BBallFreak wrote:AirP. wrote:
The big problem is that to have Winslow start at PG means you're taking the ball out of the hands of Butler more who is a way better player and also overall putting a much less efficient player on the court with the starters. If you want long term success, things like this matter. Do I need to add in that Winslow is great defensively? I just see him as a fringe starter, great roleplayer.
I don't see anything wrong with them splitting those choirs, especially if it helps Winslow be more efficient. Look, we're talking about 3 games where he stank from the floor and one where he was amazing. This is a small sample size. You want to see who he is? You're much better off looking at what he did last year. That's a much better indicator.
And if you want to trash him based on last year, go right ahead.
I'm "trashing" him by saying his offensive efficiency is bad? There's data saying it's a fact that it seems fans are fine with ignoring. He's not had 1 year where his offensive efficiency has even been average. You can see that in his TS% or his ORTG for each year in his career. Also I am only talking about his offensive efficiency being bad, everything else is great, it's just that offensive efficiency is so important in this current era. All he has to do is play more towards his strengths on offense or just take less shots to help mitigate hurting his and his team's offensive efficiency.
BBallFreak wrote:But this year? You better be prepared to look at Jimmy Butler, too. Dude isn't averaging 15 a game and isn't shooting 40% from the floor. We're paying the max for those stats. Yet I don't see you trashing him.
I am interested in the perception of Butler if he doesn't look for his own shot and get those "max contract stats", especially if the team continues to win a good clip. Also, I've already seen Butler do this in Minnesota, so he in fact has a history of doing this.
Butler is a different kind a person, does what he feels is needed to win, his first 12 games in Minnesota(he missed 2 early games sick), 15.3pts, 5 reb, 4.8 ast while shooting .397 FG%, with scoring games of 4 and 6 points(both easy wins), the Timberwolves were 9-3 at that point but he got tired of the work ethics and griping of numbers from 1 or 2 younger players then announced Jimmy Buckets coming back, when that stretch started he averaged 24.1 pts, 5.6 reb, 5.0 asts for 44 games till he tore his meniscus.
Butler did the same thing in Philly in the playoffs, Philly's first playoff game they were getting hammered, nobody could score so Butler took over(scored 36) and almost brought them back from being 20 behind in the first half then took a back seat(averaged 10.8 ppg the rest of the series) to his teammates the rest of the 1st round because they had enough scoring. 2nd round they needed him and he almost got them past the eventual champs where he averaged 22 pts, 7 reb and 5.6 ast.
BBallFreak wrote:Maybe it's because you give him the benefit of the doubt based on last year? His career? Maybe you're expecting him to get his numbers where we all expect them to be because history tells us he will?
Maybe give Justise the same benefit of the doubt here. He's off to a slow start. So what? He'll get there...
I just don't get this, you're honestly telling me to give Winslow the same benefit of a doubt as Butler while knowing that Butler has had many years of being efficient offensively(has done this in the past with a new team) and Winslow has never had an efficient year offensively in the NBA. What is the reasoning that Justise deserves the same benefit of a doubt, it's not based on history of performance over a year.
Once again, outside Winslow's' offensive efficiency, he has a great game, but we're at a point in time where offensive efficiency is really important if you shoot a decent amount of times and he's putting up 15 FGA a game.