The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

XxIronChainzxX
RealGM
Posts: 14,457
And1: 7,665
Joined: Oct 22, 2004
   

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#181 » by XxIronChainzxX » Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:27 pm

robbie84 wrote:
Yogatti wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote: almost 30 with Draymond guarding him in 2 series.


2015: Warriors swept the Pelicans

2018: Warriors beat the Pelicans 4-1.

Yeah AD sure put up a fight in both of those series :lol:


Would be been a different story with LeBron on his team.


It was a different story after that last ECF. The Pacers lost to Lowry and DeRozan in 7. They got swept by LeBron. Then PG teamed up with Westbrook and lost to the Jazz, then got humiliated by the Blazers.

He's a superstar and an incredible player, but I wouldn't exactly talk up that post season record.
Jadoogar
RealGM
Posts: 17,343
And1: 16,974
Joined: May 06, 2010
   

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#182 » by Jadoogar » Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:37 pm

Why wouldn't you think that? Lets say the top 2 are a wash (essentially 2 top 10 players on both sides), 3-12 is such a massive difference in favour of the Clippers.

Harrell, Beverley, Lou Will, Zubac, harkless
vs
Kuzma, Danny green, rondo (?), KCP, Bradley (?)
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,952
And1: 10,687
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#183 » by TheNewEra » Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:59 pm

robbie84 wrote:I don't think Paul George is a good fit next to Kawahi.
Kawahi is so ball dominant.
PG is going to have to shoot a lot of threes, and shoot them very well.

Lakers with Davis and LeBron is way ahead for me, and I really hate the Lakers as a rival.
Not sure how teams are supposed to guard LeBron James and Anthony Davis in a 7 game series.


Load up in the paint and force both of them to shoot.
TerryTate
Analyst
Posts: 3,414
And1: 1,485
Joined: May 22, 2008
Location: The 6ix
   

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#184 » by TerryTate » Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:06 pm

ClipsFanSince98 wrote:
TerryTate wrote:
ClipsFanSince98 wrote:Holy misinformation.

Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using RealGM mobile app

What is misinformation? Really, I'd like to know... PG injury?!?
There are reports that say up to a few games at the beginning of the season and some that say late November. Anyways, why would they rush him back after dropping so much to get him? Honestly, that would be kinda of stupid.


You're dead wrong about everything Clippers related. For one Kawhi isn't on load management. Kawhi, Doc, Frank have already openly said this. He will play every game he's healthy. All parties have said Kawhi was on such strict load management last year because he went into the season injured and hadn't played the year before. There are no plans to rest him. Doc said health is priority, but he's not going to just sit him due to "load management". Clippers beat writers are saying the coaches expect Kawhi to play 70+ potentially.

Then secondly PG was NEVER facing 1-2 months out. That was a random Bill Simmons myth that the rest of media ran with. His timeline for grade 2 rotator cuff tear was always 5-6 months. That's Oct 7th-Nov 7th. Missing no games to missing maybe 5-6 games. He's already shoulder pressing 50s in each hand and on the court doing everything with the team besides contact scrimmaging. Not sure on what planet you come up with 1-2 months missed. Honestly with how far ahead PG looks right now I would not be surprised if he goes through training camp, sits most of preseason but is ready for the opener.

I'm glad you believe the BS that they say to the media..... but it's nice to be objectively thinking instead taking everything face value.
Rivers said this two days ago....... "Rivers said he doesn’t expect the Clippers will employ as “aggressive” a load management plan with Leonard as the Raptors did last season". That kind of implies that they will be load managing him.
Clippers beat writers..... expect him to play 70 games? Kawhi, hit > 70 games, 2 out of this 8 years in the NBA. Between the clipper beat writers opinion and the "light" load management, I'd say 70+ games is going to be hard.

Anything I've googled on PG injury has said "undisclosed" timeline with minimum being out all of October. I mean why rush him back? 2-3 extra weeks off isn't going to hurt the Clips. Whatever it's your franchise.... It's not like with the Clippers talent that they'd be <.500 without Kawhi or PG. I'm gonna reference the Markennen injury from last year. They also said early november mid summer, and then it shifted to Christmas. I mean things drag out...

It's not like I'm trying to discredit your team. I'm just being realistic.
Image
Metallikid
RealGM
Posts: 10,723
And1: 9,971
Joined: Mar 10, 2010

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#185 » by Metallikid » Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:31 pm

zimpy27 wrote:How do NBA execs get these jobs?

The fit on the Lakers is better than the Clippers but the Clippers have more talent from 1 to 8. The Lakers defense will be better, the Clippers offense will be better. I would say Clippers are slight favorites because they are younger.


Really? I'm pretty sure like 90% of people think it's going to be the opposite with the Clippers having the better defense by far, but LeBron's Lakers will be fantastic offensively.
User avatar
OkcSinceSGA
RealGM
Posts: 31,186
And1: 32,892
Joined: Sep 19, 2015
 

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#186 » by OkcSinceSGA » Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:39 pm

TerryTate wrote:
ClipsFanSince98 wrote:
TerryTate wrote:What is misinformation? Really, I'd like to know... PG injury?!?
There are reports that say up to a few games at the beginning of the season and some that say late November. Anyways, why would they rush him back after dropping so much to get him? Honestly, that would be kinda of stupid.


You're dead wrong about everything Clippers related. For one Kawhi isn't on load management. Kawhi, Doc, Frank have already openly said this. He will play every game he's healthy. All parties have said Kawhi was on such strict load management last year because he went into the season injured and hadn't played the year before. There are no plans to rest him. Doc said health is priority, but he's not going to just sit him due to "load management". Clippers beat writers are saying the coaches expect Kawhi to play 70+ potentially.

Then secondly PG was NEVER facing 1-2 months out. That was a random Bill Simmons myth that the rest of media ran with. His timeline for grade 2 rotator cuff tear was always 5-6 months. That's Oct 7th-Nov 7th. Missing no games to missing maybe 5-6 games. He's already shoulder pressing 50s in each hand and on the court doing everything with the team besides contact scrimmaging. Not sure on what planet you come up with 1-2 months missed. Honestly with how far ahead PG looks right now I would not be surprised if he goes through training camp, sits most of preseason but is ready for the opener.

I'm glad you believe the BS that they say to the media..... but it's nice to be objectively thinking instead taking everything face value.
Rivers said this two days ago....... "Rivers said he doesn’t expect the Clippers will employ as “aggressive” a load management plan with Leonard as the Raptors did last season". That kind of implies that they will be load managing him.
Clippers beat writers..... expect him to play 70 games? Kawhi, hit > 70 games, 2 out of this 8 years in the NBA. Between the clipper beat writers opinion and the "light" load management, I'd say 70+ games is going to be hard.

Anything I've googled on PG injury has said "undisclosed" timeline with minimum being out all of October. I mean why rush him back? 2-3 extra weeks off isn't going to hurt the Clips. Whatever it's your franchise.... It's not like with the Clippers talent that they'd be <.500 without Kawhi or PG. I'm gonna reference the Markennen injury from last year. They also said early november mid summer, and then it shifted to Christmas. I mean things drag out...

It's not like I'm trying to discredit your team. I'm just being realistic.


Are you really wanting to cherry pick against a Clippers fan with a vested interest in this, who is literally obsessed with his team? Not a smart road to go down. Kawhi in his press conference is the first one to say he's not on "load management" and will take it game by game. As for last week Doc/Frank emphasized that the reason for aggressive load management in Toronto was because he went into the season injured to begin with and hadn't played the year before much. My personal feeling is he KNEW he didn't plan on sticking around in Toronto for the long haul and didn't want to jeopardize his future in free agency etc.

Also you admit they won't have as aggressive of a load management plan with him... yet have an issue with me saying a plan of 70? Isn't that just 8 or 9 more games than Toronto played him? In a season where he's even healthier? Not sure what you are picking at here. So you post those quotes, then fight me over an 8 game difference, despite those quotes saying his rest won't be as aggressive lol?

As for PG... simple logic, deduction and research go a long way. The prognosis was ALWAYS to assess him going into training camp, but we can use a little fact finding and piece this together, so I'll explain a little more clearly how I came to my conclusions.

1. Paul George had surgery for a grade 2 rotator cuff tear on May 7th. The timeline for full recovery for this injury in every medical publication I can find is 5-6 months, which INCLUDES strength training rehab and conditioning. He then had a 2nd surgery to repair a minor labrum tear on the other shoulder June 11th (at which point Dr's stated did NOT affect the original timeline from the rotator cuff tear). The 5-6 month timeline is October 7th-Nov 7th range. Either missing 0 games, or missing 8-9 games (depending if he plays on the actual 7th or next game on 11th).

Paul George had successful surgery on his left shoulder to repair a tear in his labrum, per a Thunder spokesperson. Recovery timetable is the same it was when he had surgery on his right shoulder a few weeks ago — reassessed around the start of training camp.

— Royce Young (@royceyoung) June 11, 2019

George has been in the training facility practicing and weightlifting for nearly three weeks, as we’ve seen on Instagram. His on-court work has primarily consisted of shooting and finishing-at-the-rim exercises, one-on-one drills to keep his isolation skills sharp and free throws. He has yet to return to full-contact action. But that hasn’t prevented from being in the gym every day, including making late-night trips with Leonard and Lou Williams. “He’s made great progress,” Frank said. “He works his tail off. He’s been terrific. We have a great performance, health and wellness staff. … We put it in their hands. He works extremely hard. He’s extremely excited and motivated. I’m sure you guys have seen some of the stuff that’s been posted. He gets after it.”

-The Athletic

2. If you look at the actual exercises he's doing, and you know even a basic amount of physiology or medicine, you can tell how close he is. He's shoulder pressing heavy weights unassisted for the last few weeks now. He's getting up hundreds of shots. He's dunking hard. Literally the ONLY thing he's NOT doing yet is full contact play with teammates. That's simply a formality because he hasn't been cleared yet (he's expected to see a Dr this week before training camp). The idea that he could still be 2 months away is asinine. I'd literally bet $500 right now that he suits up in October, even if he misses preseason.

3. The source of the random "PG is going to miss months" was a random Bill Simmons tidbit, in which he gave literally ZERO evidence, stated zero source and admitted it was just a haunch or gut feeling. Shortly after that, all of the media started randomly parroting this, also without any sources. Woj for example has never reported on this.
“This kid reminds me of a 6-6 Chris Paul. He wants to win everything.”

Olin Simplis- SGA’s trainer.
lakerz12
Head Coach
Posts: 7,494
And1: 9,052
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Contact:
     

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#187 » by lakerz12 » Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:41 pm

Jadoogar wrote:Why wouldn't you think that? Lets say the top 2 are a wash (essentially 2 top 10 players on both sides), 3-12 is such a massive difference in favour of the Clippers.

Harrell, Beverley, Lou Will, Zubac, harkless
vs
Kuzma, Danny green, rondo (?), KCP, Bradley (?)


-Beverley is a good defender but bad on offense. He averages 9 points for his career (7.6 last year) on 41% shooting.
-Lou Will is going to be 33 going on his 15th season. Good offensive punch but not a great player. Liability on defense.
-Zubac was considered garbage on the Lakers. He's supposed to be good now? He should be a backup center.
-Harkless is a mediocre role player.
-Harrell is the only guy with potential to be an above average/great player out of this whole group.

What are we supposed to be impressed by?

The Lakers supporting cast is not great either but you can throw in Caruso, McGee and Howard. Pretty equal overall IMO.

Neither team has a clear 3rd star. Kuzma could emerge as 3rd star and Harrell could emerge as a 3rd star.
User avatar
Official
Veteran
Posts: 2,721
And1: 321
Joined: Apr 14, 2009

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#188 » by Official » Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:57 pm

Patrick Beverly is one of the most overrated players in the league. He averaged 7.6ppg/3.8appg/ 5rpg and is making 12 million per year now. And he has never had a great defensive DBPM. In no world is that a starting point guard caliber player. I would give him one thing - he has brilliantly made himself relevant in circles and made bank this summer from the following:

Injured Westbrook
Pushed Lonzo
Fouled the hell out of Lebron and KD until they got annoyed and destroyed him.

Think of it like this - Freaking Rondo averages the below and everyone thinks he is washed up:

9.2ppg, 8apg, and 5.3rpg and only makes 2.6 million.
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,952
And1: 10,687
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#189 » by TheNewEra » Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:27 pm

Official wrote:Patrick Beverly is one of the most overrated players in the league. He averaged 7.6ppg/3.8appg/ 5rpg and is making 12 million per year now. And he has never had a great defensive DBPM. In no world is that a starting point guard caliber player. I would give him one thing - he has brilliantly made himself relevant in circles and made bank this summer from the following:

Injured Westbrook
Pushed Lonzo
Fouled the hell out of Lebron and KD until they got annoyed and destroyed him.

Think of it like this - Freaking Rondo averages the below and everyone thinks he is washed up:

9.2ppg, 8apg, and 5.3rpg and only makes 2.6 million.


Beverly is a bit overrated as a player but his fire and leadership goes a long way. The culture begins with Beverly and has been amazing in taking young guys under his wing and connecting with vets. He’s not afraid of the dirty work and can rally his team and unlike the Lob City teams he’s persistent about staying on a teams throat.

Even with Kawhi and PG on the team front office still has him showcased as a leader. He was a big influence on SGA last year and seems he’s forming a bond with Zubac and they are getting closer and pushing Zubac to have more of a push back edge.


For a contender he’s going to play the Iggy-PJ Tucker-Lowry(2019) and etc type super glue guy
Danny1616
General Manager
Posts: 9,690
And1: 12,725
Joined: May 26, 2007

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#190 » by Danny1616 » Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:30 pm

TheNewEra wrote:
Official wrote:Patrick Beverly is one of the most overrated players in the league. He averaged 7.6ppg/3.8appg/ 5rpg and is making 12 million per year now. And he has never had a great defensive DBPM. In no world is that a starting point guard caliber player. I would give him one thing - he has brilliantly made himself relevant in circles and made bank this summer from the following:

Injured Westbrook
Pushed Lonzo
Fouled the hell out of Lebron and KD until they got annoyed and destroyed him.

Think of it like this - Freaking Rondo averages the below and everyone thinks he is washed up:

9.2ppg, 8apg, and 5.3rpg and only makes 2.6 million.


Beverly is a bit overrated as a player but his fire and leadership goes a long way. The culture begins with Beverly and has been amazing in taking young guys under his wing and connecting with vets. He’s not afraid of the dirty work and can rally his team and unlike the Lob City teams he’s persistent about staying on a teams throat.

Even with Kawhi and PG on the team front office still has him showcased as a leader. He was a big influence on SGA last year and seems he’s forming a bond with Zubac and they are getting closer and pushing Zubac to have more of a push back edge.


For a contender he’s going to play the Iggy-PJ Tucker-Lowry(2019) and etc type super glue guy


Lowry is one of the best floor generals, outside shooters, and facilitators in the NBA that can put up 20 a night if needed...not a great comparison.
User avatar
OkcSinceSGA
RealGM
Posts: 31,186
And1: 32,892
Joined: Sep 19, 2015
 

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#191 » by OkcSinceSGA » Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:32 pm

Official wrote:Patrick Beverly is one of the most overrated players in the league. He averaged 7.6ppg/3.8appg/ 5rpg and is making 12 million per year now. And he has never had a great defensive DBPM. In no world is that a starting point guard caliber player. I would give him one thing - he has brilliantly made himself relevant in circles and made bank this summer from the following:

Injured Westbrook
Pushed Lonzo
Fouled the hell out of Lebron and KD until they got annoyed and destroyed him.

Think of it like this - Freaking Rondo averages the below and everyone thinks he is washed up:

9.2ppg, 8apg, and 5.3rpg and only makes 2.6 million.


I wouldn't go that far. He's not a top tier PG by any means, but he is a great fit with this roster in particular, and is better than you're giving him credit for. He's got a +8 net rating, is a positive in almost every lineup. He's also #11 among PG's in the NBA in RPM at 2.71 ahead of guys like Westbrook, Fox, Russell, Rubio, Murray, Hill. He's 6th in DRPM among PG's trailing only CP3, Hill, Lowry, Joseph and Derrick White. He's a specialist. He's basically a guy who's going to make decently smart reads, hit open 3's and get after it on D. He's also really good at not turning the ball over, so he's not killing you there. Based on the contracts we've seen recently he's still a relative bargain. I wouldn't go with counting stats for Rondo who hemorrhages teams on both ends in terms of metrics.
“This kid reminds me of a 6-6 Chris Paul. He wants to win everything.”

Olin Simplis- SGA’s trainer.
User avatar
LKN
General Manager
Posts: 9,678
And1: 15,580
Joined: Jun 04, 2018
       

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#192 » by LKN » Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:43 pm

lakerz12 wrote:
Jadoogar wrote:Why wouldn't you think that? Lets say the top 2 are a wash (essentially 2 top 10 players on both sides), 3-12 is such a massive difference in favour of the Clippers.

Harrell, Beverley, Lou Will, Zubac, harkless
vs
Kuzma, Danny green, rondo (?), KCP, Bradley (?)


-Beverley is a good defender but bad on offense. He averages 9 points for his career (7.6 last year) on 41% shooting.
-Lou Will is going to be 33 going on his 15th season. Good offensive punch but not a great player. Liability on defense.
-Zubac was considered garbage on the Lakers. He's supposed to be good now? He should be a backup center.
-Harkless is a mediocre role player.
-Harrell is the only guy with potential to be an above average/great player out of this whole group.

What are we supposed to be impressed by?

The Lakers supporting cast is not great either but you can throw in Caruso, McGee and Howard. Pretty equal overall IMO.

Neither team has a clear 3rd star. Kuzma could emerge as 3rd star and Harrell could emerge as a 3rd star.


Have you actually looked at Beverly's numbers? He's pretty clearly better than Green on offense:

Last 4 years he's at 39.4% from 3 on 4.1 attempts per game.

Compare that to Danny Green - 38.7% from 3 on 4.8 attempts per game over the same period.

Given that unlike Danny Green he actually has a higher AST% than TOV% (his OBPM is clearly better too) I'd say he's at least a better offensive player than Green.

I'd say they are somewhat comparable as players.
lakerz12
Head Coach
Posts: 7,494
And1: 9,052
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Contact:
     

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#193 » by lakerz12 » Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:48 pm

LKN wrote:
lakerz12 wrote:
Jadoogar wrote:Why wouldn't you think that? Lets say the top 2 are a wash (essentially 2 top 10 players on both sides), 3-12 is such a massive difference in favour of the Clippers.

Harrell, Beverley, Lou Will, Zubac, harkless
vs
Kuzma, Danny green, rondo (?), KCP, Bradley (?)


-Beverley is a good defender but bad on offense. He averages 9 points for his career (7.6 last year) on 41% shooting.
-Lou Will is going to be 33 going on his 15th season. Good offensive punch but not a great player. Liability on defense.
-Zubac was considered garbage on the Lakers. He's supposed to be good now? He should be a backup center.
-Harkless is a mediocre role player.
-Harrell is the only guy with potential to be an above average/great player out of this whole group.

What are we supposed to be impressed by?

The Lakers supporting cast is not great either but you can throw in Caruso, McGee and Howard. Pretty equal overall IMO.

Neither team has a clear 3rd star. Kuzma could emerge as 3rd star and Harrell could emerge as a 3rd star.


Have you actually looked at Beverly's numbers? He's pretty clearly better than Green on offense:

Last 4 years he's at 39.4% from 3 on 4.1 attempts per game.

Compare that to Danny Green - 38.7% from 3 on 4.8 attempts per game over the same period.

Given that unlike Danny Green he actually has a higher AST% than TOV% (his OBPM is clearly better too) I'd say he's at least a better offensive player than Green.

I'd say they are somewhat comparable as players.


Where did I compare him to Green?

So last year Beverley gave the Clippers 1.4 threes a game. That's fine. Not game changing. He can be a fine spot up shooter for them.

Still not sure what makes the supporting cast great?
User avatar
LKN
General Manager
Posts: 9,678
And1: 15,580
Joined: Jun 04, 2018
       

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#194 » by LKN » Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:50 pm

lakerz12 wrote:
LKN wrote:
lakerz12 wrote:
-Beverley is a good defender but bad on offense. He averages 9 points for his career (7.6 last year) on 41% shooting.
-Lou Will is going to be 33 going on his 15th season. Good offensive punch but not a great player. Liability on defense.
-Zubac was considered garbage on the Lakers. He's supposed to be good now? He should be a backup center.
-Harkless is a mediocre role player.
-Harrell is the only guy with potential to be an above average/great player out of this whole group.

What are we supposed to be impressed by?

The Lakers supporting cast is not great either but you can throw in Caruso, McGee and Howard. Pretty equal overall IMO.

Neither team has a clear 3rd star. Kuzma could emerge as 3rd star and Harrell could emerge as a 3rd star.


Have you actually looked at Beverly's numbers? He's pretty clearly better than Green on offense:

Last 4 years he's at 39.4% from 3 on 4.1 attempts per game.

Compare that to Danny Green - 38.7% from 3 on 4.8 attempts per game over the same period.

Given that unlike Danny Green he actually has a higher AST% than TOV% (his OBPM is clearly better too) I'd say he's at least a better offensive player than Green.

I'd say they are somewhat comparable as players.


Where did I compare him to Green?

So last year Beverley gave the Clippers 1.4 threes a game. That's fine. Not game changing. He can be a fine spot up shooter for them.

Still not sure what makes the support cast great?


The reason I compared him to Green is that Green might end up being the Lakers 3rd best player depending on how things shake out.

Do you think Danny Green is a bad offensive player?
lakerz12
Head Coach
Posts: 7,494
And1: 9,052
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Contact:
     

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#195 » by lakerz12 » Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:54 pm

LKN wrote:
lakerz12 wrote:
LKN wrote:
Have you actually looked at Beverly's numbers? He's pretty clearly better than Green on offense:

Last 4 years he's at 39.4% from 3 on 4.1 attempts per game.

Compare that to Danny Green - 38.7% from 3 on 4.8 attempts per game over the same period.

Given that unlike Danny Green he actually has a higher AST% than TOV% (his OBPM is clearly better too) I'd say he's at least a better offensive player than Green.

I'd say they are somewhat comparable as players.


Where did I compare him to Green?

So last year Beverley gave the Clippers 1.4 threes a game. That's fine. Not game changing. He can be a fine spot up shooter for them.

Still not sure what makes the support cast great?


The reason I compared him to Green is that Green might end up being the Lakers 3rd best player depending on how things shake out.

Do you think Danny Green is a bad offensive player?


Green is a 3 point specialist on offense. In the right situation he can be good. He did shoot 45.5% from three last year!

In a vacuum compared to every starting shooting guard in the league, he's probably below average or bad on offense. Because he's just a 3 pt specialist.

Kuzma is a far better scorer. If you want to look at who will be the 3rd option on offense it certainly won't be Green.

Still, I'm not claiming the Laker's supporting cast is far better than the Clippers. I was responding to someone who claimed the Clippers supporting cast is far better.
User avatar
robbie84
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,398
And1: 4,806
Joined: Dec 24, 2011
Location: Cape Cod, MA.
     

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#196 » by robbie84 » Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:54 pm

TheNewEra wrote:
robbie84 wrote:I don't think Paul George is a good fit next to Kawahi.
Kawahi is so ball dominant.
PG is going to have to shoot a lot of threes, and shoot them very well.

Lakers with Davis and LeBron is way ahead for me, and I really hate the Lakers as a rival.
Not sure how teams are supposed to guard LeBron James and Anthony Davis in a 7 game series.


Load up in the paint and force both of them to shoot.


The Eastern Conference has tried that with Lebron for 15 years, he just bullies his way to the hole and finishes or gets the foul.
One day Marcus Smart will be defensive player of the year, mark my words.
User avatar
LKN
General Manager
Posts: 9,678
And1: 15,580
Joined: Jun 04, 2018
       

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#197 » by LKN » Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:56 pm

lakerz12 wrote:
LKN wrote:
lakerz12 wrote:
Where did I compare him to Green?

So last year Beverley gave the Clippers 1.4 threes a game. That's fine. Not game changing. He can be a fine spot up shooter for them.

Still not sure what makes the support cast great?


The reason I compared him to Green is that Green might end up being the Lakers 3rd best player depending on how things shake out.

Do you think Danny Green is a bad offensive player?


Green is a 3 point specialist on offense. In the right situation he can be good. He did shoot 45.5% from three last year!

In a vacuum compared to every starting shooting guard in the league, he's probably below average or bad on offense. Because he's just a 3 pt specialist.

Kuzma is a far better scorer. If you want to look at who will be the 3rd option on offense it certainly won't be Green.



That's fair - Kuzma is the big question mark to me. If he could make a big leap the Lakers could really have something.
TerryTate
Analyst
Posts: 3,414
And1: 1,485
Joined: May 22, 2008
Location: The 6ix
   

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#198 » by TerryTate » Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:57 pm

LKN wrote:
lakerz12 wrote:
Jadoogar wrote:Why wouldn't you think that? Lets say the top 2 are a wash (essentially 2 top 10 players on both sides), 3-12 is such a massive difference in favour of the Clippers.

Harrell, Beverley, Lou Will, Zubac, harkless
vs
Kuzma, Danny green, rondo (?), KCP, Bradley (?)


-Beverley is a good defender but bad on offense. He averages 9 points for his career (7.6 last year) on 41% shooting.
-Lou Will is going to be 33 going on his 15th season. Good offensive punch but not a great player. Liability on defense.
-Zubac was considered garbage on the Lakers. He's supposed to be good now? He should be a backup center.
-Harkless is a mediocre role player.
-Harrell is the only guy with potential to be an above average/great player out of this whole group.

What are we supposed to be impressed by?

The Lakers supporting cast is not great either but you can throw in Caruso, McGee and Howard. Pretty equal overall IMO.

Neither team has a clear 3rd star. Kuzma could emerge as 3rd star and Harrell could emerge as a 3rd star.


Have you actually looked at Beverly's numbers? He's pretty clearly better than Green on offense:

Last 4 years he's at 39.4% from 3 on 4.1 attempts per game.

Compare that to Danny Green - 38.7% from 3 on 4.8 attempts per game over the same period.

Given that unlike Danny Green he actually has a higher AST% than TOV% (his OBPM is clearly better too) I'd say he's at least a better offensive player than Green.

I'd say they are somewhat comparable as players.


Who slow down there...... Danny Green has one of the highest RAPM (13th) last season.
Not saying Beverley isn't good, cause he's top 36 as well, but I think Green's impact is > Beverley's.
Image
User avatar
LKN
General Manager
Posts: 9,678
And1: 15,580
Joined: Jun 04, 2018
       

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#199 » by LKN » Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:59 pm

TerryTate wrote:
LKN wrote:
lakerz12 wrote:
-Beverley is a good defender but bad on offense. He averages 9 points for his career (7.6 last year) on 41% shooting.
-Lou Will is going to be 33 going on his 15th season. Good offensive punch but not a great player. Liability on defense.
-Zubac was considered garbage on the Lakers. He's supposed to be good now? He should be a backup center.
-Harkless is a mediocre role player.
-Harrell is the only guy with potential to be an above average/great player out of this whole group.

What are we supposed to be impressed by?

The Lakers supporting cast is not great either but you can throw in Caruso, McGee and Howard. Pretty equal overall IMO.

Neither team has a clear 3rd star. Kuzma could emerge as 3rd star and Harrell could emerge as a 3rd star.


Have you actually looked at Beverly's numbers? He's pretty clearly better than Green on offense:

Last 4 years he's at 39.4% from 3 on 4.1 attempts per game.

Compare that to Danny Green - 38.7% from 3 on 4.8 attempts per game over the same period.

Given that unlike Danny Green he actually has a higher AST% than TOV% (his OBPM is clearly better too) I'd say he's at least a better offensive player than Green.

I'd say they are somewhat comparable as players.


Who slow down there...... Danny Green has one of the highest RAPM (13th) last season.
Not saying Beverley isn't good, cause he's top 36 as well, but I think Green's impact is > Beverley's.


Hey - I said somewhat comparable! :D
Ballerhogger
RealGM
Posts: 47,741
And1: 17,306
Joined: Jul 06, 2014
       

Re: The Athletic: NBA execs around the league expect the gap between Clippers and Lakers to be significant 

Post#200 » by Ballerhogger » Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:00 pm

wait and see. .. The two havent played with each other as far kawhi and PG . See how it works out.

Return to The General Board