Durant Durant wrote:seems like the only way to end this is to fire Morey.
No. How about we let China continue to whine about freedom of speech?
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
Durant Durant wrote:seems like the only way to end this is to fire Morey.

Overhere wrote:This is nothing but communist propaganda. This is what the poor people in China hear every day.
Get em, anyone who disagrees with the views you got from mainstream US media headlines is a shill spreading commie propaganda. US media reporting on foreign countries is 100% objective and anyone who disagrees is an enemy of freedomocracy.
So much projection and hypocrisy in this thread. Kobe vs Lebron threads from 5 years ago have more critical thought and background research put into them.

Jim Naismith wrote:Hornet Mania wrote:Jim Naismith wrote:
Donald Sterling was banned from the NBA for a private conversation in his own home.
Ridiculous comparison.
Donald Sterling made statements that were clearly offensive and arguably proved he had a dehumanizing view of about 75% of the NBA's players. The NBA moved quickly in that instance because you simply cannot lose the support of nearly your entire labor force, and nearly all of the most marketable stars. An anti-racist labor strike would have done irreparable damage to the entire league, the NBA would simply not be able to exist without the support of its black players and fans. The Sterling situation, if it had been allowed to fester, could have become an existential threat the NBA's normal operations within the United States and Canada.
Conversely, the NBA can operate as-is at present with or without the CCP's support if that is what the league chose to do. Currently 90% of NBA revenue is coming outside of China. Bowing and scraping to China today is all about future growth tomorrow, not an existential threat to the present. The NBA could still grow without China and the NBA could still easily exist in its present form without China.
And beyond all that there is an importance difference in where this directive is coming from that makes those situation incomparable. The NBA is a private organization that can hire or fire based on its 'values'. Obviously being racist in a league where 75% of the work force is black is naturally at odds with those 'values'. The players, fans and owners spoke out about Sterling as individuals and the league moved to make a change to undo the damage. In this case an authoritarian government is issuing directives to a private organization that its employees either have to surrender their right to freedom of expression and essentially say only what the CCP will allow or that organization will lose its right to exist within China.
Chinese fans spoke out as individuals to what they perceived to be an arrogant white man trying to recolonialize Hong Kong.
Hornet Mania wrote:Jim Naismith wrote:Hornet Mania wrote:
Ridiculous comparison.
Donald Sterling made statements that were clearly offensive and arguably proved he had a dehumanizing view of about 75% of the NBA's players. The NBA moved quickly in that instance because you simply cannot lose the support of nearly your entire labor force, and nearly all of the most marketable stars. An anti-racist labor strike would have done irreparable damage to the entire league, the NBA would simply not be able to exist without the support of its black players and fans. The Sterling situation, if it had been allowed to fester, could have become an existential threat the NBA's normal operations within the United States and Canada.
Conversely, the NBA can operate as-is at present with or without the CCP's support if that is what the league chose to do. Currently 90% of NBA revenue is coming outside of China. Bowing and scraping to China today is all about future growth tomorrow, not an existential threat to the present. The NBA could still grow without China and the NBA could still easily exist in its present form without China.
And beyond all that there is an importance difference in where this directive is coming from that makes those situation incomparable. The NBA is a private organization that can hire or fire based on its 'values'. Obviously being racist in a league where 75% of the work force is black is naturally at odds with those 'values'. The players, fans and owners spoke out about Sterling as individuals and the league moved to make a change to undo the damage. In this case an authoritarian government is issuing directives to a private organization that its employees either have to surrender their right to freedom of expression and essentially say only what the CCP will allow or that organization will lose its right to exist within China.
Chinese fans spoke out as individuals to what they perceived to be an arrogant white man trying to recolonialize Hong Kong.
Absolute nonsense. The CCP has control over what products and services Chinese citizens are allowed to legally purchase. 'Consumer choice', as flimsy and ineffective as it often is in the west, does not exist in any form within China. The Party decides what you can consume and that decision can change on a whim.
Furthermore the Chinese populace is inundated with propaganda that makes even the considerable PR powers of western governments envious. I don't blame any Chinese citizens for seeing the NBA as the big-bad just because one guy employed by the league gave his opinion as a private citizen, they are not receiving anything resembling a fair and balanced perspective in their news media.
And as for the west trying to 'recolonialize' (sic) Hong Kong......
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The west wishes it had the power to set a million protestors loose on the streets of governments it opposes, in reality they have no such influence. The HK protests are obviously organic to anyone who isn't swallowing the CCP propaganda hook line and sinker or those who think the CIA has omnipotent power of persuasion that only tin foil can prevent.
PD28 wrote:Durant Durant wrote:seems like the only way to end this is to fire Morey.
No. How about we let China continue to whine about freedom of speech?
Sgt Major wrote:There's a nice comment about this on Jazzfans:
"Imagine USA in a similar situation and imagine how we would react.
Imagine we lost a war that was not a war where we were the ones attacked. They took NYC and kept it as their country. 150 years later its back and a part of the USA but a group of people there are protesting because they dont like certain USA policies and think they are bad (you can pick whatever policy you want depending on your political affiliation). Do you think USA citizens would be happy to have people from other countries that dont really know all the information to be cheering for the protesters? Does that mean the protesters are completely wrong? No, there is just a lot to this".
13th Man wrote:Honestly, I knew something like this would happen in time, just didn't think it would be so abrupt. It's like Morey poked a stick into a hornets nest without realizing the magnitude of the situation and it's implications.
This is what happens when you condone and encourage SJW type behaviour, everybody thinks that they're world changers all of the sudden and that they're opinions are so important. How about stick to what you're good at rather than be Mr. Influencer on controversial topics you have little real knowledge of.
Hornet Mania wrote:Jim Naismith wrote:Hornet Mania wrote:
Ridiculous comparison.
Donald Sterling made statements that were clearly offensive and arguably proved he had a dehumanizing view of about 75% of the NBA's players. The NBA moved quickly in that instance because you simply cannot lose the support of nearly your entire labor force, and nearly all of the most marketable stars. An anti-racist labor strike would have done irreparable damage to the entire league, the NBA would simply not be able to exist without the support of its black players and fans. The Sterling situation, if it had been allowed to fester, could have become an existential threat the NBA's normal operations within the United States and Canada.
Conversely, the NBA can operate as-is at present with or without the CCP's support if that is what the league chose to do. Currently 90% of NBA revenue is coming outside of China. Bowing and scraping to China today is all about future growth tomorrow, not an existential threat to the present. The NBA could still grow without China and the NBA could still easily exist in its present form without China.
And beyond all that there is an importance difference in where this directive is coming from that makes those situation incomparable. The NBA is a private organization that can hire or fire based on its 'values'. Obviously being racist in a league where 75% of the work force is black is naturally at odds with those 'values'. The players, fans and owners spoke out about Sterling as individuals and the league moved to make a change to undo the damage. In this case an authoritarian government is issuing directives to a private organization that its employees either have to surrender their right to freedom of expression and essentially say only what the CCP will allow or that organization will lose its right to exist within China.
Chinese fans spoke out as individuals to what they perceived to be an arrogant white man trying to recolonialize Hong Kong.
Absolute nonsense. The CCP has control over what products and services Chinese citizens are allowed to legally purchase. 'Consumer choice', as flimsy and ineffective as it often is in the west, does not exist in any form within China. The Party decides what you can consume and that decision can change on a whim.
Furthermore the Chinese populace is inundated with propaganda that makes even the considerable PR powers of western governments envious. I don't blame any Chinese citizens for seeing the NBA as the big-bad just because one guy employed by the league gave his opinion as a private citizen, they are not receiving anything resembling a fair and balanced perspective in their news media.
And as for the west trying to 'recolonialize' (sic) Hong Kong......
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The west wishes it had the power to set a million protestors loose on the streets of governments it opposes, in reality they have no such influence. The HK protests are obviously organic to anyone who isn't swallowing the CCP propaganda hook line and sinker or those who think the CIA has omnipotent power of persuasion that only tin foil can prevent.
Duffman100 wrote:Whatever. NBA shouldn't bow down to China. Constant human rights issues, abusing protestors...

TerryTate wrote:Duffman100 wrote:Whatever. NBA shouldn't bow down to China. Constant human rights issues, abusing protestors...
"Constant humans right issues" can be equally said about the US and half of it's "middle eastern" allies.
Globally, there is a lot of focus is in HK right now... but Saudi, UAE, Israel.... cmon. It's not like HK is a glorified ghetto, like the people of Palestine.

TerryTate wrote:Duffman100 wrote:Whatever. NBA shouldn't bow down to China. Constant human rights issues, abusing protestors...
"Constant humans right issues" can be equally said about the US and half of it's "middle eastern" allies.
Globally, there is a lot of focus is in HK right now... but Saudi, UAE, Israel.... cmon. It's not like HK is a glorified ghetto, like the people of Palestine.
Sgt Major wrote:There's a nice comment about this on Jazzfans:
"Imagine USA in a similar situation and imagine how we would react.
Imagine we lost a war that was not a war where we were the ones attacked. They took NYC and kept it as their country. 150 years later its back and a part of the USA but a group of people there are protesting because they dont like certain USA policies and think they are bad (you can pick whatever policy you want depending on your political affiliation). Do you think USA citizens would be happy to have people from other countries that dont really know all the information to be cheering for the protesters? Does that mean the protesters are completely wrong? No, there is just a lot to this".
Duffman100 wrote:TerryTate wrote:Duffman100 wrote:Whatever. NBA shouldn't bow down to China. Constant human rights issues, abusing protestors...
"Constant humans right issues" can be equally said about the US and half of it's "middle eastern" allies.
Globally, there is a lot of focus is in HK right now... but Saudi, UAE, Israel.... cmon. It's not like HK is a glorified ghetto, like the people of Palestine.
Every country does have human rights issues. But if you follow politics and the news, China is really really bad for it.
Journalists just... disappear... even from HK. Which is a lot about what this protest is about.