melo4three wrote:Nazrmohamed wrote:GONYK wrote:
Payton has never gotten a deal over $3M, now he's worth $8M coming off a shortened season with a broken jumper?
Ellington has been a minimum player most of his career and now he's getting $8M/yr
Taj is obvious
Portis hasn't been a full time starter his entire career, including here. Now he's worth $15M/yr?
Morris couldn't find anyone else in the NBA to pay him $15M/yr. That's why he initially signed with the Spurs for $10M.
Randle hasn't proven to be better than KP. He's a more efficient interior scorer and better ballhandler, especially in transition. KP is no slouch offensively and dwarfs Randle defensively. He's arguable because Knicks are banking on his potential, but I doubt he's getting $20M/yr from anyone else.
These guys might enjoy being Knicks, but they didn't come here just for pride. We overpaid them for their services.
Exactly. And that's why in my last post I didnt bash Randle but still bash the offseason. You're alittle harsher on Randle than I am but you sound reasonable. If the Knocks made that signing and were betting on his potential to break out, I'm sure you could forgive one single splurge right?
That's my big issue. The Knicks went out and signed all these expensive backups to a player who might be our only wise signing ( Randle). Its like give an inch, take a mile with Mills. Dude just cant help himself.
We couldve signed Randle (and truth is...given him alittle more tbh) and then signed all of our expiring deals and still not met the contracts of 2 of our incoming BACKUPS....BACKUPS.
Randle 22mil
Vonleh 4mil
Kornet 4mil
Herzonia 4mil
And truth is it wouldve created a roster that makes a hell of alot more sense, had a helluva lot less logjams and quite possibly improved yr over year with this crazy concept other teams employ called roster continuity and chemistry.
Smith/Frank
RJ/Trier/Dotson
Knox/Herzonia/Iggy
Randle/Vonleh
Robinson/Kornet
And a whole max contract worth of space to sell for some waivable bum who has draft picks in tow. Or.....or we coukdve used the space to sign a single player who at least is in the Randle tier of player (although I'm fine if we just trade the space for picks). Instead the Knicks rather spend the most money the leagues ever seen on redundant PFs. Again, I like the Randall signing. Mills ruined it by taking the mile.
Wtf are the knicks going to do with 45mil in capspace? Nothing, you act like there are tons of teams looking to get off contracts but in reality there is probably 3-5 of those a year and they aren't offering anything great. Nobody cares about a pick in 2024. Knicks have plans to compete now, and what they did this offseason was the right move.
If somehow the knicks aren't in playoff contention ( they will be though) at the trade deadline they could move these contracts easily and achieve the same goals involved in trading capspace for picks.
Lets try to win, I am tired of tanking it's just not worth it.
Helloooo everyone. The Knicks overpaid, at least to some degree, and I don't think a small degree, so the players would take shorter contracts. Was there a chance they could have signed some of these guys for less and they got the same # of years? Not denying that. But what they got, by overpaying them by 25% in year one of a contract, was in almost all the cases, the ability to:
- Have the 2nd year be a team option.
- Have very little guaranteed money in the 2nd year. (I forget; two players have some guaranteed money in the 2nd year - a million each)
Randle's different. That was another pay partly on potential. That can be argued about. The good news? It was 2 years and 4 million guaranteed money in the 3rd year, but the 3rd year remains a team option.