ImageImageImage

Boston All-Sports Thread

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#541 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sun Jan 5, 2020 8:20 pm

threrf23 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
And he was a POS human being who sexually assaulted a woman and then, after the story was reported, threatened her and her kids via a group text message. Like, lets not gloss over that fact— he sent pictures of the children of a woman he sexually assaulted to a bunch of people she didnt know to investigate her.

**** AB. How anyone can defend that dude is beyond me.


Not to defend AB - but the woman he threatened never accused him of sexual assault. Just sexual misconduct - an unwanted advance. He allegedly exposed himself to her at one point, but was basically just accused of being an ****.


Yah, whipping out your dick and propositioning a woman in your house is sexual assault to me.
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,075
And1: 9,090
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#542 » by ParticleMan » Sun Jan 5, 2020 8:40 pm

Even with AB maybe we beat the Titans but we are still well below either the Chiefs or Ravens. This team had problems that went way beyond the WR position. The D was horribly overrated, couldn't get pressure or stops when it counted, which was masked by gift turnovers against bad teams early in the year. The O line was slightly improved of late with Wynn but overall still a dumpster fire. There was no running game to speak of.

And for the first time in a long while I genuinely put Brady in a category below the elite QBs. He looks uncomfortable out there, didn't have consistent zip on his passes, and made too many errant throws.

Look, it was an amazing run. For a guy who grew up in the Steve Grogan era where making the playoffs was an achievement, what Belichick and Brady have done the last two decades is beyond anything I could have imagined. But it's time to admit that it's come to an end. It's not just that we've declined, but other AFC teams are gotten way better.

I wouldn't mind at all if Brady moved on, Bill moved up to the FO full-time and hired Josh McDaniels as the HC, we trade our vets for picks and go full rebuild. It's better than fading out as a shell of our former glory.
threrf23
RealGM
Posts: 15,041
And1: 4,988
Joined: Mar 22, 2004

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#543 » by threrf23 » Sun Jan 5, 2020 8:47 pm

ParticleMan wrote:

And for the first time in a long while I genuinely put Brady in a category below the elite QBs. He looks uncomfortable out there, didn't have consistent zip on his passes, and made too many errant throws.


Yeah. Although I'm curious whether he's just been playing hurt.
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 51,782
And1: 60,991
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#544 » by Parliament10 » Sun Jan 5, 2020 9:04 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BigTrade92 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
And he was a POS human being who sexually assaulted a woman and then, after the story was reported, threatened her and her kids via a group text message. Like, lets not gloss over that fact— he sent pictures of the children of a woman he sexually assaulted to a bunch of people she didnt know to investigate her.

**** AB. How anyone can defend that dude is beyond me.

Okay guys, play devil’s advocate with me. You think he’s going to get placed on the exempt list if he was still on the roster over a cash grab civil lawsuit that held no merit? Please. The NFLPA would’ve sued the league. And even if they did get ballsy and suspend him over a civil lawsuit, which would’ve been unprecedented, he would’ve been back in early November.

I don’t watch sports because I want my players to be model human beings. The owner of the team got caught getting jacked off in a prostitution sting. Should I stop watching the Pats too?

Give me a break. You keep AB on the roster and let the NFL make a decision. You don’t cut him and make the league decision for them. They basically blackballed him the entire season. The NFLPA had no leg to stand on because technically he was free to sign anywhere. The NFL used the exempt list and their fraud investigation as a threat and the teams all bit and fell for it.

His accuser was interviewed in mid-September. It doesn’t take 4 plus months to investigate that. They froze him out because they didn’t want him hijacking the league for their 100th season, as he was doing up until that point.

If AB doesn’t get cut, the Pats are currently on a bye week and preparing for next week. To say it was the right move is idiotic as we clearly saw last night with that dumpster fire of an offense...


Yah, if youre innocent youre first instinct isnt to threaten the kids of your accuser. Also were talking about the second case, not the first.

Theres a reason literally EVERY team ignored him— I mean, he **** brought a camera crew with him to his Saints interview. There is something wrong with him. Only a misogynist would argue elsewise. Hes is a POS human that has left utter destruction everywhere hes been in everything hes done.

His accusations werent a cash grab. Multiple people arent lying and some didnt even want cash [beyond his contractual obligations].

One Mistake = is a mistake.
Two Mistakes = You've got a Problem.
Three? or more? = YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
User avatar
SichtingLives
RealGM
Posts: 40,893
And1: 25,460
Joined: Mar 25, 2009

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#545 » by SichtingLives » Sun Jan 5, 2020 9:10 pm

To think I actually wrote a set based on the Pats winning and they didn't do their part smh boy did they ever kill the mood. Funniest thing I heard all night is the guy that said I should've opened with Sweet Caroline anyway lol
10 miles through the snow uphill both ways
User avatar
K For Three
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,498
And1: 33,240
Joined: Jan 03, 2018
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#546 » by K For Three » Sun Jan 5, 2020 9:45 pm

Both 40+ year old QBs out now with Brees going down.

I think if your QB is 61 years old it's often best to have a bye week.....

Technically the Pats were eliminated by the Dolphins.

Rooting for Rodgers to win it all now and get another ring. He's 36, time is ticking there too. Not sure how much I trust this Packers team but would love to see them make a run.
At the very least a Packers at 49ers NFCCG would be pretty cool considering Rodgers like Brady grew up a Niners fan and being so into Joe Montana. And the Niners took Alex Smith over Aaron Rodgers lol.
exculpatory
RealGM
Posts: 15,203
And1: 11,396
Joined: Nov 10, 2008

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#547 » by exculpatory » Sun Jan 5, 2020 10:37 pm

Kyrie For Three wrote:Both 40+ year old QBs out now with Brees going down.

I think if your QB is 61 years old it's often best to have a bye week.....

Technically the Pats were eliminated by the Dolphins.

Rooting for Rodgers to win it all now and get another ring. He's 36, time is ticking there too. Not sure how much I trust this Packers team but would love to see them make a run.
At the very least a Packers at 49ers NFCCG would be pretty cool considering Rodgers like Brady grew up a Niners fan and being so into Joe Montana. And the Niners took Alex Smith over Aaron Rodgers lol.


You will get your wish.
Vikings suck.
Eagles suck - now without Wendy also.
Seahawks suck.
SamIam 2010: Truth's ability to play so incredibly efficiently is so UNDERAPPRECIATED. Bballcool 2012: Amazing how great Pierce has been for so long. Continues to defy age! KG 2013: P is original Celtic. Wherever he goes, we go. This is The Truth's house.
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,423
And1: 23,553
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#548 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Mon Jan 6, 2020 1:32 am

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:Can't believe Julian dropped that pass..and that we punted on 4th and 6 with 3 minutes left.

But we lost this game on the 1st and goal at the 1 yard line. Shameful play calling to not get in there..just absurd. 17-7 game probably ends them as they would have to throw more and run less.

Shocking how a dominant 8-0 season went down the drain so quickly.

If it was the last time for Tom, it was an absolute pleasure.


Disagree— we lost that game when the number one defense in the game allowed a run heavy team to march down our throats in about 1.5 minutes to end the half. Or when we allowed a 3rd and long completion at the end.

Or when we allowed Ryan Fitzpatrick to lead a long touchdown drive the week before.

We just werent good enough. Our ‘historically good’ d was overrated and we had a worse than 2006 level supporting cast on offense. Major bummer, but oh well.


Nah..won't say you're wrong, but the biggest play to me was the goal line stand. Three tries to get 1 yard for a 10 pt lead that completely changes this game. I thought the defense actually did OK. Second half they did as well as they could with the run. They got Brady the ball back 3 or 4 times in the 4th and we couldn't even get in FG range. At the end of the day, Titans had 14 pts at the half and it stayed that way til 1 minute left before Brady threw the pick 6. You should be able to win a friggin home playoff game against anybody if your defense only allows 14 points. The problem was obviously offense and it had been the offense ever since Brown and Gordon got sent packing. I fully agree that the defense was overrated, though I think the secondary is pretty damn elite and if Chung doesn't get injured we probably don't give up that first TD where Brooks came in and immediately got dusted. That would have been a FG at best with Chung, IMO. But who knows.

Even against Miami, we should have scored more than 20 something pts. We hung 40 on them earlier in the season like it was nothing..
WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎ THANK YOU TRUTH!
sam_I_am
RealGM
Posts: 16,735
And1: 9,521
Joined: Jul 10, 2004

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#549 » by sam_I_am » Mon Jan 6, 2020 1:39 am

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:Can't believe Julian dropped that pass..and that we punted on 4th and 6 with 3 minutes left.

But we lost this game on the 1st and goal at the 1 yard line. Shameful play calling to not get in there..just absurd. 17-7 game probably ends them as they would have to throw more and run less.

Shocking how a dominant 8-0 season went down the drain so quickly.

If it was the last time for Tom, it was an absolute pleasure.


Disagree— we lost that game when the number one defense in the game allowed a run heavy team to march down our throats in about 1.5 minutes to end the half. Or when we allowed a 3rd and long completion at the end.

Or when we allowed Ryan Fitzpatrick to lead a long touchdown drive the week before.

We just werent good enough. Our ‘historically good’ d was overrated and we had a worse than 2006 level supporting cast on offense. Major bummer, but oh well.


Nah..won't say you're wrong, but the biggest play to me was the goal line stand. Three tries to get 1 yard for a 10 pt lead that completely changes this game. I thought the defense actually did OK. Second half they did as well as they could with the run. They got Brady the ball back 3 or 4 times in the 4th and we couldn't even get in FG range. At the end of the day, Titans had 14 pts at the half and it stayed that way til 1 minute left before Brady threw the pick 6. You should be able to win a friggin home playoff game against anybody if your defense only allows 14 points. The problem was obviously offense and it had been the offense ever since Brown and Gordon got sent packing. I fully agree that the defense was overrated, though I think the secondary is pretty damn elite and if Chung doesn't get injured we probably don't give up that first TD where Brooks came in and immediately got dusted. That would have been a FG at best with Chung, IMO. But who knows.

Even against Miami, we should have scored more than 20 something pts. We hung 40 on them earlier in the season like it was nothing..


To me the biggest play was the 3rd and 6 after Edelman dropped the ball. Brady was under pressure and couldn’t deliver the difficult pass to an barely open receiver. The Brady of the last 20 years would have made it look easy,
"I think the criticism's stupid," Stevens said. "So I don't care. I'm with Jaylen (Brown) on that. Those two had achieved more than most 25 and 26 year olds ever had. I'd rather be in the mix and have my guts ripped out than suck."
User avatar
BigTrade92
General Manager
Posts: 9,400
And1: 11,061
Joined: Mar 24, 2011
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#550 » by BigTrade92 » Mon Jan 6, 2020 3:32 am

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BigTrade92 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
And he was a POS human being who sexually assaulted a woman and then, after the story was reported, threatened her and her kids via a group text message. Like, lets not gloss over that fact— he sent pictures of the children of a woman he sexually assaulted to a bunch of people she didnt know to investigate her.

**** AB. How anyone can defend that dude is beyond me.

Okay guys, play devil’s advocate with me. You think he’s going to get placed on the exempt list if he was still on the roster over a cash grab civil lawsuit that held no merit? Please. The NFLPA would’ve sued the league. And even if they did get ballsy and suspend him over a civil lawsuit, which would’ve been unprecedented, he would’ve been back in early November.

I don’t watch sports because I want my players to be model human beings. The owner of the team got caught getting jacked off in a prostitution sting. Should I stop watching the Pats too?

Give me a break. You keep AB on the roster and let the NFL make a decision. You don’t cut him and make the league decision for them. They basically blackballed him the entire season. The NFLPA had no leg to stand on because technically he was free to sign anywhere. The NFL used the exempt list and their fraud investigation as a threat and the teams all bit and fell for it.

His accuser was interviewed in mid-September. It doesn’t take 4 plus months to investigate that. They froze him out because they didn’t want him hijacking the league for their 100th season, as he was doing up until that point.

If AB doesn’t get cut, the Pats are currently on a bye week and preparing for next week. To say it was the right move is idiotic as we clearly saw last night with that dumpster fire of an offense...


Yah, if youre innocent youre first instinct isnt to threaten the kids of your accuser. Also were talking about the second case, not the first.

Theres a reason literally EVERY team ignored him— I mean, he **** brought a camera crew with him to his Saints interview. There is something wrong with him. Only a misogynist would argue elsewise. Hes is a POS human that has left utter destruction everywhere hes been in everything hes done.

His accusations werent a cash grab. Multiple people arent lying and some didnt even want cash [beyond his contractual obligations].

Lmao he didn’t threaten the kids of his accuser. He sent a picture of the children to his friend and his lawyer and made fun of their clothes, nothing more. Yeah that totally means he shouldn’t play in the NFL. Lmaooo what a dumb leg to stand on.

And, yeah I study law, the accusations against him were exactly a cash grab and the woman who accused him had to refile her civil lawsuit, never a good sign.

Just admit you don’t like AB. That’s fine. Better than trying to pretend like your some white knight who only roots for model citizens to play on his favorite sports teams. No one is saying he’s a choir boy, but he shouldn’t have been cut. And as you saw, it was the kiss of death for this offense and this team’s season.
threrf23
RealGM
Posts: 15,041
And1: 4,988
Joined: Mar 22, 2004

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#551 » by threrf23 » Mon Jan 6, 2020 3:42 am

BigTrade92 wrote:Lmao he didn’t threaten the kids of his accuser. He sent a picture of the children of a painter whom accused him of not paying for a portrait to his friend and his lawyer and made fun of their clothes, nothing more. Yeah that totally means he shouldn’t play in the NFL. Lmaooo what a dumb leg to stand on.

And, yeah I study law, the accusations against him were exactly a cash grab and the woman who accused him had to refile her civil lawsuit never a good sign.

Just admit you don’t like AB. That’s fine. Better than trying to pretend like your some white knight who only roots for model citizens to play on his favorite sports teams. No one is saying he’s a choir boy, but he shouldn’t have been cut. Talk about being full of it...


https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/09/19/antonio-brown-accuser-text-messages
User avatar
BigTrade92
General Manager
Posts: 9,400
And1: 11,061
Joined: Mar 24, 2011
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#552 » by BigTrade92 » Mon Jan 6, 2020 3:43 am

threrf23 wrote:
BigTrade92 wrote:Lmao he didn’t threaten the kids of his accuser. He sent a picture of the children of a painter whom accused him of not paying for a portrait to his friend and his lawyer and made fun of their clothes, nothing more. Yeah that totally means he shouldn’t play in the NFL. Lmaooo what a dumb leg to stand on.

And, yeah I study law, the accusations against him were exactly a cash grab and the woman who accused him had to refile her civil lawsuit never a good sign.

Just admit you don’t like AB. That’s fine. Better than trying to pretend like your some white knight who only roots for model citizens to play on his favorite sports teams. No one is saying he’s a choir boy, but he shouldn’t have been cut. Talk about being full of it...


https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/09/19/antonio-brown-accuser-text-messages

I know what the texts say. He made fun of the woman being poor and used her children as an example.

In poor taste? Most definitely. Doesn’t mean you should lose your job over private texts that an attention seeker allowed a sports journalist to publish on twitter.

I’d love to see you get accused of something, lose your job over an unfounded accusation and then just sit there and pretended like life is good. You definitely wouldn’t, but I can see your one of the SJW who think guilty until proven innocent should be the new reality. Sad.
threrf23
RealGM
Posts: 15,041
And1: 4,988
Joined: Mar 22, 2004

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#553 » by threrf23 » Mon Jan 6, 2020 3:56 am

BigTrade92 wrote:I know what the texts say. He made fun of the woman being poor and used her children as an example.


And the texts were sent to that woman, and served as a veiled threat, possibly against her children. Maybe that was unintentional, but it probably wasn't, and the fact it happened to begin with is troubling.

The texts would have been revealing even if they were kept confidential - and there were more than enough stories out there to begin with to shed light on the guy's character (or lack thereof). This was something inexcusable, something proven, something done as a New England Patriot, something done while he was under a microscope and after he had probably promised our front office that he would stay out of trouble. This behavior also lent credibility to any unproven and/or speculated rumors against him.

Should he receive a lifetime ban from the NFL? No. But we had to cut him. You're a lost cause man.
User avatar
BigTrade92
General Manager
Posts: 9,400
And1: 11,061
Joined: Mar 24, 2011
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#554 » by BigTrade92 » Mon Jan 6, 2020 4:39 am

threrf23 wrote:
BigTrade92 wrote:I know what the texts say. He made fun of the woman being poor and used her children as an example.


And the texts were sent to that woman, and served as a veiled threat, possibly against her children. Maybe that was unintentional, but it probably wasn't, and the fact it happened to begin with is troubling.

The texts would have been revealing even if they were kept confidential - and there were more than enough stories out there to begin with to shed light on the guy's character (or lack thereof). This was something inexcusable, something proven, something done as a New England Patriot, something done while he was under a microscope and after he had probably promised our front office that he would stay out of trouble. This behavior also lent credibility to any unproven and/or speculated rumors against him.

Should he receive a lifetime ban from the NFL? No. But we had to cut him. You're a lost cause man.

No, they definitely didn’t need to cut him because of text messages.

Especially not by an owner who got caught in a prostitution sting months earlier and is still in the midst of his own legal troubles. Where’s his punishment though?

He sent a picture of kids and talked about how “broke” she was in a sarcastic manner. In poor taste? For sure. But there’s literally no threat there, at all. Just more fake, manufactured internet outrage.

Again, the guilty until proven innocent BS is sad. You’re not going to persuade me that it was the right football move. It wasn’t. Clearly. And no one watches sports because of the morality of the players on the field, so using that excuse is even more hogwash.

Ray Lewis killed two people and there’s a statue sitting outside a stadium in Baltimore. I’m pretty sure Antonio Brown’s accusations pale in comparison, but hey, it was 2019 so you and the SJW of the internet needed your pound of flesh and you got it...
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,125
And1: 98,277
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#555 » by zoyathedestroya » Mon Jan 6, 2020 6:52 am

Read on Twitter

Title drought in NE has to end soon.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#556 » by SmartWentCrazy » Mon Jan 6, 2020 11:25 am

BigTrade92 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BigTrade92 wrote:Okay guys, play devil’s advocate with me. You think he’s going to get placed on the exempt list if he was still on the roster over a cash grab civil lawsuit that held no merit? Please. The NFLPA would’ve sued the league. And even if they did get ballsy and suspend him over a civil lawsuit, which would’ve been unprecedented, he would’ve been back in early November.

I don’t watch sports because I want my players to be model human beings. The owner of the team got caught getting jacked off in a prostitution sting. Should I stop watching the Pats too?

Give me a break. You keep AB on the roster and let the NFL make a decision. You don’t cut him and make the league decision for them. They basically blackballed him the entire season. The NFLPA had no leg to stand on because technically he was free to sign anywhere. The NFL used the exempt list and their fraud investigation as a threat and the teams all bit and fell for it.

His accuser was interviewed in mid-September. It doesn’t take 4 plus months to investigate that. They froze him out because they didn’t want him hijacking the league for their 100th season, as he was doing up until that point.

If AB doesn’t get cut, the Pats are currently on a bye week and preparing for next week. To say it was the right move is idiotic as we clearly saw last night with that dumpster fire of an offense...


Yah, if youre innocent youre first instinct isnt to threaten the kids of your accuser. Also were talking about the second case, not the first.

Theres a reason literally EVERY team ignored him— I mean, he **** brought a camera crew with him to his Saints interview. There is something wrong with him. Only a misogynist would argue elsewise. Hes is a POS human that has left utter destruction everywhere hes been in everything hes done.

His accusations werent a cash grab. Multiple people arent lying and some didnt even want cash [beyond his contractual obligations].

Lmao he didn’t threaten the kids of his accuser. He sent a picture of the children to his friend and his lawyer and made fun of their clothes, nothing more. Yeah that totally means he shouldn’t play in the NFL. Lmaooo what a dumb leg to stand on.

And, yeah I study law, the accusations against him were exactly a cash grab and the woman who accused him had to refile her civil lawsuit, never a good sign.

Just admit you don’t like AB. That’s fine. Better than trying to pretend like your some white knight who only roots for model citizens to play on his favorite sports teams. No one is saying he’s a choir boy, but he shouldn’t have been cut. And as you saw, it was the kiss of death for this offense and this team’s season.


Yah, being in a group text with people you dont know and having pictures of your children sent to them while AB says to investigate you is a threat against your kids.

Multiple members of my family practice law, including two who are partners at separate firms. If this was a cash grab, he wouldnt have negotiated all summer and been prepared to fork over 2M only to switch it up at the last second. If you knew anything about law or how much lower the burden of proof is in these cases civilly vs criminally you’d understand why the majority of successful cases are filed that way.

Probably should study harder or just admit your sexist. Its your choice, really— I’m right either way.

For the record, I supported keeping him after news of the civil suit [its a dangerous precedent] — but when he gets accused a second time and then threatens the accusers children? Yah, somethings **** wrong with that person and its time to move on. Id guess you probably still wanted to keep Aaron Hernandez though.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#557 » by SmartWentCrazy » Mon Jan 6, 2020 12:02 pm

BigTrade92 wrote:
threrf23 wrote:
BigTrade92 wrote:Lmao he didn’t threaten the kids of his accuser. He sent a picture of the children of a painter whom accused him of not paying for a portrait to his friend and his lawyer and made fun of their clothes, nothing more. Yeah that totally means he shouldn’t play in the NFL. Lmaooo what a dumb leg to stand on.

And, yeah I study law, the accusations against him were exactly a cash grab and the woman who accused him had to refile her civil lawsuit never a good sign.

Just admit you don’t like AB. That’s fine. Better than trying to pretend like your some white knight who only roots for model citizens to play on his favorite sports teams. No one is saying he’s a choir boy, but he shouldn’t have been cut. Talk about being full of it...


https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/09/19/antonio-brown-accuser-text-messages

I know what the texts say. He made fun of the woman being poor and used her children as an example.

In poor taste? Most definitely. Doesn’t mean you should lose your job over private texts that an attention seeker allowed a sports journalist to publish on twitter.

I’d love to see you get accused of something, lose your job over an unfounded accusation and then just sit there and pretended like life is good. You definitely wouldn’t, but I can see your one of the SJW who think guilty until proven innocent should be the new reality. Sad.


Yikes, if you take someone sending pictures of your kids to people you dont know while the talk about investigating you as anything other than a threat, you should not ever be a father.

As to the last blurb, that says it all— youre an MRA more concerned with being falsely accused than you are about seeing a loved one raped and having the justice system do nothing about it cuz it wasnt violent and theres a ‘reasonable doubt’ against your claim because theres no witness. Ones far more likely than the other, and its sad sexists like you are more concerned with youre own sketchy actions than you are about the likely fact that someone you know/love will be the victim if a sexual assault to no repercussions. Sad.
User avatar
BigTrade92
General Manager
Posts: 9,400
And1: 11,061
Joined: Mar 24, 2011
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#558 » by BigTrade92 » Mon Jan 6, 2020 11:55 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BigTrade92 wrote:

I know what the texts say. He made fun of the woman being poor and used her children as an example.

In poor taste? Most definitely. Doesn’t mean you should lose your job over private texts that an attention seeker allowed a sports journalist to publish on twitter.

I’d love to see you get accused of something, lose your job over an unfounded accusation and then just sit there and pretended like life is good. You definitely wouldn’t, but I can see your one of the SJW who think guilty until proven innocent should be the new reality. Sad.


Yikes, if you take someone sending pictures of your kids to people you dont know while the talk about investigating you as anything other than a threat, you should not ever be a father.

As to the last blurb, that says it all— youre an MRA more concerned with being falsely accused than you are about seeing a loved one raped and having the justice system do nothing about it cuz it wasnt violent and theres a ‘reasonable doubt’ against your claim because theres no witness. Ones far more likely than the other, and its sad sexists like you are more concerned with youre own sketchy actions than you are about the likely fact that someone you know/love will be the victim if a sexual assault to no repercussions. Sad.

Except there wasn’t any rape involved so you fell into the media trap hook line and sinker.

The woman filed a civil lawsuit, not criminal meaning there’s no chance of jail involved whatsoever, with only monetary gains being her only motive. Not to mention there’s literally photos online of the two cuddling in bed.

Now if this woman went on record in her court filings to claim she had a strictly “professional” relationship with Brown as a trainer, then why are there photos of them in bed with no clothes on? Because she’s full of crap and looking for a pay day, that’s why.

Negotiations mean absolutely nothing in regards to guilt or innocence of the filing. Many, many celebrities cut a check with a gag order just to make nonsense like this go away before it becomes public and have for years and years and years.

You sound soft as baby sh*t and someone who just read the headlines and made up your mind right then and there. Brown’s a sh*t person, I’m not sticking up for his moral behavior, but he deserves the same innocent until guilty treatment of the law that any other citizen does in this country, not internet mob rule justice.

Hilarious that Patriots fans who ridicule fans of the other 31 teams for not knowing the facts and subsequently blasting the team and Brady during Spygate, Deflategate, etc are the same ones who want to do it to Brown.

You’re literally not right about jack sh*t, but it’s hilarious that because you think you have a heart of gold, it means it trumps due process. Do some research on the whole story here and take your PC bullsh*t elsewhere because I don’t need a lecture from a random on the internet about fatherhood and how I should think.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#559 » by SmartWentCrazy » Tue Jan 7, 2020 2:13 am

Edit- Never mind, I’m not getting in an argument with a poorly educated MRA
User avatar
K For Three
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,498
And1: 33,240
Joined: Jan 03, 2018
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread, Phase 2 

Post#560 » by K For Three » Tue Jan 7, 2020 4:12 am

The Brady rumors until FA starts are going to be torture. The idea of him on another team and what team and blah blah blah. I've even heard scenarios of him playing for the ****ing Colts.

I mean look, even if he is going to be 43 next year he still should be a Patriot until he hangs it up. If it were up to me he signs a two year deal. Or a one year deal and goes year by year for his future but it sounds like he wants to play NEXT season.

Can't the Patriots find some way to make a move for another weapon or two on offense? Go all out for one more year or two? Like the offseason when they somehow got Moss and Welker?

Return to Boston Celtics