Image ImageImage Image

NBA Trade Thread

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,765
And1: 9,345
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#341 » by Dez » Fri Dec 27, 2019 3:53 am

HomoSapien wrote:
According to the source, another player the Knicks are expected to monitor is local product, Karl Anthony-Towns, the Timberwolves’ 24-year-old superstar who also signed a max extension this summer.

In an era when stars have shunned the Knicks (Irving, Kevin Durant, Kemba Walker, Leonard), it’s only logical Towns would intrigue the front office.

The first pick of the 2015 draft, Towns hails from Metuchen, N.J., and grew up a diehard Knicks’ fan. If he sought a trade, his wish list figures to include the Knicks.

The Timberwolves have enjoyed little success during Towns’ tenure and are currently on an 11-game losing streak, dropping to 13th place in the Western Conference at 10-19. Towns, averaging 26.5 points and 11.7 rebounds, has been out the past few games with a knee sprain.


https://nypost.com/2019/12/25/knicks-karl-anthony-towns-trade-whispers-are-beginning-to-grow/

I'd like us to be monitoring him too. I know he's considered soft and not a winner, but his talent is undeniable and he's extremely productive. I would be offer Lauri, Carter, Coby, our 1st, and Thad Young (for salary purposes) without any hesitation.

At that point, it would leave us with a strong 1-2 punch of KAT and LaVine, with Porter, Sato, and Dunn being the key role players. Obviously, it still has some holes but I sure like that core's potential way more than our current one.


All three of Lauri, Carter and White is overkill, two of the three is as far as I would go.
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,570
And1: 4,356
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#342 » by pipfan » Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:01 am

What about Carter, White, Young and the Billy King special of 3 unprotected 1sts?
Imagine
Sato/Dunn
Lavine/Valentine
Porter/Hutchinson
Lauri/?
Towns/Gafford

That team could be NASTY if healthy. Lavine can be a good 2nd option
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,765
And1: 9,345
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#343 » by Dez » Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:07 am

pipfan wrote:What about Carter, White, Young and the Billy King special of 3 unprotected 1sts?
Imagine
Sato/Dunn
Lavine/Valentine
Porter/Hutchinson
Lauri/?
Towns/Gafford

That team could be NASTY if healthy. Lavine can be a good 2nd option


3 unprotected firsts? It was stupid when Billy King did it and it would be stupid now.
Rose2Boozer
Veteran
Posts: 2,661
And1: 826
Joined: Apr 07, 2011

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#344 » by Rose2Boozer » Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:11 am

Dwayne Dedmond has requested a trade from Sacramento. I'd gladly ship Young out for Dedmond.
ROLES & HOLES
cool007
RealGM
Posts: 17,818
And1: 3,113
Joined: Feb 03, 2005

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#345 » by cool007 » Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:38 am

If Minny is stupid enough to trade KAT, I would jump on board super quick.

I would trade Lauri or Wendell, our 1st round pick as main pieces and whatever else they might want except Lavine.
cool007
RealGM
Posts: 17,818
And1: 3,113
Joined: Feb 03, 2005

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#346 » by cool007 » Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:41 am

On another thought, who are we kidding? We have one of the most laziest and the least creative front office who are no where near bold enough to make a trade for an all-star/superstar caliber player.

They rather just assemble the assets that they can overvalue while Bulls just don't go anywhere other than lottery bound.
cool007
RealGM
Posts: 17,818
And1: 3,113
Joined: Feb 03, 2005

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#347 » by cool007 » Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:59 am

If we are really shooting for playoffs in the east, I think it would be a no brainer to trade for Chris Paul. Yes, he has a HUGE contract but he is the perfect point guard that we need. With him on the floor, we will have a coach on the floor when the game is close in the 4th. With him on the team, he will help Lauri reach his potential, Lavine would be great off the ball, he would be a great mentor to our young team.

I think with him on the Bulls team, everything can fall into place nicely and we will reach our potential sooner than later/never.

I think his contract would be well worth it for us - he wouldn't cost us too much either if OKC is trying to dump him?

I would do - CP3/Ferguson/Roberson for Otto/Sato/Felicio and a 2nd rounder. This way we have a good playmaking PG and a couple of wing players.
Ayman78
Sophomore
Posts: 183
And1: 51
Joined: Jan 03, 2018
         

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#348 » by Ayman78 » Sat Dec 28, 2019 7:29 am

cool007 wrote:If we are really shooting for playoffs in the east, I think it would be a no brainer to trade for Chris Paul. Yes, he has a HUGE contract but he is the perfect point guard that we need. With him on the floor, we will have a coach on the floor when the game is close in the 4th. With him on the team, he will help Lauri reach his potential, Lavine would be great off the ball, he would be a great mentor to our young team.

I think with him on the Bulls team, everything can fall into place nicely and we will reach our potential sooner than later/never.

I think his contract would be well worth it for us - he wouldn't cost us too much either if OKC is trying to dump him?

I would do - CP3/Ferguson/Roberson for Otto/Sato/Felicio and a 2nd rounder. This way we have a good playmaking PG and a couple of wing players.


I personally like the idea of CP3 on the Bulls. But, I also like Dennis Schroder if he's available for trade. A clean trade of Thad Young and a couple of 2nd round picks.

With Schroder the Bulls have a true lead gaurd and a more balanced team.

PG: Schroder/Dunn/Archie
SG: Lavine/White/Satoranský
SF: Porter/Hutchison
PF: Markkanen/Gafford/Kornet
C: Carter/Gafford/Kornet
Ayman78
Sophomore
Posts: 183
And1: 51
Joined: Jan 03, 2018
         

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#349 » by Ayman78 » Sat Dec 28, 2019 7:40 am

Anyone interested acquiring Lonzo Ball? If so what do you think is the trade assets would be required to make a trade happen.

Even though it's a pipe dream, but would you do a Zach Lavine for Ben Simmons plus filers? I see that trade being a win-win for both teams and players. Bulls get a legitimate star to build around, with a good foundation for a player like Simmons. The 76ers get a true outside elite scorer to play the 2nd option for Embied.
RakimAbdulJabar
Analyst
Posts: 3,162
And1: 4,180
Joined: Apr 16, 2016

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#350 » by RakimAbdulJabar » Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:32 am

Ayman78 wrote:Anyone interested acquiring Lonzo Ball? If so what do you think is the trade assets would be required to make a trade happen.

Even though it's a pipe dream, but would you do a Zach Lavine for Ben Simmons plus filers? I see that trade being a win-win for both teams and players. Bulls get a legitimate star to build around, with a good foundation for a player like Simmons. The 76ers get a true outside elite scorer to play the 2nd option for Embied.


A Ball/Simmons backcourt would be the most punchable Bulls duo since John Starks and anyone else that was standing next to him.

Also neither can shoot for ---- so I have no interest in them despite both being great defenders
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,765
And1: 9,345
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#351 » by Dez » Sat Dec 28, 2019 12:53 pm

RakimAbdulJabar wrote:
Ayman78 wrote:Anyone interested acquiring Lonzo Ball? If so what do you think is the trade assets would be required to make a trade happen.

Even though it's a pipe dream, but would you do a Zach Lavine for Ben Simmons plus filers? I see that trade being a win-win for both teams and players. Bulls get a legitimate star to build around, with a good foundation for a player like Simmons. The 76ers get a true outside elite scorer to play the 2nd option for Embied.


A Ball/Simmons backcourt would be the most punchable Bulls duo since John Starks and anyone else that was standing next to him.

Also neither can shoot for ---- so I have no interest in them despite both being great defenders


He wasn't advocating for a Simmons/Ball back-court just two players he's interested in.

Also what have either Ball or Simmons done to make them "punchable"?
Bulldog23
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,447
And1: 174
Joined: Oct 25, 2002

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#352 » by Bulldog23 » Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:29 pm

Not sure I see any trades that makes sense for the Bulls. Whatever talent is on the Bulls is under performing resulting in every aspect of the game looking poor. The Bulls need a versatile small forward who can guard 2 to 4, this would address some of the problems. I think in the end the Bulls might reboot again sell of the young guys to get a top pick to build around.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,528
And1: 9,264
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#353 » by sco » Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:18 pm

I would do Lauri and our unprotected 1st (plus filler) or Lauri/Otto/Cobi for KAT. Minny loves their northern Euro's - Lauri would be a fan fav there.

KAT has the cache to move Zach down in the pecking order. WCj wants to play PF and would still be a good complement to KAT.
:clap:
Phu317
Ballboy
Posts: 24
And1: 6
Joined: Nov 22, 2017

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#354 » by Phu317 » Sat Dec 28, 2019 3:35 pm

pipfan wrote:What about Carter, White, Young and the Billy King special of 3 unprotected 1sts?
Imagine
Sato/Dunn
Lavine/Valentine
Porter/Hutchinson
Lauri/?
Towns/Gafford

That team could be NASTY if healthy. Lavine can be a good 2nd option


If we are able to get Towns, I am all in. We have not been able to recruit a true star/superstar to the Bulls. However, trading multiple unprotected picks has been proven to be a failure. I would add Lauri in place of those picks. White/Carter/Lauri and fillers should be enough.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,528
And1: 9,264
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#355 » by sco » Sat Dec 28, 2019 4:00 pm

Phu317 wrote:
pipfan wrote:What about Carter, White, Young and the Billy King special of 3 unprotected 1sts?
Imagine
Sato/Dunn
Lavine/Valentine
Porter/Hutchinson
Lauri/?
Towns/Gafford

That team could be NASTY if healthy. Lavine can be a good 2nd option


If we are able to get Towns, I am all in. We have not been able to recruit a true star/superstar to the Bulls. However, trading multiple unprotected picks has been proven to be a failure. I would add Lauri in place of those picks. White/Carter/Lauri and fillers should be enough.

I feel like Towns/Lauri would be a terrible defensive combo - would rather include Lauri and cut number of 1sts to 1.
:clap:
User avatar
Repeat 3-peat
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 15,495
Joined: Nov 02, 2013
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#356 » by Repeat 3-peat » Sat Dec 28, 2019 4:49 pm

No on trading for KAT, or better yet any big man. This league is built on the perimeter.
Image
Louri
Senior
Posts: 631
And1: 351
Joined: Jun 28, 2017

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#357 » by Louri » Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:27 pm

Kuzma <—> Markkanen, make it happen.
"Larry Nance Jr is better than Lauri Markkanen" -RealGM 2021
Ayman78
Sophomore
Posts: 183
And1: 51
Joined: Jan 03, 2018
         

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#358 » by Ayman78 » Sun Dec 29, 2019 12:37 am

Dez wrote:
RakimAbdulJabar wrote:
Ayman78 wrote:Anyone interested acquiring Lonzo Ball? If so what do you think is the trade assets would be required to make a trade happen.

Even though it's a pipe dream, but would you do a Zach Lavine for Ben Simmons plus filers? I see that trade being a win-win for both teams and players. Bulls get a legitimate star to build around, with a good foundation for a player like Simmons. The 76ers get a true outside elite scorer to play the 2nd option for Embied.


A Ball/Simmons backcourt would be the most punchable Bulls duo since John Starks and anyone else that was standing next to him.

Also neither can shoot for ---- so I have no interest in them despite both being great defenders


He wasn't advocating for a Simmons/Ball back-court just two players he's interested in.

Also what have either Ball or Simmons done to make them "punchable"?


Thanks
RakimAbdulJabar
Analyst
Posts: 3,162
And1: 4,180
Joined: Apr 16, 2016

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#359 » by RakimAbdulJabar » Sun Dec 29, 2019 1:09 am

Dez wrote:
RakimAbdulJabar wrote:
Ayman78 wrote:Anyone interested acquiring Lonzo Ball? If so what do you think is the trade assets would be required to make a trade happen.

Even though it's a pipe dream, but would you do a Zach Lavine for Ben Simmons plus filers? I see that trade being a win-win for both teams and players. Bulls get a legitimate star to build around, with a good foundation for a player like Simmons. The 76ers get a true outside elite scorer to play the 2nd option for Embied.


A Ball/Simmons backcourt would be the most punchable Bulls duo since John Starks and anyone else that was standing next to him.

Also neither can shoot for ---- so I have no interest in them despite both being great defenders


He wasn't advocating for a Simmons/Ball back-court just two players he's interested in.

Also what have either Ball or Simmons done to make them "punchable"?


Whether it's both of them together or 1 of them, I don't like either. You don't have to do anything to have a punchable face, but Simmons has done more than enough to justify it
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,765
And1: 9,345
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread 

Post#360 » by Dez » Sun Dec 29, 2019 2:40 am

RakimAbdulJabar wrote:
Dez wrote:
RakimAbdulJabar wrote:
A Ball/Simmons backcourt would be the most punchable Bulls duo since John Starks and anyone else that was standing next to him.

Also neither can shoot for ---- so I have no interest in them despite both being great defenders


He wasn't advocating for a Simmons/Ball back-court just two players he's interested in.

Also what have either Ball or Simmons done to make them "punchable"?


Whether it's both of them together or 1 of them, I don't like either. You don't have to do anything to have a punchable face, but Simmons has done more than enough to justify it


By all means please elaborate on what he's done to justify it?

Return to Chicago Bulls