pancakes3 wrote:there's no picking sides on this one. both are in the wrong. there used to be a time where voters complained about politicians across the board. now there's an instinct to pick sides when politicians squabble between themselves.
clinton is irrelevant and 1% gabbard is too. why even pay them any mind? even if gabbard was a russian asset, they backed a dud of a candidate. who cares? let the watchdogs monitor the situation, life's too short.
I’m going with Clinton on this one. The woman ran the State department and obviously knows what she’s talking about. She’s rightly called out Trump being Putin’s puppet and warned about a lot of things that would happen if Trump was elected.
Gabbard is what the Russians would call a useful idiot. She doesn’t have to be a witting collaborator to still be a Russian asset. Her own arrogance and belief she’s always right is exactly what Putin wants. Throw bombs at the DNC (check), blame Democrats for Trump’s Syria mess (check), claim mainstream media conspiracies about her (check) and the list goes on. It has nothing to do with Gabbard winning but everything to do with creating doubt with voters and poisoning American politics