zhenyasj wrote:clyde21 wrote:zhenyasj wrote:They traded Iggy because that was the agreement when he joined. We obviously wouldn't have traded him and would still have an old team with no scoring and no depth. 2021 pick can be used to improve the team both short and long term depending whether we keep it or trade it. 2024 pick is too far away to help this core compete.
i know, that's not my point. my point is the same asset they used to get Winslow we gave THEM a future first just to take...that's Myers completely not understand the value of Iggy on the market.
You can't compare situations. Myers was trying to free up money fast to sign D-Lo versus Memphis taking time to listen to offers.
Whether this trade works out or not, I'd rather a GM being proactive and taking chances rather than playing it safe and settling.
yes I can, Myers panicked and not only gave away a + asset for nothing but attached a future pick (could be a really high one, too) just so he pay D-Lo 30mil a pop.
again, we essentially traded Iggy and a 24 FRP for Wiggins and a 21 FRP...that's not a good deal...the Wiggins contract on its own is a negative asset that needed a 1st just to unload.