Alatan wrote:leolozon wrote:Alatan wrote:Here is a thought experiment for you. Swap Mitchell and Simmons to each others teams and think about witch team would improve and witch team would regress. I bet that Utah would be the worst offense in the league while the Sixers would improve dramatically.
People tend to forget how offense starved the Jazz were. Its hard being the sole offensive option on a team without any spacing as a 2nd year player. Call him a chucker all you want but the kid is a superstar in the making.
There's absolutely no chance that Utah would be the worst offense in the league either with last year's team or this year's team. I refuse to believe that you really think that and so it seems like you're ready to exaggerate to push your point.
Utah would be better defensively and maybe worst offensively. But I think they would be a better team considering Conley, Bojan and Ingles are all good shooters. A line-up of Simmons, Conley, Bojan, Ingles and Gobert is scaring me a lot more than if you put Mitchell in there.
It's not as if Mitchell made the Jazz a great offense last year. They were average and the team didn't have a bad offensive starting 5 (3 of the other guys had a positive ORPM, Ingles was right up there with Mitchell, 50th vs 46th). Mitchell was great at the end of the year, but he was atrocious in the playoffs... so who knows? If he keeps playing like he played in March and April, he'll probably be better than Simmons.
Firstly i was talking about the last seasons teams. And year 100% Simmons would yank them to the bottom of the offensive standings. He is a 0 on the offensive end. A team with Gobert, Favors, Rubio and Simmons would leave a wall of 4 defenders surrounding the paint.
Face it Simmons is almost useless without the ball and mediocre with it. The only thing he has is being a good defender. He is closer to a worse version of Draymond Green than he is to LeBron James.
I completely disagree with your assessment that Simmons is a 0 on the offensive end and that the only thing he has is being a good defender (great passer, great rebounder and clearly above average at the rim)... I think you are being irrational when you imply that Ben Simmons isn't a good passer... I'll trust ORPM and net rating before I trust someone who makes such a ludicrous statement.
EDIT : If you think a team would start Simmons and Rubio, you don't know much about basketball. Rubio would get traded for anyone who's a decent shooter, so your scenario doesn't even make sense. The Jazz would have started Crowder or O'Neale before Rubio.




















