greenpierce wrote:keevsnick1 wrote:sam_I_am wrote:
Hayward had to have surgery in May or June. People don’t realize what a setback that was. Hayward basically began his rehab all over again in July. Not fair to compare him to George or others who had injury and 1 surgery.
The second surgery is a bit of a lame excuse to me. It wasn't repairing anything, it wasn't doing anything structurally. It was just removing some hardware in his leg. It's like a 4-6 week setback. It doesnt explain his lack luster season.
Broken ankles aren't like a broken leg, you can't equate the two. It's a joint injury that you can't immobilize. As soon as you can use it, you do, but it hurts like hell. The whole weight of your body stresses the joint itself. His playing last year was one in which he probably was in pain the whole time. We don't get to see him in the trainers room with a big, fat, swollen ankle after each game or practice. However that's the reality. He probably is finally getting to the point in which the pain happens only after the compression on the ankle is removed. IE the ankle swells up after removing tape, brace, ect... After having a similar injury myself, I expect big things from Hayward this season.
Hayward played very well after the all-star break on the offensive end at least. Put him on the warriors in playoffs last year, he averages 18 PPG IMO in a rather efficient manner. I don't expect him to do that much better than that this year.
I am not concerned about him too much at all but I also don't think he is a big time answer to the Celtics PF/C problems either.
As for his injury, even after the season it was clearly still bothering him at least a moderate amount if not a hell of a lot more than that. If his ankle was 100%, he probably wouldn't be having to do any exercises/treatment for it that he wasn't doing before the injury but that by Hayward's own admission isn't the case.
Lastly, with Hayward or any 30ish year old wing player we are talking a little bit about the unknown. Some of them age better than others. Having extra length probably helps. But even with his length, K Leonard possibly due to injury/age/offensive load really didn't play the same calibre of defense he did when he was younger. Still a good to very good defender but most Toronto fans well before his departure acknowledged that he was never really elite defensively this year. It was more of a team effort on defense with nearly everyone contributing. I point this out to make the simply point that decent chance that Hayward even if his offensive load isn't as large as his Utah days, may not be same defensively as his last year in Utah because of age/injury. Offensively, you can kind of make up for a decline in athleticism from becoming a better shooter but tougher for a 30 year old to make up for losing a half a step on the defensive end. Defense is where the Celtics really need as much as possible out of Brown/Tatum/Hayward since Horford is gone and Kemba is not a good defender and Kanter is not a good defender either.