Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 66,580
And1: 61,497
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#81 » by Raps in 4 » Fri Jul 19, 2019 6:32 pm

delux55 wrote:He is only viewed as so bad because he makes far far to much money. If he was a 10 to 15 mill a year guy the hate wouldnt be so strong


He would still be grossly overpaid.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,935
And1: 22,508
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#82 » by Klomp » Fri Jul 19, 2019 6:32 pm

wutevahung wrote:
Klomp wrote:I know people don't want to admit it, but he is improving with his shot selection. His percentage of shots being 3s has improved every season and his percentage of long 2s has been declining the last two years.


He also has taken a lot less lay ups and drawing less fouls though, so I can't really say his shot selections are getting better.

career low in % of shots from 0-3 feet (0.229 and 0.264), both lower than his rookie year (0.307)
He is dunking a lot less (58 and 39 successful dunks), significantly lower than his rookie year (79)
Also career lows in FT attempt per 100 (5.3 and 5.6), down from his rookie year (8)
Career low in TS% (0.505 and 0.493), lower than his rookie year (0.517)

Pretty sharp improvement from last year to this year
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
wutevahung
Pro Prospect
Posts: 940
And1: 670
Joined: Dec 13, 2012

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#83 » by wutevahung » Fri Jul 19, 2019 6:39 pm

Klomp wrote:
wutevahung wrote:
Klomp wrote:I know people don't want to admit it, but he is improving with his shot selection. His percentage of shots being 3s has improved every season and his percentage of long 2s has been declining the last two years.


He also has taken a lot less lay ups and drawing less fouls though, so I can't really say his shot selections are getting better.

career low in % of shots from 0-3 feet (0.229 and 0.264), both lower than his rookie year (0.307)
He is dunking a lot less (58 and 39 successful dunks), significantly lower than his rookie year (79)
Also career lows in FT attempt per 100 (5.3 and 5.6), down from his rookie year (8)
Career low in TS% (0.505 and 0.493), lower than his rookie year (0.517)

Pretty sharp improvement from last year to this year


his 2nd year and 3rd year are 0.321 and 0.291. Sharp improvement, but still lower than his career average, and only because his 3rd to 4th year dropped from 0.291 to 0.229.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,935
And1: 22,508
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#84 » by Klomp » Fri Jul 19, 2019 6:40 pm

wutevahung wrote:
Klomp wrote:
wutevahung wrote:
He also has taken a lot less lay ups and drawing less fouls though, so I can't really say his shot selections are getting better.

career low in % of shots from 0-3 feet (0.229 and 0.264), both lower than his rookie year (0.307)
He is dunking a lot less (58 and 39 successful dunks), significantly lower than his rookie year (79)
Also career lows in FT attempt per 100 (5.3 and 5.6), down from his rookie year (8)
Career low in TS% (0.505 and 0.493), lower than his rookie year (0.517)

Pretty sharp improvement from last year to this year


his 2nd year and 3rd year are 0.321 and 0.291. Sharp improvement, but still lower than his career average, and only because his 3rd to 4th year dropped from 0.291 to 0.229.

The Jimmy Butler effect
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
dho4ever
Rookie
Posts: 1,072
And1: 760
Joined: Apr 20, 2011

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#85 » by dho4ever » Fri Jul 19, 2019 7:37 pm

For a guy whose athleticism made him comparable to Lebron James, I haven't seen him make a lot of wow plays. Does anyone have a highlight, just to see his potential?

Don't really watch minnesota, but it seems like everytime I watch him I see him bricking a lot of midrange 2s.
Soulcatcher33
Veteran
Posts: 2,569
And1: 2,758
Joined: Dec 14, 2016

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#86 » by Soulcatcher33 » Fri Jul 19, 2019 7:41 pm

wutevahung wrote:
Klomp wrote:
wutevahung wrote:
He also has taken a lot less lay ups and drawing less fouls though, so I can't really say his shot selections are getting better.

career low in % of shots from 0-3 feet (0.229 and 0.264), both lower than his rookie year (0.307)
He is dunking a lot less (58 and 39 successful dunks), significantly lower than his rookie year (79)
Also career lows in FT attempt per 100 (5.3 and 5.6), down from his rookie year (8)
Career low in TS% (0.505 and 0.493), lower than his rookie year (0.517)

Pretty sharp improvement from last year to this year


his 2nd year and 3rd year are 0.321 and 0.291. Sharp improvement, but still lower than his career average, and only because his 3rd to 4th year dropped from 0.291 to 0.229.


You actually have to be able to get to the rim to shoot at the rim. Unless it's in the open court Wiggins is rarely going to get to the rim as he's not a good ball handler with any kind of dribble moves to get there. There's also the fact that he's a horrible off the ball player. He doesn't make any cuts to the rim or anything.
iggymcfrack
RealGM
Posts: 11,920
And1: 9,420
Joined: Sep 26, 2017

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#87 » by iggymcfrack » Fri Jul 19, 2019 7:47 pm

Raps in 4 wrote:
delux55 wrote:He is only viewed as so bad because he makes far far to much money. If he was a 10 to 15 mill a year guy the hate wouldnt be so strong


He would still be grossly overpaid.


Honestly, I think he’s be overpaid at $4MM. He’s that bad. Would anyone in their right mind rather have him than Cousins?
dc
General Manager
Posts: 7,817
And1: 9,102
Joined: Aug 11, 2001

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#88 » by dc » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:09 pm

dho4ever wrote:For a guy whose athleticism made him comparable to Lebron James, I haven't seen him make a lot of wow plays. Does anyone have a highlight, just to see his potential?

Don't really watch minnesota, but it seems like everytime I watch him I see him bricking a lot of midrange 2s.


As it's been mentioned before, Wiggins is a straight line athlete. He'll look good in drills, workouts and even a few highlights where he beats 1 guy for a dunk, but that's about it.

Put 2-3 guys in front of him on his way to the basket and all of a sudden he looks less athletic. He's a stiff/straight line athlete. He can't improvise. He's a glorified Harrison Barnes, and he might not even be better than Barnes.
Brian Geltzeiler: You see Mark Jackson getting a head coaching job as early as next year?

Adrian Wojnarowski: Not if people make calls on him. Not if an organization is doing their homework and knows all the things he brings with him.
delux55
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,939
And1: 104
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#89 » by delux55 » Fri Jul 19, 2019 9:12 pm

iggymcfrack wrote:
Raps in 4 wrote:
delux55 wrote:He is only viewed as so bad because he makes far far to much money. If he was a 10 to 15 mill a year guy the hate wouldnt be so strong


He would still be grossly overpaid.


Honestly, I think he’s be overpaid at $4MM. He’s that bad. Would anyone in their right mind rather have him than Cousins?


That's just nonsense. Get real. The haters around here lack common sense. Every team in the league would line up to get Wiggins at 4 mill
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,935
And1: 22,508
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#90 » by Klomp » Fri Jul 19, 2019 10:34 pm

dho4ever wrote:For a guy whose athleticism made him comparable to Lebron James, I haven't seen him make a lot of wow plays. Does anyone have a highlight, just to see his potential?

Don't really watch minnesota, but it seems like everytime I watch him I see him bricking a lot of midrange 2s.

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Quentin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,595
And1: 1,317
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
 

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#91 » by Quentin » Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:25 pm

His handles are severely over-rated. And that's considering his handles are viewed as pretty bad. He literally loses the ball anytime he dribbles in the lane. Wolves handcuffed themselves with that contract.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,935
And1: 22,508
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#92 » by Klomp » Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:38 am

Quentin wrote:He literally loses the ball anytime he dribbles in the lane.

That's literally false.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Alatan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,824
And1: 4,110
Joined: May 06, 2017

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#93 » by Alatan » Sat Jul 20, 2019 8:15 am

Image


This describes Wiggins in more ways than one. :lol:
JN61
RealGM
Posts: 11,722
And1: 9,243
Joined: Jan 07, 2018
 

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#94 » by JN61 » Sat Jul 20, 2019 8:36 am

Kabookalu wrote:I hate to say this since I hyped him up so much before the draft, but yes he is. I've followed him since high school, and he's so frustrating to watch because I've seen so many instances throughout the years that suggested he'll be a star, but he doesn't bother putting in the effort. When he's focused and locked in he can be a superstar stopper.



But more often than not he just doesn't care and will completely cost his team on defense all because he's not paying attention. The above video is the rare times where he will and you can see the potential brimming off of him.

Most of those clips are bad defense. He opens up his stance all the time and allows the drive to all directions which is also known as not following the defensive scheme, and can't stay ahead on the screen or recover after but tries to goose pick from behind which doesn't affect shot.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.
Mulhollanddrive
RealGM
Posts: 12,555
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jan 19, 2013

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#95 » by Mulhollanddrive » Sat Jul 20, 2019 8:54 am

41% FG at -9 points below league offensive efficiency.

Does he have to go into the 30s to be bad?
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 32,825
And1: 36,239
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#96 » by UcanUwill » Sat Jul 20, 2019 9:08 am

cellphonecamera wrote:Thibodeau stunted his growth along with the trade for Jimmy Butler. Wiggins averaged 23 points then all of a sudden a year later he goes down to 17. Maybe Wiggins actually does better this year with new coach. He showed some flashes and signs late last year.

The less he scores the better, since he shooting at absolute terrible efficiency. He is a negative player, I disagree with notion that if he was paid less he would get no hate, he would still be terrible player.
wutevahung
Pro Prospect
Posts: 940
And1: 670
Joined: Dec 13, 2012

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#97 » by wutevahung » Sat Jul 20, 2019 10:22 am

UcanUwill wrote:
cellphonecamera wrote:Thibodeau stunted his growth along with the trade for Jimmy Butler. Wiggins averaged 23 points then all of a sudden a year later he goes down to 17. Maybe Wiggins actually does better this year with new coach. He showed some flashes and signs late last year.

The less he scores the better, since he shooting at absolute terrible efficiency. He is a negative player, I disagree with notion that if he was paid less he would get no hate, he would still be terrible player.


No man
Unless you think you know better than coaches who get lapis millions than you are wrong
User avatar
Kabookalu
RealGM
Posts: 63,103
And1: 70,115
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Long Beach, California

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#98 » by Kabookalu » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:30 pm

JN61 wrote:
Kabookalu wrote:I hate to say this since I hyped him up so much before the draft, but yes he is. I've followed him since high school, and he's so frustrating to watch because I've seen so many instances throughout the years that suggested he'll be a star, but he doesn't bother putting in the effort. When he's focused and locked in he can be a superstar stopper.



But more often than not he just doesn't care and will completely cost his team on defense all because he's not paying attention. The above video is the rare times where he will and you can see the potential brimming off of him.

Most of those clips are bad defense. He opens up his stance all the time and allows the drive to all directions which is also known as not following the defensive scheme, and can't stay ahead on the screen or recover after but tries to goose pick from behind which doesn't affect shot.


Not really, no. It's not required to force the scorer to one side if they can challenge the shot straight up, and Wiggins is a world class athlete that he can do that if he tries.
Read on Twitter
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,062
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#99 » by The_Hater » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:33 pm

AJ_Joseph wrote:What's up with people's hate on this guy? What's he so bad at? His FG% isn't atrocious although I haven't seem him play a whole lot.


Why don’t you list all the things he does well for us? And I’m hopeful the list goes beyond ‘FG% isn’t atrocious’
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
taikibansei
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,944
And1: 11,233
Joined: Jul 17, 2008
     

Re: Is Andrew Wiggins Really That Bad? 

Post#100 » by taikibansei » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:36 pm

wutevahung wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
cellphonecamera wrote:Thibodeau stunted his growth along with the trade for Jimmy Butler. Wiggins averaged 23 points then all of a sudden a year later he goes down to 17. Maybe Wiggins actually does better this year with new coach. He showed some flashes and signs late last year.

The less he scores the better, since he shooting at absolute terrible efficiency. He is a negative player, I disagree with notion that if he was paid less he would get no hate, he would still be terrible player.


No man
Unless you think you know better than coaches who get lapis millions than you are wrong


This argument always cracks me up. :lol: The Timberwolves are on their fourth coach during Wiggins 5-year career, so playing Wiggins that much certainly has not increased job security. In 3 1/2 seasons of games without Butler, Wiggins has "led" the Twolves to a .375 W-L record, and while leading the team in minutes, and he has yet to lead "his" team in win shares even once (i.e., not even the season before KAT got there). Accordingly, playing Wiggins does not seem to lead to victories either.

Why is Wiggins played so much? I would say Taylor, who has a history of meddling (e.g., the Love contract fiasco, the LaVine trade and Wiggins max) with generally adverse (for the team) results. Regardless, there is no reason for other teams to mirror the Twolves bad decisions.
RIP magnumt--you're literally why I'm still here on these boards.
RIP The Hater--keep up the good fight in the great beyond.

Return to The General Board