pancakes3 wrote:people who get into crashes are already punished.
just bc it's 4pm on thanksgiving eve, i'll elaborate.
extenuating circumstances that add on to the severity of a crime has little to do with punishment of the underlying crime and everything to do with (1) reflecting societal values and (2) shaping behavior.
we have heightened penalties for killing cops v killing other ppl bc we want to send a message that killing cops is much worse than civilians.
DWI laws are in effect because as a society, we've agreed that crashing while intoxicated is worse than crashing sober - we want to shape the behavior that deters people from drinking and driving. the underlying crime of hitting someone or something with a car is still equally punished.
drugs like opioids and meth have devastating health consequences, and also materially change people's behavior when they're high on the substance and the argument stands that they should be treated harsher than other substances that affect people's behavior, like say nicotine, caffeine, or alcohol. THC fits a lot more squarely with nicotine, caffeine, and alcohol than opioids and methamphetamines and yet the criminalization and enforcement of THC use is being enforced harshly and discriminatorily, and also disproportionately outweighs whatever societal benefits that discouraging marijuana use begets.
bottom line, it's a bad law. i'm not entirely sure who my audience is for this rant, or why i'm bothering to post about it yet again but i hope some lurker out there is gaining benefit from reading it.