Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
XtremeDunkz
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,512
- And1: 7,063
- Joined: Mar 08, 2012
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Kevin King is hurt
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
GBPackers47
- Starter
- Posts: 2,166
- And1: 1,294
- Joined: Jun 23, 2016
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
StickeeFingaz wrote:GBPackers47 wrote:StickeeFingaz wrote:Why did we pay Dean Lowry?
Because he’s a good football player
Good? Eh, average at best.
Ok so because he’s an average football player then.
Dean Lowry ain’t the problem my guy.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- thomchatt3rton
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,405
- And1: 2,236
- Joined: Jun 11, 2009
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Magic Giannison wrote:Wait why did he threw the ball out? Because it was too risky to make a pass?
Yep
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,180
- And1: 4,579
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
MoMM wrote:trwi7 wrote:MoMM wrote:If we tie this game, we can thank God for that 2-point conversion that they tried and made no sense at all.
It absolutely made sense.
Please explain to me, because I didn't understand it, neither the Brazilian broadcasters.
Gives you a chance to go up 9, make it a 2 possession game. The reward is far greater than the risk.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,320
- And1: 27,981
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
MoMM wrote:trwi7 wrote:MoMM wrote:If we tie this game, we can thank God for that 2-point conversion that they tried and made no sense at all.
It absolutely made sense.
Please explain to me, because I didn't understand it, neither the Brazilian broadcasters.
There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- FrieAaron
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,195
- And1: 5,701
- Joined: Mar 25, 2010
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Magic Giannison wrote:Wait why did he threw the ball out? Because it was too risky to make a pass?
Yeah, remember if you get tackled behind the line with possession you lose the yards so often you'll see QBs prefer an incompletion
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,320
- And1: 27,981
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
We can all agree on a draw call on 4th and 8 right?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- Magic Giannison
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,848
- And1: 27,302
- Joined: Aug 08, 2014
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
THATS GOTTA BE A FOUL ?
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
BigDee
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,186
- And1: 1,384
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
- Location: Wisconsin
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
The flag bails us out once again.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,320
- And1: 27,981
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Good catch by MVS.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
BigDee
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,186
- And1: 1,384
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
- Location: Wisconsin
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Great grab MVS.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- TJ_Ford_11
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,263
- And1: 971
- Joined: Nov 09, 2005
- Location: Hawaii
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
trwi7 wrote:MoMM wrote:trwi7 wrote:
It absolutely made sense.
Please explain to me, because I didn't understand it, neither the Brazilian broadcasters.
There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.
But there was over a quarter to play still. You never know what’s going to happen the rest of the game. Too much time left to go for two

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- thomchatt3rton
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,405
- And1: 2,236
- Joined: Jun 11, 2009
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,145
- And1: 41,684
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
MVS looking good on those slants.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- Magic Giannison
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,848
- And1: 27,302
- Joined: Aug 08, 2014
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- chuckleslove
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,566
- And1: 1,128
- Joined: Nov 17, 2009
- Location: In an RV down by the river
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
no
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
BigDee
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,186
- And1: 1,384
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
- Location: Wisconsin
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Way to hang in there Tonyan.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 33,219
- And1: 16,912
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
I do like all the quick throws.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,145
- And1: 41,684
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Yes because I am tired.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,320
- And1: 27,981
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
TJ_Ford_11 wrote:trwi7 wrote:MoMM wrote:Please explain to me, because I didn't understand it, neither the Brazilian broadcasters.
There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.
But there was over a quarter to play still. You never know what’s going to happen the rest of the game. Too much time left to go for two
A two possession lead is always better than a one possession lead no matter the time especially with no risk of trailing if the opponent scores a touchdown.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.








