DimesandKnicks wrote:IgorK wrote:CIN-C-STAR wrote:Kobe has zero argument for best player on his team for 3 of his championships, so stop right there.
And even if some players of Lebron have as many rings as he does, so what? The next tie breaker would be what? Probably either how many Finals overall you've lead your team to, or MVP Awards.
So who wins if we look at those stats next?  

 
What a weak argument. LBJ wasn't best player for his first ring, either. He also needed TWO other stars to win 3 (Wade+Bosh in Miami, Love & Irving in Clevelad). Kobe only had 1 certified star for all 5 of his rings.
 
Shaq = 2 stars and Bynum and Gasol are two stars. Stop mentioning Kobe in the same breathe as Lebron. They are on different tiers.
 
Man. Lol. Before 2010, did you EVER think that someone would put Gasol, Bynum, and Shaq in the same sentence? Yikes. 
 The Kobe hate is real. Lol. Throwing everything but the kitchen sink, I see.
Imagine that, though. All the talk about how Kobe could've been EASILY replaced with 'player x' and Lakers would've won because they had Shaq.
Fast-forward, Kobe replaces the MOST DOMINANT PLAYER EVER with Pau Gasol and Bynum and EXPECTED to win  
 Humble pie is humble...