WeekapaugGroove wrote:th87 wrote:If they lose with Rodgers ignoring open receivers and taking sacks and/or turtling up the offense too early, that will mean something.
"How" matters.
So are you suggesting they move on from Rodgers or fire MLF?
Honestly I'm kind of lost on what's even debated at this point. We have 14 weeks of evidence of what this team is, they can look good at times and they can bog down and not look good at others. Nobody thinks this is some juggernaut or the SB favorite but they are 11-3 which puts them right in a group of 5 NFC teams all within a game of each other and all with strengths and weakness, good wins and bad losses. The playoffs should be interesting because the NFC looks pretty level, probably comes down to injuries and matchups. One example of how flat this conference is, if the season ended today the 4-6 seeds would all have a better point differential than 1-3
Also it's fair to say this team has already exceeded preseason expectations.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using
RealGM mobile app
I'm saying that it's wrong to sarcastically dismiss legitimate concerns, particularly by attributing strawmen to them. There's a group here that does it every year, and every year it's those exact concerns that end up being our demise. You'd think they'd learn by now. For example, in years past, people would say that TT blew the drafts, and it's necessary to dabble in FA'cy to address a shallow talent pool. The opposing group would dismiss that concern by asserting that all teams have weaknesses (true; but real contenders' weaknesses are not so glaring), and then apply a position that these concerned people want to splurge on Day 1 free agents a'la the Redskins, and then argue against that position (which was never the argument). But lo and behold, the Packers finally decided to take the FA'cy approach that the concerned always wanted, and the results are far superior.
Today, my concern is that this team could be a legitimate contender/favorite/juggernaut, only if someone can figure out what is up with Rodgers mentally. You look at games from 2014, and he's setting his feet, stepping up in the pocket, sliding around and then re-setting in the pocket. Blitzing him was suicide, he'd call the right protections, and he'd anticipate receivers coming open. Now he rarely steps up in the pocket and bails out and rolls out early, holds the ball, takes unnecessary sacks, and often misses optimal timing windows. It's a mystery. Physically, he looks okay (maybe deep and short accuracy isn't what it once was, but still good). If we lose in the playoffs, I predict that this will be what does us in. And then we'll need to discuss whether it's time to find his successor.