CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:payitforward wrote:nate33 wrote:Agreed.
And I think Simmons shooting liability can be minimized if the right team is put around him. For example, he led Philly to an amazing winning streak at the tail end of the 2018-19 season when Embiid got hurt and they didn't have much choice but to play Simmons at power forward with a stretch 5 (Saric or Illyasova) at center.
Simmons is a really good player, which is why I'd be willing to trade Beal for him (assuming Beal refuses to sign an extension). But we can't ignore that Simmons' idiosyncrasies as a player require that you put a special type of team around him to maximize his effectiveness. Those types of players (shooters who can defend) aren't easy to find and often cost a lot if free agency.
No doubt about it -- Simmons is an extremely unusual player. Not too many like him in the barrel.
I seem to be wrong, nate, in thinking that you underestimate the guy -- given that you'd be willing to trade Beal for him & that you've placed Beal among the top 15+ players in the game.
In the series vs. Toronto, it would be a stretch to blame Philly's offense on Ben Simmons. He went 36-60 (60% fg%). Tobias Harris was 38-100. In fairness, 12 makes were 3-pointers, so it's a .44 eFG% Each team blew the other one out once. Over the other 5 games of the series there is a total of a 4 point difference. There's little doubt that had Embiid been well for game 7, Philly would have won.
So Tobias had a cold series, it happens, especially with that team’s chemistry. I think an overlooked aspect of this whole argument is that $150 million dollar man took less than 10 FG attempts per game, shoot less than 20 free throws while barely shooting over 50% from there.
I’m there with you. Maybe with that team they have he won’t have to shoot.
Let’s hope Troy Brown and Rui are not similarly afflicted.