ImageImageImage

Nuggets Trades

Moderator: THE J0KER

User avatar
getrichordie
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 2,313
Joined: Oct 22, 2015
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#181 » by getrichordie » Mon Feb 3, 2020 5:58 am

The Rebel wrote:
getrichordie wrote:Thunder buddy here. How interested would you guys be in a shiny Chris Paul? Premise of trade would be centered around Millsap & Paul obviously.


I wouldn't be at all. I love Paul, but it was obvious how much he struggled at times off the ball, and fact is Paul is just too injury prone already with a long time left on that contract. We cannot afford to take on that deal if we are building a long term contender with Jokic, MPJ, and Murray.


How much does Denver value Murray? Does trading Millsap for CP3 not give Denver its best chance for a ship barring a crazy trade or development?
[twitter] @thunderdustin
User avatar
THE J0KER
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Posts: 7,442
And1: 6,816
Joined: Apr 12, 2017
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#182 » by THE J0KER » Mon Feb 3, 2020 11:40 am

getrichordie wrote:
The Rebel wrote:
getrichordie wrote:Thunder buddy here. How interested would you guys be in a shiny Chris Paul? Premise of trade would be centered around Millsap & Paul obviously.


I wouldn't be at all. I love Paul, but it was obvious how much he struggled at times off the ball, and fact is Paul is just too injury prone already with a long time left on that contract. We cannot afford to take on that deal if we are building a long term contender with Jokic, MPJ, and Murray.


How much does Denver value Murray? Does trading Millsap for CP3 not give Denver its best chance for a ship barring a crazy trade or development?

CP3 biggest value is passing and playmaking, which means Denver with Jokic already doing it very well is the wrong destination for him. Our only target in Oklahoma (considering SGA is locked) is expiring Gallinari, which played already here with Jokic, Murray, and Harris, and will be ready to contribute since the very first day. Gallinari and Roberson for Millsap and Bol Bol... but this makes sense for the Nuggets only if we have some guarantee from Galo to re-sign this summer because rookie Bol Bol is the only there which not expiring, and he is lottery pick potential.
NuggetsWY
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,392
And1: 4,125
Joined: Oct 28, 2015
Location: Cheyenne, WY
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#183 » by NuggetsWY » Mon Feb 3, 2020 2:23 pm

getrichordie wrote:
The Rebel wrote:
getrichordie wrote:Thunder buddy here. How interested would you guys be in a shiny Chris Paul? Premise of trade would be centered around Millsap & Paul obviously.

I wouldn't be at all. I love Paul, but it was obvious how much he struggled at times off the ball, and fact is Paul is just too injury prone already with a long time left on that contract. We cannot afford to take on that deal if we are building a long term contender with Jokic, MPJ, and Murray.

How much does Denver value Murray? Does trading Millsap for CP3 not give Denver its best chance for a ship barring a crazy trade or development?

As said, Paul's contract added to his age (long-term fit for Denver is important), plus his injury issues and I seriously doubt Denver is interested.

How much does Denver value Murray? I suspect OKC could get Murray IF they traded everything they got for Paul George, including all players and picks. He is still too inconsistent but he fits so well next to Jokic and has a ton of potential.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#184 » by The Rebel » Mon Feb 3, 2020 2:38 pm

getrichordie wrote:
The Rebel wrote:
getrichordie wrote:Thunder buddy here. How interested would you guys be in a shiny Chris Paul? Premise of trade would be centered around Millsap & Paul obviously.


I wouldn't be at all. I love Paul, but it was obvious how much he struggled at times off the ball, and fact is Paul is just too injury prone already with a long time left on that contract. We cannot afford to take on that deal if we are building a long term contender with Jokic, MPJ, and Murray.


How much does Denver value Murray? Does trading Millsap for CP3 not give Denver its best chance for a ship barring a crazy trade or development?


I would say that Denver values Murray a lot more than most fans would ever understand. There are not many PGs that can play off the ball as much as Murray does, and only a handful of guards around the league that are willing to sacrifice their body to set screens on and off ball, unless you have someone coming back that can replace those than it hurts the Nuggets. The entire Nuggets offense for the starters has been struggling with Murray out, only saved by Jokic and MPJ playing like beasts and Malone having the good sense to put the hot shooters on the court at the end of the game (until yesterday that is). I personally think that Murray would put up much better stats on a team where he had the ball in his hands near as much as most PGs but he doesn't get those opportunities with Jokic on the floor.

As for CP3, what do we need him for? Maybe you have missed it, but the Nuggets were the 4th youngest team in the league to make the 2nd round of the playoffs, I would say we are just fine on development. With Jokic becoming more vocal, we have Murray, Jokic, and MIllsap who are all leaders of the team and we seem to be doing just fine with them. Our entire scheme depends heavily on good defensive PFs so that Jokic and our guards can be aggressive on the perimeter, while Grant is pretty good he is not Millsap and going from Grant to Vanderbilt or Plumlee as backup PF hurts that defense. Our offensive scheme depends heavily on having a PG that is happy playing off the ball and Paul is not great about that. Sorry I just do not see the need.

Add to the lack of need is that contract, for the next 3 years we have Murray and Jokic on 25% max deals, we have to resign Grant or Millsap next summer, with Harris and Barton still having 2 more years. I watched the Nuggets throw away years with Melo due to having a near max deal on an injury prone players. KMart Leanord, and Nene's lack of health kept this team from ever moving into firm contender status, why put yourself in the same spot with Jokic?
User avatar
THE J0KER
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Posts: 7,442
And1: 6,816
Joined: Apr 12, 2017
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#185 » by THE J0KER » Tue Feb 4, 2020 1:04 am

About two days before trade-deadline, Nuggets are involved only in a rumor about Jrue, but in the news that he will most probably stay with Pells. And the most logical choice of the player which should be moved and traded for someone we need more is not only someone who is not part of any current trade rumor around but our coach delusionally mentioned him as someone who deserved to be mentioned in all-star selection discussions!?

This not sounds good to me...
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,102
And1: 5,457
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#186 » by skywalker33 » Tue Feb 4, 2020 2:42 am

THE J0KER wrote:About two days before trade-deadline, Nuggets are involved only in a rumor about Jrue, but in the news that he will most probably stay with Pells. And the most logical choice of the player which should be moved and traded for someone we need more is not only someone who is not part of any current trade rumor around but our coach delusionally mentioned him as someone who deserved to be mentioned in all-star selection discussions!?

This not sounds good to me...


To be fair, the Nuggets have kept trades under wraps very well, loose lips sink ships and all. As I said, I don't see the Nuggets making any moves this year.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
TunaFish
Head Coach
Posts: 6,543
And1: 6,124
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#187 » by TunaFish » Wed Feb 5, 2020 5:54 am

Looks like a trade is happening with Beasley, Hernangomez and Vanderbilt being sent out.

Diop and Vonieh are headed to Denver. Napier is headed to Denver. Maybe more, this trade is going down now.
Canned in Denver.
TKainZero
Head Coach
Posts: 7,056
And1: 3,275
Joined: Jul 31, 2014
       

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#188 » by TKainZero » Wed Feb 5, 2020 6:08 am

TunaFish wrote:Looks like a trade is happening with Beasley, Hernangomez and Vanderbilt being sent out.

Diop and Vonieh are headed to Denver. Napier is headed to Denver. Maybe more, this trade is going down now.


And it looks like Denver got a 1st round pick as well
USA Celtics in full effect. Amazing chemistry building experience right there for the main core of the team


Proceeds to finish 7th and shames the entire nation!
DaFan334
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,931
And1: 1,480
Joined: Jul 21, 2006

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#189 » by DaFan334 » Wed Feb 5, 2020 6:30 am

I could see this setting up a trade of Morris, Harris and that 1st round pick for Jrue Holiday. Napier makes Morris expendable, especially with Jrue capable of playing the point. This lineup would be pretty well poised for a good run in the playoffs:

Murray/Napier/Holiday
Holiday/Craig/Green
Barton/MPJ/Bates-Diop
Milsap/Grant/Vonleh
Jokic/Plumlee/Vonleh
Image
TunaFish
Head Coach
Posts: 6,543
And1: 6,124
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#190 » by TunaFish » Wed Feb 5, 2020 6:39 am

DaFan334 wrote:I could see this setting up a trade of Morris, Harris and that 1st round pick for Jrue Holiday. Napier makes Morris expendable, especially with Jrue capable of playing the point. This lineup would be pretty well poised for a good run in the playoffs:

Murray/Napier/Holiday
Holiday/Craig/Green
Barton/MPJ/Bates-Diop
Milsap/Grant/Vonleh
Jokic/Plumlee/Vonleh


Green (from Houston) is unlikely to play and will probably be waived. You are right about how interesting it is that Denver traded for a veteran point guard and what that may mean.
Canned in Denver.
Manolito
Senior
Posts: 607
And1: 398
Joined: Dec 29, 2018
   

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#191 » by Manolito » Wed Feb 5, 2020 7:11 am

So:
Beasley x Napier + HOU FRP
Juancho x Bates Diop (super cheap contract with one year more)
Vanderbilt x Vonleh (I don't like this one)

It is not that bad if they were leaving for free at the end of the season, but It is a pity to see Beasley gone.

Maybe Denver is not finish yet

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
THE J0KER
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Posts: 7,442
And1: 6,816
Joined: Apr 12, 2017
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#192 » by THE J0KER » Wed Feb 5, 2020 8:37 am

Sorry, but I'm not happy with this deal. In a vacuum, it is the fair and equal deal, but in reality, we make our team worse before the playoff, and a team with the best young core in the league, we are the last ones who need late 1st rounder this summer for anything. I asked so many times for Nuggets being part of the Covington deal, but not in this way. We should add Barton or Bol or 2022 first to this MB-JH-JV package and get 3&D "The Missing Piece" Covington.

I wish Malik, Juancho, and JV all the best. For all three I always thought that they are better players than they get the chance to show in Denver.

Napier in last month showed maybe he can be useful, and maybe Bates is better than it seems right now, considering Wolves was a toxic place for role players development in the past 5 years (I watched Bjelica and Saric cases back in time).

If this was just one step before another deal before the trade deadline and arrival of one starter-level player, just ignore all these my complaints.
Maf
Veteran
Posts: 2,510
And1: 955
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: heart of Europe
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#193 » by Maf » Wed Feb 5, 2020 9:06 am

My first reaction wasn't any good. I don't have good opinion about any of incoming players. Vonleh might be useful to back up Jokič till Plums is back buck then I'll never want to see him again. That Diop guy I don't think I've ever noticed him on the court. But I admit I see Wolves very rarely. Napier? No thank you. As for 3rd string PG I'd rather watch how good can Dozier be.

Minutes later I've started to admit that we... didn't get anything but like... didn't give up anything. If team felt there is no way they could resign Beasley then it's basically couple of months of Malik's for (about) 20th pick. That is nothing to be excited but it's far from my first disgruntled reaction.
"I never played a game sober, unfortunately" - Keon Clark

"I've never drunk alcohol socially. I've never took cocain socially. I've never smoked anything socially. I did all of this... to got **** up!" - Ozzy Osbourne
User avatar
THE J0KER
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Posts: 7,442
And1: 6,816
Joined: Apr 12, 2017
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#194 » by THE J0KER » Wed Feb 5, 2020 10:04 am

BTW, Houston's 1st round pick is more tradable for rebuilding teams than Beasley+Juancho+JV package, so if we are still interested in Gallinari or Jrue Holiday, it may be very helpful.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#195 » by The Rebel » Wed Feb 5, 2020 10:27 am

I am not a fan of this deal. It is another one where it feels like we held onto our guys for too long and buried them to deep in the rotation and ended up getting the short end of the deal. Even worse we gave the Twolves a lot of talent for basically some end of rotation guys on expiring deals and a late 1st. Beasley can start immediately and Juancho is arguably the 2nd best forward the the TWolves have on their roster now. It was likely that we were not bringing back Beasley or Juancho, and Vanderbilt was going to be even further buried with Bol on the roster next year. I get all that, but I am sure we could have gotten more for all of them 3 months ago.

There has to be another deal in the works with Morris going out, and possibly Dozier, otherwise why are we bringing in another PG? We did not exactly have an issue there.

As for the guys we are getting, I am disappointed that we got significantly worse from the 3 point line, not one of the guys we are getting back is even average from 3. Which considering Craig will likely get the majority of minutes being vacated by trading Beasley and Juancho, is not a good thing. They do make some sense as deep bench guys with Vonleh being an okay 6th big that can play some C and Napier who is a solid backup PG. Bates-Diop seems like he is a good defender and has some talent, but is a downgrade on Vanderbilt.
NuggetsWY
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,392
And1: 4,125
Joined: Oct 28, 2015
Location: Cheyenne, WY
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#196 » by NuggetsWY » Wed Feb 5, 2020 1:12 pm

Beasley & Hernangomez were inconsistent this year, but it's hard to be consistent when you don't play much. I especially don't like trading Beasley, especially with Harris seemingly afraid to shoot. Is Malone going to move Barton to starting SG?

I really liked Vanderbilt's potential and was hoping he might be Grant's backup at PF next year. But assuming Bol joins the team next year and knowing Porter can play PF and maybe they plan to bring back Millsap, trading Vanderbilt makes some sense.

I'll agree with above posts: I think we should have gotten more for these players. We waited until we didn't have much choice. I'm not impressed with this trade, but in the long-run, I don't think it hurts us too much. It does put more pressure on our core - especially when there are injuries.
Manolito
Senior
Posts: 607
And1: 398
Joined: Dec 29, 2018
   

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#197 » by Manolito » Wed Feb 5, 2020 1:13 pm

Do you know if Gerald Green injury (and salary) is covered by he insurance? That would save us 1.6M
User avatar
_AIJ_
RealGM
Posts: 14,144
And1: 4,635
Joined: Oct 15, 2008
     

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#198 » by _AIJ_ » Wed Feb 5, 2020 1:53 pm

Hi guys! How is Beasley’s, Juancho’s, JV’s defense? Will they be able to help the Wolves immensely? What would be Beasley’s role there?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LETS GO WOLVES!!! 8-)
TunaFish
Head Coach
Posts: 6,543
And1: 6,124
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#199 » by TunaFish » Wed Feb 5, 2020 2:10 pm

_AIJ_ wrote:Hi guys! How is Beasley’s, Juancho’s, JV’s defense? Will they be able to help the Wolves immensely? What would be Beasley’s role there?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Beasley is the key to the deal as he will likely be your starting shooting guard. Defense is not his strength but he can man up and has good quickness. Hernangomez is also a spot up shooter and average defender but he could well be a starter at small forward. Vanderbilt is a re-bounder and backup power forward.

What you get in this package is some good outside shooting with Beasley and Hernangomez.
Canned in Denver.
TunaFish
Head Coach
Posts: 6,543
And1: 6,124
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
 

Re: Nuggets Trades 

Post#200 » by TunaFish » Wed Feb 5, 2020 2:19 pm

I don't think it is any accident that the all the players coming back to Denver are expiring contracts. As I have previously suggested, we could not have retained Beasley. At the same time Vonleh fills an immediate need for a back up center while Plumlee is out. He can also play power forward and we may be down Millsap and Grant for a while. Diop is a solid defense first small forward and a prospect.

Napier is a good backup point guard who has recently shown some offensive improvement and he may be the reason we made this trade. That suggests Morris may be on the block.

We did give up some shooting to get some defense.
Canned in Denver.

Return to Denver Nuggets