iamworthy wrote:So does Ramona Shelburne work for the clippers now?
Yup
Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy
iamworthy wrote:So does Ramona Shelburne work for the clippers now?


Worst_to_First wrote:I remember getting ridiculed here when I said BI will be the next Kawhi.
I wish you guys kept him instead of Kuz.


Dr Aki wrote:Worst_to_First wrote:I remember getting ridiculed here when I said BI will be the next Kawhi.
I wish you guys kept him instead of Kuz.
Look at the players in the trade, the Lakers needed to make it a legal above the cap trade and Ingram's salary was a necessary part of the trade
Worst_to_First wrote:Dr Aki wrote:Worst_to_First wrote:I remember getting ridiculed here when I said BI will be the next Kawhi.
I wish you guys kept him instead of Kuz.
Look at the players in the trade, the Lakers needed to make it a legal above the cap trade and Ingram's salary was a necessary part of the trade
From what I remember Lakers had the cap space that time to take on the additional salary that comes with AD.
The rationale for putting Ingram there instead of Kuz is to be able to create that max space in order to lure Kawhi in. Unfortunately that didn’t pay off but at least Rob was able to recover and sign guys like Danny Green etc.
Under a scenario where Kuz was included and BI was kept the effect would be you guys wouldn’t have signed Avery Bradley.
Am still rooting for you guys to get the chip this year but having a trio of LeBron, AD and BI would have made the Lakers unstoppable.



+
= 
I think the Wolves are looking to win, therefore better off keeping Cov and avoiding BI.
Covington is currently the better player (by a fairly large margin) and is signed for 3 years after this season at a bargain rate. Ingram only has one year left on his rookie deal and still hasn't shown all that much. I don't see any way the Wolves give up an elite 3-and-D guy on a good contract for a player whose value is largely unproven upside.
Maybe it’s me, but I don’t see Ingram as having as much trade value as Covington.
I expected to see more from him by now. Even if he demonstrates it at the end of this season, he will be extension eligible this summer, and has only one more year for rookie scale. Covington is locked up on a good deal for 3.5 years.
Eh, Lakers have a better record than the Wolves, and Saric is really only shooting well from 3 with the Wolves this year. I'd also say control and volume of shots factor. I have Kuz as a little more valuable. Enough to offset the difference between Ingram and Cov.
I am trying to see how Ingram is a good fit for Minnesota. Towns already shoots the three pointer better than Wiggins and adding another wing that isn't even at the Wiggins level on three point shooting would hurt spacing.
Even an expanded trade that includes Kuzma still has spacing problems and the defense isn't going to be improved.
I don’t think the general public realizes how much better roco makes us over Butler...
RoCo >>>>> Ingram
ROCO >>>>>> Ingram. Please keep Roco. Avoid Ingram at all costs. Let him rot in LA.
Bogdan is a more useful player and is likely going to get paid less. I'm struggling to see any arguments for Ingram other than the false allure of potential.
Depending on how Ingram's season goes and his health is, he may not be in the top 2 RFAs. Teams may prefer Beasley or Saric. Hell, maybe even Royce O'Neale. There's just a real concern Ingram will never be able to be relied upon and he's still almost all potential on top of that.
Based on what I expect each to get paid next off-season I would take Bogdanovic as being the better value.
+
=
Dr Aki wrote:Worst_to_First wrote:Dr Aki wrote:
Look at the players in the trade, the Lakers needed to make it a legal above the cap trade and Ingram's salary was a necessary part of the trade
From what I remember Lakers had the cap space that time to take on the additional salary that comes with AD.
The rationale for putting Ingram there instead of Kuz is to be able to create that max space in order to lure Kawhi in. Unfortunately that didn’t pay off but at least Rob was able to recover and sign guys like Danny Green etc.
Under a scenario where Kuz was included and BI was kept the effect would be you guys wouldn’t have signed Avery Bradley.
Am still rooting for you guys to get the chip this year but having a trio of LeBron, AD and BI would have made the Lakers unstoppable.
we would have still signed avery bradley, because bradley was signed with the room MLE
without ingram in the deal, davis would've been absorbed into cap space, and that precluded a run at kawhi.
there is no scenario where LA voluntarily takes themselves out of the running for kawhi

Worst_to_First wrote:Dr Aki wrote:Worst_to_First wrote:
From what I remember Lakers had the cap space that time to take on the additional salary that comes with AD.
The rationale for putting Ingram there instead of Kuz is to be able to create that max space in order to lure Kawhi in. Unfortunately that didn’t pay off but at least Rob was able to recover and sign guys like Danny Green etc.
Under a scenario where Kuz was included and BI was kept the effect would be you guys wouldn’t have signed Avery Bradley.
Am still rooting for you guys to get the chip this year but having a trio of LeBron, AD and BI would have made the Lakers unstoppable.
we would have still signed avery bradley, because bradley was signed with the room MLE
without ingram in the deal, davis would've been absorbed into cap space, and that precluded a run at kawhi.
there is no scenario where LA voluntarily takes themselves out of the running for kawhi
Ah I see about AB.
Putting yourselves in the Kawhi sweepstakes was of course understandable. Hindsight is 20/20. What is sad here is if Kawhi and the Clippers made you guys believe you were in the running as a delaying tactic for the FA market to have dried up.
+
= 
Kilroy wrote:Watching those clips, Ingrams at least a half step quicker now. I just love watching him play. That fluidity is a thing of beauty. Like Clyde or Dr J.
Kilroy wrote:Watching those clips, Ingrams at least a half step quicker now. I just love watching him play. That fluidity is a thing of beauty. Like Clyde or Dr J.

Worst_to_First wrote:Dr Aki wrote:Worst_to_First wrote:I remember getting ridiculed here when I said BI will be the next Kawhi.
I wish you guys kept him instead of Kuz.
Look at the players in the trade, the Lakers needed to make it a legal above the cap trade and Ingram's salary was a necessary part of the trade
From what I remember Lakers had the cap space that time to take on the additional salary that comes with AD.
The rationale for putting Ingram there instead of Kuz is to be able to create that max space in order to lure Kawhi in. Unfortunately that didn’t pay off but at least Rob was able to recover and sign guys like Danny Green etc.
Under a scenario where Kuz was included and BI was kept the effect would be you guys wouldn’t have signed Avery Bradley.
Am still rooting for you guys to get the chip this year but having a trio of LeBron, AD and BI would have made the Lakers unstoppable.