Jellybeans wrote:Jokic D just funny as hell
Dead snail moves faster
Dead snail=Scola
Damn, Scola 20 points barely missed any shots
If Jokic continues getting fatter which he has, he's gonna eat himself out of the league eventually.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Jellybeans wrote:Jokic D just funny as hell
Dead snail moves faster
Dead snail=Scola
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
KGboss wrote:Brown doesnt need you to clean his jock strap for him
Captain_Caveman wrote:You are perfectly welcome to never read or respond to my posts ever again. I don't find you particularly knowledgeable or insightful from anything I have read to date.
5InOfLouisville wrote:This is the first game FIBA game I've watched in its entirety, so I am not claiming to be an expert, but going in, I was focused on Jaylen Brown's supposed "inability to pass" and "low basketball IQ", which I see bandied about frequently on RealGM.
His playmaking looked pretty good to me, js.
To be fair, this was just one game.
But do you think that maybe, drawing conclusions either way, based on a couple of International games with unfamiliar teammates and an unfamiliar system is not the best method for evaluating his growth?
I see a young player with a high ceiling. I can't guarantee he will reach it. I agree that he often puts his head down with the goal of getting to the rim no matter what, and sometimes gets tunnel vision.
I don't think that most young wings come into this league as established play makers.
I look forward to seeing him play this year for the Celtics.
5InOfLouisville wrote:This is the first game FIBA game I've watched in its entirety, so I am not claiming to be an expert, but going in, I was focused on Jaylen Brown's supposed "inability to pass" and "low basketball IQ", which I see bandied about frequently on RealGM.
His playmaking looked pretty good to me, js.
To be fair, this was just one game.
But do you think that maybe, drawing conclusions either way, based on a couple of International games with unfamiliar teammates and an unfamiliar system is not the best method for evaluating his growth?
I see a young player with a high ceiling. I can't guarantee he will reach it. I agree that he often puts his head down with the goal of getting to the rim no matter what, and sometimes gets tunnel vision.
I don't think that most young wings come into this league as established play makers.
I look forward to seeing him play this year for the Celtics.

cloverleaf wrote:5InOfLouisville wrote:This is the first game FIBA game I've watched in its entirety, so I am not claiming to be an expert, but going in, I was focused on Jaylen Brown's supposed "inability to pass" and "low basketball IQ", which I see bandied about frequently on RealGM.
His playmaking looked pretty good to me, js.
To be fair, this was just one game.
But do you think that maybe, drawing conclusions either way, based on a couple of International games with unfamiliar teammates and an unfamiliar system is not the best method for evaluating his growth?
I see a young player with a high ceiling. I can't guarantee he will reach it. I agree that he often puts his head down with the goal of getting to the rim no matter what, and sometimes gets tunnel vision.
I don't think that most young wings come into this league as established play makers.
I look forward to seeing him play this year for the Celtics.
JB did come into the league as a low BBIQ player and he still had limited vision, handles and decision-making last season. .
KGboss wrote:Brown doesnt need you to clean his jock strap for him
Captain_Caveman wrote:You are perfectly welcome to never read or respond to my posts ever again. I don't find you particularly knowledgeable or insightful from anything I have read to date.
5InOfLouisville wrote:cloverleaf wrote:5InOfLouisville wrote:This is the first game FIBA game I've watched in its entirety, so I am not claiming to be an expert, but going in, I was focused on Jaylen Brown's supposed "inability to pass" and "low basketball IQ", which I see bandied about frequently on RealGM.
His playmaking looked pretty good to me, js.
To be fair, this was just one game.
But do you think that maybe, drawing conclusions either way, based on a couple of International games with unfamiliar teammates and an unfamiliar system is not the best method for evaluating his growth?
I see a young player with a high ceiling. I can't guarantee he will reach it. I agree that he often puts his head down with the goal of getting to the rim no matter what, and sometimes gets tunnel vision.
I don't think that most young wings come into this league as established play makers.
I look forward to seeing him play this year for the Celtics.
JB did come into the league as a low BBIQ player and he still had limited vision, handles and decision-making last season. .
He definitely has areas in which he can improve. I think we essentially said the same thing about his vision, handles and decision-making.
I think "Basketball IQ" is difficult to define. are there myriad 21 year olds with high-basketball iq's? Isn't an adjustment period to the speed and size of the NBA normal?
Again, I don't know. I just think it's hard to determine basketball IQ's, particularly for us message board evaluators.
3D Chess wrote:Seems to me that Jaylen is getting praise for his play everywhere except this board lol
jmr07019 wrote:There’s more to BB IQ than shot selection but it is worth noting that Brown, who we say has a low b-ball is, has shot about 29% of his shots from mid range for his career. Tatum, who is generally praised for high b-ball iq, has shot 42% of his shots from mid range in his career.
jmr07019 wrote:There’s more to BB IQ than shot selection but it is worth noting that Brown, who we say has a low b-ball is, has shot about 29% of his shots from mid range for his career. Tatum, who is generally praised for high b-ball iq, has shot 42% of his shots from mid range in his career.
cloverleaf wrote:jmr07019 wrote:There’s more to BB IQ than shot selection but it is worth noting that Brown, who we say has a low b-ball is, has shot about 29% of his shots from mid range for his career. Tatum, who is generally praised for high b-ball iq, has shot 42% of his shots from mid range in his career.
Right, but JB and JT have different skillsets and the term BBIQ is generally referred to as speed in making good on-the-court decisions, mid-action, whereas shot selection of the type you're referring to is usually a little more premeditated, shall we say.
If JB keeps learning as he has and JT remains stuck in last year's play, their reputations will end up flipped. Also, remember, JT was younger and playing just his second year, last season.
Higgs Boston wrote:A player can't improve dramatically his vision but it can be improved a bit with some exercises and there are tricks on court to be a better passer like passing while jumping (he did sometimes last game), passing while post-up, predicting teammates future positions etc
He has to focus on these things and he will be fine even with average handles.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
keevsnick1 wrote:cloverleaf wrote:jmr07019 wrote:There’s more to BB IQ than shot selection but it is worth noting that Brown, who we say has a low b-ball is, has shot about 29% of his shots from mid range for his career. Tatum, who is generally praised for high b-ball iq, has shot 42% of his shots from mid range in his career.
Right, but JB and JT have different skillsets and the term BBIQ is generally referred to as speed in making good on-the-court decisions, mid-action, whereas shot selection of the type you're referring to is usually a little more premeditated, shall we say.
If JB keeps learning as he has and JT remains stuck in last year's play, their reputations will end up flipped. Also, remember, JT was younger and playing just his second year, last season.
Not sure I agree with this definition. Shot election should be very much a mid action choice, and i'd say premediating and deciding too take a mid ranger is probably even more indicative of a low basketball IQ than making that decision mid action, since literally everybody who knows anything about basketball knows you wnat to avoid those shots.
Higgs Boston wrote:A player can't improve dramatically his vision but it can be improved a bit with some exercises and there are tricks on court to be a better passer like passing while jumping (he did sometimes last game), passing while post-up, predicting teammates future positions etc
He has to focus on these things and he will be fine even with average handles.
BillTheGOAT wrote:I want Australia v USA in the final. Spain wouldn't be bad but I think Australia-USA would be entertaining as hell.


reload141 wrote:BillTheGOAT wrote:I want Australia v USA in the final. Spain wouldn't be bad but I think Australia-USA would be entertaining as hell.
Our first top 3 finish would be amazing for Australia.
PLEASE MAKE IT HAPPEN!!