ImageImageImage

Trade for Westbrook?

Moderators: Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites, dVs33

joeposh
Pro Prospect
Posts: 809
And1: 413
Joined: Feb 03, 2011
       

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#341 » by joeposh » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:26 am

Kilo wrote:Fandom is a weird thing - pre-draft I wouldn't bat an eye trading #15, Kennard and a 2021 FRP - but now that we drafted Doumbouya I don't want to include him at all and might even be willing to walk away if OKC insisted on his inclusion.


It's because the #15 was a hypothetical, one that had a high chance of whiffing. Now we have a high quality prospect that slipped to us, and there's more value in that.
kellmellus50
Starter
Posts: 2,406
And1: 161
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#342 » by kellmellus50 » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:27 am

How would a potential deal work? The Pistons could send OKC Reggie Jackson and Tony Snell to make the money work (Jackson expires after this year while Snell has a $12 million player option in 2020), if you have to pay more cancel the deal !!!!
Defence Wins Championships,we need to return to the Bad Boy era.
joeposh
Pro Prospect
Posts: 809
And1: 413
Joined: Feb 03, 2011
       

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#343 » by joeposh » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:29 am

RJ/Dre or some variation thereof is the ideal, but they're going to want picks and prospects. That along with the salary implications are what's got a lot of us nervous.
freddy
Senior
Posts: 694
And1: 10
Joined: Jan 25, 2002
Location: Oklahoma

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#344 » by freddy » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:30 am

The thing with Westbrook is, if he comes to Detroit, I think he instantly makes us a top 3 seed in the East. Milwaukie and Boston will be close but neither took great steps forward this year. It will be at least a year before Broolyn competes. Surround Blake and Westbrook with shooters and I think Dre has a career year with Westbrook running the point, we would be an instant force. I think we could sign some decent vets on minimum deals to round out the roster.
buzzkilloton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,858
And1: 2,442
Joined: Feb 20, 2017
Location: Bangkok
 

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#345 » by buzzkilloton » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:31 am

sc8581 wrote:
buzzkilloton wrote:
Neptune wrote:We're already committed to Blake and Dre, why not go all in with Westbrook and see what we can do? Just like someone said in here, maybe we lure players to sign with Detroit to make us better.



With Dre/Blake/Westbrook all the money is spent. You cant lure anyone else on the team. This is the same problem the Thunder just had they couldnt add to the roster due to being capped out and they had just lost 4-1 to the blazers in the first round.


Dre will be off the books next summer assuming he opts out for a long-term deal, that will certainly help. We also have a handful of young players that are cheap for now, assuming they're not included in the deal because they shouldn't be.


Drummond is going to be the number 1 free agent next summer. Its a historically bad class. We would most likely lock him up to have the best player on the market if we add Westbrook.

https://www.nbcsports.com/boston/celtics/nba-free-agents-2020-ranking-top-10-players-who-could-be-available#slide-13

The guys who will be ahead of them wont hit the market.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,292
And1: 5,267
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#346 » by Kilo » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:32 am

I don't think it would be Snell - we'd need a starting SF still. Kennard, Galloway, Maker and Reggie can all be replaced in house. Westbrook replaces Reggie, Maker was bumped to 4th big with Markieff signing and would be replaced by vet minimum signing, Brown, Thomas, Svi and Rose off-ball would man our 2-guard.

If we deal Snell, who is our SF's? Start Svi Mykhailiuk? What FA SF's are still out there for the vet minimum?
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
Cowology
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 41,361
And1: 4,810
Joined: Sep 05, 2004

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#347 » by Cowology » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:34 am

We are better with Dre than without, but I have no interest in giving him another max contract and I don't want to lose him for nothing. There could be something to moving him now as opposed to a year or two down the line when he starts dictating where he wants to go.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,292
And1: 5,267
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#348 » by Kilo » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:37 am

Cowology wrote:We are better with Dre than without, but I have no interest in giving him another max contract and I don't want to lose him for nothing. There could be something to moving him now as opposed to a year or two down the line when he starts dictating where he wants to go.


Dre has been interviewed twice during SL and both times he's asked about his PO and being a FA and he's played coy but given every indication that if healthy he'll opt out and look to get PAID. So he'll go to the highest bidder - I don't want that to be us. Ideally OKC would want him for whatever reason and include Adams coming back our way in the deal.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
NYPiston
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,858
And1: 4,406
Joined: Jun 21, 2019
       

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#349 » by NYPiston » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:41 am

Neptune wrote:
buzzkilloton wrote:
Neptune wrote:\
We're already committed to Blake and Dre, why not go all in with Westbrook and see what we can do? Just like someone said in here, maybe we lure players to sign with Detroit to make us better.


A couple of things. "All in" with this group isn't contending for a championship so what's the point of all in if a championship isn't the end goal? If they give up a couple of their good young players/prospects and picks, they could end up in a couple of years with a couple of early playoff exists and no youth to build with when these old guys aren't good enough anymore.

Also, Westbrook doesn't attract players, he scares them away as they usually get sick of his antics after a year or two of playing with him.
kellmellus50
Starter
Posts: 2,406
And1: 161
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#350 » by kellmellus50 » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:41 am

Westbrook’s contract is truly heinous and the Thunder, staring at a luxury tax bill and a rebuild would be thrilled to simply get off of Westbrook’s money. Jackson is on an expiring contract. Langston Galloway is on an expiring contract., if you have to pay more cancel the deal !!!!
Defence Wins Championships,we need to return to the Bad Boy era.
User avatar
A_dub06
Starter
Posts: 2,088
And1: 985
Joined: Dec 02, 2013
 

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#351 » by A_dub06 » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:45 am

Liqourish wrote:
Kilo wrote:Fandom is a weird thing - pre-draft I wouldn't bat an eye trading #15, Kennard and a 2021 FRP - but now that we drafted Doumbouya I don't want to include him at all and might even be willing to walk away if OKC insisted on his inclusion.


That’s exactly my point. If we were to open capspace, we’d hope to sign a player like Westbrook and possibly move assets (players+picks) to open space and everyone would applaud the free agent signing. But those same fans don’t want to part with players+picks in a trade for that same player. :lol:


Actually if we had the cap space and RW was a free agent I think you would find all of us against trading for him would also be against signing him. And no, I would not be open to moving assets to open up cap space because cap space in Detroit isn’t valuable in terms of signing free agents.

I understand how infuriating/underwhelming/depressing the team has been but as fanatics of this team let’s aim our sights on the real glory which is winning a championship and stop going for short term moves that at best will only improve how watchable the team is. If you’re mature enough to admit this team with RW isn’t making the conference finals then you should also be able to see that trading assets for him only gives us less assets towards the rebuild which will inevitably come one way or another and will also lower the ceiling of that rebuild.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,292
And1: 5,267
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#352 » by Kilo » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:49 am

One thing that can be predicted - if Miami trades for Westbrook, Riley is a genius and Russell makes them a contender in the East, but if Detroit acquires him - same ol dummy Detroit.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
kellmellus50
Starter
Posts: 2,406
And1: 161
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#353 » by kellmellus50 » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:49 am

Is Westbrook worth the price?

I’d say no.
Defence Wins Championships,we need to return to the Bad Boy era.
sfballa13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,831
And1: 928
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#354 » by sfballa13 » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:50 am

Kilo wrote:
Cowology wrote:We are better with Dre than without, but I have no interest in giving him another max contract and I don't want to lose him for nothing. There could be something to moving him now as opposed to a year or two down the line when he starts dictating where he wants to go.


Dre has been interviewed twice during SL and both times he's asked about his PO and being a FA and he's played coy but given every indication that if healthy he'll opt out and look to get PAID. So he'll go to the highest bidder - I don't want that to be us. Ideally OKC would want him for whatever reason and include Adams coming back our way in the deal.


The Adams component of the deal is really what would seal it for me

Adams is signed to another year, wont require the same type of overpay Dre would, and is still only 25 years old

Westbrook - Blake - Adams is a solid trio and would be a joy to watch
Neptune
Veteran
Posts: 2,725
And1: 1,400
Joined: Jan 30, 2014

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#355 » by Neptune » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:51 am

buzzkilloton wrote:
Neptune wrote:
buzzkilloton wrote:
No what we need to do at some point is commit to a rebuild. We see the thunder who just had Adams/PG13/Westbrook not win a playoff series for 2 seasons so they're blowing it up which is what they should do. Some pistons fans and Gores want to replicate them.

We're already committed to Blake and Dre, why not go all in with Westbrook and see what we can do? Just like someone said in here, maybe we lure players to sign with Detroit to make us better.



With Dre/Blake/Westbrook all the money is spent. You cant lure anyone else on the team. This is the same problem the Thunder just had they couldnt add to the roster due to being capped out and they had just lost 4-1 to the blazers in the first round.

Huh? You would get other players through drafts, trades, mid level exceptions and vet mins.
Liqourish
RealGM
Posts: 14,912
And1: 2,245
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
       

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#356 » by Liqourish » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:52 am

A_dub06 wrote:
Liqourish wrote:
Kilo wrote:Fandom is a weird thing - pre-draft I wouldn't bat an eye trading #15, Kennard and a 2021 FRP - but now that we drafted Doumbouya I don't want to include him at all and might even be willing to walk away if OKC insisted on his inclusion.


That’s exactly my point. If we were to open capspace, we’d hope to sign a player like Westbrook and possibly move assets (players+picks) to open space and everyone would applaud the free agent signing. But those same fans don’t want to part with players+picks in a trade for that same player. :lol:


Actually if we had the cap space and RW was a free agent I think you would find all of us against trading for him would also be against signing him. And no, I would not be open to moving assets to open up cap space because cap space in Detroit isn’t valuable in terms of signing free agents.

I understand how infuriating/underwhelming/depressing the team has been but as fanatics of this team let’s aim our sights on the real glory which is winning a championship and stop going for short term moves that at best will only improve how watchable the team is. If you’re mature enough to admit this team with RW isn’t making the conference finals then you should also be able to see that trading assets for him only gives us less assets towards the rebuild which will inevitably come one way or another and will also lower the ceiling of that rebuild.


This team isn’t winning a championship with or without Westbrook. As I’ve stated that numerous times, and I’m pretty sure everyone here is literate to a point, I feel it’s redundant to continue saying as such. Also, I’ve stated that the team, without a plan or competence is inadequate in completing a “rebuild” my only motive is for entertainment purposes. Now, if you’ve been a fan for more than 5 seasons and are mature enough to recognize that
stockpiling “assets” will not help us in either the short or long term, you enjoy the whimsical nature of offseason shenanigans and rumors.
User avatar
A_dub06
Starter
Posts: 2,088
And1: 985
Joined: Dec 02, 2013
 

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#357 » by A_dub06 » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:55 am

Neptune wrote:
buzzkilloton wrote:
Neptune wrote:We're already committed to Blake and Dre, why not go all in with Westbrook and see what we can do? Just like someone said in here, maybe we lure players to sign with Detroit to make us better.



With Dre/Blake/Westbrook all the money is spent. You cant lure anyone else on the team. This is the same problem the Thunder just had they couldnt add to the roster due to being capped out and they had just lost 4-1 to the blazers in the first round.

Huh? You would get other players through drafts, trades, mid level exceptions and vet mins.


The draft? You mean the draft where we would be trading away our picks and then drafting around #20? Trades with which assets? We won’t have as Lenard would be included in the deal and Sekou would need to be packaged with another below average player diluting the value of the trade? No above average vets are going to sign here for the minimum where they could go to many different teams offering a better chance at a championship and the same for MLE’s unless we can offer them a starting position and even then it’s murky.
kellmellus50
Starter
Posts: 2,406
And1: 161
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#358 » by kellmellus50 » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:59 am

Westbrook is a 30 year old BUM no deal !!!!
Defence Wins Championships,we need to return to the Bad Boy era.
tradez401
Veteran
Posts: 2,740
And1: 792
Joined: Jun 30, 2011
 

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#359 » by tradez401 » Mon Jul 8, 2019 2:02 am

i know 90% of this board wants a full blown rebuild but gores wants to win at all cost so why not roll the dice on westbrook sure his contract is crazy but its not like we'd get a top player when we do have capspace we'll just be gettin over paid role players and be stuck at 8-9th seed anyway.
User avatar
ComboGuardCity
RealGM
Posts: 26,052
And1: 4,940
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: Trade for Westbrook? 

Post#360 » by ComboGuardCity » Mon Jul 8, 2019 2:04 am

If we can do this while keeping Dre, we have a dynamic duo + an all star. More than most elite teams.

Return to Detroit Pistons