Celtics exposed?

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

User avatar
bisme37
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 25,047
And1: 72,839
Joined: May 24, 2014
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#61 » by bisme37 » Tue Oct 8, 2019 3:46 pm

LloydFree wrote:
bisme37 wrote:I legit have no idea what this thread is about. We've played one preseason game and won it. And I'd be surprised if more than 5 non-celtics fans on here even watched the game. This is just a random, general "feel good" thread for Celtic haters I guess?

You know exactly what it's about. You saw the game, and you saw the Charlotte Guards, running past Kanter like a traffic cone. That's what the OP is saying.


This is a four page thread about how the Celtics were exposed in a preseason win. Ok.

It was actually Robert Williams who was playing the worst defense of the bigs. Kanter was in during the run we made to re-take the lead and the team got a lot of stops in that period.

Anyway, I think everyone realizes the team has some holes and flaws (like 95% of the league). I haven't seen many people who are expecting us to win a championship this season. Can't we just be a good team? Or that's not acceptable and must be ridiculed?
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,239
And1: 22,761
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#62 » by RHODEY » Tue Oct 8, 2019 3:47 pm

Fantaxp7 wrote:
Prokorov wrote:
RHODEY wrote:Funny how the BSPN analysts couldn't see this coming .No interior defense... You lose Morris, Horford, and Baynes, replace that with Kanter and what did they expect?Instead of talking about the Celts being a top 4 Eastern team and whether Kemba could replace Kyrie , they needed to be asking if they can even make the playoffs as a "donut" team.


It has been extremely under reported exactly what they lost outside of Kyrie....

-They had 3 bigs who could defend, and in horfords case at an extremely high level (Horford, morris, baynes).
-Those 3 bigs also stretched the floor. Morris and Horford are 2 guys you can space the floor with without going small.
-They lost NBA calibur depth. Maybe a young guy steps up, but right now they really only go 7 deep with nba players. and when we talk about depth, its not just the bench playing well, its having nba level players to step in and start when injuries happen


It has been reported many times how the biggest loss is our big men.


Not on TV, all they talked about was losing Kyrie Kyrie /getting Kemba and just posing the question of "It will be interesting to se how the Celts deal with the loss of Horford"...when it should have been... "the Celtics should take a major step back from losing not just Horford but Baynes and Morris.

Poor TV analysis via omission and likely the need to push the narrative that Boston is still a big market contending team.
User avatar
bisme37
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 25,047
And1: 72,839
Joined: May 24, 2014
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#63 » by bisme37 » Tue Oct 8, 2019 3:49 pm

RHODEY wrote:
Fantaxp7 wrote:
Prokorov wrote:
It has been extremely under reported exactly what they lost outside of Kyrie....

-They had 3 bigs who could defend, and in horfords case at an extremely high level (Horford, morris, baynes).
-Those 3 bigs also stretched the floor. Morris and Horford are 2 guys you can space the floor with without going small.
-They lost NBA calibur depth. Maybe a young guy steps up, but right now they really only go 7 deep with nba players. and when we talk about depth, its not just the bench playing well, its having nba level players to step in and start when injuries happen


It has been reported many times how the biggest loss is our big men.


Not on TV, all they talked about was losing Kyrie Kyrie /getting Kemba and just posing the question of "It will be interesting to se how the Celts deal with the loss of Horford"...when it should have been... "the Celtics should take a major step back from losing not just Horford but Baynes and Morris.

Poor TV analysis via omission and likely the need to push the narrative that Boston is still a big market contending team.


Bro maybe you should write an email to whatever TV station you were watching and log a complaint. I don't know why you're chewing the Celtics out because of an unnamed TV show you disagree with.
User avatar
cupcakesnake
Senior Mod- WNBA
Senior Mod- WNBA
Posts: 15,765
And1: 32,423
Joined: Jul 21, 2016
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#64 » by cupcakesnake » Tue Oct 8, 2019 3:53 pm

TheBallsDeeper wrote:Celtics are going to be in the race for the number one pick unless they make some big moves. Can't make the playoffs with no defense. They probably have the worse interia defense in the league, and a really poor defensive point guard. The only thing that can save them is their coach, but even Stevens can not preform miracles with this mess.



The Celtics have enough defensive personnel. Jaylen Brown, Ojeleye and Marcus Smart are two of the switchiest players in the NBA. Theis and Tatum are positive defenders. Hayward sounds healthy. They have some young defensive bigs and one of them might pop. Brad Stevens is a good defensive coach.

I think Boston will be mediocre this year and that the loss of Horford was not measured accurately when analysts were predicting records. But as long as they avoid long stretches of Kemba and Kanter on the floor, they'll be just fine. The Spurs managed a top 3 defense over 2 years (1st and 3rd) starting old Tony Parker and old Pau Gasol and teams would obliterate them in pick & rolls. They compensated with a strong defensive bench unit and some switchy perimeter defenders.
"Being in my home. I was watching pokemon for 5 hours."

Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#65 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Tue Oct 8, 2019 3:57 pm

TheBallsDeeper wrote:Celtics are going to be in the race for the number one pick unless they make some big moves. Can't make the playoffs with no defense. .



Image
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,840
And1: 11,657
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#66 » by LloydFree » Tue Oct 8, 2019 3:59 pm

jamaalstar21 wrote:
TheBallsDeeper wrote:Celtics are going to be in the race for the number one pick unless they make some big moves. Can't make the playoffs with no defense. They probably have the worse interia defense in the league, and a really poor defensive point guard. The only thing that can save them is their coach, but even Stevens can not preform miracles with this mess.



The Celtics have enough defensive personnel. Jaylen Brown, Ojeleye and Marcus Smart are two of the switchiest players in the NBA. Theis and Tatum are positive defenders. Hayward sounds healthy. They have some young defensive bigs and one of them might pop. Brad Stevens is a good defensive coach.

I think Boston will be mediocre this year and that the loss of Horford was not measured accurately when analysts were predicting records. But as long as they avoid long stretches of Kemba and Kanter on the floor, they'll be just fine. The Spurs managed a top 3 defense over 2 years (1st and 3rd) starting old Tony Parker and old Pau Gasol and teams would obliterate them in pick & rolls. They compensated with a strong defensive bench unit and some switchy perimeter defenders.

What? The Spurs had Kawhi Leonard.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
User avatar
ITYSL
General Manager
Posts: 8,467
And1: 11,380
Joined: May 04, 2017
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#67 » by ITYSL » Tue Oct 8, 2019 4:01 pm

After one preseason game lmao, never change GB
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,051
And1: 31,145
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#68 » by mademan » Tue Oct 8, 2019 4:03 pm

Crazy. Even if Hayward goes back to who he is and Tatum takes a big step forward, thats a lay up line. Kanter defending the PnR is not something you want happening for the majority of the game
CIN-C-STAR
General Manager
Posts: 8,439
And1: 18,310
Joined: Dec 17, 2017

Re: Celtics interior defense exposed? 

Post#69 » by CIN-C-STAR » Tue Oct 8, 2019 4:21 pm

shangrila wrote:
CIN-C-STAR wrote:I didn't understand why they shipped Baynes to Phoenix in what was basically a salary dump.
The guy is an excellent big defender and rim protector. They couldn't have found a use for that, at least situationally?

I thought they needed the money for Kemba?

Or maybe I just assumed it at the time.


Yea, you're right. I guess I had assumed that by letting Kyrie AND Horford walk they would have had room to sign Kemba already, but I guess that wasn't the case.
https://www.boston.com/sports/boston-celtics/2019/06/21/aron-baynes-trade-draft-picks-suns
Getting the #24 pick to absorb Baynes' $5.4 million, one-year deal was quite a coup for Phoenix.
I'm sure they'll manage to screw it up, but can't argue with that deal on paper :lol:
"I'd rather have Kevin Love spacing out to the three point line than anything (Karl) Malone brings"
:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Bad-Thoma
Head Coach
Posts: 7,233
And1: 10,183
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Location: Still riding proud on the C's bandwagon

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#70 » by Bad-Thoma » Tue Oct 8, 2019 4:25 pm

Lol, "exposed" after one preseason game. I love haters.
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,062
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#71 » by The_Hater » Tue Oct 8, 2019 4:26 pm

Is this thread based on an exhibition game? Really?
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,885
And1: 67,594
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Celtics interior defense exposed? 

Post#72 » by Duke4life831 » Tue Oct 8, 2019 4:34 pm

RHODEY wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:Not sure how an interior defense that consist of Kanter and 2nd year Williams can get exposed. Were the expectations for their interior defense even high?

Youre right I meant the Celtics overall.


Oh if that is the point you're trying to make, then no. We are talking about 1 preseason game that they won. How bout we give them 20-30 games in the regular season until we start talking getting exposed?
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#73 » by Slartibartfast » Tue Oct 8, 2019 4:35 pm

It's bizarre watching Kanter choose to box out his guy over contesting a lay-up.
Karate Diop
General Manager
Posts: 9,422
And1: 11,381
Joined: May 19, 2017
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#74 » by Karate Diop » Tue Oct 8, 2019 5:06 pm

It's preseason... But yes the Celtics center rotation does project to be a problem for them come the regular season. People claiming that a player of Robert Williams' caliber will change things are seriously delusional...
User avatar
Johnny Bball
RealGM
Posts: 54,987
And1: 59,374
Joined: Feb 01, 2015
 

Re: Celtics interior defense exposed? 

Post#75 » by Johnny Bball » Tue Oct 8, 2019 5:11 pm

IgorK wrote:Keep talking and they're gonna slap you all the way to Tuesday.

Image


If he had two overly violent brothers, that would a be perfect look.
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,866
And1: 25,189
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#76 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Tue Oct 8, 2019 5:16 pm

They badly need veteran frontcourt players that can play some defense. They should try to get their hands on Favors if they can.
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,679
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: Celtics interior defense exposed? 

Post#77 » by Prokorov » Tue Oct 8, 2019 5:21 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:Not sure how an interior defense that consist of Kanter and 2nd year Williams can get exposed. Were the expectations for their interior defense even high?

Youre right I meant the Celtics overall.


Oh if that is the point you're trying to make, then no. We are talking about 1 preseason game that they won. How bout we give them 20-30 games in the regular season until we start talking getting exposed?


we know kanter is one of the worst defensive bigs in the league. he has shown that for years. what do we need 20-30 games for?
User avatar
GWVan
Analyst
Posts: 3,022
And1: 2,549
Joined: Dec 12, 2002
Location: The world's most famous beach
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#78 » by GWVan » Tue Oct 8, 2019 5:27 pm

Is this a Celtics hate thread or a Kantor hate thread? just want to understand.
Full of sound and fury; signifying nothing
StojkoVrankovic
RealGM
Posts: 10,721
And1: 9,600
Joined: Nov 29, 2011
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#79 » by StojkoVrankovic » Tue Oct 8, 2019 5:27 pm

If we only had 10 million to throw at an equally bad defender in Jordan, oh well
RIP texas celtic, 12/10/14 - 12/10/14
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,885
And1: 67,594
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Celtics interior defense exposed? 

Post#80 » by Duke4life831 » Tue Oct 8, 2019 5:30 pm

Prokorov wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:
RHODEY wrote:Youre right I meant the Celtics overall.


Oh if that is the point you're trying to make, then no. We are talking about 1 preseason game that they won. How bout we give them 20-30 games in the regular season until we start talking getting exposed?


we know kanter is one of the worst defensive bigs in the league. he has shown that for years. what do we need 20-30 games for?


Ya exactly, so his weakness should've already been included on the Celtics predictions for this year. Im not sure how 1 preseason game exposed the Celtics, since the main issue everyone seems to be talking about is the main issue everyone knew they were going to have.

Return to The General Board