ImageImageImageImage

Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET

Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass

ezzzp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,425
And1: 3,462
Joined: Aug 25, 2009
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#441 » by ezzzp » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:00 pm

Knightro wrote:
The one glaring issue with what your saying is that Denver, despite maintaining a “winning” infrastructure and culture in their post Melo transition, would certainly not be a contender right now and maybe not even a playoff team at all without the historically good fortune of lucking into a top 10 NBA player with the 41st pick.

Denver without landing Jokic would basically be the Magic right now. A 6-8 seed at best.

All the stuff they did is post Melo is all well and good, and I do understand why you/anyone would prefer to remain competitive v. straight up tanking, but let’s not kid ourselves here. The Nuggets were not going to be able to move forward in a significant way without Jokic and getting a player that good that late is a once in a generation type lucky break for a franchise.

A whole heck of a lot more superstar players and all-star players are drafted in the top half of the lottery than not, ya know?

Citing like extreme good luck outliers like Jokic and Giannis and as franchises to model just doesn’t seem like a particularly wise strategy.


...and Minnesota with #1 Wiggins AND #1 KAT are a lottery team for half decade and counting with exception of one year when Jimmy Butler a 30th PICK carried them to 1st playoff appearance since 12 years of tanking for that "superstar."

Draft anomalies occur all over the draft, drafting a superstar in the high lottery is just as much an anomaly as it is outside of it. Its not unprecedented that many of the top players right now weren't top picks.

In addition, while more all-star players might be drafted at top of draft, the team that drafts them rarely reaps the benefits because of player movement, cap issues, bad development due to tank conditions, W-L issues related to too much youth etc etc etc.

The vast majority of "stars" get poached just as they enter their prime by teams that have winning cultures and/or desirable markets.
If you weren't aware, prime is when the vast majority of those "stars" carry teams deep into the playoffs.

Surely as a Magic fan you should know that.
User avatar
Xatticus
Head Coach
Posts: 6,787
And1: 8,279
Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Location: the land of the blind
         

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#442 » by Xatticus » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:00 pm

ezzzp wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
ezzzp wrote:
If you want to downplay skill development as if it isn't one of the most crucial parts of young player development, go right ahead.

...AND even if you want to dismiss it as just about working out, go listen to that Woj interview + a couple other ones he gave around same time. In them VO states that he didn't learn how to properly train until he got to OKC...and in fact, he credits a lot of his improved conditioning as the big factor to his break out year.

he was 4 years and Indiana, a major basketball university, and then on an NBA team. yeah im calling BS on that. maybe he didnt "want" to workout, but he knew how and what to do. OKC seemed to put the drive in him to finally get in shape

he went to Indiana 6'3 180 and 4 years later was at 213 lbs. so yeah, he knew how to work out.
high school
Spoiler:
Image


college
Spoiler:
Image


If you want to ignore Oladipo's words, the words of the FO who pointed to condition of team infrastructure, the words of reporters who weren't even looking for that information...go right ahead :lol:

...oh, here is picture Oladipo literally posted about how his body changed after learning how to train correctly

Image


He went to Miami to work with a personal trainer that summer. I'm sure some teams are better than others when it comes to providing resources for development, but this isn't really an example of that.
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991
User avatar
j-ragg
RealGM
Posts: 18,332
And1: 11,680
Joined: Mar 31, 2005
Location: the don't re-sign Hedo bandwagon.
   

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#443 » by j-ragg » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:04 pm

I would hope with world class professionals Oladipo didn't need 5 years in the league to learn how to shed his baby fat.
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
ezzzp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,425
And1: 3,462
Joined: Aug 25, 2009
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#444 » by ezzzp » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:06 pm

Xatticus wrote:
ezzzp wrote:
If you want to ignore Oladipo's words, the words of the FO who pointed to condition of team infrastructure, the words of reporters who weren't even looking for that information...go right ahead :lol:

...oh, here is picture Oladipo literally posted about how his body changed after learning how to train correctly

Spoiler:
Image


He went to Miami to work with a personal trainer that summer. I'm sure some teams are better than others when it comes to providing resources for development, but this isn't really an example of that.


Oladipo literally said that he learned how to train properly after leaving Orlando; where he did it doesn't excuse Orlando for having a crap barebones infrastructure that got that way because of the fiscal cutbacks of tanking.
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,918
And1: 14,847
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#445 » by tiderulz » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:08 pm

ezzzp wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
ezzzp wrote:
If you want to downplay skill development as if it isn't one of the most crucial parts of young player development, go right ahead.

...AND even if you want to dismiss it as just about working out, go listen to that Woj interview + a couple other ones he gave around same time. In them VO states that he didn't learn how to properly train until he got to OKC...and in fact, he credits a lot of his improved conditioning as the big factor to his break out year.

he was 4 years and Indiana, a major basketball university, and then on an NBA team. yeah im calling BS on that. maybe he didnt "want" to workout, but he knew how and what to do. OKC seemed to put the drive in him to finally get in shape

he went to Indiana 6'3 180 and 4 years later was at 213 lbs. so yeah, he knew how to work out.
high school
Spoiler:
Image


college
Spoiler:
Image


If you want to ignore Oladipo's words, the words of the FO who pointed to condition of team infrastructure, the words of reporters who weren't even looking for that information...go right ahead :lol:

...oh, here is picture Oladipo literally posted about how his body changed after learning how to train correctly

Image

that is drive. Because that left image was chubbier than when he was at Indiana. we will all believe what we want. i cant believe a athlete at a major university doesnt know how to work out, especially one who was there for 4 years. They have strength and conditioning coaches working individual plans with athletes. I know at Bama, most players have said they worked out the hardest while at Alabama then they did after they left
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 28,160
And1: 29,350
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#446 » by Knightro » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:13 pm

ezzzp wrote:My wires weren't crossed.

My comment was in response to your claim that: the only reason Denver was not a perennial 6-8 seed was because they got
lucky in the draft.

My comment clearly states that "luck" is nearly always a factor.

You are the one that tried to dismiss Denver's success as different than other top teams because they just got "all-time lucky break by stumbling into a top 10 NBA talent."


Just for the record when someone is trying to apologize to you for accidentally misquoting you, it’s good form to simply say thank you for the apology and not double down on being defensive or hard done by. But you do you.
ezzzp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,425
And1: 3,462
Joined: Aug 25, 2009
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#447 » by ezzzp » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:14 pm

j-ragg wrote:I would hope with world class professionals Oladipo didn't need 5 years in the league to learn how to shed his baby fat.


Yet, right there is an image he posted about how it did.

But it seems pretty clear that the tank faithful just don't want to face evidence of collateral damage of that strategy...and instead resort to semantic arguments or disregard literal statements by players, new FO, and media to just make it go away.
ezzzp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,425
And1: 3,462
Joined: Aug 25, 2009
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#448 » by ezzzp » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:17 pm

Knightro wrote:
Just for the record when someone is trying to apologize to you for accidentally misquoting you, it’s good form to simply say thank you for the apology and not double down on being defensive or hard done by. But you do you.


Just for the record, I know backhanded remark when I see it...especially when it uses bold colors. :lol:

But you do you.
User avatar
j-ragg
RealGM
Posts: 18,332
And1: 11,680
Joined: Mar 31, 2005
Location: the don't re-sign Hedo bandwagon.
   

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#449 » by j-ragg » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:28 pm

ezzzp wrote:
Knightro wrote:
Just for the record when someone is trying to apologize to you for accidentally misquoting you, it’s good form to simply say thank you for the apology and not double down on being defensive or hard done by. But you do you.


Just for the record, I know backhanded remark when I see it...especially when it uses bold colors. :lol:

But you do you.

Must be tough having to deal with all of us idiots on here on a daily basis.
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 28,160
And1: 29,350
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#450 » by Knightro » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:30 pm

ezzzp wrote:Draft anomalies occur all over the draft, drafting a superstar in the high lottery is just as much an anomaly as it is outside of it. Its not unprecedented that many of the top players right now weren't top picks.


This is not really all that accurate when you really dive into the numbers.

Considering the genesis of this conversation is Jokic, let's talk about second round picks.

There have been 330 second round picks made since 2009.

Only three of them - Isaiah Thomas, Draymond Green and Nikola Jokic - have made an All-NBA team (someone I would consider a superstar player). That's under 1 percent.

In that same time frame, 16 of 110 top 10 selections have made an All-NBA team with at least 2 more and possibly as many as 4 more coming this season.

Look at last year's all-star game...

27 players were selected. 15 of them were picked in the top 5. 20 of them were picked in the top 10.

Again, I'm not knocking scouting or player development because I think both of those things are important, but at the end of the day a LOT more all-star and superstar players are drafted near the top of the draft than not.

Citing teams that have gotten above and beyond lucky and found high end guys late in the draft as organizations to try emulate is simply misguided.
ezzzp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,425
And1: 3,462
Joined: Aug 25, 2009
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#451 » by ezzzp » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:42 pm

j-ragg wrote:
ezzzp wrote:
Just for the record, I know backhanded remark when I see it...especially when it uses bold colors.

But you do you.

Must be tough having to deal with all of us idiots on here on a daily basis.


Is Knightro asking you to defend his honor? :lol:

go read his comment and see if you don't see it different...and no need to reply, its obvious what your response will be
ezzzp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,425
And1: 3,462
Joined: Aug 25, 2009
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#452 » by ezzzp » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:45 pm

Knightro wrote:
ezzzp wrote:Draft anomalies occur all over the draft, drafting a superstar in the high lottery is just as much an anomaly as it is outside of it. Its not unprecedented that many of the top players right now weren't top picks.


This is not really all that accurate when you really dive into the numbers.

Considering the genesis of this conversation is Jokic, let's talk about second round picks.

There have been 330 second round picks made since 2009.

Only three of them - Isaiah Thomas, Draymond Green and Nikola Jokic - have made an All-NBA team (someone I would consider a superstar player). That's under 1 percent.

In that same time frame, 16 of 110 top 10 selections have made an All-NBA team with at least 2 more and possibly as many as 4 more coming this season.

Look at last year's all-star game...

27 players were selected. 15 of them were picked in the top 5. 20 of them were picked in the top 10.

Again, I'm not knocking scouting or player development because I think both of those things are important, but at the end of the day a LOT more all-star and superstar players are drafted near the top of the draft than not.

Citing teams that have gotten above and beyond lucky and found high end guys late in the draft as organizations to try emulate is simply misguided.


Actually I have looked at the numbers closely...and studied them over the span of 3-4 years now. Its why I have that opinion now.

Also, your attempt to spin it to only 2nd rounders is cute, but not at all what my statement was...smh
User avatar
swarlesbarkley
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,061
And1: 2,157
Joined: Jun 18, 2014
   

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#453 » by swarlesbarkley » Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:52 pm

ezzzp wrote:
Knightro wrote:
ezzzp wrote:Draft anomalies occur all over the draft, drafting a superstar in the high lottery is just as much an anomaly as it is outside of it. Its not unprecedented that many of the top players right now weren't top picks.


This is not really all that accurate when you really dive into the numbers.

Considering the genesis of this conversation is Jokic, let's talk about second round picks.

There have been 330 second round picks made since 2009.

Only three of them - Isaiah Thomas, Draymond Green and Nikola Jokic - have made an All-NBA team (someone I would consider a superstar player). That's under 1 percent.

In that same time frame, 16 of 110 top 10 selections have made an All-NBA team with at least 2 more and possibly as many as 4 more coming this season.

Look at last year's all-star game...

27 players were selected. 15 of them were picked in the top 5. 20 of them were picked in the top 10.

Again, I'm not knocking scouting or player development because I think both of those things are important, but at the end of the day a LOT more all-star and superstar players are drafted near the top of the draft than not.

Citing teams that have gotten above and beyond lucky and found high end guys late in the draft as organizations to try emulate is simply misguided.


Actually I have looked at the numbers closely...and studied them over the span of 3-4 years now. Its why I have that opinion now.

Also, your attempt to spin it to only 2nd rounders is cute, but not at all what my statement was...smh


So what's the hit ratio of superstars drafted in the lottery vs outside the lottery? I'm interested in seeing these numbers.
User avatar
Xatticus
Head Coach
Posts: 6,787
And1: 8,279
Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Location: the land of the blind
         

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#454 » by Xatticus » Fri Dec 20, 2019 9:25 pm

ezzzp wrote:
Knightro wrote:
ezzzp wrote:Draft anomalies occur all over the draft, drafting a superstar in the high lottery is just as much an anomaly as it is outside of it. Its not unprecedented that many of the top players right now weren't top picks.


This is not really all that accurate when you really dive into the numbers.

Considering the genesis of this conversation is Jokic, let's talk about second round picks.

There have been 330 second round picks made since 2009.

Only three of them - Isaiah Thomas, Draymond Green and Nikola Jokic - have made an All-NBA team (someone I would consider a superstar player). That's under 1 percent.

In that same time frame, 16 of 110 top 10 selections have made an All-NBA team with at least 2 more and possibly as many as 4 more coming this season.

Look at last year's all-star game...

27 players were selected. 15 of them were picked in the top 5. 20 of them were picked in the top 10.

Again, I'm not knocking scouting or player development because I think both of those things are important, but at the end of the day a LOT more all-star and superstar players are drafted near the top of the draft than not.

Citing teams that have gotten above and beyond lucky and found high end guys late in the draft as organizations to try emulate is simply misguided.


Actually I have looked at the numbers closely...and studied them over the span of 3-4 years now. Its why I have that opinion now.

Also, your attempt to spin it to only 2nd rounders is cute, but not at all what my statement was...smh


https://www.82games.com/barzilai1.htm

This is a topic that has been studied extensively. There is plenty of data out there and the results are demonstrably clear and unambiguous. There are no guarantees, but there is obviously more value in higher draft picks. The relationship isn't complex or difficult to understand. Further, these results are eminently predictable on the basis of logic and the basic assumption that NBA front offices aren't completely incompetent.

It's great to strike gold in the second round, but relying on that strain of luck is a fool's gambit. If you are defending the decisions of this front office on the basis of that luck working out for select other organizations, then I feel obligated to inform you that you are fighting a losing battle.

You can't keep attributing the successes of Ujiri or Milwaukee to our front office. It's akin to crediting Hennigan for the successes of San Antonio or Oklahoma City. Nor can you sustain this argument about creating an environment conducive to cultivating talent when there are innumerable examples to refute it. The Bulls cleared the decks for Jordan. Seattle/OKC did the same for Durant/ Westbrook. Talent wins. If you don't have it, you should be trying to get it.
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991
ezzzp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,425
And1: 3,462
Joined: Aug 25, 2009
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#455 » by ezzzp » Fri Dec 20, 2019 9:33 pm

swarlesbarkley wrote:So what's the hit ratio of superstars drafted in the lottery vs outside the lottery? I'm interested in seeing these numbers.


Its all there for free to do your own research and come to your own conclusions.

You'll be surprised by what you find. While there is definitely an advantage in top of the lottery all-stars, the % differential is not as wide a margin as you'd expect especially as you gradually drop off from very top. Then when you add in that the sample size is so small you really have to be wanting hard to make it meaningful.

I was a pro-tanking early on in Magic rebuild, but over time I started to look at how other teams were rebuilding, and eventually I started to change my opinion. Once I decided to look at the numbers that tank theory refers to - immediately its hard to not notice that not only is the sample size tiny, but that much of the data is from when players entered the NBA at much later age, plus other factors that made much of that already small amount of information unstable. If you correct for that, it just makes the sample size even smaller and thus less meaningful.

The clincher for me was when I looked into how many top picks actually led their drafting teams into contention or even winning teams for that matter. What I found was that while there is odds advantage to draft star higher, player movement (for many reasons) stops contention or peak stardom to occur on team that drafted player from actually happening most of the time or if it does its only for a short tail end. More often than not, its the quality competitive franchises or destination markets that swoop in and poach those stars just as they are entering their prime (which is age when most stars carry their team deep into contention). Its those franchises that usually reap the rewards, not the original draft team.

Which is why, now my perspective is that as small market team the Magic needs to remain competitive to maximize all of its levers of talent acquisition. Its no secret that best player development context is to be on a competitive team playing at least 82 meaningful games. That is also good for trade value of most players as well. Competitive context also makes the team more appealing in free agency. This doesn't mean to focus team on veterans, it means to have balance approach to improve all 3 options .

Its why I have been adamant all along that Bamba's role not be taken away despite early poor play, or that the Magic not trade for a vet guard that might take the ball out of Fultz' hands etc. While at same time understanding that Vucevic and Ross were important to keep the floor of this team at reasonably competitive level so that it maintains the context I explained in paragraph above.
ezzzp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,425
And1: 3,462
Joined: Aug 25, 2009
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#456 » by ezzzp » Fri Dec 20, 2019 9:42 pm

Xatticus wrote:
https://www.82games.com/barzilai1.htm

This is a topic that has been studied extensively. There is plenty of data out there and the results are demonstrably clear and unambiguous. There are no guarantees, but there is obviously more value in higher draft picks. The relationship isn't complex or difficult to understand. Further, these results are eminently predictable on the basis of logic and the basic assumption that NBA front offices aren't completely incompetent.

It's great to strike gold in the second round, but relying on that strain of luck is a fool's gambit. If you are defending the decisions of this front office on the basis of that luck working out for select other organizations, then I feel obligated to inform you that you are fighting a losing battle.

You can't keep attributing the successes of Ujiri or Milwaukee to our front office. It's akin to crediting Hennigan for the successes of San Antonio or Oklahoma City. Nor can you sustain this argument about creating an environment conducive to cultivating talent when there are innumerable examples to refute it. The Bulls cleared the decks for Jordan. Seattle/OKC did the same for Durant/ Westbrook. Talent wins. If you don't have it, you should be trying to get it.


Surely you see the sample size issues...or that a lot of the information is from when players entered NBA at a much later age and other era related contexts...or that when you add in the reality of player movement that means that a lot of that data excludes that in majority of cases the player wasn't even on the team that drafted them for the key chunk of peak numbers.

...and that was before the anti-tanking measures were implemented.

Hammond literally picked Giannis...he was the GM that drafted him, how is he not responsible....and there are not innumerable examples that dispute the idea of "environment conducive to cultivating talent," there are anomalies, I can point to same in other direction.
Bensational
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,282
And1: 13,734
Joined: Apr 10, 2001
     

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#457 » by Bensational » Fri Dec 20, 2019 11:26 pm

If your team is a fringe playoff team without an obvious cornerstone player, then you're just making the job harder by hoping to land one with a 14-18 pick than you are landing one with a 1-5 pick.

Yes, the results are hit and miss both ways. Giannis is the result of a 1/14 chance, Jokic was a 1/41 chance, Luka was a 1/3 chance.

Relying on 13-40 other teams not selecting your future superstar is a risky move. All the praise about implementing better development and scouting isn't worth anything unless you make the best pick with what you have. Ie, selecting Ayton/Bagley over Luka, or the 13 players before Giannis.

We are in the position of still requiring a foundation piece to build around. Pretending that selecting from the late lottery/mid first round to try to find that talent is anything but a disadvantage to drafting from higher up in the lottery is purely wishful thinking. Yes, stars can be found from that range, but assuming it will happen is riskier than ensuring you've got one before you take your team to a competitive level.
User avatar
Def Swami
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 25,970
And1: 15,369
Joined: Aug 04, 2008
Location: Huevos Bancheros Brunch
Contact:
   

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#458 » by Def Swami » Fri Dec 20, 2019 11:46 pm

ezzzp, I think we agree on what the Magic's "process" is laid out to be in relation to other teams (Nuggets, Raptors), but I think we differ on our belief in the front office to carry this out to success.

While I believe the intent of these franchises are similar, I do not believe the process has yielded the same results for us. I can get on board with Weltman and Hammond trying to stay competitive, build a more fortified infrastructure, create a culture of work, and build off their scouting and smart drafts, trades, and signings. As much as I hate to admit it, I admire a team like the Heat, who are building a deep playoff team with undrafted players like Kendrick Nunn and Duncan Robinson and maximizing their mid-lottery picks like Bam Adebayo and Tyler Herro. A lot of this probably doesn't come together without Jimmy Butler, which is what I think others are getting at. At some point, you need a top 20 guy in the league to propel a team to relevance. I don't even really care about how you get that player so long as it happens some way (2nd round of the draft vs trade vs lottery pick, etc).

But it's the other stuff (the smart free agency signings, the finding hidden talent to complement a roster, and making smart trade) that other teams like the Raptors, Nuggets, Heat, Pacers do really well that I do not believe the Magic have earned the recognition for. You can argue that these other front offices have longer track records and more years of a resume than Weltman and Hammond, which is fair, and is why I'm open to giving Weltman and Hammond this season to further improve the roster. But, I don't believe they've had any signature moves that ultimately changes the ceiling of this team that those other teams have made. The draft hasn't yielded a player on the level of Jamal Murray or Nikola Jokic with mid-lottery picks or mid-2nd round picks. There hasn't been a G League developmental wonder like Pascal Siakam or Fred Van Vleet.

I don't even really care if the Magic choose to never tank. But, if that's the strategy, they have to capitalize on the draft regardless of where they pick. Isaac is a really good defensive player who floats in and out of offense. The jury is out on Bamba, but has had a rough go of it thus far. Time will tell on Okeke. None of these players are changing the fortunes of the franchise. Again, I can buy that this outlook changes over the course of 1-2 more seasons. The early returns are pretty hazy at the moment.

I know that Hammond and Weltman were part of those franchises and they deserve some credit for that track record. There are a lot of good players acquired during the their tenures there. I just wonder at what point, in an inherently competitive game of talent acquisition, their seats get warm. Unfortunately for them, it's a results based business, regardless of what your process is. I don't know how many teams afford their front offices more than 3 seasons to show some growth before an ownership/fan base gets antsy. 3 seasons is a lot of time for a front office to change the complexion, ceiling, competitiveness of a roster in a substantial way. To this point, I'm quite dubious that they've made the complimentary moves that other franchises have made to bolster their fortunes. And they've certainly been unable to add the game-changing talent that some of the other more competitive front offices have done.
ezzzp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,425
And1: 3,462
Joined: Aug 25, 2009
 

Re: Regular Season Game 28: Orlando Magic (12-15) at Denver Nuggets (17-8) - 9pm ET 

Post#459 » by ezzzp » Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:48 am

Def Swami wrote:ezzzp, I think we agree on what the Magic's "process" is laid out to be in relation to other teams (Nuggets, Raptors), but I think we differ on our belief in the front office to carry this out to success.

While I believe the intent of these franchises are similar, I do not believe the process has yielded the same results for us. I can get on board with Weltman and Hammond trying to stay competitive, build a more fortified infrastructure, create a culture of work, and build off their scouting and smart drafts, trades, and signings. As much as I hate to admit it, I admire a team like the Heat, who are building a deep playoff team with undrafted players like Kendrick Nunn and Duncan Robinson and maximizing their mid-lottery picks like Bam Adebayo and Tyler Herro. A lot of this probably doesn't come together without Jimmy Butler, which is what I think others are getting at. At some point, you need a top 20 guy in the league to propel a team to relevance. I don't even really care about how you get that player so long as it happens some way (2nd round of the draft vs trade vs lottery pick, etc).

But it's the other stuff (the smart free agency signings, the finding hidden talent to complement a roster, and making smart trade) that other teams like the Raptors, Nuggets, Heat, Pacers do really well that I do not believe the Magic have earned the recognition for. You can argue that these other front offices have longer track records and more years of a resume than Weltman and Hammond, which is fair, and is why I'm open to giving Weltman and Hammond this season to further improve the roster. But, I don't believe they've had any signature moves that ultimately changes the ceiling of this team that those other teams have made. The draft hasn't yielded a player on the level of Jamal Murray or Nikola Jokic with mid-lottery picks or mid-2nd round picks. There hasn't been a G League developmental wonder like Pascal Siakam or Fred Van Vleet.

I don't even really care if the Magic choose to never tank. But, if that's the strategy, they have to capitalize on the draft regardless of where they pick. Isaac is a really good defensive player who floats in and out of offense. The jury is out on Bamba, but has had a rough go of it thus far. Time will tell on Okeke. None of these players are changing the fortunes of the franchise. Again, I can buy that this outlook changes over the course of 1-2 more seasons. The early returns are pretty hazy at the moment.

I know that Hammond and Weltman were part of those franchises and they deserve some credit for that track record. There are a lot of good players acquired during the their tenures there. I just wonder at what point, in an inherently competitive game of talent acquisition, their seats get warm. Unfortunately for them, it's a results based business, regardless of what your process is. I don't know how many teams afford their front offices more than 3 seasons to show some growth before an ownership/fan base gets antsy. 3 seasons is a lot of time for a front office to change the complexion, ceiling, competitiveness of a roster in a substantial way. To this point, I'm quite dubious that they've made the complimentary moves that other franchises have made to bolster their fortunes. And they've certainly been unable to add the game-changing talent that some of the other more competitive front offices have done.


Teams give their FO's at least +4 years to produce "results," as the vast majority of GM contracts are 5 years. BUT how each team defines "results" varies from market to market...and within that "results" varies enormously depending on where team was at start of that FO's tenure.

The Magic hired Jeff Weltman on May 22, 2017. That means that he's had barely 2.5 years to turn around a +6 year tailspin. Weltman walked into a PR disaster with Magic the laughing stock of the NBA. He walked into a roster full of distressed assets with a nightmare cap situation. The DeVos' family knows that.

And as I posted earlier: "When Weltman came in he found a basketball operations program that was bare bones, if present at all. He was building a lot of things from the ground up." LINK

In that short period, Weltman has already altered composition of franchise enough to get them into playoffs for the first time in 7 years. People will try to downplay that by saying the East was/is weak, but that's been true for years - even during the Dwight years.

In his first summer, Weltman acquired Isaac + assets that became Fultz. That's two of the Magic's highest upside pieces. In his second summer he drafted Bamba + re-signed Gordon to a team friendly contract that will make him a very nice trade asset this summer.

I have way more confidence in the future of Isaac, Fultz, Okeke and Bamba than what you are giving them.

Isaac to me is a player that will be in mix for DPOY throughout his career. That is a fundamental and crucial piece to nearly every contention caliber team. While his offense is still a work in progress, there is a LOT to like at this very early stage.

Fultz, at 21 + having not yet even breached 1400 NBA minutes (aka rookie year minutes), is already a very solid rotation PG. My floor for him is a better scoring Rubio; if he gets to point were he's high volume efficient mid range shooter he'll be a DeRozan type scorer; if his 3pt shot develops he'll be an All-Star level PG.

Bamba to me has physical attributes and skill combination that has potential to be a serious impact level player. We can already see how he alters the floor defensively when he's clicking and how quickly he can rack up points. That's with him in a very early raw stage.

Every forum regular knows I'm very high on Okeke, as I was one of very few defenders of him over NAW.

...for now all we can do is speculate about those player's future without an answer as that's 2-3 years down the road. But I definitely like the direction and how the FO has handled digging out of the hole the organization was in.

Return to Orlando Magic