gh123 wrote:We had 2 threads on it in the last year or so with his stats and all those HCA loses. He had like 7 I think and he played poorly in 6 of them, dragged his team down.
I would like to read those
Moderators: PaulieWal, Doctor MJ, Clyde Frazier, penbeast0, trex_8063
gh123 wrote:We had 2 threads on it in the last year or so with his stats and all those HCA loses. He had like 7 I think and he played poorly in 6 of them, dragged his team down.
Cavsfansince84 wrote:gh123 wrote:Cavsfansince84 wrote:
Which easy opponent would you be referring to outside of the 83 Milwaukee series? His team losing a series doesn't necessarily mean he choked either.
We had 2 threads on it in the last year or so with his stats and all those HCA loses. He had like 7 I think and he played poorly in 6 of them, dragged his team down.
You specifically said against easy opponents though. I asked which easy opponents and Bird post 89 wouldn't be relevant imo.
gh123 wrote:Cavsfansince84 wrote:gh123 wrote:
We had 2 threads on it in the last year or so with his stats and all those HCA loses. He had like 7 I think and he played poorly in 6 of them, dragged his team down.
You specifically said against easy opponents though. I asked which easy opponents and Bird post 89 wouldn't be relevant imo.
viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1764914
There was an older one as well, something about top 10 players and people were arguing how Bird's playoffs weren't consistently great like all other top 10 players'. If you're a superstar and you lose to a lower seed while having a bad statline that's a choke. Not that I mind Bird, he's in my top 10 too, but he did choke more than others.
Cavsfansince84 wrote:gh123 wrote:Cavsfansince84 wrote:
You specifically said against easy opponents though. I asked which easy opponents and Bird post 89 wouldn't be relevant imo.
viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1764914
There was an older one as well, something about top 10 players and people were arguing how Bird's playoffs weren't consistently great like all other top 10 players'. If you're a superstar and you lose to a lower seed while having a bad statline that's a choke. Not that I mind Bird, he's in my top 10 too, but he did choke more than others.
I don't think that that thread constitutes some sort of unanimous opinion that Bird choked in all those series.
gh123 wrote:Cavsfansince84 wrote:gh123 wrote:
viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1764914
There was an older one as well, something about top 10 players and people were arguing how Bird's playoffs weren't consistently great like all other top 10 players'. If you're a superstar and you lose to a lower seed while having a bad statline that's a choke. Not that I mind Bird, he's in my top 10 too, but he did choke more than others.
I don't think that that thread constitutes some sort of unanimous opinion that Bird choked in all those series.
It's not an opinion there, just numbers.
DatAsh wrote:Hakeem/Malone gap is too big, and on top of that, the Bird/Hakeem duo is a better fit.
Cavsfansince84 wrote:gh123 wrote:Cavsfansince84 wrote:
I don't think that that thread constitutes some sort of unanimous opinion that Bird choked in all those series.
It's not an opinion there, just numbers.
Right but you sort of alluded to it as proving your point about him choking and its mostly just him losing to some very good teams and based on his ppg and ts%. That in itself doesn't really = him choking.
gh123 wrote:
Choking is losing to a worse team while significantly underperforming. He lost with HCA and underperformed considerably compare to his RS numbers. He had some ridiculous series, but I just feel more comfortable having someone like Hakeem or may be Dirk, who choked only twice compare to Bird's 7. He's still a top10 ATG, just not as reliable as many other top20 players.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.
lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…