7footMONSTER wrote:Kawhi picks Kobe over LeBron:
BuT yOu MuSt bE CrAzY iF yOu hAvE KoBe iN YoUr ToP 5
No, he doesn't. You just don't understand the question or the answer.
Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Dirk, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27
7footMONSTER wrote:Kawhi picks Kobe over LeBron:
BuT yOu MuSt bE CrAzY iF yOu hAvE KoBe iN YoUr ToP 5
Danny1616 wrote:7footMONSTER wrote:Kawhi picks Kobe over LeBron:
BuT yOu MuSt bE CrAzY iF yOu hAvE KoBe iN YoUr ToP 5
Kawhi is from L.A and is a guy that has competed against Lebron during the finals.
He's not going to say Lebron.
7footMONSTER wrote:Danny1616 wrote:7footMONSTER wrote:Kawhi picks Kobe over LeBron:
BuT yOu MuSt bE CrAzY iF yOu hAvE KoBe iN YoUr ToP 5
Kawhi is from L.A and is a guy that has competed against Lebron during the finals.
He's not going to say Lebron.
Why would that matter? I think Curry has Lebron in his Top 5. I thought Game recognize Game?
Danny1616 wrote:7footMONSTER wrote:Danny1616 wrote:
Kawhi is from L.A and is a guy that has competed against Lebron during the finals.
He's not going to say Lebron.
Why would that matter? I think Curry has Lebron in his Top 5. I thought Game recognize Game?
Did Kawhi say Lebron is not in his top 5?
Kawhi also said Iverson was his favorite player of all time.
Players aren't always the most objective people. Isiah Thomas said if Bird was black he wouldn't even be considered that great. He only said that because he hated Bird as the Celtics were an obstacle to the Pistons in the East despite Bird being the clear-cut best player in the NBA from 1983-1987. Ron Artest said Brandon Roy was the toughest player he ever went up against.
picc wrote:Gooner wrote:picc wrote:I always enjoy people referencing Kobe's finals series against by far the two best defensive teams in NBA history.
I guess thats one way to eliminate him from a GOAT debate he was never in in the first place.
Funny thing is, Dirk shot 41% against Miami in the 2011 finals, and that's considered as one of the best performances. Shooting percentage can be very misleading, especially on a small sample size.
There's nothing misleading about Kobe's percentages in the 04 and 08 finals. He shot the ball like **** in both, and how clutch can you have been in 1-4 and 2-4 losses. Of course, no one mentions how great he was defensively in both those series, because the decisive losses render it inconsequential, and we judge mainly by offense if you underperformed enough on that end.
But when the two best defensive teams in history are selling out on making you shoot poorly, you shooting poorly shouldn't exactly be a shock to anyone. And yet it appears it still is.
7footMONSTER wrote:Danny1616 wrote:7footMONSTER wrote:
Why would that matter? I think Curry has Lebron in his Top 5. I thought Game recognize Game?
Did Kawhi say Lebron is not in his top 5?
Kawhi also said Iverson was his favorite player of all time.
Players aren't always the most objective people. Isiah Thomas said if Bird was black he wouldn't even be considered that great. He only said that because he hated Bird as the Celtics were an obstacle to the Pistons in the East despite Bird being the clear-cut best player in the NBA from 1983-1987. Ron Artest said Brandon Roy was the toughest player he ever went up against.
Yes we all have different opinions. I don’t understand why some fans are so insecure they have to call anyone who disagrees with them as “delusional”.
Danny1616 wrote:7footMONSTER wrote:Danny1616 wrote:
Did Kawhi say Lebron is not in his top 5?
Kawhi also said Iverson was his favorite player of all time.
Players aren't always the most objective people. Isiah Thomas said if Bird was black he wouldn't even be considered that great. He only said that because he hated Bird as the Celtics were an obstacle to the Pistons in the East despite Bird being the clear-cut best player in the NBA from 1983-1987. Ron Artest said Brandon Roy was the toughest player he ever went up against.
Yes we all have different opinions. I don’t understand why some fans are so insecure they have to call anyone who disagrees with them as “delusional”.
Also, I hate when fans think that an NBA player's opinion is somehow more credible than any other person. We see NBA players all the time make foolish statements that make no sense.
Players are usually the most biased because they only played with certain players, they may not not liked other players, there may be jealousy, they may have teammates that didn't like other players etc. I saw Pierce claim he was better than Wade and downplay Lebron probably due to the rivalry he had with the Heat, I saw Damon Jones predict the Magic would beat the Raptors in the 1st round, I saw Arenas early in the playoffs say Kawhi is an easy player to guard 1 v 1 and that the Raptors had no shot against the Sixers.
Yeah sometimes player's opinions are useful, but I give more credence to a data analyst/reporter/journalist that actually looked at the evidence and statistics objectively and came to a detailed conclusion.
Danny1616 wrote:7footMONSTER wrote:Danny1616 wrote:
Did Kawhi say Lebron is not in his top 5?
Kawhi also said Iverson was his favorite player of all time.
Players aren't always the most objective people. Isiah Thomas said if Bird was black he wouldn't even be considered that great. He only said that because he hated Bird as the Celtics were an obstacle to the Pistons in the East despite Bird being the clear-cut best player in the NBA from 1983-1987. Ron Artest said Brandon Roy was the toughest player he ever went up against.
Yes we all have different opinions. I don’t understand why some fans are so insecure they have to call anyone who disagrees with them as “delusional”.
Also, I hate when fans think that an NBA player's opinion is somehow more credible than any other person. We see NBA players all the time make foolish statements that make no sense.
Players are usually the most biased because they only played with certain players, they may not not liked other players, there may be jealousy, they may have teammates that didn't like other players etc. I saw Pierce claim he was better than Wade and downplay Lebron probably due to the rivalry he had with the Heat, I saw Damon Jones predict the Magic would beat the Raptors in the 1st round, I saw Arenas early in the playoffs say Kawhi is an easy player to guard 1 v 1 and that the Raptors had no shot against the Sixers.
Yeah sometimes player's opinions are useful, but I give more credence to a data analyst/reporter/journalist that actually looked at the evidence and statistics objectively and came to a detailed conclusion.
AdagioPace wrote:Bashing Kobe is not fun anymore. His game has already been eviscerated to a morbid degree.
PS: what's up with these tiny pic images ?

G35 wrote:Danny1616 wrote:7footMONSTER wrote:
Yes we all have different opinions. I don’t understand why some fans are so insecure they have to call anyone who disagrees with them as “delusional”.
Also, I hate when fans think that an NBA player's opinion is somehow more credible than any other person. We see NBA players all the time make foolish statements that make no sense.
Players are usually the most biased because they only played with certain players, they may not not liked other players, there may be jealousy, they may have teammates that didn't like other players etc. I saw Pierce claim he was better than Wade and downplay Lebron probably due to the rivalry he had with the Heat, I saw Damon Jones predict the Magic would beat the Raptors in the 1st round, I saw Arenas early in the playoffs say Kawhi is an easy player to guard 1 v 1 and that the Raptors had no shot against the Sixers.
Yeah sometimes player's opinions are useful, but I give more credence to a data analyst/reporter/journalist that actually looked at the evidence and statistics objectively and came to a detailed conclusion.
Both ways are biased and subjective and neither is better than the other.
It's like saying I trust a liberal news site over a conservative news site......
Danny1616 wrote:G35 wrote:Danny1616 wrote:
Also, I hate when fans think that an NBA player's opinion is somehow more credible than any other person. We see NBA players all the time make foolish statements that make no sense.
Players are usually the most biased because they only played with certain players, they may not not liked other players, there may be jealousy, they may have teammates that didn't like other players etc. I saw Pierce claim he was better than Wade and downplay Lebron probably due to the rivalry he had with the Heat, I saw Damon Jones predict the Magic would beat the Raptors in the 1st round, I saw Arenas early in the playoffs say Kawhi is an easy player to guard 1 v 1 and that the Raptors had no shot against the Sixers.
Yeah sometimes player's opinions are useful, but I give more credence to a data analyst/reporter/journalist that actually looked at the evidence and statistics objectively and came to a detailed conclusion.
Both ways are biased and subjective and neither is better than the other.
It's like saying I trust a liberal news site over a conservative news site......
What?
I simply said I trust the opinion of someone who has done objective research based on evidence over someone who is basing his analysis purely on subjective opinion.
Subjective opinions are useful but accorded less credibility when not supported by objective evidence.
So when Gilbert Arenas says Kawhi isn't a good 1 vs. 1 player and could be easily stopped without being supported by objective evidence his opinion is useless. Evidence since 2017 shows Kawhi is one of the deadliest isolation players in the game on deadly efficiency.
When Paul Pierce claims he was a better player than Wade despite vast amounts of evidence pointing to the contrary, his opinion is not credible.
You aren't getting what I'm saying, dude.
7footMONSTER wrote:Danny1616 wrote:G35 wrote:
Both ways are biased and subjective and neither is better than the other.
It's like saying I trust a liberal news site over a conservative news site......
What?
I simply said I trust the opinion of someone who has done objective research based on evidence over someone who is basing his analysis purely on subjective opinion.
Subjective opinions are useful but accorded less credibility when not supported by objective evidence.
So when Gilbert Arenas says Kawhi isn't a good 1 vs. 1 player and could be easily stopped without being supported by objective evidence his opinion is useless. Evidence since 2017 shows Kawhi is one of the deadliest isolation players in the game on deadly efficiency.
When Paul Pierce claims he was a better player than Wade despite vast amounts of evidence pointing to the contrary, his opinion is not credible.
You aren't getting what I'm saying, dude.
Why would you listen to Gilbert Arenas?

Gooner wrote:GeorgeMarcus wrote:I’ve pulled back the reigns on Kobe hating after it became so trendy, but the fact remains that he simply doesn’t belong in the GOAT conversation. Even if you’re a sucker for “mamba mentality”, volume scoring and championship success, he’s clearly a worse player than MJ.
He is, but so is everybody else really.
G35 wrote:Danny1616 wrote:7footMONSTER wrote:
Yes we all have different opinions. I don’t understand why some fans are so insecure they have to call anyone who disagrees with them as “delusional”.
Also, I hate when fans think that an NBA player's opinion is somehow more credible than any other person. We see NBA players all the time make foolish statements that make no sense.
Players are usually the most biased because they only played with certain players, they may not not liked other players, there may be jealousy, they may have teammates that didn't like other players etc. I saw Pierce claim he was better than Wade and downplay Lebron probably due to the rivalry he had with the Heat, I saw Damon Jones predict the Magic would beat the Raptors in the 1st round, I saw Arenas early in the playoffs say Kawhi is an easy player to guard 1 v 1 and that the Raptors had no shot against the Sixers.
Yeah sometimes player's opinions are useful, but I give more credence to a data analyst/reporter/journalist that actually looked at the evidence and statistics objectively and came to a detailed conclusion.
Both ways are biased and subjective and neither is better than the other.
It's like saying I trust a liberal news site over a conservative news site......
G35 wrote:picc wrote:Gooner wrote:
Funny thing is, Dirk shot 41% against Miami in the 2011 finals, and that's considered as one of the best performances. Shooting percentage can be very misleading, especially on a small sample size.
There's nothing misleading about Kobe's percentages in the 04 and 08 finals. He shot the ball like **** in both, and how clutch can you have been in 1-4 and 2-4 losses. Of course, no one mentions how great he was defensively in both those series, because the decisive losses render it inconsequential, and we judge mainly by offense if you underperformed enough on that end.
But when the two best defensive teams in history are selling out on making you shoot poorly, you shooting poorly shouldn't exactly be a shock to anyone. And yet it appears it still is.
Yeah, Kobe played against the two best defenses in the finals in the past 20+ years and he gets criticized for shooting poorly but then we always apply "context" to players like Harden, Curry, Lebron, etc.
But Kobe, no its just pure numbers when judging him.
There's no shame in that he shot poorly/played poorly in the playoffs...that's what is suppose to happen. Jordan and I think only Olajuwon can really say they clearly improve in the playoffs.
Lebron vs Spurs 2007
Lebron vs Mavericks 2011
Lebron missing the playoffs 2019
Oh no he's legit in the GOAT conversation........
Johnny Bball wrote:7footMONSTER wrote:Kawhi picks Kobe over LeBron:
BuT yOu MuSt bE CrAzY iF yOu hAvE KoBe iN YoUr ToP 5
No, he doesn't. You just don't understand the question or the answer.
triple_threat wrote:G35 wrote:picc wrote:
There's nothing misleading about Kobe's percentages in the 04 and 08 finals. He shot the ball like **** in both, and how clutch can you have been in 1-4 and 2-4 losses. Of course, no one mentions how great he was defensively in both those series, because the decisive losses render it inconsequential, and we judge mainly by offense if you underperformed enough on that end.
But when the two best defensive teams in history are selling out on making you shoot poorly, you shooting poorly shouldn't exactly be a shock to anyone. And yet it appears it still is.
Yeah, Kobe played against the two best defenses in the finals in the past 20+ years and he gets criticized for shooting poorly but then we always apply "context" to players like Harden, Curry, Lebron, etc.
But Kobe, no its just pure numbers when judging him.
There's no shame in that he shot poorly/played poorly in the playoffs...that's what is suppose to happen. Jordan and I think only Olajuwon can really say they clearly improve in the playoffs.
Lebron vs Spurs 2007
Lebron vs Mavericks 2011
Lebron missing the playoffs 2019
Oh no he's legit in the GOAT conversation........
Dont forget kobe got swept by those mavs in those playoffs. Dont forget kobe missed the playoffs at age 26 if i recall correctly without suffering a major injury that year. Dont forget kobe in his 4th year only averaged 22.5 ppg and put up the worst finals stats in the history of the nba for a top 10-15 player
7footMONSTER wrote:Kawhi picks Kobe over LeBron:
BuT yOu MuSt bE CrAzY iF yOu hAvE KoBe iN YoUr ToP 5