nate33 wrote:pcbothwel wrote:nate33 wrote:I can't fathom a reason for NY to consider it. Payton is better than IT and Gibson is better than Mahinmi. Remember, Payton started early in the season before he got hurt. He's due back in 2 weeks.
I suppose NY is one of the few teams with a bad enough front office to be fooled by IT's counting stats. I'd definitely pull the trigger on the deal if NY would go for it. Gibson would be a great influence on our young bigs.
The other advantage is that both Gibson and Payton have team options next year (well, Payton is non-guaranteed, which is practically the same thing). That gives us a little more trade flexibility. We could, for example, opt to keep them next year if we needed their salaries as ballast to make an offseason trade.
Ehhh... Not even that great for us either. Both have 1M guaranteed, so thats 2M in cap space we give up next year even if we decline the option.
Actually both guys aren't guaranteed unless they haven't been cut by June 28, 2020. So basically, the 2nd year is not guaranteed. And even if that $1M was guaranteed, it doesn't matter. The Wizards will be well under the luxtax with no capability of getting to the tax even if they resign Bertans and a full MLE free agent.
I'd really like this deal because I really like Taj Gibson. He'd be a great veteran mentor and help teach our young bigs toughness and defensive aptitude. I'd love for Rui to be exactly like Gibson on D (but with Rui's superior offensive gifts).
No kidding!
I fail to see any benefit whatever to the Knicks in this trade. No FO would be bad enough to go for it.




















