CA Governer signs CA-SB206 - LOL at the NCAA

LKN · Post #1 » by **LKN** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:35 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=20

RCM88x · Post #2 » by **RCM88x** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:40 pm

More like RIP the PAC12, granted this has pretty much been the case for the last 5 years.

LKN · Post #3 » by **LKN** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:42 pm

RCM88x wrote:More like RIP the PAC12, granted this has pretty much been the case for the last 5 years.

You think they are going to move all the Bowl games out of CA also? LOL

In any case Florida is working on a similar bill right now as well. If/when that passes it's over. NCAA absolutely can not lose CA and Florida.

Post #4 » by **dockingsched** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:44 pm

RCM88x wrote:More like RIP the PAC12, granted this has pretty much been the case for the last 5 years.

There’s 25 division I schools in California and you think this is about only 1 conference that has just 4 of them?

Post #5 » by **dockingsched** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:46 pm

Read on Twitter

Every other state is probably going to have similar legislation by 2023 if they aren’t already working on it.

The High Cyde · Post #6 » by **The High Cyde** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:46 pm

My state doesn't get stuff right most of the time, but this is a great step for student athletes.

KrAzY3 · Post #7 » by **KrAzY3** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:48 pm

dockingsched wrote:
RCM88x wrote:More like RIP the PAC12, granted this has pretty much been the case for the last 5 years.

There’s 25 division I schools in California and you think this is about only 1 conference that has just 4 of them?

And which one of those 25 schools outside of the Pac-12 are relevant?

Post #8 » by **dockingsched** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:50 pm

KrAzY3 wrote:
dockingsched wrote:
RCM88x wrote:More like RIP the PAC12, granted this has pretty much been the case for the last 5 years.

There’s 25 division I schools in California and you think this is about only 1 conference that has just 4 of them?

And which one of those 25 schools outside of the Pac-12 are relevant?

Um, all of them since they’re all in California and this legislation applies to them. This seems obvious lol.

SWYM · Post #9 » by **SWYM** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:52 pm

The NCAA in its current form will cease to exist very soon...

NBA is allowing HSers, CA is leading the way for fball players to get paid.

Night, night...

Method28 · Post #10 » by **Method28** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:09 pm

Let's see what kind of athletes USC can get once they're allowed to give theyre players money, unlike before

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

MrBigShot · Post #11 » by **MrBigShot** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:11 pm

It's about damn time people put a stop to the NCAA's ability to milk the top prospects who can and should be making money. Also pretty pathetic the way the NCAA replied trying to claim the bill is unconstitutional, as if they care about anything other than $$$. You can vote and join the military at 18 years old and yet somehow getting a shoe deal is unconstitutional? Lmao. Hope the other states follow suit soon.

People will look back at this down the line and wonder why it took so long for this to happen, but better late than never.

Johnny Bball · Post #12 » by **Johnny Bball** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:13 pm

The High Cyde wrote:My state doesn't get stuff right most of the time, but this is a great step for student athletes.

Not sure what you mean but California leads on so many issues that the federal government is trying to remove their right to do so.

xdrta+ · Post #13 » by **xdrta+** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:14 pm

The writing is on the wall. Legislation is planned in South Carolina. A NY state senator introduced legislation that goes even further, compelling colleges to pay 15 percent of the money earned from sports ticket sales to student-athletes.

The NCAA is due to receive a committee’s recommendations for changes by the end of October. There will be big changes before the California law goes into effect in 3 years.

miamiheat319 · Post #14 » by **miamiheat319** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:16 pm

Dude I mean it’s right in the tweet. Governor**

Knicks7Tape · Post #15 » by **Knicks7Tape** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:18 pm

Trojans are about to become the Monstars in football and basketball.

RCM88x · Post #16 » by **RCM88x** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:29 pm

dockingsched wrote:
KrAzY3 wrote:
dockingsched wrote:There’s 25 division I schools in California and you think this is about only 1 conference that has just 4 of them?

And which one of those 25 schools outside of the Pac-12 are relevant?

Um, all of them since they’re all in California and this legislation applies to them. This seems obvious lol.

The question is if they are relevant to CFB and CBB nationally, and the answer to that is probably none.

USC Football, Stanford Football, UCLA Basketball and maybe UCLA and CAL Football are the only college sports in California that really matter to the NCAA and Conferences. I'd bet those first 4 programs bring in like 75% of the money for NCAA sports in California, and probably a similar amount to the PAC12.

Is the NCAA going to care if they lose out on USC Men's Volleyball? Eh, probably not.

Curmudgeon · Post #17 » by **Curmudgeon** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:34 pm

The NCAA slave system is in the process of collapsing. This is just the first major crack in the foundation. You know the best athletes will flock to the CA schools, and other states with high profile college teams will be forced to enact similar statutes.

Matty · Post #18 » by **Matty** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:36 pm

about damn time.

If the Tim Tebows of the world want to continue working like slaves for the culture so be it. It's a shame it took this long but better late than never.

Michael Jordan · Post #19 » by **Michael Jordan** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:36 pm

Former CA college athletes should also be able to entitled to payments.

Post #20 » by **dockingsched** » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:36 pm

RCM88x wrote:
dockingsched wrote:
KrAzY3 wrote:And which one of those 25 schools outside of the Pac-12 are relevant?

Um, all of them since they’re all in California and this legislation applies to them. This seems obvious lol.

The question is if they are relevant to CFB and CBB nationally, and the answer to that is probably none.

USC Football, Stanford Football, UCLA Basketball and maybe UCLA and CAL Football are the only college sports in California that really matter to the NCAA and Conferences. I'd bet those first 4 programs bring in like 75% of the money for NCAA sports in California, and probably a similar amount to the PAC12.

Is the NCAA going to care if they lose out on USC Men's Volleyball? Eh, probably not.

Not sure what you mean when you ask “Is the NCAA going to care if they lose out on...”

From the article “The bill prohibits the NCAA from barring a university from competition if its athletes are compensated for the use of their name, image or likeness beginning in 2023.”