sunsbg wrote:bwgood77 wrote:sunsbg wrote:
Somehow all people in the organization have a very bad eye for basketball despite being ex-players, so they can't figure out Mikal is not only a better fit, but also much better player. Or maybe they see something that all the advanced stat gurus don't see. Not sure. I would wait for Bridges to break the 10ppg barrier before using any kind of stats to show he's a better O player than Oubre, who happens to create his own shot.
Yeah, not sure why the people in the organization can't see it. I imagine the injury to Mikal in preseason and the early struggle with the shot hurt, but hopefully they see it soon.
Doesn't matter if you can create your own shot if you are not as efficient as teammates who should be taking them. He plays 1 on 1 ball (or 1 on 3 or 4). I didn't much like when Booker did it, but I sure as hell would rather see that than Oubre trying it in an ugly way.
I am pretty surprised people judge how good players are so much on PPG these days.
I judge the players only based on what I see.
The advanced stats will only tell you Mikal is efficient on O in the Spurs game(one putback), while you can see he's a no-show once again.
You also greatly overrate his D. Once again nothing special 1-on-1, Derozan scored with easy on two occasions against him. They don't even use him to defend the best player most of the time, which should be the case if he really was anything close to elite on D.
At this point I'll take CJ before the other two SFs.
Weird you don't think he's a great defender, but not worth arguing that. Again Bridges doesn't show up? Sure, he may not be taking shots, and is only 1-2, but Oubre is 2-10. I'd rather the former , by A LOT.