Wait. What???
Stevens is committing early, huh?
OK. Now, do something about the Gordon Hayward bottleneck.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Parliament10 wrote:
Wait. What???
Stevens is committing early, huh?
OK. Now do something about the Gordon Hayward bottleneck.

100proof wrote:Parliament10 wrote:
Wait. What???
Stevens is committing early, huh?
OK. Now do something about the Gordon Hayward bottleneck.
I only makes sense.
You cannot start both Kanter and Kemba. 2 weak defenders at the 2 most important defensive positions on the floor.
IMO you have to start Smart and 1 of Williams or Poirier at Center.
Kemba
Smart
Brown
Tatum
Poirier or Williams
and Hayward/ Kanter and rookies off the bench. Hayward solidifies the bench unit and is the first off the bench, Kanter is all offense and rebounds off the bench.

Parliament10 wrote:100proof wrote:Parliament10 wrote:Wait. What???
Stevens is committing early, huh?
OK. Now do something about the Gordon Hayward bottleneck.
I only makes sense.
You cannot start both Kanter and Kemba. 2 weak defenders at the 2 most important defensive positions on the floor.
IMO you have to start Smart and 1 of Williams or Poirier at Center.
Kemba
Smart
Brown
Tatum
Poirier or Williams
and Hayward/ Kanter and rookies off the bench. Hayward solidifies the bench unit and is the first off the bench, Kanter is all offense and rebounds off the bench.
Hmmm.
Hayward would be a really expensive Bench player (Déjà vu).
You might have somethign there, though.
sam_I_am wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:We don’t have anyone with the raw talent of Zion, Doncic, Ben Simmons, Donovan Mitchell, even Lonzo Ball. Tatum has some of it as a scorer, and he’s got the upside to become dominant eventually, like Giannis or Paul George, but right now he doesn’t have the ability to impact a game like those players, to take it over.
That is a really interesting point. Tatum scoring 24 ppg in a playoff series rout of Philly cannot impact a game......like Lonzo Ball.
Slartibartfast wrote:
It's great in theory. Problem is our more defensive oriented big options aren't very compelling. Poirier is skinny and seems to be lacking in lateral quickness. RW3 lacks physicality and awareness on both ends. Theis is too small.
They will all at least contest shots, which is more than I can say for Kanter, but not sure if any of them are good enough even to spot start.
My guess is Theis will win out and become a 15mpg starter.
NuckyPowell wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:
It's great in theory. Problem is our more defensive oriented big options aren't very compelling. Poirier is skinny and seems to be lacking in lateral quickness. RW3 lacks physicality and awareness on both ends. Theis is too small.
They will all at least contest shots, which is more than I can say for Kanter, but not sure if any of them are good enough even to spot start.
My guess is Theis will win out and become a 15mpg starter.
I thought Poirier moved his feet pretty well and cut off drives pretty well. Not much of a sample size, to be sure. There was a good article on CelticsBlog with some video that showcased Poirier defending a few plays, fwiw. Here it is:
https://www.celticsblog.com/2019/10/8/20903409/three-things-boston-celtics-vs-charlotte-hornets-kemba-walker-jaylen-brown-vincent-poirier

NuckyPowell wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:
It's great in theory. Problem is our more defensive oriented big options aren't very compelling. Poirier is skinny and seems to be lacking in lateral quickness. RW3 lacks physicality and awareness on both ends. Theis is too small.
They will all at least contest shots, which is more than I can say for Kanter, but not sure if any of them are good enough even to spot start.
My guess is Theis will win out and become a 15mpg starter.
I thought Poirier moved his feet pretty well and cut off drives pretty well. Not much of a sample size, to be sure. There was a good article on CelticsBlog with some video that showcased Poirier defending a few plays, fwiw. Here it is:
https://www.celticsblog.com/2019/10/8/20903409/three-things-boston-celtics-vs-charlotte-hornets-kemba-walker-jaylen-brown-vincent-poirier
Parliament10 wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:I don’t think I’m overreacting.. Danny held onto Brown and Tatum with the hope of trading one or both for Anthony Davis, who would join Kyrie, Horford, Hayward, probably Morris, Baynes and Rozier. He passed on or missed out on Jimmy Butler, Paul George, and Kawhi because he didn’t want to give up Jaylen or Jayson.
If he hadn’t been waiting for a pitch to hit out of the park, I think we’d either have more veteran talent or more/better young talent right now.
Obviously Kemba and Hayward are good vets to have, but Orlando has Vucevic, New Orleans has Favors and Reddick.. And both those teams are more loaded with maturing young talent than we are. Chicago, too, except their guys are more raw.
I think that Danny held onto Brown and especially Tatum, cause that was the Plan all along, iff (if, and only if) Anthony Davis didn't commit to us long-term.
Homerclease wrote:
Said this months ago. They need him to carry the offense on the second unit and provide experience along with Smart
Parliament10 wrote:NuckyPowell wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:
It's great in theory. Problem is our more defensive oriented big options aren't very compelling. Poirier is skinny and seems to be lacking in lateral quickness. RW3 lacks physicality and awareness on both ends. Theis is too small.
They will all at least contest shots, which is more than I can say for Kanter, but not sure if any of them are good enough even to spot start.
My guess is Theis will win out and become a 15mpg starter.
I thought Poirier moved his feet pretty well and cut off drives pretty well. Not much of a sample size, to be sure. There was a good article on CelticsBlog with some video that showcased Poirier defending a few plays, fwiw. Here it is:
https://www.celticsblog.com/2019/10/8/20903409/three-things-boston-celtics-vs-charlotte-hornets-kemba-walker-jaylen-brown-vincent-poirier
What about this Rotation?
2019-20 Tentative Roster
Kemba - Smart - Tatum - Theis - R. Williams
Edwards - Brown - Hayward - G. Williams - Kanter
Wanamaker - Langford - Ojeleye - Poirier - (Fall)
Two-Ways = Strus; Waters
Slartibartfast wrote:31to6 wrote:Dannyboy36 wrote:
Like you guys have never overreacted. Give me a break.
For context the 'plastic people' were the ones who doubted when we had KG and PP.
That was a very different situation than a Kemba/Hayward/Kanter veteran core.
This is where all the canaries in the coal mine pass out.

Andrew McCeltic wrote:
Meaning Rob W. will be the starter? Even with his inexperience he’s probably better than Kanter already on defense..
Parliament10 wrote:100proof wrote:Parliament10 wrote:Wait. What???
Stevens is committing early, huh?
OK. Now do something about the Gordon Hayward bottleneck.
I only makes sense.
You cannot start both Kanter and Kemba. 2 weak defenders at the 2 most important defensive positions on the floor.
IMO you have to start Smart and 1 of Williams or Poirier at Center.
Kemba
Smart
Brown
Tatum
Poirier or Williams
and Hayward/ Kanter and rookies off the bench. Hayward solidifies the bench unit and is the first off the bench, Kanter is all offense and rebounds off the bench.
Hmmm.
Hayward would be a really expensive Bench player (Déjà vu).
You might have somethign there, though.
Dannyboy36 wrote:Parliament10 wrote:100proof wrote:
I only makes sense.
You cannot start both Kanter and Kemba. 2 weak defenders at the 2 most important defensive positions on the floor.
IMO you have to start Smart and 1 of Williams or Poirier at Center.
Kemba
Smart
Brown
Tatum
Poirier or Williams
and Hayward/ Kanter and rookies off the bench. Hayward solidifies the bench unit and is the first off the bench, Kanter is all offense and rebounds off the bench.
Hmmm.
Hayward would be a really expensive Bench player (Déjà vu).
You might have somethign there, though.
I think Hayward MAY walk for nothing in this scenario. I don’t think it would necessarily tick him off but he could either be the #3 guy on a contender or he could be the #1 on a bad team and have the ball in his hands a ton. Could see both of those scenarios being more attractive than this set up.

Andrew McCeltic wrote:Interesting comment from Hayward here (https://www.nbcsports.com/boston/celtics/elbow-scare-only-concern-gordon-hayward-lives-offseason-hype):Later in the first quarter, Hayward picked off a pass and streaked in for a layup. He wore a big smile after the play — not because of the athleticism he displayed in jumping the passing lane and breaking out alone, but because he didn’t have the energy to dunk the ball.
“Still gotta get my legs underneath me. I would have normally dunked the one on the fast break but I was way too tired,” said Hayward. "I’m going to have to improve that. It was certainly good to get out there and make some explosive moves to the basket.”
Do we buy it?