Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild

Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47

User avatar
Galloisdaman
Analyst
Posts: 3,674
And1: 2,171
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#761 » by Galloisdaman » Sat Oct 5, 2019 3:35 pm

spearsy23 wrote:It's just preseason excitement, but wouldn't it be fun to make one last surprise playoff run, have Paul and Steven's trade value increase, and maybe see Houston/Russ win a championship?


Last year around this time many people including myself (and Vegas oddsmakers) had very low expectations of the Clippers. They shocked a lot of people. I could see that possibility in OKC as well if CP3, SGA, Adams, and Gallo play well and have healthy seasons. All 4 of those guys are capable when on their games.
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. :D
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,396
And1: 7,526
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#762 » by Dadouv47 » Sat Oct 5, 2019 6:17 pm

Galloisdaman wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:It's just preseason excitement, but wouldn't it be fun to make one last surprise playoff run, have Paul and Steven's trade value increase, and maybe see Houston/Russ win a championship?


Last year around this time many people including myself (and Vegas oddsmakers) had very low expectations of the Clippers. They shocked a lot of people. I could see that possibility in OKC as well if CP3, SGA, Adams, and Gallo play well and have healthy seasons. All 4 of those guys are capable when on their games.


we won't risk losing our first round pick (top 20 protected) for a potential first round exit.

If Gallo and CP3 are playing well, at least one of them will be traded.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,347
And1: 19,173
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#763 » by ThunderBolt » Sat Oct 5, 2019 8:14 pm

Dadouv47 wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:It's just preseason excitement, but wouldn't it be fun to make one last surprise playoff run, have Paul and Steven's trade value increase, and maybe see Houston/Russ win a championship?


Last year around this time many people including myself (and Vegas oddsmakers) had very low expectations of the Clippers. They shocked a lot of people. I could see that possibility in OKC as well if CP3, SGA, Adams, and Gallo play well and have healthy seasons. All 4 of those guys are capable when on their games.


we won't risk losing our first round pick (top 20 protected) for a potential first round exit.

If Gallo and CP3 are playing well, at least one of them will be traded.

We can watch some good team basketball until the deadline and then shift our focus to the draft and playoff development.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
DoubleJ13
Junior
Posts: 263
And1: 145
Joined: Apr 26, 2015
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#764 » by DoubleJ13 » Sun Oct 6, 2019 8:33 pm

Biggest things that stuck out during the blue/white scrimmage were SGA even in the scrimmage setting looked smooth & in control, Hami was going about 600 mph, & Muscala was making a bunch of 3s.
User avatar
Galloisdaman
Analyst
Posts: 3,674
And1: 2,171
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#765 » by Galloisdaman » Sun Oct 6, 2019 9:15 pm

Dadouv47 wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:It's just preseason excitement, but wouldn't it be fun to make one last surprise playoff run, have Paul and Steven's trade value increase, and maybe see Houston/Russ win a championship?


Last year around this time many people including myself (and Vegas oddsmakers) had very low expectations of the Clippers. They shocked a lot of people. I could see that possibility in OKC as well if CP3, SGA, Adams, and Gallo play well and have healthy seasons. All 4 of those guys are capable when on their games.


we won't risk losing our first round pick (top 20 protected) for a potential first round exit.

If Gallo and CP3 are playing well, at least one of them will be traded.


You could be exactly right. The irony is several Clippers fans said the same thing last season but the Clippers made the playoffs and gave up the pick anyway.
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. :D
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,396
And1: 7,526
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#766 » by Dadouv47 » Sun Oct 6, 2019 9:26 pm

Galloisdaman wrote:
Dadouv47 wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:
Last year around this time many people including myself (and Vegas oddsmakers) had very low expectations of the Clippers. They shocked a lot of people. I could see that possibility in OKC as well if CP3, SGA, Adams, and Gallo play well and have healthy seasons. All 4 of those guys are capable when on their games.


we won't risk losing our first round pick (top 20 protected) for a potential first round exit.

If Gallo and CP3 are playing well, at least one of them will be traded.


You could be exactly right. The irony is several Clippers fans said the same thing last season but the Clippers made the playoffs and gave up the pick anyway.


yeah but we have no hope of signing any good free agent. Two very different situations.
User avatar
Galloisdaman
Analyst
Posts: 3,674
And1: 2,171
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#767 » by Galloisdaman » Sun Oct 6, 2019 9:42 pm

Dadouv47 wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:
Dadouv47 wrote:
we won't risk losing our first round pick (top 20 protected) for a potential first round exit.

If Gallo and CP3 are playing well, at least one of them will be traded.


You could be exactly right. The irony is several Clippers fans said the same thing last season but the Clippers made the playoffs and gave up the pick anyway.


yeah but we have no hope of signing any good free agent. Two very different situations.


Before this offseason how many all star free agents had the Clippers ever signed in their history? The coach and owner believed winning made them more attractive to FA than a draft pick. I'm not saying you are wrong. I'm just pointing out similar things were said last offseason in LA.
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. :D
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,347
And1: 19,173
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#768 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Oct 6, 2019 9:48 pm

DoubleJ13 wrote:Biggest things that stuck out during the blue/white scrimmage were SGA even in the scrimmage setting looked smooth & in control, Hami was going about 600 mph, & Muscala was making a bunch of 3s.

Is that a good 600 mph or out of control 600 mph?
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,347
And1: 19,173
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#769 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Oct 6, 2019 9:51 pm

Galloisdaman wrote:
Dadouv47 wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:
You could be exactly right. The irony is several Clippers fans said the same thing last season but the Clippers made the playoffs and gave up the pick anyway.


yeah but we have no hope of signing any good free agent. Two very different situations.


Before this offseason how many all star free agents had the Clippers ever signed in their history? The coach and owner believed winning made them more attractive to FA than a draft pick. I'm not saying you are wrong. I'm just pointing out similar things were said last offseason in LA.

Teams like the clippers and nets were always sleeping giants because of their market. Okc will never have those advantages.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Galloisdaman
Analyst
Posts: 3,674
And1: 2,171
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#770 » by Galloisdaman » Sun Oct 6, 2019 10:01 pm

ThunderBolt wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:
Dadouv47 wrote:
yeah but we have no hope of signing any good free agent. Two very different situations.


Before this offseason how many all star free agents had the Clippers ever signed in their history? The coach and owner believed winning made them more attractive to FA than a draft pick. I'm not saying you are wrong. I'm just pointing out similar things were said last offseason in LA.

Teams like the clippers and nets were always sleeping giants because of their market. Okc will never have those advantages.


Maybe but teams like SA and GS were not considered big TV market teams and they had FA come there way after winning. OKC could have a different mindset than LAC. I just hope the team does not view this season as a tank. I like all teams to compete.
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. :D
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,347
And1: 19,173
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#771 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Oct 6, 2019 10:15 pm

Galloisdaman wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:
Before this offseason how many all star free agents had the Clippers ever signed in their history? The coach and owner believed winning made them more attractive to FA than a draft pick. I'm not saying you are wrong. I'm just pointing out similar things were said last offseason in LA.

Teams like the clippers and nets were always sleeping giants because of their market. Okc will never have those advantages.


Maybe but teams like SA and GS were not considered big TV market teams and they had FA come there way after winning. OKC could have a different mindset than LAC. I just hope the team does not view this season as a tank. I like all teams to compete.

The Bay Area is absolutely a big market. I’ll give you the SAS but I don’t think their situation is identical to okcs at this time. Okc can get free agents. We’ve already proven that with Melo waiving his NTC, George re-sigining and with reportedly Horford willing to join. However you can’t go all in every year. It just doesn’t make sense to do so this year. You can only compromise the future by going for it in the present for so long.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,396
And1: 7,526
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#772 » by Dadouv47 » Sun Oct 6, 2019 10:16 pm

Galloisdaman wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:
Before this offseason how many all star free agents had the Clippers ever signed in their history? The coach and owner believed winning made them more attractive to FA than a draft pick. I'm not saying you are wrong. I'm just pointing out similar things were said last offseason in LA.

Teams like the clippers and nets were always sleeping giants because of their market. Okc will never have those advantages.


Maybe but teams like SA and GS were not considered big TV market teams and they had FA come there way after winning. OKC could have a different mindset than LAC. I just hope the team does not view this season as a tank. I like all teams to compete.


I think tanking at least 2-3 years is the only chance we have if we want to have an elite team in the next 5+ years. We have a very good young prospect and tons of picks. Drafting 2-3 good young guys and trading future assets/picks for good players seems like the best solution for a small market team like us.
Don't want to do a very long rebuild like the Sixers did. That's why I was really happy about the PG13 trade (even if MVPG was a lot of fun)
User avatar
Galloisdaman
Analyst
Posts: 3,674
And1: 2,171
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#773 » by Galloisdaman » Sun Oct 6, 2019 10:30 pm

ThunderBolt wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:Teams like the clippers and nets were always sleeping giants because of their market. Okc will never have those advantages.


Maybe but teams like SA and GS were not considered big TV market teams and they had FA come there way after winning. OKC could have a different mindset than LAC. I just hope the team does not view this season as a tank. I like all teams to compete.

The Bay Area is absolutely a big market. I’ll give you the SAS but I don’t think their situation is identical to okcs at this time. Okc can get free agents. We’ve already proven that with Melo waiving his NTC, George re-sigining and with reportedly Horford willing to join. However you can’t go all in every year. It just doesn’t make sense to do so this year. You can only compromise the future by going for it in the present for so long.


The Bay area is a money filled area but before this decades Warriors did Golden State the have the kind of TV ratings that other big market teams had? Were they a big attraction to all star FA?
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. :D
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,347
And1: 19,173
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#774 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Oct 6, 2019 10:44 pm

Galloisdaman wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:
Maybe but teams like SA and GS were not considered big TV market teams and they had FA come there way after winning. OKC could have a different mindset than LAC. I just hope the team does not view this season as a tank. I like all teams to compete.

The Bay Area is absolutely a big market. I’ll give you the SAS but I don’t think their situation is identical to okcs at this time. Okc can get free agents. We’ve already proven that with Melo waiving his NTC, George re-sigining and with reportedly Horford willing to join. However you can’t go all in every year. It just doesn’t make sense to do so this year. You can only compromise the future by going for it in the present for so long.


The Bay area is a money filled area but before this decades Warriors did Golden State the have the kind of TV ratings that other big market teams had? Were they a big attraction to all star FA?

On most occasions, even a big name market needs to be good at basketball. They warriors were bad for a long time. The Knicks got Melo and LAL got James without being great. However those franchises have also been rebuffed by more allstar free agents than have signed with them when they were bad. Would aldridge have gone to the spurs if they had been bad like LAL? Of course not.

Although OKC hasn’t been bad, they don’t have in place the talent or coaching staff to convince someone like a Bradley beal to come join up with Chris Paul in free agency. Small market teams almost always have to rebuild. Sam has made comments that rebuilds don’t take as long anymore. I think we will do our best to accelerate it like the pacers did however I don’t think Gallo and CP3 are in the longterm plans.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#775 » by spearsy23 » Sun Oct 6, 2019 10:52 pm

ThunderBolt wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:The Bay Area is absolutely a big market. I’ll give you the SAS but I don’t think their situation is identical to okcs at this time. Okc can get free agents. We’ve already proven that with Melo waiving his NTC, George re-sigining and with reportedly Horford willing to join. However you can’t go all in every year. It just doesn’t make sense to do so this year. You can only compromise the future by going for it in the present for so long.


The Bay area is a money filled area but before this decades Warriors did Golden State the have the kind of TV ratings that other big market teams had? Were they a big attraction to all star FA?

On most occasions, even a big name market needs to be good at basketball. They warriors were bad for a long time. The Knicks got Melo and LAL got James without being great. However those franchises have also been rebuffed by more allstar free agents than have signed with them when they were bad. Would aldridge have gone to the spurs if they had been bad like LAL? Of course not.

Although OKC hasn’t been bad, they don’t have in place the talent or coaching staff to convince someone like a Bradley beal to come join up with Chris Paul in free agency. Small market teams almost always have to rebuild. Sam has made comments that rebuilds don’t take as long anymore. I think we will do our best to accelerate it like the pacers did however I don’t think Gallo and CP3 are in the longterm plans.

We did get a commitment from Al Horford prior to Durant leaving. We did get George to re-sign. We won't ever attract star talent without already having a good team in place, but I don't think the situation is quite as hopeless as it's made out to be.


The problem with attracting players at this juncture is that it's not a good basketball situation going forward, even if we snuck into the playoffs this year.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#776 » by spearsy23 » Sun Oct 6, 2019 11:12 pm

Robes not even being able to play in the scrimmage 20+ months after his injury just drives home how badly we've screwed his career.

For reference Shaun Livingston was playing in regular season games <20 months after coming close to losing a leg.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
kdthunderup
Rookie
Posts: 1,006
And1: 562
Joined: May 13, 2011
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#777 » by kdthunderup » Mon Oct 7, 2019 12:13 am

Not much to take away from the scrimmage tbh. Very scrappy, passes were going astray and mistimed but each team was playing decent defense.

SGA was a standout and is going to be an absolute baller, played with a lot of confidence which is great to see from a young player. He absolutely needs to start at the 2 with CP3.

I suspect we will look back on the PG13 trade in 2-3 years and laugh about how well we made out.
DoubleJ13
Junior
Posts: 263
And1: 145
Joined: Apr 26, 2015
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#778 » by DoubleJ13 » Mon Oct 7, 2019 1:44 am

ThunderBolt wrote:
DoubleJ13 wrote:Biggest things that stuck out during the blue/white scrimmage were SGA even in the scrimmage setting looked smooth & in control, Hami was going about 600 mph, & Muscala was making a bunch of 3s.

Is that a good 600 mph or out of control 600 mph?


Oh he was out of control :lol:

Both "teams" were sloppy with the ball so it felt like every 2nd trip down the floor it would get picked off & ran the other way so a lot of guys were playing quick. Hami just seemed to be going quicker than everybody else.
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#779 » by Old Man Game » Mon Oct 7, 2019 3:20 am

spearsy23 wrote:Robes not even being able to play in the scrimmage 20+ months after his injury just drives home how badly we've screwed his career.

For reference Shaun Livingston was playing in regular season games <20 months after coming close to losing a leg.


Is it really necessary to lay blame there? Obviously everyone agrees it sucks but its not altogether clear its anyone in particular's fault. Sometimes dudes just have bad luck.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread Part Deux: Rebuild 

Post#780 » by spearsy23 » Mon Oct 7, 2019 3:26 am

Old Man Game wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:Robes not even being able to play in the scrimmage 20+ months after his injury just drives home how badly we've screwed his career.

For reference Shaun Livingston was playing in regular season games <20 months after coming close to losing a leg.


Is it really necessary to lay blame there? Obviously everyone agrees it sucks but its not altogether clear its anyone in particular's fault. Sometimes dudes just have bad luck.

When you admit to an aggressive rehabilitation plan that results in multiple setbacks it's fair to blame you for the results. Even if Robes was the one pushing the timetable, you have a responsibility as a organization to protect your players.

Also, fool me once...
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder