AZNKidd wrote:clyde21 wrote:D.Brasco wrote:
Ok but are you giving China a pass there on what they are doing just because they are not European?
I do think China's response to the HK protestors does have some after effects of being screwed over by Europeans in the past but I can't think of any remote justification to what they are doing to the Uyghurs and that story should be the one dominating the news.
what? i have been talking about the Uyghurs this entire time...my entire point is that everyone's a hypocrite because now all of the sudden they care about 'human rights' and 'freedom' when it comes to Hong Kong but China has been committing genocide against Uyghers for YEARS and no one has batted an eye...NBA was playing NBA games miles away from where China has been putting them in internment camps...you didn't see that on the news tho...because, again, selective outrage depending on who the victim is..and if the victims are Muslim everyone tends to ignore it, like they've been ignoring Palestine for 7 decades and how they've been ignoring the MILLIONS of dead/refugees across the entire Middle East the last 20 years.
The contrast between the Uygher genocide and HK protests should raise alarms around the world about the dangers of media censorship, which is exactly the issue facing the NBA at hand. On one hand, there is some truth that Euro centric colonialism has something to do with the lack of past media attention to the genocide of Muslims and other minority ethnic group (also see eg Myanmar), but one big if not the biggest reason the HK movement has taken so much international interest is because there is no media censorship in HK which gives them a voice. The Ugyhers don’t have a voice and activists in China are either improsoned or killed, let alone getting any Chinese media exposure. This is the major major issue the NBA needs to realize if they want to operate in the China market.
mainstream media, and that's means both sides, are just arms of the pentagon/deep state/corporations at this point, they'll show you only what they want to you show you as long as it fits within a particular pro-America agenda narrative.
i mean, Saudia Arabia has been slaughtering Yemenis for 5 years now (90 thousand children slaughtered, 14 million Yemenis on brink of famine as we speak)...but what makes headline news? an attack on an oil refinery in Saudia Arabia and how it might affect oil prices.
just completely disgusting.
and you're wrong about people 'not having voice'...that's the entire point of journalism, reporting on behalf of people who don't have a voice...the Uygher situations has been reported by independent media for years now, just go read articles about it on The Incercept and The Grayzone from 2016 and 2017...how come these independent journalists with a fraction of the resources that CNN/Fox News have reported on it but the mainstream conglomerates don't? the answer should be obvious.






















