MiamiLoyal926 wrote:twix2500 wrote:MiamiLoyal926 wrote:
CP is a far greater negative asset than Westbrook due to age and injuries. No way should our offer be the same as what we were willing to do for Westbrook. Cap relief comes with a price, and OKC needs to pay up to get that relief. They no longer are offering this shiny player, they are offering a rusty, over the hill player with the same albatross of a contract. That’s gonna cost them to get rid of.
Well that is between the Heat and OKC. Heat did not want to give up any young players for Westbrook. OKC wanted two young prospects, they got them in the Westbrook trade in forms of draft picks. It would be pointless for them to now turn around and give that to the Heat. I do not believe any of our young players on on the table for Paul. All they are gonna get is cap fillers on shorter deals from the Heat.
Then we walk away. What is the incentive here to get them from out of that deal? It’s not like CP is a positive asset at this point in his career with that contract. We just got off of giving Wade the minimum 2 years in a row at that age. Wade is the Miami HEAT and we gave him the min during these years. Why should we give Paul nearly 40 for the same age years and do it without incentive from the team being saved from that?
What do you mean positive asset? He would be the second best player on the team? Why would the Heat trade for him if he isnt making the Heat better? For a few late round draft picks??



















