Image ImageImage Image

Is Zach LaVine a Winner?

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

User avatar
Clocian
RealGM
Posts: 12,654
And1: 2,672
Joined: Nov 01, 2009
Location: Hip Hop
     

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#221 » by Clocian » Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:12 pm

Showtime23 wrote:
kodo wrote:Too bad he had that rough start to the season, his current play is easily an all-star in the East.

Since Dec 1, 27.4 ppg on 46% FG / 38% 3P. Solid rebound, assist, and steal #s for a SG as well.
2nd highest scoring guard in the EC. Outscoring Beal and even Doncic.


All-star and outscoring Doncic does not equate to winner even if I conceded he actually achieved them.
No one cares if Lavine averages 30 or won a scoring title. You think ESPN will now say he is the next american superstar?
Superstars always have unique signature move and are all-rounded in nearly every aspect.
Lavine literally relies 99% on athleticism and yet falls in love with jumpers which means he will be washed like Melo when he hits his 30s. His game is very similar to a homeless man's Westbrook, very likelly to end up like a B. Roy, destroying a franchise.


This post :lol: :crazy:. Where to even start...
Damn I love Hip Hop!
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,307
And1: 9,287
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#222 » by Jcool0 » Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:52 pm

Showtime23 wrote:
kodo wrote:Too bad he had that rough start to the season, his current play is easily an all-star in the East.

Since Dec 1, 27.4 ppg on 46% FG / 38% 3P. Solid rebound, assist, and steal #s for a SG as well.
2nd highest scoring guard in the EC. Outscoring Beal and even Doncic.


All-star and outscoring Doncic does not equate to winner even if I conceded he actually achieved them.
No one cares if Lavine averages 30 or won a scoring title. You think ESPN will now say he is the next american superstar?
Superstars always have unique signature move and are all-rounded in nearly every aspect.
Lavine literally relies 99% on athleticism and yet falls in love with jumpers which means he will be washed like Melo when he hits his 30s. His game is very similar to a homeless man's Westbrook, very likelly to end up like a B. Roy, destroying a franchise.

Rose, a player we all bashed after his ACL for not having any skills, actually had a very high bbiq, intangibles.
I have always argued a post ACL Rose is still better than most players in the league and looks like his 22PER vindicates he will be the number 1 option on this Bulls team. per 36 stat of 26/8 on 50percent shooting is just insanity better than his MVP prime.
Even the eye test confirms his moves are much more refined and decisive while still being the best closer in the league.
Him and Noah still can average way more wins than this Bulls squad. Just let them take load mgt like Kawhi and bumslay in the playoffs.


So if Rose is "still better than most players in the league" why is Detroit 6-13 since December 12th?
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,390
And1: 11,191
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#223 » by MrSparkle » Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:46 pm

MeloRoseNoah wrote:I always compare Lavine to a more athletic Ray Allen, and it’s looking like it’s on point.


I wouldn't go that far... ever... Ray Allen's IQ and playmaking abilities were very good.

IMO he's "JR Smith with great attitude" and more athleticism.
User avatar
FranchisePlayer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 598
Joined: Oct 25, 2019
 

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#224 » by FranchisePlayer » Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:53 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
Showtime23 wrote:
kodo wrote:Too bad he had that rough start to the season, his current play is easily an all-star in the East.

Since Dec 1, 27.4 ppg on 46% FG / 38% 3P. Solid rebound, assist, and steal #s for a SG as well.
2nd highest scoring guard in the EC. Outscoring Beal and even Doncic.


All-star and outscoring Doncic does not equate to winner even if I conceded he actually achieved them.
No one cares if Lavine averages 30 or won a scoring title. You think ESPN will now say he is the next american superstar?
Superstars always have unique signature move and are all-rounded in nearly every aspect.
Lavine literally relies 99% on athleticism and yet falls in love with jumpers which means he will be washed like Melo when he hits his 30s. His game is very similar to a homeless man's Westbrook, very likelly to end up like a B. Roy, destroying a franchise.

Rose, a player we all bashed after his ACL for not having any skills, actually had a very high bbiq, intangibles.
I have always argued a post ACL Rose is still better than most players in the league and looks like his 22PER vindicates he will be the number 1 option on this Bulls team. per 36 stat of 26/8 on 50percent shooting is just insanity better than his MVP prime.
Even the eye test confirms his moves are much more refined and decisive while still being the best closer in the league.
Him and Noah still can average way more wins than this Bulls squad. Just let them take load mgt like Kawhi and bumslay in the playoffs.


So if Rose is "still better than most players in the league" why is Detroit 6-13 since December 12th?


The Bulls are I think 7-11 in that timespan despite Lavine "playing like a true all-star". Why is that?

"He needs help, he can't do it all by himself". I guess it goes both ways?
MrSparkle wrote:I don't see a scenario here or there where Lauri becomes the "7-pick we thought he could be." If you remove his 3P ability, he's worse than Felicio by a mile.

12/2/2022
I like the quote- it makes me chuckle. And it was/is pretty much true.
jordanwilliams6
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,091
And1: 3,749
Joined: Nov 01, 2018
 

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#225 » by jordanwilliams6 » Sun Jan 19, 2020 10:49 pm

MrSparkle wrote:
MeloRoseNoah wrote:I always compare Lavine to a more athletic Ray Allen, and it’s looking like it’s on point.


I wouldn't go that far... ever... Ray Allen's IQ and playmaking abilities were very good.

IMO he's "JR Smith with great attitude" and more athleticism.

How do people come up with such ridiculous opinions? J.R Smith averaged over 16 points once in his career, and did so on horrible efficiency.

Zach is an elite 25+ PPG scorer in the league. He has a poor perception because of how badly his teammates suck. Zach is an incredibly hard worker and good teammate. He's only 24 years old and has improved every year and I can't stand when people place him in a certain box.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,307
And1: 9,287
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#226 » by Jcool0 » Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:19 pm

FranchisePlayer wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Showtime23 wrote:
All-star and outscoring Doncic does not equate to winner even if I conceded he actually achieved them.
No one cares if Lavine averages 30 or won a scoring title. You think ESPN will now say he is the next american superstar?
Superstars always have unique signature move and are all-rounded in nearly every aspect.
Lavine literally relies 99% on athleticism and yet falls in love with jumpers which means he will be washed like Melo when he hits his 30s. His game is very similar to a homeless man's Westbrook, very likelly to end up like a B. Roy, destroying a franchise.

Rose, a player we all bashed after his ACL for not having any skills, actually had a very high bbiq, intangibles.
I have always argued a post ACL Rose is still better than most players in the league and looks like his 22PER vindicates he will be the number 1 option on this Bulls team. per 36 stat of 26/8 on 50percent shooting is just insanity better than his MVP prime.
Even the eye test confirms his moves are much more refined and decisive while still being the best closer in the league.
Him and Noah still can average way more wins than this Bulls squad. Just let them take load mgt like Kawhi and bumslay in the playoffs.


So if Rose is "still better than most players in the league" why is Detroit 6-13 since December 12th?


The Bulls are I think 7-11 in that timespan despite Lavine "playing like a true all-star". Why is that?

"He needs help, he can't do it all by himself". I guess it goes both ways?


Be better then a comment like this.
User avatar
Red Larrivee
RealGM
Posts: 42,271
And1: 19,119
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#227 » by Red Larrivee » Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:35 am

PaKii94 wrote:Because we define careers by one game right :roll:

But actually it was probably the first game since last year that I felt Zach truly carried the team. Much more so than the Charlotte game. That game was fun but that was more him getting hot


No, but we don't ignore new evidence in the development of a 24-year-old SG in the middle of a breakout season.

20.0 PER (career high)
1.71 ORPM (career high)
-0.59 DRPM (career high)
1.12 RPM (career high)
3.4 Win Shares (career high)
2.7 OBPM (career high)
-0.7 DBPM (career high)
2.0 BPM (career high)
1.5 VORP (career high)
+7.7 on/off oRTG (career high)

Flawed player? Absolutely. Would you like him to be a better defender? That would be **** lovely. Does he take dumb shots from time to time? Yes; all high volume offensive players do, but ultimately, LaVine is playing all-star caliber basketball, and is the least of the Bulls roster issues. Should you build your franchise around him? No, but he's proving to be a good, impactful piece on a very fair contract.
jordanwilliams6
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,091
And1: 3,749
Joined: Nov 01, 2018
 

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#228 » by jordanwilliams6 » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:40 am

Red Larrivee wrote:
PaKii94 wrote:Because we define careers by one game right :roll:

But actually it was probably the first game since last year that I felt Zach truly carried the team. Much more so than the Charlotte game. That game was fun but that was more him getting hot


No, but we don't ignore new evidence in the development of a 24-year-old SG in the middle of a breakout season.

20.0 PER (career high)
1.71 ORPM (career high)
-0.59 DRPM (career high)
1.12 RPM (career high)
3.4 Win Shares (career high)
2.7 OBPM (career high)
-0.7 DBPM (career high)
2.0 BPM (career high)
1.5 VORP (career high)
+7.7 on/off oRTG (career high)

Flawed player? Absolutely. Would you like him to be a better defender? That would be **** lovely. Does he take dumb shots from time to time? Yes; all high volume offensive players do, but ultimately, LaVine is playing all-star caliber basketball, and is the least of the Bulls roster issues. Should you build your franchise around him? No, but he's proving to be a good, impactful piece on a very fair contract.

I think most reasonable people should agree that he isn't the player to build around as your superstar, but is a very important piece moving forward. The best part is that he's on a very good contract. He's been playing the #1 option through our **** roster construction but we're paying him like a #2 or #3 option.
dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,084
And1: 13,020
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#229 » by dice » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:46 am

jordanwilliams6 wrote:
MrSparkle wrote:
MeloRoseNoah wrote:I always compare Lavine to a more athletic Ray Allen, and it’s looking like it’s on point.


I wouldn't go that far... ever... Ray Allen's IQ and playmaking abilities were very good.

IMO he's "JR Smith with great attitude" and more athleticism.

How do people come up with such ridiculous opinions? J.R Smith averaged over 16 points once in his career, and did so on horrible efficiency.

your response is what is ridiculous. first of all, you cherry picked a single season to denigrate smith. secondly, you ignored the "more athleticism" part of what he said. if j.r. smith had lavine's athleticism, guess what? he probably would have scored more points!

if you wan't to actually make a FAIR comparison of the two, use smith's time in denver (age 21-25), which roughly mirrors lavine's time with the bulls (age 22-24). per 36:

25p on 56% ts lavine
20p on 56% ts smith

if smith was leading a terrible team like zach does as opposed to playing on a GOOD team with guys like melo, AI and billups, smith might have put up nearly identical numbers to zach!

Zach is an elite 25+ PPG scorer in the league. He has a poor perception because of how badly his teammates suck.

putting a + on there when he averages exactly 25.0 points per game makes you look irrationally biased. and his poor perception is based as much on his low IQ and poor defense as it is on his team being bad. that's just reality. that said, his perception (along with his defense) continues to improve
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,084
And1: 13,020
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#230 » by dice » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:47 am

Jcool0 wrote:
Showtime23 wrote:
kodo wrote:Too bad he had that rough start to the season, his current play is easily an all-star in the East.

Since Dec 1, 27.4 ppg on 46% FG / 38% 3P. Solid rebound, assist, and steal #s for a SG as well.
2nd highest scoring guard in the EC. Outscoring Beal and even Doncic.


All-star and outscoring Doncic does not equate to winner even if I conceded he actually achieved them.
No one cares if Lavine averages 30 or won a scoring title. You think ESPN will now say he is the next american superstar?
Superstars always have unique signature move and are all-rounded in nearly every aspect.
Lavine literally relies 99% on athleticism and yet falls in love with jumpers which means he will be washed like Melo when he hits his 30s. His game is very similar to a homeless man's Westbrook, very likelly to end up like a B. Roy, destroying a franchise.

Rose, a player we all bashed after his ACL for not having any skills, actually had a very high bbiq, intangibles.
I have always argued a post ACL Rose is still better than most players in the league and looks like his 22PER vindicates he will be the number 1 option on this Bulls team. per 36 stat of 26/8 on 50percent shooting is just insanity better than his MVP prime.
Even the eye test confirms his moves are much more refined and decisive while still being the best closer in the league.
Him and Noah still can average way more wins than this Bulls squad. Just let them take load mgt like Kawhi and bumslay in the playoffs.


So if Rose is "still better than most players in the league" why is Detroit 6-13 since December 12th?

maybe because even bad teams tend to have a few players that are better than league average?
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#231 » by Jedzz » Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:57 am

dice wrote:
jordanwilliams6 wrote:
MrSparkle wrote:
I wouldn't go that far... ever... Ray Allen's IQ and playmaking abilities were very good.

IMO he's "JR Smith with great attitude" and more athleticism.

How do people come up with such ridiculous opinions? J.R Smith averaged over 16 points once in his career, and did so on horrible efficiency.

your response is what is ridiculous. first of all, you cherry picked a single season to denigrate smith. secondly, you ignored the "more athleticism" part of what he said. if j.r. smith had lavine's athleticism, guess what? he probably would have scored more points!

if you wan't to actually make a FAIR comparison of the two, use smith's time in denver (age 21-25), which roughly mirrors lavine's time with the bulls (age 22-24). per 36:

25p on 56% ts lavine
20p on 56% ts smith

if smith was leading a terrible team like zach does as opposed to playing on a GOOD team with guys like melo, AI and billups, smith might have put up nearly identical numbers to zach!

Zach is an elite 25+ PPG scorer in the league. He has a poor perception because of how badly his teammates suck.

putting a + on there when he averages exactly 25.0 points per game makes you look irrationally biased. and his poor perception is based as much on his low IQ and poor defense as it is on his team being bad. that's just reality. that said, his perception (along with his defense) continues to improve


I think some of you have yet to realize how this player started out in this league and how important it is that he keeps showing that he's getting better each season since you got him. He was doing the same as a Wolves player with each minute. But it's not like he had even one great player mentor, or good development coaches working with him much. He started with the Wolves in an environment that taught nearly zero players how to get better at shooting, building game IQ, or defense in the prior 15 years. I swear, if I saw even one other player get better at either in a Wolves Uni during that time I would give you his name right now.

Zach did everything on his own, behind the two darlings of the team in Towns/Wiggins. In Minny things are simple, Towns/Wiggins were #1 picks and Lavine wasn't even top 10. That's as deep as they go. But Flip Saunders had plans for him and very unusual for Wolves country was how many minutes and roles Flip was finding for him even though he had very little college exp. You should check out his actual college exp. Most players with that little experience are bound to be a project. Flip wanted to give him playing experience and he cast him upon the shores of the live games to learn. The team had no one else to play really. But he wasn't getting the true direction he needed, just experience minutes, especially when Flip left us early and his plans for LaVine went out the window. Yet, this guy was the one flashing amazing stuff often.

The Wolves team is loaded still today with lack of game IQ, lack of defensive accumen or desire, lack of consistent shooting skills, and since losing players like Zach and Rose there is certainly a lack of heart.

Watching from afar now, I can see a difference. I also noticed him stand up to a coach, and respond to that coach with higher play on the court at the same time. I see significantly more awareness already. I see attempts at defense when it wasn't even a thought in anyone's mind in Minny. I think you see that he is a workhorse with the goal of being a great player. With constant reminders about the importance of improving his defense, and with actual help and direction in exactly how he should, he will. I would suggest you don't let your team move him. I suggest you overlook that he wasn't a top 10 pick. Your team was lucky enough to have a heart player like Rose. This guy is all heart, desire, work, loaded with talents and he's aiming for a rung above most. Just keep teaching him about game IQ and defense. Don't just demand it. He's got everything else in spades and will keep achieving more. By age 27 I think he's going to be taking over as King in someone's castle and even the doubters will have to finally admit it.

In Minnesota, most of us can't stand that he plays for someone else. But we also knew nobody in the Wolves franchise was going to teach him defense or game IQ. Bulls have the connections and staff to do so. Get him some real direction in those areas of need and watch him get better. We have one or two players still capable of 40pt games, but none of them really know defense or have much game IQ yet. Please excuse the book report.
JimmyJammer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,651
And1: 1,798
Joined: Aug 31, 2005

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#232 » by JimmyJammer » Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:05 am

Showtime23 wrote:
kodo wrote:Too bad he had that rough start to the season, his current play is easily an all-star in the East.

Since Dec 1, 27.4 ppg on 46% FG / 38% 3P. Solid rebound, assist, and steal #s for a SG as well.
2nd highest scoring guard in the EC. Outscoring Beal and even Doncic.


All-star and outscoring Doncic does not equate to winner even if I conceded he actually achieved them.
No one cares if Lavine averages 30 or won a scoring title. You think ESPN will now say he is the next american superstar?
Superstars always have unique signature move and are all-rounded in nearly every aspect.
Lavine literally relies 99% on athleticism and yet falls in love with jumpers which means he will be washed like Melo when he hits his 30s. His game is very similar to a homeless man's Westbrook, very likelly to end up like a B. Roy, destroying a franchise.

Rose, a player we all bashed after his ACL for not having any skills, actually had a very high bbiq, intangibles.
I have always argued a post ACL Rose is still better than most players in the league and looks like his 22PER vindicates he will be the number 1 option on this Bulls team. per 36 stat of 26/8 on 50percent shooting is just insanity better than his MVP prime.
Even the eye test confirms his moves are much more refined and decisive while still being the best closer in the league.
Him and Noah still can average way more wins than this Bulls squad. Just let them take load mgt like Kawhi and bumslay in the playoffs.


Bro, stop living in the past. This post is about Lavine and the now but you are turning it into a promotion for Derrick Rose. We get it, Derrick Rose still has some left in the tank, good for him, but that's not our problem. Derrick and his circle did and said some stupid **** that turned the organization off on him, which is the main reason why he is playing somewhere else. He got a boat load of money on a contract that he only played for half of it. He was ready to rip off the organization on a new contract, as he had made reference to, despite the fact he had barely played, but the organization was smart enough to send him packing. Before he was traded, a feud started to emerge between him/his people and Butler about whose team it was, when clearly Butler was the man at the time. Rose and his handlers could not handle the fact that it was Butler's time. So, that Derrick Rose's story is dead to me. We'll do something like we did for Deng by allowing him to retire as a Bull when the time comes.
User avatar
FranchisePlayer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 598
Joined: Oct 25, 2019
 

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#233 » by FranchisePlayer » Mon Jan 20, 2020 6:05 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
FranchisePlayer wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
So if Rose is "still better than most players in the league" why is Detroit 6-13 since December 12th?


The Bulls are I think 7-11 in that timespan despite Lavine "playing like a true all-star". Why is that?

"He needs help, he can't do it all by himself". I guess it goes both ways?


Be better then a comment like this.


I am. You're the one who can't seem to be able to answer a simple question.
MrSparkle wrote:I don't see a scenario here or there where Lauri becomes the "7-pick we thought he could be." If you remove his 3P ability, he's worse than Felicio by a mile.

12/2/2022
I like the quote- it makes me chuckle. And it was/is pretty much true.
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,390
And1: 11,191
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#234 » by MrSparkle » Mon Jan 20, 2020 6:05 pm

dice wrote:
jordanwilliams6 wrote:
MrSparkle wrote:
I wouldn't go that far... ever... Ray Allen's IQ and playmaking abilities were very good.

IMO he's "JR Smith with great attitude" and more athleticism.

How do people come up with such ridiculous opinions? J.R Smith averaged over 16 points once in his career, and did so on horrible efficiency.

your response is what is ridiculous. first of all, you cherry picked a single season to denigrate smith. secondly, you ignored the "more athleticism" part of what he said. if j.r. smith had lavine's athleticism, guess what? he probably would have scored more points!

if you wan't to actually make a FAIR comparison of the two, use smith's time in denver (age 21-25), which roughly mirrors lavine's time with the bulls (age 22-24). per 36:

25p on 56% ts lavine
20p on 56% ts smith

if smith was leading a terrible team like zach does as opposed to playing on a GOOD team with guys like melo, AI and billups, smith might have put up nearly identical numbers to zach!

Zach is an elite 25+ PPG scorer in the league. He has a poor perception because of how badly his teammates suck.

putting a + on there when he averages exactly 25.0 points per game makes you look irrationally biased. and his poor perception is based as much on his low IQ and poor defense as it is on his team being bad. that's just reality. that said, his perception (along with his defense) continues to improve


Thanks Dice. I had to pause to make sure I wasn’t tripping when I brought up JR.

Honestly , JR with good attitude and better athleticism would’ve made several all-star games and probably stayed on one team longer. He helped Lebron win a championship; normally it’d be a ‘whatever,’ but seeing as they were going against the GSW Flagship 73-win Enterprise, being a 4th option, it’s not like talent-wise it’s an insult to Zach.

JR’s off-court attitude was as bad as it gets for a guy who stayed in the league so league. Have to have talent to make it like that. Kobe is on record complimenting his talent. On-court, I see similarities in a “no, yes!” blend of brilliant shot-making and bone-headed turnovers or shot chucking.

I find the Ray Allen comparison outlandish. Ray Allen was a career winner who could seamlessly fit into any role and team chemistry. He won as a 1st, 2nd and 3rd option, as well as a 40yo deep bench shooter.
MeloRoseNoah
Starter
Posts: 2,229
And1: 1,410
Joined: Jul 12, 2014

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#235 » by MeloRoseNoah » Mon Jan 20, 2020 6:12 pm

Jr Smith has never played defense like Lavine has done for this season.

At worst, Lavine is playing NBA average defense right now. My personal opinion is that he’s playing slightly above average NBA defense with more potential to generate 2+ steals per game with better instincts developed with more game time.

Lavine is one of those players who will develop with more game time by correcting mistakes in the gym after games. I feel that way about Coby White as well. In fact, I want both Lavine and White to lock themselves on an island together and put some work on improving their games.

Big Soft Lauri is not invited.
User avatar
FranchisePlayer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 598
Joined: Oct 25, 2019
 

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#236 » by FranchisePlayer » Mon Jan 20, 2020 6:30 pm

MeloRoseNoah wrote:Jr Smith has never played defense like Lavine has done for this season.

At worst, Lavine is playing NBA average defense right now. My personal opinion is that he’s playing slightly above average NBA defense with more potential to generate 2+ steals per game with better instincts developed with more game time.

Big Soft Lauri is not invited.


In his last game Lavine scored 42 points and left the court with a -1 rating. Lauri had +6. The game before that -17 (team worst), Lauri -9.
MrSparkle wrote:I don't see a scenario here or there where Lauri becomes the "7-pick we thought he could be." If you remove his 3P ability, he's worse than Felicio by a mile.

12/2/2022
I like the quote- it makes me chuckle. And it was/is pretty much true.
User avatar
drosereturn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,755
And1: 1,495
Joined: Oct 12, 2018

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#237 » by drosereturn » Mon Jan 20, 2020 6:34 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:No, but we don't ignore new evidence in the development of a 24-year-old SG in the middle of a breakout season.

20.0 PER (career high)
1.71 ORPM (career high)
-0.59 DRPM (career high)
1.12 RPM (career high)
3.4 Win Shares (career high)
2.7 OBPM (career high)
-0.7 DBPM (career high)
2.0 BPM (career high)
1.5 VORP (career high)
+7.7 on/off oRTG (career high)

Flawed player? Absolutely. Would you like him to be a better defender? That would be **** lovely. Does he take dumb shots from time to time? Yes; all high volume offensive players do, but ultimately, LaVine is playing all-star caliber basketball, and is the least of the Bulls roster issues. Should you build your franchise around him? No, but he's proving to be a good, impactful piece on a very fair contract.


Again, these are not signs that he is a winner which is the main topic we are discussing.
His improvements doesnt really matter since he will never be a 1st option. Like his usage screams 1st option but the Bulls are still the worst team in the NBA. If his stats doesnt improve the team, thats the definition of a empty stat player.

As much as I hated Butler for his diva, that guy is literally the only guy I would consider building around post Rose era. Everyone else is just pure garbage they arent close worth developing.
Lamelo will be a future superstar Bull. Book it. Lavar for president!
TheFinishSniper
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,076
And1: 3,244
Joined: Feb 02, 2018
Location: Earth

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#238 » by TheFinishSniper » Mon Jan 20, 2020 6:35 pm

zach is least a problem with this team so I dont get why we are even arguing about is he a winner. to me he is not in role he plays, usage he gets, but this franchise put him into that spot. with another guy who is clearly better at intangibles and be another scoring option (which Lauri was supposed to be) everyone would be ducking his duck.
User avatar
drosereturn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,755
And1: 1,495
Joined: Oct 12, 2018

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#239 » by drosereturn » Mon Jan 20, 2020 6:52 pm

MeloRoseNoah wrote:Jr Smith has never played defense like Lavine has done for this season.

At worst, Lavine is playing NBA average defense right now. My personal opinion is that he’s playing slightly above average NBA defense with more potential to generate 2+ steals per game with better instincts developed with more game time.

Lavine is one of those players who will develop with more game time by correcting mistakes in the gym after games. I feel that way about Coby White as well. In fact, I want both Lavine and White to lock themselves on an island together and put some work on improving their games.

Big Soft Lauri is not invited.


I know its a stupid logic to say but Lavine will never reach JR Smith since he will never win one.
Its almost like I want Lavine to be JR Smith and score 15 instead of 25 for the sake of the team. Do less to win.
JR was athletic as Lavine if not more and the reason why I coveted him was he limited his dumb mistakes by playing off ball.
JR was the same loser category as Lavine except he worked his butt off and won everything as the team 3/4th option.
You think Lavine who played 1st option in a crappy team will concede like JR? Just look at his attitude.
Him and Butler's selfishness is the clear reason why I dont want these type of players.
Lamelo will be a future superstar Bull. Book it. Lavar for president!
User avatar
drosereturn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,755
And1: 1,495
Joined: Oct 12, 2018

Re: Is Zach LaVine a Winner? 

Post#240 » by drosereturn » Mon Jan 20, 2020 7:05 pm

Jedzz wrote:
I think some of you have yet to realize how this player started out in this league and how important it is that he keeps showing that he's getting better each season since you got him. He was doing the same as a Wolves player with each minute. But it's not like he had even one great player mentor, or good development coaches working with him much. He started with the Wolves in an environment that taught nearly zero players how to get better at shooting, building game IQ, or defense in the prior 15 years. I swear, if I saw even one other player get better at either in a Wolves Uni during that time I would give you his name right now.

Zach did everything on his own, behind the two darlings of the team in Towns/Wiggins. In Minny things are simple, Towns/Wiggins were #1 picks and Lavine wasn't even top 10. That's as deep as they go. But Flip Saunders had plans for him and very unusual for Wolves country was how many minutes and roles Flip was finding for him even though he had very little college exp. You should check out his actual college exp. Most players with that little experience are bound to be a project. Flip wanted to give him playing experience and he cast him upon the shores of the live games to learn. The team had no one else to play really. But he wasn't getting the true direction he needed, just experience minutes, especially when Flip left us early and his plans for LaVine went out the window. Yet, this guy was the one flashing amazing stuff often.

The Wolves team is loaded still today with lack of game IQ, lack of defensive accumen or desire, lack of consistent shooting skills, and since losing players like Zach and Rose there is certainly a lack of heart.

Watching from afar now, I can see a difference. I also noticed him stand up to a coach, and respond to that coach with higher play on the court at the same time. I see significantly more awareness already. I see attempts at defense when it wasn't even a thought in anyone's mind in Minny. I think you see that he is a workhorse with the goal of being a great player. With constant reminders about the importance of improving his defense, and with actual help and direction in exactly how he should, he will. I would suggest you don't let your team move him. I suggest you overlook that he wasn't a top 10 pick. Your team was lucky enough to have a heart player like Rose. This guy is all heart, desire, work, loaded with talents and he's aiming for a rung above most. Just keep teaching him about game IQ and defense. Don't just demand it. He's got everything else in spades and will keep achieving more. By age 27 I think he's going to be taking over as King in someone's castle and even the doubters will have to finally admit it.

In Minnesota, most of us can't stand that he plays for someone else. But we also knew nobody in the Wolves franchise was going to teach him defense or game IQ. Bulls have the connections and staff to do so. Get him some real direction in those areas of need and watch him get better. We have one or two players still capable of 40pt games, but none of them really know defense or have much game IQ yet. Please excuse the book report.


Well too bad, MIN wasted 3 yrs of Lavine which is the exact reason why I dont want to invest 30+ USG for 5+ years.
You make him look like he is some untapped draft prospect but the reality is he is a 6yr veteran aged 24.
Like him and Dunn are done in terms of developing. They are literally finished products theres no if, but.
We had the exact same discussion with Dunn and I lost my mind when Dunn was gifted a starting spot and look what happenend.
Confirmed bust. End of story. Why spend on these type of players when you literally have a star prospect in Lauri?
Now Lauris going to be a bust since he is going through what Lavine did. I just dont understand why Chicago's own players (Lauri, Carter, White) have to suffer from MIN's problems. White is literally going into no man's land as well.

Like Chicago's issue is they are a rebuilding team but they keep trying to take shortcuts and contend like MIN and develop too many youngsters at the same time it wont work.
Literally, they are trying to develop 5 prospects at once when they should concentrate on 2-3 and fill rest with Veterans like OKC.
Lamelo will be a future superstar Bull. Book it. Lavar for president!

Return to Chicago Bulls