ReasonablySober wrote:Just gonna say this was this dumbest one day idiotic discussion I've been on here. Congrats to who won!
A hot dog is not a sandwich.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
ReasonablySober wrote:Just gonna say this was this dumbest one day idiotic discussion I've been on here. Congrats to who won!
Bucksfan28 wrote:DingleJerry wrote:But of everyone on the team last year if the ball was getting swung around the perimeter down 2 with under 40 seconds left who would you prefer ended up with the open 3? I know I'd take Brogdon and I wouldn't think twice.
I think that point is at least debatable, Mids has made some clutch threes for the Bucks. I could support either one taking the shot.
But even if that's a point you're completely unwilling to concede on, that one thing does not validate the claim.
leroyjw10 wrote:Bucksfan28 wrote:DingleJerry wrote:But of everyone on the team last year if the ball was getting swung around the perimeter down 2 with under 40 seconds left who would you prefer ended up with the open 3? I know I'd take Brogdon and I wouldn't think twice.
I think that point is at least debatable, Mids has made some clutch threes for the Bucks. I could support either one taking the shot.
But even if that's a point you're completely unwilling to concede on, that one thing does not validate the claim.
Brogdon's clutch stats were through the roof last year, with ridiculous 65/75/100 splits during the last five minutes of a 5-point game. Middleton, on the other hand, "boasted" 35/37/87 splits.
MoreTrife wrote:Love seeing two buffoons have a buffoon competition.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
paulpressey25 wrote:Giving Eric Nehm credit. In his piece on Brogdon this afternoon, he got Brogdon to note that Marc Lasry specifically cut the deal with Herb Simon. Our new Governor in action!
Cereal is a soupchonestown wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Just gonna say this was this dumbest one day idiotic discussion I've been on here. Congrats to who won!
A hot dog is not a sandwich.
crkone wrote:Bucks are surely going to miss Brogdon's 1.9 points of clutch play in 3.3 minutes in 26 games.
Newz wrote:Bucks4Milwaukee wrote:Glad youre not in the front office. We will be contending next year if all stay healthy.
crkone wrote:Bucks are surely going to miss Brogdon's 1.9 points of clutch play in 3.3 minutes in 26 games.
kid idioteque wrote:So that new "interview" from The Athletic is less than insightful.
Also, in the comments Nehm posted that Malcolm "seemed pretty complimentary of Milwaukee in his introductory presser with the Pacers."
DavidDunn21 wrote:So please allow me to continue to be the scapegoat for our very rational fears, but just remember that I understand and forgive all of you.
DavidDunn21 wrote:crkone wrote:Bucks are surely going to miss Brogdon's 1.9 points of clutch play in 3.3 minutes in 26 games.
Is your recollection that we played in a lot of close games last year? Very well.
Bucks are surely going to enjoy paying way too much for Middleton's 1.5 points of clutch play in 3.1 minutes in 33 games.
Swan Vox wrote:Not happy about Lasry making deals at all. This is what most of us feared. Marc thinks of this franchise as his toy, buying routinely into his own space jam fantasies.
HaroldinGMinor wrote:I'd be curious to know how much space Brogdon had against Toronto vs the rest of the season given Giannis was quintuple teamed the whole series.
kid idioteque wrote:So that new "interview" from The Athletic is less than insightful.
Also, in the comments Nehm posted that Malcolm "seemed pretty complimentary of Milwaukee in his introductory presser with the Pacers."
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?