JN61 wrote:Where is Lebron's opinion?
Imagine the further outrage and damage to NBA China caused by an "icon" like Lebron if he took the same political stances that he does with US politics
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
JN61 wrote:Where is Lebron's opinion?
levon wrote:It is basketball today. Silver and the league office are srrongly invested in making the game more global, especially with the African league and plans for India.
Sports have always been political, especially when they're global and international. Sports are diplomacy. They're meant to be unifying under microcosmic rulesets, within defined periods of time. They're meant to be human.
If tomorrow an African dictator got offended by a position some NBA GM took and decided to divest from the league, the NBA shouldn't just take its ball and go home. Diffusion of values and conversation about differences can't happen unless these diplomatic touch points are maintained.
To be clear, I don't condone what's happening in China, nor do I endorse the NBA's lukewarm response. But I think the rhetoric around here has been 100% about corporations and bottom lines and the Chinese market, and I think the NBA is a more nuanced organization than that given that it represents an entire sport trying to grow globally.
levon wrote:... and I think the NBA is a more nuanced organization than that given that it represents an entire sport trying to grow globally.

emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
ElodyTamTam wrote:LOL @ all the US imperialists calling China "authoritarian". LOL @ the same old trite "human rights" card being played once more when NBA teams periodically wear camo. Your terrorist soldiers killed over 10 million (and counting) Arab civilians in less than 30 years, your beloved NBA teams think that's something worth celebrating... but of course the problem is China, right?
Can't wait for the day you get fed your own medicine.
SK21209 wrote:The China-Hong Kong issue is not the hill I'm dying on because it's completely **** and finally shedding light on the nature of Xi's regime but I am starting to become very uncomfortable with this new trend of expecting/pressuring corporations to take stands on social/non-economic political issues. That is not a path this country needs to go down.
mademan wrote:Maroko wrote:mademan wrote:
So you have to be perfect to critique another country?
Have you seen any tweets from Morey about the USA? I will help you, no.
Thats a weird answer. Have you looked through his entire timeline? I've seen many critiques about the US from many in the NBA. It's not a taboo topic at all
Plutonashfan wrote:Lol this is ridiculous. But then again after watching the latest Southpark episode nothing surprises me how stupid and evil that country government is, but also how money hunger, soulless, gutless these American corporations. They make a deal with devil all in name of profit.
jbk1234 wrote:spikeslovechild wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
This is just more nonsense. Morey didn't start what is actually happening in Hong Kong or what's happening to religious minorities in China. The Chinese government did. The idea that having the temerity to speak up for, checks notes, democracy and basic freedoms is somehow bad is completely bonkers.
He stood up and immediately sat his ass back down. Wow what a response. Now the NBA and Rockets are emboldening the Chinese even further and where is Morey? Probably in a secure bunker somewhere.
And instead of blaming China, the NBA and/or the Rockets, you're blaming Morey. It's like blaming the person calling 911 instead of the person committing the crime.
kio80 wrote:mademan wrote:kio80 wrote:
Exactly my point, however, comparison to China or not, it’s arguable, your opinion is as valuable as mine.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What point? lol.
America isnt perfect, and you'll find problems everywhere you look
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
13th Man wrote:
Totally agree with this dude.
Many people here including myself have always had issues with the players, coaches or league becoming progressive and forcing their SJW issues down our throats when at the end of the day, all the fans really want is an escape from their real life problems. We don't need to spend our hard earned money to escape to more political BS.
Look at this very site. Why do you think political talk is not allowed on the General Board? Because it is a clear distraction from the real topics that we all want to discuss which is basketball. So why would anyone endorse activism in sports when it causes a huge distraction?
The NBA made this bed imo. They, along with the mainstream media like ESPN, TNT etc. have turned SJW on us. Everybody in the league suddenly thinks that they are some world changer activist with their holier than thou opinions when they should be focusing on what they're good at and what they're getting paid for.
What I find ever more funny and hypocritical is that all these Trump hating activists that are now are silent and bowing down to China whereas Trump is actually the one who is standing up to China and not letting them bully us. Anyone else see the irony in all of this?
Promezclan wrote:levon wrote:It is basketball today. Silver and the league office are srrongly invested in making the game more global, especially with the African league and plans for India.
Sports have always been political, especially when they're global and international. Sports are diplomacy. They're meant to be unifying under microcosmic rulesets, within defined periods of time. They're meant to be human.
If tomorrow an African dictator got offended by a position some NBA GM took and decided to divest from the league, the NBA shouldn't just take its ball and go home. Diffusion of values and conversation about differences can't happen unless these diplomatic touch points are maintained.
To be clear, I don't condone what's happening in China, nor do I endorse the NBA's lukewarm response. But I think the rhetoric around here has been 100% about corporations and bottom lines and the Chinese market, and I think the NBA is a more nuanced organization than that given that it represents an entire sport trying to grow globally.
Huh?. There was a massive sports boycott of South Africa during apartheid. Believe me, if some African dictator tried to get an NBA executive fired for tweeting an opinion, the NBA wouldn't even acknowledge it. There is one difference, and that is market size.
Which isn't to trivialize the situation they're in, because it is a big potential market, and they are a business. But just giving into any demand, no matter how petty, obviously isn't a great strategy, either.
The G League thing may be good for the NBA, though. The Chinese regime can save face, and say they punished the imperialist scum, and the NBA can walk away, because obviously this is 100% irrelevant to them.
Plutonashfan wrote:Lol this is ridiculous. But then again after watching the latest Southpark episode nothing surprises me how stupid and evil that country government is, but also how money hunger, soulless, gutless these American corporations. They make a deal with devil all in name of profit.