jayu70 wrote:The Goal of the Hawks, Schlenk and Pierce despite the wins and showing thus far has ALWAYS been to develop this young roster. Play hard, play and compete and if they win cool.
That was the point.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
jayu70 wrote:The Goal of the Hawks, Schlenk and Pierce despite the wins and showing thus far has ALWAYS been to develop this young roster. Play hard, play and compete and if they win cool.

dirkforpres wrote:Courtney Lee
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
DTP wrote:Myth wrote:DTP wrote:Children, please. None of them have anything on Bruce Brown.
I beg to differ. Brown at least has a respectable fg% (47.4%) and hits 50% of his threes.
No, no....Brown has one game where he wasnt completely trash and that was last night when he came off the bench. He went 3/3 from 3 last night, so the percentages arent accurate at all. Watch him, he's trash.
jayu70 wrote:The_Hater wrote:kg01 wrote:
My response is that you're just saying names and choosing to ignore the team's circumstances. They're not force-feeding the dude minutes, and keeping him ahead of guys, just because he was a FRP.
Carter is a 4, Turner is the backup 1. Bembry is getting as many minutes as the team can stomach.
Simply claiming that some players play different positions Isn’t a good argument. Even ignoring that we’re in the era of positionless basketball, all 3 of those players have played SF either in the current season or as recently as last season, and none of those players I listed have played some huge minute load thst couldn’t be increased if needed. Even Hunter, who I didn’t list, has only played 26 mpg and could soak up more minutes. Meanwhile Reddish is somehow 4th on the team in minutes right now.
If the goal of the Hawks was truly to put their best players on the floor, Reddish would be getting close to zero mpg right now. But Pierce and Schlenk are obviously thinking about a different direction.
The Goal of the Hawks, Schlenk and Pierce despite the wins and showing thus far has ALWAYS been to develop this young roster. Play hard, play and compete and if they win cool.
If the thought was different, they would have looked for a different starting C and backup PG.
Also note that, Turner was also limited with sore achilles, then sprained ankle.

kg01 wrote:No jay, we're supposed to ignore circumstance just to try to "prove", after 3 games, that Reddish is a bust. smdh
kg01 wrote:Really? We're setting fire to rookies after 3 games? And doing so completely oblivious to the actual situation of the team whereby the dude is only starting because of minute restrictions on the usual starter?
Do better, OP.
abark wrote:kg01 wrote:Really? We're setting fire to rookies after 3 games? And doing so completely oblivious to the actual situation of the team whereby the dude is only starting because of minute restrictions on the usual starter?
Do better, OP.
The problem is he is the exact player he was at Duke. So many people made excuses for his sub 36% shooting percentage in college because he had to play third fiddle. Even though he was the same player while Zion was out.
As a Heat fan, I was so glad that teams were dumb enough to overlook his horrendous freshman year and rank him as a top ten prospect.
If he was even somewhat good at the college level, I would hold off on judgments because you are right that most rookies struggle (Herro hasn't been setting the world on fire yet).
But the real problem is that unlike every other first rounder, the last time he played at an acceptable level was high school.
I am still just seeing the same extremely low efficiency player that brings nothing else to the game besides some defence.
I'm not saying he can't improve as a player. But his first few games do reinforce my opinion that his situation was not the problem at Duke.
The Hawks drafted a guy who shot horrendously in college and provided very little rebounding or playmaking at number 10. And surprise, that's what he is right now.
CP War Hawks wrote:DTP wrote:Myth wrote:I beg to differ. Brown at least has a respectable fg% (47.4%) and hits 50% of his threes.
No, no....Brown has one game where he wasnt completely trash and that was last night when he came off the bench. He went 3/3 from 3 last night, so the percentages arent accurate at all. Watch him, he's trash.
These people are looking at stats and not watching impact of the player. Red is not ready, but his length on defense actually helps this team compete.
Huerter missed all of training camp/preseason cause of knee pain. He'll get his spot back once he gets back in shape.
jlokine wrote:crap on a guy who played 3 games? can we not wait at least like 20 games? wouldnt you the worst worker at your new work after 3 days?
abark wrote:jlokine wrote:crap on a guy who played 3 games? can we not wait at least like 20 games? wouldnt you the worst worker at your new work after 3 days?
It's not about the three games. He absolutely sucked in college too. This is just 3 more games of trash
DaT WaVeY RiCaN wrote:Meanwhile
abark wrote:jlokine wrote:crap on a guy who played 3 games? can we not wait at least like 20 games? wouldnt you the worst worker at your new work after 3 days?
It's not about the three games. He absolutely sucked in college too. This is just 3 more games of trash
ItsThatEasy wrote:DaT WaVeY RiCaN wrote:Meanwhile
No offense to you of course, and RJ is playing great, but this is exactly the kind of stat cherry picking that's ruining the league.
Why stop at 19 points? He didn't make it to 20/15/5 yet, ok, cool, maybe he still will. Singling out 19 is just corny.
abark wrote:jlokine wrote:crap on a guy who played 3 games? can we not wait at least like 20 games? wouldnt you the worst worker at your new work after 3 days?
It's not about the three games. He absolutely sucked in college too. This is just 3 more games of trash