Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, MoneyTalks41890, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck
Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
Mykhyn
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,733
- And1: 2,232
- Joined: Sep 16, 2004
-
Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
Celtics out: Hayward + Brown
Celtics in: Gary Harris + Plumlee + Belinelli
Nuggets out: Gary Harris + Plumlee
Nuggets in: Derozan
Spurs out: Derozan + Belinelli
Spurs in: Hayward + Bamba
Magic out: Bamba
Magic in: Jaylen Brown
Celtics get a replacement for Brown signed for about what they want to pay Brown and get a quality big
Nuggets get a man who can get buckets and raise their ceiling.
Spurs get a better C prospect than Poeltl and get a good fit in Hayward while opening minutes for Lonnie
Magic get a good win now piece who is also the perfect age to grow with Fultz/Isaac/AG
Who says no?
Celtics in: Gary Harris + Plumlee + Belinelli
Nuggets out: Gary Harris + Plumlee
Nuggets in: Derozan
Spurs out: Derozan + Belinelli
Spurs in: Hayward + Bamba
Magic out: Bamba
Magic in: Jaylen Brown
Celtics get a replacement for Brown signed for about what they want to pay Brown and get a quality big
Nuggets get a man who can get buckets and raise their ceiling.
Spurs get a better C prospect than Poeltl and get a good fit in Hayward while opening minutes for Lonnie
Magic get a good win now piece who is also the perfect age to grow with Fultz/Isaac/AG
Who says no?
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
- Mauro Pedrosa
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,631
- And1: 4,409
- Joined: Oct 15, 2016
- Contact:
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
Good trade for most but I think the Celtics can get a better deal elsewhere
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
pad300
- Starter
- Posts: 2,001
- And1: 422
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
Value wise, I could see it for SAS. But unless my math is off, this pushes their payroll up by close to $8 million this year - which is into the lux tax, and thus they won't do it.
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
Magic_Johnny12
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,719
- And1: 10,223
- Joined: Sep 27, 2013
- Contact:
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
I feel as *current Bamba is worth current Jaylen. I don’t think Jaylen by deadline will be worth deadline Bamba.
Jaylen is EXACTLY the player our managment goes after though so I could def see this happening some way or another.
Jaylen is EXACTLY the player our managment goes after though so I could def see this happening some way or another.
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
Mykhyn
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,733
- And1: 2,232
- Joined: Sep 16, 2004
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
pad300 wrote:Value wise, I could see it for SAS. But unless my math is off, this pushes their payroll up by close to $8 million this year - which is into the lux tax, and thus they won't do it.
Spurs are 8.8mil from tax no?
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
The Rebel
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 25,186
- And1: 11,359
- Joined: Mar 05, 2005
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
I doubt the Nuggets would trade for Derozan, he is an on ball player with limited outside shooting which does nothing to spread the floor. Also losing Harris tremendously hurts the perimeter defense so this likely makes them worse on both ends.
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
SmokeyPaw
- Starter
- Posts: 2,207
- And1: 1,163
- Joined: May 14, 2016
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
The Rebel wrote:I doubt the Nuggets would trade for Derozan, he is an on ball player with limited outside shooting which does nothing to spread the floor. Also losing Harris tremendously hurts the perimeter defense so this likely makes them worse on both ends.
I agree with this.
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
pad300
- Starter
- Posts: 2,001
- And1: 422
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
Cklbmk wrote:pad300 wrote:Value wise, I could see it for SAS. But unless my math is off, this pushes their payroll up by close to $8 million this year - which is into the lux tax, and thus they won't do it.
Spurs are 8.8mil from tax no?
The expected tax line is $132.6M for 19-20. Hoopshype has spurs payroll as $125.6M; add $8M and you get $133.6M > $132.6M ... I don't think they would go into the lux tax for this.
https://hoopshype.com/salaries/san_antonio_spurs/
https://www.blazersedge.com/2019/6/29/20188350/2019-20-nba-salary-cap-luxury-tax-mle-maximum-max-supermax-extension-damian-lillard
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
orlando_joe
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,962
- And1: 1,928
- Joined: Dec 27, 2015
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
pad300 wrote:Cklbmk wrote:pad300 wrote:Value wise, I could see it for SAS. But unless my math is off, this pushes their payroll up by close to $8 million this year - which is into the lux tax, and thus they won't do it.
Spurs are 8.8mil from tax no?
The expected tax line is $132.6M for 19-20. Hoopshype has spurs payroll as $125.6M; add $8M and you get $133.6M > $132.6M ... I don't think they would go into the lux tax for this.
https://hoopshype.com/salaries/san_antonio_spurs/
https://www.blazersedge.com/2019/6/29/20188350/2019-20-nba-salary-cap-luxury-tax-mle-maximum-max-supermax-extension-damian-lillard
same for magic don't see them going in tax or wanting to pay brown what is being reported for him...
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
Mykhyn
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,733
- And1: 2,232
- Joined: Sep 16, 2004
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
pad300 wrote:Cklbmk wrote:pad300 wrote:Value wise, I could see it for SAS. But unless my math is off, this pushes their payroll up by close to $8 million this year - which is into the lux tax, and thus they won't do it.
Spurs are 8.8mil from tax no?
The expected tax line is $132.6M for 19-20. Hoopshype has spurs payroll as $125.6M; add $8M and you get $133.6M > $132.6M ... I don't think they would go into the lux tax for this.
https://hoopshype.com/salaries/san_antonio_spurs/
https://www.blazersedge.com/2019/6/29/20188350/2019-20-nba-salary-cap-luxury-tax-mle-maximum-max-supermax-extension-damian-lillard
I go off https://www.spotrac.com/nba/san-antonio-spurs/yearly/cap/
Theyre typically more accurate
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
- tiderulz
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,004
- And1: 14,908
- Joined: Jun 16, 2010
- Location: Atlanta
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:I feel as *current Bamba is worth current Jaylen. I don’t think Jaylen by deadline will be worth deadline Bamba.
Jaylen is EXACTLY the player our managment goes after though so I could def see this happening some way or another.
Current Bamba is not worth current Jaylen.
Now the big key will be what kind of contract Jaylen is aiming for. He isnt worth a max deal to me, but he saw Terry Rozier get a nice deal. Is he worth that? maybe. will be interesting to see his play this year. Though if it is great play, why would Boston want to move him.
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
- bigmean
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,807
- And1: 133
- Joined: Nov 19, 2001
- Location: Yardley, Pa
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
not enough for the celtics, added a lonnie walker or michael porter... i would sub paul millsap and either michael porter or torrey craig... then squeeze lonnie walker from spurs
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
ecuhus1981
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,951
- And1: 1,602
- Joined: Jun 19, 2007
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
I Jaylen Brown could net Mo Bamba, the Celtics would cut out everyone else, do that deal and call it a night.
The problem is, I don't think ORL wants to move Mo. He's a luxury as long as Nic is around, but Mo is clearly their long-term future at C. Also, the Magic aren't a perfect squad, but I don't see Jaylen giving them anything they don't already get with Evan and Terrence.
The problem is, I don't think ORL wants to move Mo. He's a luxury as long as Nic is around, but Mo is clearly their long-term future at C. Also, the Magic aren't a perfect squad, but I don't see Jaylen giving them anything they don't already get with Evan and Terrence.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
-- Steve Martin
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
21 TD
- Junior
- Posts: 425
- And1: 131
- Joined: Aug 12, 2019
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
Spurs and Magic say yes, Celtics and Nuggets say no.
The reasoning for the latter has been stated, but the former wouldn't obliterate their enviable wing depth just to get marginally better at center. Their best lineup (Walker-Smart-Harris-Tatum-Kanter/Plumlee) would be severely undersized and they'd still have a gaping hole at "power forward".
The reasoning for the latter has been stated, but the former wouldn't obliterate their enviable wing depth just to get marginally better at center. Their best lineup (Walker-Smart-Harris-Tatum-Kanter/Plumlee) would be severely undersized and they'd still have a gaping hole at "power forward".
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
Mykhyn
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,733
- And1: 2,232
- Joined: Sep 16, 2004
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
bigmean wrote:not enough for the celtics, added a lonnie walker or michael porter... i would sub paul millsap and either michael porter or torrey craig... then squeeze lonnie walker from spurs
Dreaming. Celtics arnt giving up enough value to get lonnie or mpj
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
Patsfan1081
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,263
- And1: 5,749
- Joined: Jan 06, 2015
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
Cklbmk wrote:bigmean wrote:not enough for the celtics, added a lonnie walker or michael porter... i would sub paul millsap and either michael porter or torrey craig... then squeeze lonnie walker from spurs
Dreaming. Celtics arnt giving up enough value to get lonnie or mpj
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
Coeur
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,805
- And1: 669
- Joined: Jan 18, 2016
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
Nugs say no. Take plumlee out and put Barton in. And then flip Derozen for Bogdanovic and Bjelica
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
Skybox
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,164
- And1: 8,749
- Joined: Jan 21, 2017
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
Nuggets say no. Derozan is a better player but the outgoing are a much better fit...I like it for the Magic but it could blow up in their face when $$$ talk starts (I'd do it anyway and take our shot). Overall, one of the better 4 team trades I've seen on here. Usually silly and one-sided. Good try!
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
NuggetsWY
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 10,398
- And1: 4,129
- Joined: Oct 28, 2015
- Location: Cheyenne, WY
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
Celtics probably gives up too much but I like the fit better. Too many "ifs" for Boston though. Is Hayward back to what he was? If so, this is a bad deal - they could get more.
Nuggets might say no. DeRozan is a great player but the Nuggets need 3pt shooters to pen the court. DeRozan is a mid-range shooter but he'd probably find a way to fit in. The question in Denver is: do they think Beasley has enough potential to fill that role?
Spurs could say yes - if they believe Hayward is back to what he once was. If he's not totally healthy, this is a very bad deal for them.
Magic get an easy yes here - a steal in my opinion.
Nuggets might say no. DeRozan is a great player but the Nuggets need 3pt shooters to pen the court. DeRozan is a mid-range shooter but he'd probably find a way to fit in. The question in Denver is: do they think Beasley has enough potential to fill that role?
Spurs could say yes - if they believe Hayward is back to what he once was. If he's not totally healthy, this is a very bad deal for them.
Magic get an easy yes here - a steal in my opinion.
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
-
NotACat
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,690
- And1: 1,354
- Joined: Apr 28, 2018
-
Re: Celtics-Nuggets-Spurs-Magic
I honestly don't see why the Magic would say yes here. Jaylen Brown doesn't seem like the type of player to move the needle for them and Bamba has more long term potential and is currently a very inexpensive backup. Jaylen Brown will also require a big contract this offseason since its likely a team like Memphis will give him a big offer.
Return to Trades and Transactions


