Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

ducler
Cold Hard Gameday Facts
Posts: 15,607
And1: 8,991
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Location: France
 

Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#1 » by ducler » Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:45 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,335
And1: 19,159
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#2 » by ThunderBolt » Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:19 pm

Read on Twitter
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Dn4sty
Analyst
Posts: 3,477
And1: 1,929
Joined: Apr 11, 2017

Re: Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#3 » by Dn4sty » Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:24 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=12
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,385
And1: 7,520
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#4 » by Dadouv47 » Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:30 pm

Really suck to play the Lakers without Lebron and probably AD. Was looking for a good game against great players. I'm having a lot of fun watching our team playing this season and winning isn't the more important so facing the Lakers without their best player(s) is not what I was looking for :(
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,335
And1: 19,159
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#5 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:44 am

Very predictable to come out flat.

Diallo kind of gets on my nerves. His shot sucks, he tries to sell the flop and hasn’t been successful thus far and several times I’ve seen him not get back on defense because he’s complaining to the refs.

Even in the good games he’s had recently, Gallo is missing too many good looks from three.

Muscula is bad.

Dudley is fat.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
NaturalThunder
General Manager
Posts: 8,491
And1: 3,907
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
     

Re: Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#6 » by NaturalThunder » Sun Jan 12, 2020 2:24 am

Coming out flat is one thing...losing by 30+ at home to the Lakers without LeBron, AD, or Danny Green?

That's inexcusable.
Said in a thread about which point guards would make OKC better if they replaced Westbrook:
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,385
And1: 7,520
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#7 » by Dadouv47 » Sun Jan 12, 2020 2:34 am

Raining 3's...

Bad offense and bad defense but not so much they could do with the Lakers being so hot from deep.
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#8 » by Old Man Game » Sun Jan 12, 2020 4:16 am

Sometimes I'll watch a game and just be like, why the eff do I even watch sports? This was one of those nights.
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#9 » by Old Man Game » Sun Jan 12, 2020 4:19 am

ThunderBolt wrote:Very predictable to come out flat.

Diallo kind of gets on my nerves. His shot sucks, he tries to sell the flop and hasn’t been successful thus far and several times I’ve seen him not get back on defense because he’s complaining to the refs.


That stuff was grating when it came from first ballot future HOF'er Rusell Westbrook. Coming from a bench utility defender and wing energy guy like Diallo it's almost a sort of parody of an entitled NBA d-bag. Sorry, Hami, I love you but do better.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,385
And1: 7,520
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#10 » by Dadouv47 » Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:01 pm

Defense is the only aspect of SGA game that I'm disappointed abput since he's in OKC. He has everything to become a good defender so I'm not too worried right now...
User avatar
Galloisdaman
Analyst
Posts: 3,674
And1: 2,171
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: Game 39: Oklahoma City Thunder (22-16) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (31-7) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#11 » by Galloisdaman » Sun Jan 12, 2020 7:54 pm

ThunderBolt wrote:Very predictable to come out flat.

Diallo kind of gets on my nerves. His shot sucks, he tries to sell the flop and hasn’t been successful thus far and several times I’ve seen him not get back on defense because he’s complaining to the refs.

Even in the good games he’s had recently, Gallo is missing too many good looks from three.

Muscula is bad.

Dudley is fat.


I agree with you. I think many people saw this let down game coming.

In regards to Gallo I think he is taking two many threes. Although last nights 4 for 9 is very respectable. I said that months ago. Gallo is not a Steve Kerr type that just stands outside as a spot up shooter. He is a player that is very good in mismatches in the post if they choose to milk that to get him in the flow. The advantage of going inside with Gallo is the mismatches lead to free throws and getting in the bonus. Also put him in position for some offensive rebounds instead of 30 feet from the rim. Now the question is are all the 3 point attempts his decision? Or is he put in that position via the team scheme.

With that said Gallo is hitting almost 40% (team best) from 3 which is equivalent to around 60% from 2.
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. :D

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder