Gordon Hayward

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

User avatar
GOATTatum
Junior
Posts: 479
And1: 551
Joined: Jul 10, 2019
         

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#101 » by GOATTatum » Mon Aug 26, 2019 6:04 pm

Gordon is gonna return to allstar form this year. He's gonna get a ton of open looks with teams double and triple teaming Tatum.
Darth Celtic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,946
And1: 17,506
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Big 3 will crush the east!
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#102 » by Darth Celtic » Mon Aug 26, 2019 6:04 pm

Johnny Firpo wrote:
Panic610 wrote:
TheBoi10 wrote:More mediocrity for $30+ million


Serious answers please. Looking at how PG bounced back, I'm really curious to what Gordon will look like this season.


Didn't George look a lot better, a lot earlier? Not saying it's over for Gordon, he is, what, 29? But still, just because George managed to come back and have a peak season last year, doesn't mean Hayward can get anywhere close to his best. It is a huge enigma, but I am rooting for him.

PG13 came back in season when the team was in the playoffs. He did ok in the playoffs then had all offseason to work on his game with the team without rehab.

Hayward broke his leg in season and didn't get to work out with team for basketball till training camp. He had a second surgery to remove a screw that was rubbing on his tendons causing pain which kept him from rehabbing and working out at top level. He basically was rehabbing all last offseason.

This year, he's not rehabbing. He's working out, working on his game, 7 days a week near 4hrs a day at the Celtics practice facility with Celtics trainers.

Is there a chance he comes back same as last year and mentally just can't be that guy anymore? Sure. I bet more on the guy working his tail off, staying in boston full time, and working with the team trainers making a big return this year.
MrDollarBills = MrWelchesBets
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,054
And1: 7,446
Joined: Nov 24, 2008

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#103 » by AbeVigodaLive » Mon Aug 26, 2019 6:06 pm

Asif16 wrote:
CeltsfaninDC wrote:
TheBoi10 wrote:
I heard the same nonsense from Celtics fans last year.

60+ win team, lock to make finals, Warriors East :lol:

Overrated frauds every year, but last year they only won 49 games and got infinitely worse


I’m sorry, I can’t see you through all 18 of these banners we have over here. You had ONE good season and your rental left.


lol Classic Celtics fan comeback. Bring up 17 banners ya'll won against Firefighters and Plumbers back in the day.

Celtics and Raptors have the same amount of Titles the last 20 years lmao. Your history against a team that was born in 1995 really doesnt fit the narrative bud



... and airline pilots apparently...

Image
Darth Celtic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,946
And1: 17,506
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Big 3 will crush the east!
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#104 » by Darth Celtic » Mon Aug 26, 2019 6:09 pm

Johnny Bball wrote:If Hayward doesn't come off the bench again, Stevens is making the same mistake again. Tatum/Brown are better. Hayward isn't a 4 ( or too many spots he's not good at defending the 4). Especially with the hole at centre. And don't care how positive anyone wants to try and be about that. 14/6 and pretty average efficiency I would expect.

Look at team USA. Brown, Tatum, Middleton all playing. Brown and Tatum defending 4's. Even against bigger teams. Expect to see the same type of thing on the Celtics.

Brown/Tatum/Hayward are not 4's but can all switch on defense and defend 4's good enough to play the position.
MrDollarBills = MrWelchesBets
User avatar
Asif16
RealGM
Posts: 19,473
And1: 27,704
Joined: Feb 03, 2013
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#105 » by Asif16 » Mon Aug 26, 2019 6:12 pm

Darth Celtic wrote:
Johnny Bball wrote:If Hayward doesn't come off the bench again, Stevens is making the same mistake again. Tatum/Brown are better. Hayward isn't a 4 ( or too many spots he's not good at defending the 4). Especially with the hole at centre. And don't care how positive anyone wants to try and be about that. 14/6 and pretty average efficiency I would expect.

Look at team USA. Brown, Tatum, Middleton all playing. Brown and Tatum defending 4's. Even against bigger teams. Expect to see the same type of thing on the Celtics.

Brown/Tatum/Hayward are not 4's but can all switch on defense and defend 4's good enough to play the position.


Really depends on whether or not Hayward was able to get his speed and agility back but the chances of Hayward successfully guarding the 4 is looking bleak. He was never a solid defender to start with. And Last year he looked like he can barely move.

If its an experiment Steven is gonna try to start the season, I dont think the experiment will last long.
Darth Celtic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,946
And1: 17,506
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Big 3 will crush the east!
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#106 » by Darth Celtic » Mon Aug 26, 2019 6:16 pm

Asif16 wrote:
Darth Celtic wrote:
Johnny Bball wrote:If Hayward doesn't come off the bench again, Stevens is making the same mistake again. Tatum/Brown are better. Hayward isn't a 4 ( or too many spots he's not good at defending the 4). Especially with the hole at centre. And don't care how positive anyone wants to try and be about that. 14/6 and pretty average efficiency I would expect.

Look at team USA. Brown, Tatum, Middleton all playing. Brown and Tatum defending 4's. Even against bigger teams. Expect to see the same type of thing on the Celtics.

Brown/Tatum/Hayward are not 4's but can all switch on defense and defend 4's good enough to play the position.


Really depends on whether or not Hayward was able to get his speed and agility back but the chances of Hayward successfully guarding the 4 is looking bleak. He was never a solid defender to start with. And Last year he looked like he can barely move.

If its an experiment Steven is gonna try to start the season, I dont think the experiment will last long.

Actually last year I felt better when he defended 4's than 2's. He was a bit slower coming off injury last year and not having any training but rehabbing in the offseason. When I watched him, yes he wasn't a 4, but the dude is strong. He can muscle up a post player better than any wing on celtics other than maybe Smart.

PS, to jazz fans laughing he got hurt.... stay classy san diego.
MrDollarBills = MrWelchesBets
User avatar
Johnny Bball
RealGM
Posts: 55,119
And1: 59,556
Joined: Feb 01, 2015
 

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#107 » by Johnny Bball » Mon Aug 26, 2019 6:43 pm

Darth Celtic wrote:
Johnny Bball wrote:If Hayward doesn't come off the bench again, Stevens is making the same mistake again. Tatum/Brown are better. Hayward isn't a 4 ( or too many spots he's not good at defending the 4). Especially with the hole at centre. And don't care how positive anyone wants to try and be about that. 14/6 and pretty average efficiency I would expect.

Look at team USA. Brown, Tatum, Middleton all playing. Brown and Tatum defending 4's. Even against bigger teams. Expect to see the same type of thing on the Celtics.

Brown/Tatum/Hayward are not 4's but can all switch on defense and defend 4's good enough to play the position.


I didn't say Tatum or Brown can't defend the 4. I think they would do it better even if but you expect them to be the 2 and 3. But that is not Hayward.
Hoopz Afrik
Analyst
Posts: 3,007
And1: 2,141
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#108 » by Hoopz Afrik » Mon Aug 26, 2019 6:47 pm

I've been in the 14-5-4 camp for him with good efficiency. I think he settles into a tertiary scorer, secondary playmaker role with this team. I think he'll look markedly better this coming szn than he did this past szn. I think him and Marcus Smart manning the second unit for the Celtics is going to be a huge deal for them.
Super Eagles GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
IgorK
Veteran
Posts: 2,735
And1: 4,787
Joined: Mar 06, 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#109 » by IgorK » Mon Aug 26, 2019 6:49 pm

Panic610 wrote:
Don Ford wrote:His best year in Utah was 21/5/5 shooting 47%fg/40%3pt/84%FT. Don't see him getting anywhere near that again but I could see him being a 15/4/4 guy.


Which in theory would be the perfect 3rd option on a contending team, right?


Funny - Kuzma will easily approach those numbers this year (18/5/2 last year), yet nobody will call him "the perfect 3rd option on a contending team".
"You want me to own a team and deal with these rich, spoiled stubborn athletes, and try to get them to perform? No thank you." - Kobe

AMG
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,054
And1: 7,446
Joined: Nov 24, 2008

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#110 » by AbeVigodaLive » Mon Aug 26, 2019 6:51 pm

IgorK wrote:
Panic610 wrote:
Don Ford wrote:His best year in Utah was 21/5/5 shooting 47%fg/40%3pt/84%FT. Don't see him getting anywhere near that again but I could see him being a 15/4/4 guy.


Which in theory would be the perfect 3rd option on a contending team, right?


Funny - Kuzma will easily approach those numbers this year (18/5/2 last year), yet nobody will call him "the perfect 3rd option on a contending team".



Maybe.

But back to which stats we're using... the advanced stats (even last year) favor Hayward across the board.
IgorK
Veteran
Posts: 2,735
And1: 4,787
Joined: Mar 06, 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#111 » by IgorK » Mon Aug 26, 2019 7:12 pm

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
IgorK wrote:
Panic610 wrote:
Which in theory would be the perfect 3rd option on a contending team, right?


Funny - Kuzma will easily approach those numbers this year (18/5/2 last year), yet nobody will call him "the perfect 3rd option on a contending team".



Maybe.

But back to which stats we're using... the advanced stats (even last year) favor Hayward across the board.


My comment was more about fans' take on Kuzma rather than indicating Gordon's skills/value. I think Gordon has a high enough IQ to play well beyond this injury. He was never a max guy in my view but he can be one of the league's best glue guys (a la Iggy).
"You want me to own a team and deal with these rich, spoiled stubborn athletes, and try to get them to perform? No thank you." - Kobe

AMG
PurpleGreenGold
Junior
Posts: 278
And1: 262
Joined: Apr 10, 2015
       

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#112 » by PurpleGreenGold » Mon Aug 26, 2019 8:42 pm

Darth Celtic wrote:
Asif16 wrote:
Darth Celtic wrote:Look at team USA. Brown, Tatum, Middleton all playing. Brown and Tatum defending 4's. Even against bigger teams. Expect to see the same type of thing on the Celtics.

Brown/Tatum/Hayward are not 4's but can all switch on defense and defend 4's good enough to play the position.


Really depends on whether or not Hayward was able to get his speed and agility back but the chances of Hayward successfully guarding the 4 is looking bleak. He was never a solid defender to start with. And Last year he looked like he can barely move.

If its an experiment Steven is gonna try to start the season, I dont think the experiment will last long.

Actually last year I felt better when he defended 4's than 2's. He was a bit slower coming off injury last year and not having any training but rehabbing in the offseason. When I watched him, yes he wasn't a 4, but the dude is strong. He can muscle up a post player better than any wing on celtics other than maybe Smart.

PS, to jazz fans laughing he got hurt.... stay classy san diego.


I really worry for Boston's defensive efficiency if you have Tatum/Hayward spending any sort of time at the 4 spot when Kanter is in the game. Maybe Stevens can make it work, but that seems like a major problem.
PurpleGreenGold
Junior
Posts: 278
And1: 262
Joined: Apr 10, 2015
       

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#113 » by PurpleGreenGold » Mon Aug 26, 2019 8:48 pm

Like a few others have posted, I agree that Hayward will never reach the numbers he put up in Utah. Snyder designed the entire offense around Hayward and ways to get the ball in his hands.

Boston has Walker/Tatum/Brown now in from of him, and he's just not the type of guy who demands his fair share of equal touches. I see him at maybe 15-4-4. He's capable of so much more, but he's not set up for success in Boston's system. And because of this, he'll continue to get dragged by fans/media because of his contract.
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,054
And1: 7,446
Joined: Nov 24, 2008

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#114 » by AbeVigodaLive » Mon Aug 26, 2019 9:09 pm

PurpleGreenGold wrote:Like a few others have posted, I agree that Hayward will never reach the numbers he put up in Utah. Snyder designed the entire offense around Hayward and ways to get the ball in his hands.

Boston has Walker/Tatum/Brown now in from of him, and he's just not the type of guy who demands his fair share of equal touches. I see him at maybe 15-4-4. He's capable of so much more, but he's not set up for success in Boston's system. And because of this, he'll continue to get dragged by fans/media because of his contract.



If we go by usage rate... Hayward was the 5th option in Boston last season at 19.0. Barely ahead of Horford and Rozier.

I expect that to go up. It's near criminal that Marcus Morris had a higher rate...
User avatar
Asif16
RealGM
Posts: 19,473
And1: 27,704
Joined: Feb 03, 2013
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#115 » by Asif16 » Mon Aug 26, 2019 9:17 pm

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
PurpleGreenGold wrote:Like a few others have posted, I agree that Hayward will never reach the numbers he put up in Utah. Snyder designed the entire offense around Hayward and ways to get the ball in his hands.

Boston has Walker/Tatum/Brown now in from of him, and he's just not the type of guy who demands his fair share of equal touches. I see him at maybe 15-4-4. He's capable of so much more, but he's not set up for success in Boston's system. And because of this, he'll continue to get dragged by fans/media because of his contract.



If we go by usage rate... Hayward was the 5th option in Boston last season at 19.0. Barely ahead of Horford and Rozier.

I expect that to go up. It's near criminal that Marcus Morris had a higher rate...


Marcus Morris was clearly outplaying Hayward (and many other prime celtics players) during most of the season.

He's was practically one of their best players up until the All-Star break. Which pretty much summed up their season as a whole
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,054
And1: 7,446
Joined: Nov 24, 2008

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#116 » by AbeVigodaLive » Mon Aug 26, 2019 9:22 pm

Asif16 wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
PurpleGreenGold wrote:Like a few others have posted, I agree that Hayward will never reach the numbers he put up in Utah. Snyder designed the entire offense around Hayward and ways to get the ball in his hands.

Boston has Walker/Tatum/Brown now in from of him, and he's just not the type of guy who demands his fair share of equal touches. I see him at maybe 15-4-4. He's capable of so much more, but he's not set up for success in Boston's system. And because of this, he'll continue to get dragged by fans/media because of his contract.



If we go by usage rate... Hayward was the 5th option in Boston last season at 19.0. Barely ahead of Horford and Rozier.

I expect that to go up. It's near criminal that Marcus Morris had a higher rate...


Marcus Morris was clearly outplaying Hayward (and many other prime celtics players) during most of the season.

He's was practically one of their best players up until the All-Star break. Which pretty much summed up their season as a whole



Exactly. Fool's gold.

Fast forward to the end of the season... and Hayward performed better (statistically) nearly across the board. Especially when you look at advanced stats.

The rub is that the Celtics were paying Hayward so much. And the expectations were higher. And he was a shell of his former self. My point here is simply to show that he wasn't actually nearly as terrible as some narratives would suggest... and that he was actually a plus player and possibly "better" than Morris or Brown or even Tatum.
CeltsfaninDC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,791
And1: 2,338
Joined: Oct 26, 2005
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#117 » by CeltsfaninDC » Wed Nov 6, 2019 2:22 pm

JazzyPhinz wrote:Gordon Howard will be a decent 3rd option on good efficiency. But he's a very passive player which prevents him from being worth that contract. Theres no alpha in him. He was passive in Utah until we literally handed him the keys to the offense.

oh... this is a fun thread to revisit this morning
CeltsfaninDC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,791
And1: 2,338
Joined: Oct 26, 2005
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#118 » by CeltsfaninDC » Wed Nov 6, 2019 2:23 pm

TheBoi10 wrote:
CeltsfaninDC wrote:
TheBoi10 wrote:
:crazy: Image

What you can’t see in that vid is that he’s standing on Kawhi’s shoulders again


Imagine being mediocre already and then replacing Kyrie & Horford with elite losers in Walker & Kanter :roll: . I'd be salty too.

just imagine
sean1913
Sophomore
Posts: 169
And1: 39
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#119 » by sean1913 » Wed Nov 6, 2019 2:25 pm

if i'm ainge i'm happy with 15/5/5. he's not no 1 option ( who is in Bos?). if he can be consistent now that's what will help more.
all the talent in the world and no heart equals nada
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: Gordon Hayward 

Post#120 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Wed Nov 6, 2019 2:48 pm

Nate505 wrote:
CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:
Nate505 wrote:He'll still suck, hopefully.


I understand your bitterness.

As long as he keeps sucking, it's more elation than bitterness.


Somebody check in on this dude. He might have pulled an Epstein after last night.

Return to The General Board