RCM88x wrote:dockingsched wrote:KrAzY3 wrote:And which one of those 25 schools outside of the Pac-12 are relevant?
Um, all of them since they’re all in California and this legislation applies to them. This seems obvious lol.
The question is if they are relevant to CFB and CBB nationally, and the answer to that is probably none.
USC Football, Stanford Football, UCLA Basketball and maybe UCLA and CAL Football are the only college sports in California that really matter to the NCAA and Conferences. I'd bet those first 4 programs bring in like 75% of the money for NCAA sports in California, and probably a similar amount to the PAC12.
Is the NCAA going to care if they lose out on USC Men's Volleyball? Eh, probably not.
You say that probably none are relevant on the national stage but you contradict yourself in the next paragraph by listing (correctly) how USC, UCLA, Stanford and Cal are relevant.
Imagine you're a top football prospect deciding between USC and Oregon. All of a sudden California makes it so that you can earn extra money off your likeness playing for USC. That may be enough to get you to sign with USC.
If the California schools start dominating the national stage, other states will follow. Popular colleges with big audiences will get the better players and the less popular colleges will find it harder to compete. Scholarships may become less important to players as revenue from other sources grows.
This could be the beginning of the end of the NCAA as we know it. And I'm okay with that.