NippySudz wrote:...No one is saying there aren't concerns but one game of shamet shooting poorly isnt indicative of anything long term. He shot well last game. Where you then?
You JUST said... nm...
NippySudz wrote:... The goal of the regular season is to build championship habits. Not already have them. That doesn't happen. A good win doesn't mean it's a perfect win
PPECISELY! WTF do you think I'm posting about!? Now, Now, NOW is the time to ingrain those 'championship habits'. Prodding Lou Williams to go off to bailey you out against the Suns... that's 8th-Seed level stuff. I'd prefer Landry Shamet getting those 3pt attempts, Pat Bev needs to knock the rust off too... they are our 3-range weapons that need to be honed, if we want contend for the title.
Paul George playing Kobe-ball (er, and being ALLOWED to) is not optimizing the potential of the TEAM! Dude could be as smooth as f&ck, no need to be forcing sh%t. He should be looking for open shooters (Patt, Sham, Bev, JaMyke)... so as to (1) give them their reps and (2) to make opponents pay for the double/triple-teams (and in turn opening things up for himself).
NippySudz wrote:...If the clips won by 5, and I'd say it was a good win, you would be saying they should smack the phx sun, especially without booker!Seriously, that was your complaint about the chicago game. someone wants to have it both ways. What did you want from the clips facing a non-contender? 150-30?
Good =/= perfect
They still got work to do! But to say it wasn't a good win, holding a team under 100pts and beating a team by 20 is just laughable.
When we start seeing the Clippers run smoothly for long stretches of game-time... then we'll have "good wins."