197
Joined: Jun 26, 2017
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2399 » by Thunder Up » Sun Jul 7, 2019 1:26 am

oreojenkins wrote:Is Gordon, Fournier, Augustin for Westbrook, Grant, and Patterson (give or take) feasible? I've been thinking about it after Slick posted and I kind of like the idea of Gordon.


lol
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#2400 » by Old Man Game » Sun Jul 7, 2019 1:29 am

wco81 wrote:
Old Man Game wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:I think bigger Conley is a likely scenario.


I could sort of see it. Real big kid. In an earlier era he might have been a SG or even a SF. Pretty shifty with the dribble though and appears able to get to the rim. Nice bounce. Looks like he's got tons of potential on defense given that wingspan.


To be honest, when I watched him play against the Warriors, I wasn't as impressed as Clippers fans, who see a very high ceiling for him, like a perennial all star.

But they've certainly watched more of him than I have and he is very young.

I didn't see explosiveness or shiftiness against the Warriors. Most of the time he tried to force his way into the lane or to the rim, pushing off with his off arm rather than using dribble moves to separate from the defender.

He could push off against smaller guys but not when wings like Klay were on him. He could be crafty against slower big men but a lot of times, he didn't shoot, passed it when his initial move, the push off, was stymied. But it's good that he didn't force shots, which kept up his shooting percentage.

Honestly, I thought of a more slender, younger Jarret Jack.

I think he'll be a good player but don't see being an all star multiple times. But he is very young so he could develop more, grow more.


Youtube highlights are frequently misleading so I'll defer to you on his relative ability to get to the rim with the dribble.

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder