ImageImageImageImageImage

Kings Trade Thread

Moderators: codydaze, KF10

jayu70
RealGM
Posts: 20,508
And1: 13,044
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
   

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#581 » by jayu70 » Mon Dec 30, 2019 5:00 pm

City of Trees wrote:
jayu70 wrote:Hawks offer the expiring contract of Evan Turner for Dedmon and Ferrell.
Throw in a 2021 or 22 ATL 2nd and you got a deal.

Naah, he wants out, considered an overpay when he signed, now even more so. Kings get salary relief from his contract for next season.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,385
And1: 3,063
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#582 » by BoogieTime » Mon Dec 30, 2019 5:06 pm

jayu70 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:
jayu70 wrote:Hawks offer the expiring contract of Evan Turner for Dedmon and Ferrell.
Throw in a 2021 or 22 ATL 2nd and you got a deal.

Naah, he wants out, considered an overpay when he signed, now even more so. Kings get salary relief from his contract for next season.

Deal
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#583 » by City of Trees » Mon Dec 30, 2019 5:08 pm

jayu70 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:
jayu70 wrote:Hawks offer the expiring contract of Evan Turner for Dedmon and Ferrell.
Throw in a 2021 or 22 ATL 2nd and you got a deal.

Naah, he wants out, considered an overpay when he signed, now even more so. Kings get salary relief from his contract for next season.
Id like to keep Yogi out of this deal but if he's necessary id probably pull the trigger. Kings should feel good with a redo
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,816
And1: 20,377
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#584 » by dckingsfan » Mon Dec 30, 2019 5:40 pm

I guess we can say now that the off-season acquisitions of Dedmon, Ariza and Joseph were a disaster. Anything that moves Joseph and Dedmon would be a plus. Ariza is only partially guaranteed next year.
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#585 » by City of Trees » Mon Dec 30, 2019 6:05 pm

dckingsfan wrote:I guess we can say now that the off-season acquisitions of Dedmon, Ariza and Joseph were a disaster. Anything that moves Joseph and Dedmon would be a plus. Ariza is only partially guaranteed next year.
Is Joesph a disaster though? IMO he has done a good job filling in as a starter.
kalenclayton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,635
And1: 1,729
Joined: Feb 13, 2014
 

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#586 » by kalenclayton » Mon Dec 30, 2019 6:32 pm

City of Trees wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:I guess we can say now that the off-season acquisitions of Dedmon, Ariza and Joseph were a disaster. Anything that moves Joseph and Dedmon would be a plus. Ariza is only partially guaranteed next year.
Is Joesph a disaster though? IMO he has done a good job filling in as a starter.

This is something that has baffled me. Joseph was a really good acquisition imo. He filled in very nicely while Fox was out. His man defense is fantastic and he’s been really professional. I don’t see any major cons. We knew he couldn’t shoot very well. I see him as a positive. The money is a little high, but... to get people to come to Sac. That’s the cliche and it has rang true (outside of Richaun, which seems crazy to me that he lasted so long in FA).
kalenclayton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,635
And1: 1,729
Joined: Feb 13, 2014
 

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#587 » by kalenclayton » Mon Dec 30, 2019 6:43 pm

City of Trees wrote:
jayu70 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:Throw in a 2021 or 22 ATL 2nd and you got a deal.

Naah, he wants out, considered an overpay when he signed, now even more so. Kings get salary relief from his contract for next season.
Id like to keep Yogi out of this deal but if he's necessary id probably pull the trigger. Kings should feel good with a redo

I don’t like Yogi being in the deal because Fox has proven to be a little injury prone this season. With that being said, I’m with you on the part that a redo would feel good. The team doesn’t get cap space out of it though. They will already be operating as an “over the cap” next season with or without Dedmon’s deal. I think the Kings should be looking at deals that extend into next season to (1) get better value and (2) get a functional player. It could even be a rehab type of situation. I don’t see Turner as that. We would need to trade Bogi to give Turner the best opportunity.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#588 » by KF10 » Mon Dec 30, 2019 6:48 pm

Joseph is a liability on the offensive end. He misses open shots. The guy pounds the ball little too much to my likings.

His defense is solid but doesn’t move the needle or is a game changer there.

Personally, he is overpaid and isn’t worth the contract. It’s a disaster given how this current season is going.

At this point, the Kings should be offloading every large contract they have and tank.
kalenclayton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,635
And1: 1,729
Joined: Feb 13, 2014
 

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#589 » by kalenclayton » Mon Dec 30, 2019 6:59 pm

KF10 wrote:Joseph is a liability on the offensive end. He misses open shots. The guy pounds the ball little too much to my likings.

His defense is solid but doesn’t move the needle or is a game changer there.

Personally, he is overpaid and isn’t worth the contract. It’s a disaster given how this current season is going.

At this point, the Kings should be offloading every large contract they have and tank.

I’ll use the Hield/Dedmon fallacy here: if most of the off-season moves were disasters, then I don’t think CoJo was a disaster. He’s a degree of disaster, but Dedmon is by far the disaster of the offseason. Then it’s Ariza followed by CoJo. Holmes was the best signing we’ve made in possibly the last 10 years when you factor in production vs contract. Plus we got momma Holmes.

I agree that all the signings, sans Richaun, were overpays and we should move them. I just don’t see CoJo as much of a negative. When you need to shut a single player down, CoJo is capable of that. It’s the scheme that he’s not getting (along with everyone else on the team). He is a liability for shooting on offense, but not to the extent of, say, Rondo/MKG/Mbah a Moute. He’s just subpar in that area.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,966
And1: 12,091
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#590 » by LightTheBeam » Mon Dec 30, 2019 7:11 pm

kalenclayton wrote:
KF10 wrote:Joseph is a liability on the offensive end. He misses open shots. The guy pounds the ball little too much to my likings.

His defense is solid but doesn’t move the needle or is a game changer there.

Personally, he is overpaid and isn’t worth the contract. It’s a disaster given how this current season is going.

At this point, the Kings should be offloading every large contract they have and tank.

I’ll use the Hield/Dedmon fallacy here: if most of the off-season moves were disasters, then I don’t think CoJo was a disaster. He’s a degree of disaster, but Dedmon is by far the disaster of the offseason. Then it’s Ariza followed by CoJo. Holmes was the best signing we’ve made in possibly the last 10 years when you factor in production vs contract. Plus we got momma Holmes.

I agree that all the signings, sans Richaun, were overpays and we should move them. I just don’t see CoJo as much of a negative. When you need to shut a single player down, CoJo is capable of that. It’s the scheme that he’s not getting (along with everyone else on the team). He is a liability for shooting on offense, but not to the extent of, say, Rondo/MKG/Mbah a Moute. He’s just subpar in that area.


To me, Joseph was a bigger negative than Dedmon. Dedmon has a skill set that is wanted around the league, I don't think hes going to be that difficult to move. And honestly if it wasn't for Richaun beasting, I think we woulda stuck with him and he would have turned it around.

Joseph is worse than any other contract to me. Hes awful, hes easily one of the worst offensive players in the league and his defense doesn't justify that. Teams basically defend 4v5 everytime hes in the game. You see they sag off all game, then quickly recover if they need to. Yes we hung in while Fox/Bagley missed time, that was because Barnes, Bjelica, Bogdan, and Holmes had amazing Novembers and teams thought we would give up.

Joseph is going to prove to be untradable. Hes going to haunt us for the next 2 years.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,816
And1: 20,377
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#591 » by dckingsfan » Mon Dec 30, 2019 7:24 pm

kalenclayton wrote:
KF10 wrote:Joseph is a liability on the offensive end. He misses open shots. The guy pounds the ball little too much to my likings.

His defense is solid but doesn’t move the needle or is a game changer there.

Personally, he is overpaid and isn’t worth the contract. It’s a disaster given how this current season is going.

At this point, the Kings should be offloading every large contract they have and tank.

I’ll use the Hield/Dedmon fallacy here: if most of the off-season moves were disasters, then I don’t think CoJo was a disaster. He’s a degree of disaster, but Dedmon is by far the disaster of the offseason. Then it’s Ariza followed by CoJo. Holmes was the best signing we’ve made in possibly the last 10 years when you factor in production vs contract. Plus we got momma Holmes.

I agree that all the signings, sans Richaun, were overpays and we should move them. I just don’t see CoJo as much of a negative. When you need to shut a single player down, CoJo is capable of that. It’s the scheme that he’s not getting (along with everyone else on the team). He is a liability for shooting on offense, but not to the extent of, say, Rondo/MKG/Mbah a Moute. He’s just subpar in that area.

I think my original post just mentioned Dedmon, Ariza and Joseph as disasters - and I agree that there is a level of disaster to each of them.

I agree with KF10 - this season is basically done (we aren't playing .600 to finish the season) and we should unload the contracts, tank and rebuild (which should be done by the off-season). When I say tank - I don't mean intentionally losing - I just mean a quick reload for next season.

That Vlade missed on Dedmon, Ariza and Joseph doesn't mean he will miss again. He did bring us Holmes and Bjelica; and Hield/Barnes through trades - not to shabby.

If he can get anything for Dedmon, Ariza and Joseph, terrific. If he feels he needs to trade any of the expiring contracts (Yogi, Bogdan, Giles) to get some assets in the future - then you have to trust him. He has done a pretty good job stockpiling 2nd round picks. I thought he did a very solid job in having Barnes and Hield's contracts decrease over time. It makes space for Fox/Holmes in 2021 and Bagley in 2022.

Fox/Hield/Bagley seem to be the core - I could definitely understand if one thinks Barnes and Holmes are part of the core. But even then, I would take a NO/Clippers type of deal for any of our players.
kalenclayton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,635
And1: 1,729
Joined: Feb 13, 2014
 

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#592 » by kalenclayton » Mon Dec 30, 2019 7:25 pm

RipPizzaGuy wrote:
kalenclayton wrote:
KF10 wrote:Joseph is a liability on the offensive end. He misses open shots. The guy pounds the ball little too much to my likings.

His defense is solid but doesn’t move the needle or is a game changer there.

Personally, he is overpaid and isn’t worth the contract. It’s a disaster given how this current season is going.

At this point, the Kings should be offloading every large contract they have and tank.

I’ll use the Hield/Dedmon fallacy here: if most of the off-season moves were disasters, then I don’t think CoJo was a disaster. He’s a degree of disaster, but Dedmon is by far the disaster of the offseason. Then it’s Ariza followed by CoJo. Holmes was the best signing we’ve made in possibly the last 10 years when you factor in production vs contract. Plus we got momma Holmes.

I agree that all the signings, sans Richaun, were overpays and we should move them. I just don’t see CoJo as much of a negative. When you need to shut a single player down, CoJo is capable of that. It’s the scheme that he’s not getting (along with everyone else on the team). He is a liability for shooting on offense, but not to the extent of, say, Rondo/MKG/Mbah a Moute. He’s just subpar in that area.


To me, Joseph was a bigger negative than Dedmon. Dedmon has a skill set that is wanted around the league, I don't think hes going to be that difficult to move. And honestly if it wasn't for Richaun beasting, I think we woulda stuck with him and he would have turned it around.

Joseph is worse than any other contract to me. Hes awful, hes easily one of the worst offensive players in the league and his defense doesn't justify that. Teams basically defend 4v5 everytime hes in the game. You see they sag off all game, then quickly recover if they need to. Yes we hung in while Fox/Bagley missed time, that was because Barnes, Bjelica, Bogdan, and Holmes had amazing Novembers and teams thought we would give up.

Joseph is going to prove to be untradable. Hes going to haunt us for the next 2 years.

You might be right that if it wasn’t for Holmes, Dedmon wouldn’t have lost his spot. Dedmon was terrible to start the season though. He couldn’t do anything right and was allowed to play through mistakes. I feel like he’s been in the wrong with his comments about not getting minutes. He hasn’t deserved any minutes at all. If he thinks it’s his shot that got him benched, he’s mostly wrong. He was awful all around the board.

I also agree that Joseph will probably be un-tradable until next offseason, but I don’t think that will haunt the team. Teams may sag off of him, but he can do damage if he plays with outside shooters. If the rest of the team can spread the floor, he can surprisingly do work in the low-mid range. The downside comes when you have Holmes and Bagley in the game because CoJo needs that space to operate as well. The fit isn’t great, but it’s not all doom and gloom.

I disagree that CoJo was a worse signing than Dedmon because we are working with hindsight and current observations. At the time of the signings, I was applauding the Dedmon signing and not happy with the Ariza and CoJo signings. Now, Dedmon has leapfrogged them as the worst signing because he simply got payed off the floor. CoJo has been a better player overall than Yogi, which is why he’s being played over him. Dedmon can’t get minutes over Giles.

From an asset standpoint, you are right. Dedmon is still the better signing because some teams can actually use him. He is just a bad fit for the Kings.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,966
And1: 12,091
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#593 » by LightTheBeam » Mon Dec 30, 2019 7:41 pm

kalenclayton wrote:
RipPizzaGuy wrote:
kalenclayton wrote:I’ll use the Hield/Dedmon fallacy here: if most of the off-season moves were disasters, then I don’t think CoJo was a disaster. He’s a degree of disaster, but Dedmon is by far the disaster of the offseason. Then it’s Ariza followed by CoJo. Holmes was the best signing we’ve made in possibly the last 10 years when you factor in production vs contract. Plus we got momma Holmes.

I agree that all the signings, sans Richaun, were overpays and we should move them. I just don’t see CoJo as much of a negative. When you need to shut a single player down, CoJo is capable of that. It’s the scheme that he’s not getting (along with everyone else on the team). He is a liability for shooting on offense, but not to the extent of, say, Rondo/MKG/Mbah a Moute. He’s just subpar in that area.


To me, Joseph was a bigger negative than Dedmon. Dedmon has a skill set that is wanted around the league, I don't think hes going to be that difficult to move. And honestly if it wasn't for Richaun beasting, I think we woulda stuck with him and he would have turned it around.

Joseph is worse than any other contract to me. Hes awful, hes easily one of the worst offensive players in the league and his defense doesn't justify that. Teams basically defend 4v5 everytime hes in the game. You see they sag off all game, then quickly recover if they need to. Yes we hung in while Fox/Bagley missed time, that was because Barnes, Bjelica, Bogdan, and Holmes had amazing Novembers and teams thought we would give up.

Joseph is going to prove to be untradable. Hes going to haunt us for the next 2 years.

You might be right that if it wasn’t for Holmes, Dedmon wouldn’t have lost his spot. Dedmon was terrible to start the season though. He couldn’t do anything right and was allowed to play through mistakes. I feel like he’s been in the wrong with his comments about not getting minutes. He hasn’t deserved any minutes at all. If he thinks it’s his shot that got him benched, he’s mostly wrong. He was awful all around the board.

I also agree that Joseph will probably be un-tradable until next offseason, but I don’t think that will haunt the team. Teams may sag off of him, but he can do damage if he plays with outside shooters. If the rest of the team can spread the floor, he can surprisingly do work in the low-mid range. The downside comes when you have Holmes and Bagley in the game because CoJo needs that space to operate as well. The fit isn’t great, but it’s not all doom and gloom.

I disagree that CoJo was a worse signing than Dedmon because we are working with hindsight and current observations. At the time of the signings, I was applauding the Dedmon signing and not happy with the Ariza and CoJo signings. Now, Dedmon has leapfrogged them as the worst signing because he simply got payed off the floor. CoJo has been a better player overall than Yogi, which is why he’s being played over him. Dedmon can’t get minutes over Giles.

From an asset standpoint, you are right. Dedmon is still the better signing because some teams can actually use him. He is just a bad fit for the Kings.


I mean the reality is they were all bad signings. I don't even mind Ariza that much when hes shooting, but Dedmon/Joseph are deadweight to me.

James needs to get minutes over Joseph, with Bogdan playing the point. At this point we have nothing to lose. Its beyond clear that everytime Joseph comes in the game for Fox the other team goes on a run and our offense gets stagnant. Luke needs to try something else.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#594 » by KF10 » Mon Dec 30, 2019 7:54 pm

kalenclayton wrote:I’ll use the Hield/Dedmon fallacy here: if most of the off-season moves were disasters, then I don’t think CoJo was a disaster. He’s a degree of disaster, but Dedmon is by far the disaster of the offseason. Then it’s Ariza followed by CoJo. Holmes was the best signing we’ve made in possibly the last 10 years when you factor in production vs contract. Plus we got momma Holmes.

I agree that all the signings, sans Richaun, were overpays and we should move them. I just don’t see CoJo as much of a negative. When you need to shut a single player down, CoJo is capable of that. It’s the scheme that he’s not getting (along with everyone else on the team). He is a liability for shooting on offense, but not to the extent of, say, Rondo/MKG/Mbah a Moute. He’s just subpar in that area.


The guy is sub-40% from the field and sub-30% from 3PT.

He is worse than subpar. He is absolutely putrid.

His calling card is defense but he doesn't possess enough of it to offset how bad he is offensively.

He is a negative. At best, a neutral impact, if he isn't a starter.

He is a niche player that requires him to play him specific situations. No more than 20-25 minutes of play.
User avatar
codydaze
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 6,484
And1: 5,036
Joined: Jul 06, 2013
Location: Sacramento, CA
     

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#595 » by codydaze » Mon Dec 30, 2019 7:58 pm

I'm also in the camp that CoJo hasn't been that much of a disaster. His shooting has been crap for sure, his efficiency is a career low right now (minus his rookie year) but his defense has definitely been solid. A handful of the wins we have this year are losses without his defense, the Boston game sticks out in my memory with the defense he played on Kemba on the final shot.

Dedmon has been awful, it's not just his shooting but he's had more illegal screens than I can remember. When he did get some minutes the other day, he checked in and got a rebound only to be stripped of the ball immediately. The little things have been bad for him too in addition to shooting poorly.

Ariza has been hit or miss, he's had some times where's he looked good and some times where he looks awful as well.

We need to move Dedmon for whatever we can get but with Ariza and CoJo, I wouldn't mind if they stick around unless a good offer comes through. I wonder what a package of Bogi and Dedmon could return?
User avatar
raferfenix
RealGM
Posts: 24,214
And1: 4,531
Joined: Apr 05, 2003

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#596 » by raferfenix » Mon Dec 30, 2019 9:10 pm

Hey Kings fans, how are you feeling about Bogdan these days?

Zach Lowe recently said on the Woj show that he thinks the Pacers pick the Bucks got for Brogdon will likely be on the market if of interest.

Milwaukee could package that first with DJ Wilson + Sterling Brown + Dragan Bender to make it work contractually.

Would the pick and a few young guys to take fliers on be of interest, or do you see Vlade holding out for more, or resigning Bogdan and moving other salaries if the money is a concern, or what do you think?
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,816
And1: 20,377
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#597 » by dckingsfan » Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:18 pm

raferfenix wrote:Hey Kings fans, how are you feeling about Bogdan these days?

Zach Lowe recently said on the Woj show that he thinks the Pacers pick the Bucks got for Brogdon will likely be on the market if of interest.

Milwaukee could package that first with DJ Wilson + Sterling Brown + Dragan Bender to make it work contractually.

Would the pick and a few young guys to take fliers on be of interest, or do you see Vlade holding out for more, or resigning Bogdan and moving other salaries if the money is a concern, or what do you think?

I don't think Wilson, Brown or Bender would be of interest (IMO - I an not Vlade :D). So, they would just be expiring contracts. Basically a low first for Bogdan.

I am "guessing" he would hold out for more than that or try to package him with Joseph or Dedmon.
jayu70
RealGM
Posts: 20,508
And1: 13,044
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
   

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#598 » by jayu70 » Tue Dec 31, 2019 12:15 am

BoogieTime wrote:
jayu70 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:Throw in a 2021 or 22 ATL 2nd and you got a deal.

Naah, he wants out, considered an overpay when he signed, now even more so. Kings get salary relief from his contract for next season.

Deal

Rumors around Atlanta is that Hawks aren't interested in bringing back Ded. So I guess, no deal.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,385
And1: 3,063
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#599 » by BoogieTime » Tue Dec 31, 2019 1:10 am

jayu70 wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:
jayu70 wrote:Naah, he wants out, considered an overpay when he signed, now even more so. Kings get salary relief from his contract for next season.

Deal

Rumors around Atlanta is that Hawks aren't interested in bringing back Ded. So I guess, no deal.


Hawks shouldn’t be trying to get better this year, so I understand
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: Kings Trade Thread 

Post#600 » by City of Trees » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:59 am

LoveMyRaps wrote:
City of Trees wrote:
LoveMyRaps wrote:Image

Fair trade? That first round pick would be lottery protected btw. And I very well expect y'all to be a playoff team next season so that first round pick would most likely break off into two second rounders.
Protections or not, the Kings are in no position to trade future 1sts for a 30 year old :uhoh: rental. My counter:

Raps trade
Serge Ibaka

Kings trade
Dedmon
Ariza
2019 2nd

You'll probably say no but this is the kind of deal Vlade should fish for.


Masai & Vlade should meet in the middle - Ibaka for Bjelica + 2021 1st round pick [NO PROTECTIONS]
I do like OG.

Bogdanovic + what?

Return to Sacramento Kings