ImageImageImage

Gordon Hayward Thread

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

sam_I_am
RealGM
Posts: 16,735
And1: 9,521
Joined: Jul 10, 2004

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1741 » by sam_I_am » Sun Feb 2, 2020 1:10 pm

GuyClinch wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:If Tatum or Brown were shooting above average from every spot on the floor, had 50/40/90 shooting splits for the past month, and near the top at efficiency on every offensive play type, we'd be declaring them an All-NBA type player already. Just facts.

Instead, his selfless play is being touted as not being aggressive enough while in the same breath saying he's holding back the development of his young teammates. :P


Agree for the most part. Problem with Hayward is that on some nights he doesn't seem to have 'it' - that extra little bit of athleticism and skill that makes you the best player on the court. I think he is still diminished by his injury on those nights. But then sometimes he seems to have got it - and plays chill out mode anyway..

We need to see more super star like performances out of him.. That has been his let down.. Is the extra gear still there? It's not quite a Len Bias disaster - but the injury was still horrendous.

Now you might say oh Tatum and Brown are the same - but not really. With both of them we have faith the raw physicality is there - even if they are playing like ****. Brown went through an awful stretch but every fan thinks that's okay he will straighten it out. The guy is strong as an ox and can jump out of the gym..

Hayward its like "eh...that was pretty athletic but he still missed.." So for Hayward its not clear the athletic potential is still there. That's in part why he suffers on the boards. The injury ruined his upside in the eyes of most fans..

Hayward plays a clean smart game - he makes great decision. He shoots decently can pass and rebound. His defense has been respectable IMHO. But his "this guy is taking over' moments have not really happened enough. And that matters in the NBA. The refs have to believe that a player is superior so he can get the reputation calls.

When Hayward gets hacked and misses a layup - refs are like - well its Hayward - he is old and injured..


I think the thought was that Hayward was an emerging superstar and that playing with Brad would take him to that next level. Apart from his last playoff run in Utah, I feel like we are seeing the same guy he was in Utah. I used to see the love for him here on this thread but when Cs played Utah I thought he was okay but athletically nothing that special. To steal a guy that good as a free agent was a coup but he is basically the same guy....the injury perhaps robbed him of chance to take it to the level of superstar. However, in the preseason as a Celtic before his injury he didn’t look any different than he does now, honestly. A one time all star is still a pretty good NBA player and that is what he is. He just isn’t the perennial all star we believed he might be that you can rely upon to step up when Kemba or Tatum aren’t there. Instead, it can sometimes mean Marcus or Jaylen trying to play hero ball and that can be a mixed bag. Right now Gordon is a glue guy and a role player. If the team is rolling he can augment that. If the team is struggling he can help get other guys going but if they don’t, don’t expect him to put the team on his shoulders - like Jaylen did last night. I’m not saying he can’t on occasion....you just can’t expect it because some days he can’t and some days he won’t even try.
"I think the criticism's stupid," Stevens said. "So I don't care. I'm with Jaylen (Brown) on that. Those two had achieved more than most 25 and 26 year olds ever had. I'd rather be in the mix and have my guts ripped out than suck."
ANGT4T
Ballboy
Posts: 31
And1: 47
Joined: Jan 11, 2020
 

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1742 » by ANGT4T » Sun Feb 2, 2020 5:16 pm

sam_I_am wrote:
GuyClinch wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:If Tatum or Brown were shooting above average from every spot on the floor, had 50/40/90 shooting splits for the past month, and near the top at efficiency on every offensive play type, we'd be declaring them an All-NBA type player already. Just facts.

Instead, his selfless play is being touted as not being aggressive enough while in the same breath saying he's holding back the development of his young teammates. :P


Agree for the most part. Problem with Hayward is that on some nights he doesn't seem to have 'it' - that extra little bit of athleticism and skill that makes you the best player on the court. I think he is still diminished by his injury on those nights. But then sometimes he seems to have got it - and plays chill out mode anyway..

We need to see more super star like performances out of him.. That has been his let down.. Is the extra gear still there? It's not quite a Len Bias disaster - but the injury was still horrendous.

Now you might say oh Tatum and Brown are the same - but not really. With both of them we have faith the raw physicality is there - even if they are playing like ****. Brown went through an awful stretch but every fan thinks that's okay he will straighten it out. The guy is strong as an ox and can jump out of the gym..

Hayward its like "eh...that was pretty athletic but he still missed.." So for Hayward its not clear the athletic potential is still there. That's in part why he suffers on the boards. The injury ruined his upside in the eyes of most fans..

Hayward plays a clean smart game - he makes great decision. He shoots decently can pass and rebound. His defense has been respectable IMHO. But his "this guy is taking over' moments have not really happened enough. And that matters in the NBA. The refs have to believe that a player is superior so he can get the reputation calls.

When Hayward gets hacked and misses a layup - refs are like - well its Hayward - he is old and injured..


I think the thought was that Hayward was an emerging superstar and that playing with Brad would take him to that next level. Apart from his last playoff run in Utah, I feel like we are seeing the same guy he was in Utah. I used to see the love for him here on this thread but when Cs played Utah I thought he was okay but athletically nothing that special. To steal a guy that good as a free agent was a coup but he is basically the same guy....the injury perhaps robbed him of chance to take it to the level of superstar. However, in the preseason as a Celtic before his injury he didn’t look any different than he does now, honestly. A one time all star is still a pretty good NBA player and that is what he is. He just isn’t the perennial all star we believed he might be that you can rely upon to step up when Kemba or Tatum aren’t there. Instead, it can sometimes mean Marcus or Jaylen trying to play hero ball and that can be a mixed bag. Right now Gordon is a glue guy and a role player. If the team is rolling he can augment that. If the team is struggling he can help get other guys going but if they don’t, don’t expect him to put the team on his shoulders - like Jaylen did last night. I’m not saying he can’t on occasion....you just can’t expect it because some days he can’t and some days he won’t even try.


The difference between a good NBA player and a Star ... Is about 12 shots per game.

Would Hayward's efficiency drop off a cliff if he was taking 25 shots as the #1 option? I doubt it.

Would it be best for the C's as currently constructed? Definitely not.

Understand that this team is developing two recent top 3 draft picks who are both continuing to improve, they need those shots more than Hayward right now.

We don't need Hayward to be James Harden, we just need him to stay healthy and play his part.
sam_I_am
RealGM
Posts: 16,735
And1: 9,521
Joined: Jul 10, 2004

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1743 » by sam_I_am » Sun Feb 2, 2020 6:55 pm

ANGT4T wrote:
sam_I_am wrote:
GuyClinch wrote:
Agree for the most part. Problem with Hayward is that on some nights he doesn't seem to have 'it' - that extra little bit of athleticism and skill that makes you the best player on the court. I think he is still diminished by his injury on those nights. But then sometimes he seems to have got it - and plays chill out mode anyway..

We need to see more super star like performances out of him.. That has been his let down.. Is the extra gear still there? It's not quite a Len Bias disaster - but the injury was still horrendous.

Now you might say oh Tatum and Brown are the same - but not really. With both of them we have faith the raw physicality is there - even if they are playing like ****. Brown went through an awful stretch but every fan thinks that's okay he will straighten it out. The guy is strong as an ox and can jump out of the gym..

Hayward its like "eh...that was pretty athletic but he still missed.." So for Hayward its not clear the athletic potential is still there. That's in part why he suffers on the boards. The injury ruined his upside in the eyes of most fans..

Hayward plays a clean smart game - he makes great decision. He shoots decently can pass and rebound. His defense has been respectable IMHO. But his "this guy is taking over' moments have not really happened enough. And that matters in the NBA. The refs have to believe that a player is superior so he can get the reputation calls.

When Hayward gets hacked and misses a layup - refs are like - well its Hayward - he is old and injured..


I think the thought was that Hayward was an emerging superstar and that playing with Brad would take him to that next level. Apart from his last playoff run in Utah, I feel like we are seeing the same guy he was in Utah. I used to see the love for him here on this thread but when Cs played Utah I thought he was okay but athletically nothing that special. To steal a guy that good as a free agent was a coup but he is basically the same guy....the injury perhaps robbed him of chance to take it to the level of superstar. However, in the preseason as a Celtic before his injury he didn’t look any different than he does now, honestly. A one time all star is still a pretty good NBA player and that is what he is. He just isn’t the perennial all star we believed he might be that you can rely upon to step up when Kemba or Tatum aren’t there. Instead, it can sometimes mean Marcus or Jaylen trying to play hero ball and that can be a mixed bag. Right now Gordon is a glue guy and a role player. If the team is rolling he can augment that. If the team is struggling he can help get other guys going but if they don’t, don’t expect him to put the team on his shoulders - like Jaylen did last night. I’m not saying he can’t on occasion....you just can’t expect it because some days he can’t and some days he won’t even try.


The difference between a good NBA player and a Star ... Is about 12 shots per game.

Would Hayward's efficiency drop off a cliff if he was taking 25 shots as the #1 option? I doubt it.

Would it be best for the C's as currently constructed? Definitely not.

Understand that this team is developing two recent top 3 draft picks who are both continuing to improve, they need those shots more than Hayward right now.

We don't need Hayward to be James Harden, we just need him to stay healthy and play his part.


It’s more than just 12 shots. It takes “cajones” too.....GH is just too passive too often. It would be very easy for GH to get 12 more shots up but it would mean taking leadership responsibility. He’d rather be a glue guy. And that is great....just not enough to justify letting him walk for nothing or paying him another max contract.

I think he has the skills to be more but against the big boys it seems as if he knows he doesn’t have it anymore. I’d love to be proven wrong. I’d hate to see the Celtics see another high priced asset walk for nothing.
"I think the criticism's stupid," Stevens said. "So I don't care. I'm with Jaylen (Brown) on that. Those two had achieved more than most 25 and 26 year olds ever had. I'd rather be in the mix and have my guts ripped out than suck."
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1744 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sun Feb 2, 2020 7:04 pm

Ease up, Hayward had a bad game. Its BS to come after Brown when he has them and its BS to come after Hayward now.
sam_I_am
RealGM
Posts: 16,735
And1: 9,521
Joined: Jul 10, 2004

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1745 » by sam_I_am » Sun Feb 2, 2020 7:07 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:Ease up, Hayward had a bad game. Its BS to come after Brown when he has them and its BS to come after Hayward now.


He took good safe shots and just missed them. What was bad about the game wasn’t the 1-10 or whatever, it was the blatant passiveness.
"I think the criticism's stupid," Stevens said. "So I don't care. I'm with Jaylen (Brown) on that. Those two had achieved more than most 25 and 26 year olds ever had. I'd rather be in the mix and have my guts ripped out than suck."
CelticsPride18
General Manager
Posts: 9,474
And1: 11,513
Joined: Oct 31, 2013
       

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1746 » by CelticsPride18 » Sun Feb 2, 2020 7:54 pm

sam_I_am wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:Ease up, Hayward had a bad game. Its BS to come after Brown when he has them and its BS to come after Hayward now.


He took good safe shots and just missed them. What was bad about the game wasn’t the 1-10 or whatever, it was the blatant passiveness.


He took a step back when he saw the Jays cooking. Kemba has done that a few times this season.
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,075
And1: 14,921
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1747 » by jfs1000d » Sun Feb 2, 2020 8:55 pm

This thread is dumb.

He is shooting 51 percent from floor, averaging 17.5 ppg and shooting almost 40% fro. 3.

He does that in low volume, has career highs in rebounding and assists and is OUR FOURTH option.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,075
And1: 14,921
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1748 » by jfs1000d » Sun Feb 2, 2020 8:56 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:Only on Celtics RealGM forum can a player be a near 50/40/90 shooter and is a selfless team player and that be view as a negative thing. :lol:


It is insane. Sure, he has bad shooting nights. So does Kemba, so does Tatum and so does Brown.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Ed Pinkney
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,083
And1: 5,247
Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Location: Australia
 

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1749 » by Ed Pinkney » Mon Feb 3, 2020 12:37 am

zoyathedestroya wrote:If Tatum or Brown were shooting above average from every spot on the floor, had 50/40/90 shooting splits for the past month, and near the top at efficiency on every offensive play type, we'd be declaring them an All-NBA type player already. Just facts.

Instead, his selfless play is being touted as not being aggressive enough while in the same breath saying he's holding back the development of his young teammates. :P



+1 (thousand).
User avatar
Bohemian
Analyst
Posts: 3,503
And1: 3,364
Joined: Jul 24, 2012
         

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1750 » by Bohemian » Mon Feb 3, 2020 12:42 am

The surrounding circumstances could no doubt change by June 29 when Hayward has to make his decision on 2020-21, but the most likely scenario is the one the Celtics envisioned would be the case with Al Horford last summer: Hayward opts out and signs a long-term contract that gets him his worth overall but has team friendly numbers in certain years to facilitate the larger health of the roster.

There are a number of Celts who could be mentioned in trade discussions this week, but Danny Ainge may have to go through Marcus Smart to get to Hayward.

“We definitely don’t want Danny to do anything crazy,” said Smart. “Gordon’s a big part of this team. But Danny’s smart. He’s not going to jeopardize anything.”


https://www.bostonherald.com/2020/02/02/gordon-hayward-hasnt-pondered-his-contract-decision-hes-just-thinking-about-a-title-with-the-celtics/amp/#click=https://t.co/9LmAjQxtAq
User avatar
Ed Pinkney
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,083
And1: 5,247
Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Location: Australia
 

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1751 » by Ed Pinkney » Mon Feb 3, 2020 12:54 am

Bohemian wrote:
There are a number of Celts who could be mentioned in trade discussions this week, but Danny Ainge may have to go through Marcus Smart to get to Hayward.

“We definitely don’t want Danny to do anything crazy,” said Smart. “Gordon’s a big part of this team. But Danny’s smart. He’s not going to jeopardize anything.”



This is one of the best things I've read in ages. Marcus is the best.
User avatar
K For Three
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,498
And1: 33,240
Joined: Jan 03, 2018
       

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1752 » by K For Three » Tue Feb 4, 2020 6:54 am

Read on Twitter
?s=19
GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1753 » by GuyClinch » Tue Feb 4, 2020 7:18 am

I think Hayward is way safer then the fans imagine.. We finally get to see what he can do. First year got hurt..second year he was gimpy. Now we are getting him at the best he is ever going to be..
pac213up
General Manager
Posts: 8,584
And1: 4,220
Joined: Jul 11, 2006

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1754 » by pac213up » Tue Feb 4, 2020 3:41 pm

Hayward is a perfect fit for the Brown, Tatum, Kemba dynamic.
GoGreen
Analyst
Posts: 3,050
And1: 3,487
Joined: Jul 19, 2017
 

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1755 » by GoGreen » Tue Feb 4, 2020 6:41 pm

Still unsure about Hayward tbh. But when he's on it's a great thing to see!
Dangit
Starter
Posts: 2,200
And1: 2,118
Joined: Mar 01, 2005
     

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1756 » by Dangit » Tue Feb 4, 2020 11:09 pm

It's obvious that Hayward's struggles when he came back in December were due to the nerve pain , he is absolutely the glue that binds this team and lately has been our best overall player ... I want him here long term.
Postby YouthMovement on Mon Jan 07, 2013 10:09 pm

im 19 and i can say paul pierce ruined my childhood
cloverleaf
RealGM
Posts: 10,358
And1: 7,657
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1757 » by cloverleaf » Tue Feb 4, 2020 11:30 pm

sam_I_am wrote:
ANGT4T wrote:
sam_I_am wrote:
I think the thought was that Hayward was an emerging superstar and that playing with Brad would take him to that next level. Apart from his last playoff run in Utah, I feel like we are seeing the same guy he was in Utah. I used to see the love for him here on this thread but when Cs played Utah I thought he was okay but athletically nothing that special. To steal a guy that good as a free agent was a coup but he is basically the same guy....the injury perhaps robbed him of chance to take it to the level of superstar. However, in the preseason as a Celtic before his injury he didn’t look any different than he does now, honestly. A one time all star is still a pretty good NBA player and that is what he is. He just isn’t the perennial all star we believed he might be that you can rely upon to step up when Kemba or Tatum aren’t there. Instead, it can sometimes mean Marcus or Jaylen trying to play hero ball and that can be a mixed bag. Right now Gordon is a glue guy and a role player. If the team is rolling he can augment that. If the team is struggling he can help get other guys going but if they don’t, don’t expect him to put the team on his shoulders - like Jaylen did last night. I’m not saying he can’t on occasion....you just can’t expect it because some days he can’t and some days he won’t even try.


The difference between a good NBA player and a Star ... Is about 12 shots per game.

Would Hayward's efficiency drop off a cliff if he was taking 25 shots as the #1 option? I doubt it.

Would it be best for the C's as currently constructed? Definitely not.

Understand that this team is developing two recent top 3 draft picks who are both continuing to improve, they need those shots more than Hayward right now.

We don't need Hayward to be James Harden, we just need him to stay healthy and play his part.


It’s more than just 12 shots. It takes “cajones” too.....GH is just too passive too often. It would be very easy for GH to get 12 more shots up but it would mean taking leadership responsibility. He’d rather be a glue guy. And that is great....just not enough to justify letting him walk for nothing or paying him another max contract.

I think he has the skills to be more but against the big boys it seems as if he knows he doesn’t have it anymore. I’d love to be proven wrong. I’d hate to see the Celtics see another high priced asset walk for nothing.


Gordo's 4th on the team in FGAs per game, behind the other three offensive starters and Danny has said he'd like to see him be more aggressive because of his efficiency. But 12 more shots a game, from 13 to 25--7 more than JT, 8 more than Kemba and 10 more than JB? No, I don't thilnk that's what the team is wanting him to do. His and Kemba's relative unselfishness is undoubtedly teaching the Jays some things they need to learn after having seen IT and Kyrie lead their teams before Kemba.
User avatar
Cyclical
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,766
And1: 3,397
Joined: Nov 13, 2005
     

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1758 » by Cyclical » Thu Feb 6, 2020 5:27 am

Not sure if this has been posted on one of the zillion pages of this thread, but just for perspective, Gordon was not better in his all-star season at Utah, he just had less talent around him so he took more shots. He's more efficient and has actually gone up in most statistical categories, playing 2 less minutes per game.

UTAH 2016-17:
FG: 47.1% __ 3pFG: 39.8% __ FT: 84.4% __ Rb: 5.4 __ Ast: 3.5 __ Pts: 21.9

BOS 2019-20:
FG: 50.8% __ 3pFG: 37.8% __ FT: 87.7% __ Rb: 6.4 __ Ast: 3.9 __ Pts: 17.0
Floody100
Analyst
Posts: 3,345
And1: 5,051
Joined: Oct 21, 2018
 

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1759 » by Floody100 » Thu Feb 6, 2020 7:31 am

Cyclical wrote:Not sure if this has been posted on one of the zillion pages of this thread, but just for perspective, Gordon was not better in his all-star season at Utah, he just had less talent around him so he took more shots. He's more efficient and has actually gone up in most statistical categories, playing 2 less minutes per game.

UTAH 2016-17:
FG: 47.1% __ 3pFG: 39.8% __ FT: 84.4% __ Rb: 5.4 __ Ast: 3.5 __ Pts: 21.9

BOS 2019-20:
FG: 50.8% __ 3pFG: 37.8% __ FT: 87.7% __ Rb: 6.4 __ Ast: 3.9 __ Pts: 17.0


Only difference between the two seasons is he was more athletic back then while being smarter now.
djFan71
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,215
And1: 20,575
Joined: Jul 24, 2010
 

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1760 » by djFan71 » Thu Feb 6, 2020 7:58 am

Floody100 wrote:
Cyclical wrote:Not sure if this has been posted on one of the zillion pages of this thread, but just for perspective, Gordon was not better in his all-star season at Utah, he just had less talent around him so he took more shots. He's more efficient and has actually gone up in most statistical categories, playing 2 less minutes per game.

UTAH 2016-17:
FG: 47.1% __ 3pFG: 39.8% __ FT: 84.4% __ Rb: 5.4 __ Ast: 3.5 __ Pts: 21.9

BOS 2019-20:
FG: 50.8% __ 3pFG: 37.8% __ FT: 87.7% __ Rb: 6.4 __ Ast: 3.9 __ Pts: 17.0


Only difference between the two seasons is he was more athletic back then while being smarter now.

Also the difference between being the number one option and number 3 or 4, depending on health. It’s a lot easier for him to be efficient this year than his All Star year.

Don’t get me wrong, not knocking him. But, I don’t think he’s back at that level quite yet.

Return to Boston Celtics