ImageImageImage

Gordon Hayward Thread

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 51,901
And1: 61,130
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1801 » by Parliament10 » Fri Feb 7, 2020 11:50 pm

The Comedian wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:
The Comedian wrote:
I haven't looked into it, but SWC brought up a good point the other night, Tatum has a real chance to be all nba next year, would him being eligible for the early supermax throw a wrench into it?

I thought only players with at least eight years of service (or is it 7) are eligible for supermax. Maybe it's called differently for players coming off a rookie contract. No idea.


I know about as much about the cap as Smart knows about playing halfassed.

Explained: What is an NBA supermax contract and how does it work?
By Keely Diven | May 22, 2019 5:06 PM

https://www.nbcsports.com/washington/wizards/explained-what-nba-supermax-contract-and-how-does-it-work
What is a supermax contract?

Officially known as the "Designated Veteran Player Extension," this rule allows teams to re-sign qualified players to maximum five-year contracts worth up to 35 percent of the salary cap with eight percent escalation in each subsequent year.

The length of the supermax deal depends on the player's years of NBA experience and years remaining on his current contract.

* A qualified player who has completed seven or eight years of service and has two years left on his contract is eligible for a four-year supermax (keeping the player with the same team for a total of six seasons)

* A qualified player who has completed seven or eight years of service and has one year left on his contract is eligible for a five-year supermax (keeping the player with the same team for a total of six seasons)

* A qualified free agent who has completed eight or nine years of service is eligible for a five-year supermax

Furthermore, teams cannot trade a supermax player for the first year after he signs the contract.
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
User avatar
OBisHalJordan
Rookie
Posts: 1,182
And1: 922
Joined: Aug 22, 2008
Location: Portland, ME

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1802 » by OBisHalJordan » Sat Feb 8, 2020 6:45 pm

Why does Hayward almost never sit on the bench when he is out injured? Am I the only who thinks this is weird?
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,125
And1: 98,277
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1803 » by zoyathedestroya » Sat Feb 8, 2020 6:57 pm

OBisHalJordan wrote:Why does Hayward almost never sit on the bench when he is out injured? Am I the only who thinks this is weird?

He and Brown were on the bench watching the game. Or maybe just one half?
User avatar
OBisHalJordan
Rookie
Posts: 1,182
And1: 922
Joined: Aug 22, 2008
Location: Portland, ME

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1804 » by OBisHalJordan » Sat Feb 8, 2020 7:21 pm

zoyathedestroya wrote:
OBisHalJordan wrote:Why does Hayward almost never sit on the bench when he is out injured? Am I the only who thinks this is weird?

He and Brown were on the bench watching the game. Or maybe just one half?


I saw Brown but not Hayward. Maybe I missed it. In any case, it seems that he's not on the bench a lot of the time when he's out. I am a wrong? Is this not thing?
User avatar
K For Three
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,498
And1: 33,240
Joined: Jan 03, 2018
       

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1805 » by K For Three » Sat Feb 8, 2020 7:27 pm

zoyathedestroya wrote:
OBisHalJordan wrote:Why does Hayward almost never sit on the bench when he is out injured? Am I the only who thinks this is weird?

He and Brown were on the bench watching the game. Or maybe just one half?

Saw Hayward before the game started high fiving Tatum.

As for what happened during the game who knows, sometimes guys get treatments etc.
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,125
And1: 98,277
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1806 » by zoyathedestroya » Sat Feb 8, 2020 7:27 pm

OBisHalJordan wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:
OBisHalJordan wrote:Why does Hayward almost never sit on the bench when he is out injured? Am I the only who thinks this is weird?

He and Brown were on the bench watching the game. Or maybe just one half?


I saw Brown but not Hayward. Maybe I missed it. In any case, it seems that he's not on the bench a lot of the time when he's out. I am a wrong? Is this not thing?

Two seasons ago, he was usually not with the team while doing rehab.

Not a thing this season.
User avatar
CWitch
Sophomore
Posts: 204
And1: 10
Joined: Nov 23, 2006
Location: Salem, MA
         

Gordinary Hayward? 

Post#1807 » by CWitch » Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:03 pm

I was wondering if you guys think Gordon is just a ordinary player in the league now? Also is he a bench player on this team for the rest of his contract?
User avatar
Romeiro Celtic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,597
And1: 7,183
Joined: Jan 04, 2017
Location: Brazil
   

Re: Gordinary Hayward? 

Post#1808 » by Romeiro Celtic » Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:06 pm

There's a thread for Gordon Hayward's discussions already. Please, post there.
Read on Twitter
Slax
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,579
And1: 7,076
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: New York
       

Re: Gordinary Hayward? 

Post#1809 » by Slax » Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:28 pm

User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,125
And1: 98,277
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1810 » by zoyathedestroya » Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:25 pm

Gordon's so ordinary that the 17+ ppg, 6+ rpg, 4+ apg on 60+% TS% he's putting up has only been done twice in Celtics history -- both by some dude named Larry Bird.
100proof
Starter
Posts: 2,187
And1: 1,117
Joined: Jul 25, 2019

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1811 » by 100proof » Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:46 pm

zoyathedestroya wrote:Gordon's so ordinary that the 17+ ppg, 6+ rpg, 4+ apg on 60+% TS% he's putting up has only been done twice in Celtics history -- both by some dude named Larry Bird.



I dont think anyone who is a celtics fan will say that Gordon is a bad player.

Redundant, yes
Cap hindering, yes

Bad player, no
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,125
And1: 98,277
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1812 » by zoyathedestroya » Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:50 pm

100proof wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:Gordon's so ordinary that the 17+ ppg, 6+ rpg, 4+ apg on 60+% TS% he's putting up has only been done twice in Celtics history -- both by some dude named Larry Bird.



I dont think anyone who is a celtics fan will say that Gordon is a bad player.

Redundant, yes
Cap hindering, yes

Bad player, no

Redundant right now? No. He's our only efficient scorer and playmaker from the wing position, any position really. How is someone that's making the team better whenever he's on the floor redundant?

Cap hindering right now? Maybe. Depends on whatever else the Cs + Kanter plan to do. Cs can still avoid the tax next season even if he stays unless he demands something like 40M a year.
sam_I_am
RealGM
Posts: 16,735
And1: 9,521
Joined: Jul 10, 2004

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1813 » by sam_I_am » Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:50 pm

zoyathedestroya wrote:Gordon's so ordinary that the 17+ ppg, 6+ rpg, 4+ apg on 60+% TS% he's putting up has only been done twice in Celtics history -- both by some dude named Larry Bird.


That sound like the rationalization for Al Horford. No really....13/6 is elite and worth a max.
"I think the criticism's stupid," Stevens said. "So I don't care. I'm with Jaylen (Brown) on that. Those two had achieved more than most 25 and 26 year olds ever had. I'd rather be in the mix and have my guts ripped out than suck."
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,125
And1: 98,277
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1814 » by zoyathedestroya » Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:55 pm

sam_I_am wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:Gordon's so ordinary that the 17+ ppg, 6+ rpg, 4+ apg on 60+% TS% he's putting up has only been done twice in Celtics history -- both by some dude named Larry Bird.


That sound like the rationalization for Al Horford. No really....13/6 is elite and worth a max.

2nd or 3rd best player on the team is worth the max yes. And we've been through this usage/role/stats discussion before. At this point, people are just being blind and stubborn.
User avatar
5InOfLouisville
Senior
Posts: 513
And1: 818
Joined: Jan 11, 2018
     

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1815 » by 5InOfLouisville » Tue Feb 11, 2020 1:13 pm

Gordo and Kemba sacrifice counting stats to empower JT/JB to get theirs and grow, which ultimately makes us a better team. You can also watch Hayward play, and he isnt explosive and flashy, but the results speak for themselves.
KGboss wrote:Brown doesnt need you to clean his jock strap for him


Captain_Caveman wrote:You are perfectly welcome to never read or respond to my posts ever again. I don't find you particularly knowledgeable or insightful from anything I have read to date.


:cry:
Dave_From_NB
Starter
Posts: 2,076
And1: 1,538
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Location: Quispamsis, New Brunswick (not New Bedford!)
   

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1816 » by Dave_From_NB » Tue Feb 11, 2020 1:20 pm

OBisHalJordan wrote:Why does Hayward almost never sit on the bench when he is out injured? Am I the only who thinks this is weird?


I'm pretty sure Hayward was sitting between Theis and Brown in the first half.
100proof
Starter
Posts: 2,187
And1: 1,117
Joined: Jul 25, 2019

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1817 » by 100proof » Tue Feb 11, 2020 1:25 pm

zoyathedestroya wrote:
sam_I_am wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:Gordon's so ordinary that the 17+ ppg, 6+ rpg, 4+ apg on 60+% TS% he's putting up has only been done twice in Celtics history -- both by some dude named Larry Bird.


That sound like the rationalization for Al Horford. No really....13/6 is elite and worth a max.

2nd or 3rd best player on the team is worth the max yes. And we've been through this usage/role/stats discussion before. At this point, people are just being blind and stubborn.



he is, at best, 4th best player on the team/for future.

Kemba - better
tatum - better more important for future
Brown - better more important for future
smart - not as good, more important for future

And Hayward is not the teams best playmaker. Kemba, Wanamaker and Marcus all have a higher assist%, and Tatum is not far behind, and in the summer on Team USA Jaylen showed the ability to play that role as well (Brad just has him doing other things)

in the hockey assist, gordon is 3rd on the team at 0.4 per game, tied with Smart and behind Kemba (0.8) Tatum, Brown, Wanamaker, Theis are all at 0.3. Not a drop off at all.

Gordon is 3rd in potential assists ( behind Kemba and Smart and and a couple ahead of Tatum, Brown and Wannamaker )

AS a pick and role ball handler Hayward sports a .9 Point per possession (65th percentile)
Brown is .88
Tatum is a 1
Smart is a 1.1
Kemba is a 1.2

Hayward as a playmaker is overblown, he is statistically the 3rd highest producer on the team at this, and imo, replaceable with more of the opportunity going to the Jays to pick up that slack.

8.6% of possessions are on handoffs, at which he is in the 58th percentile finishing at .96 points per possession

He is used 6.5% of possessions on cuts, at which he is in the 77th percentile in finishing at 1.44 points per possession.

Hayward is the best on the team in isolations, (he can score from the wing against power forwards) but only 6.6% of possessions are that...so underused perhaps?

His shot is excellent though, But Hayward is no longer top 4 player on the team. Luckily, cause the Jays have improved so much. Not to take away from Hayward any either.
MagicBagley18
RealGM
Posts: 14,831
And1: 20,333
Joined: Feb 15, 2019
   

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1818 » by MagicBagley18 » Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:59 pm

Hey guys , I was curious if anyone could provide some stats for me showing just how well Hayward is playing now compared to his best days in Utah. I tried looking and I’ve found some but I know some of you here are just better getting stats than me.

Having a friendly argument with a co-worker whose telling me how Gordon hasn’t been good this year for the Celtics and I said actually when he’s played for the most part and what we’ve asked of him he’s been great. We both admit he will never be the athletic Gordon he was in Utah but said he’s been incredibly important for us but his biggest flaws have been health and him not being aggressive enough.

Just looking for some comparisons or stats that back up how well he’s been playing lately and for the most part when he’s been healthy
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1819 » by SmartWentCrazy » Wed Feb 12, 2020 10:19 pm

zoyathedestroya wrote:
100proof wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:Gordon's so ordinary that the 17+ ppg, 6+ rpg, 4+ apg on 60+% TS% he's putting up has only been done twice in Celtics history -- both by some dude named Larry Bird.



I dont think anyone who is a celtics fan will say that Gordon is a bad player.

Redundant, yes
Cap hindering, yes

Bad player, no

Redundant right now? No. He's our only efficient scorer and playmaker from the wing position, any position really. How is someone that's making the team better whenever he's on the floor redundant?

Cap hindering right now? Maybe. Depends on whatever else the Cs + Kanter plan to do. Cs can still avoid the tax next season even if he stays unless he demands something like 40M a year.


He’s not even close to redundant. I’m glad he’s on the team. We are worse without him. So long as his monetary demands are reasonable, I look forward to re-signing him.

But his TS% is virtually identical to Jaylen’s and both are super efficient scorers for wings in general. Kemba has also been very efficient in general, even moreso when relative to other guards.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#1820 » by SmartWentCrazy » Wed Feb 12, 2020 10:33 pm

MagicBagley18 wrote:Hey guys , I was curious if anyone could provide some stats for me showing just how well Hayward is playing now compared to his best days in Utah. I tried looking and I’ve found some but I know some of you here are just better getting stats than me.

Having a friendly argument with a co-worker whose telling me how Gordon hasn’t been good this year for the Celtics and I said actually when he’s played for the most part and what we’ve asked of him he’s been great. We both admit he will never be the athletic Gordon he was in Utah but said he’s been incredibly important for us but his biggest flaws have been health and him not being aggressive enough.

Just looking for some comparisons or stats that back up how well he’s been playing lately and for the most part when he’s been healthy


https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/haywago01.html

Will use 16-17 as comparison point.

Utah: 21.9/5.4/3.5 on 47.1/39.8/84.4 shooting splits [59.5 TS in a league where average TS was below current levels]. 9.0% rebound rate and 18.2% assist rate. 33.4/8.2/5.3 per 100 possessions, which is important because pace in general has increased today

Boston: 17.2/6.6/4.1 on 51.4/39.3/87.2 shooting splits [ 60.5 TS which is likely slightly less impressive relative to average in today’s game]. 10.8% rebound rate and 19.2% assist rate. 25.3/9.7/6.0 per 100.

His scoring is worse. Part of this is due to role [first option in Utah, 4th option here], part of it is due to aggressiveness declining [.371 FTr vs .182 now].

His plus/minus stats have decreased from then to now, suggesting he’s gone from a top 20 to top 50 player. Part of this is again due to role, but part is also due to scoring decline.

He’s a more skilled player today than he was in Utah— his shooting splits are up in each zone save 3’s, his rebounding is better, his handle is better and his vision is better. However, his athleticism and aggression have unquestionably declined as well. Would say he’s less versatile defensively today as well, and probably a worse defender overall accordingly.

I would peg the decrease in athleticism as slightly more significant than the addition in skill and would say he’s a less impactful player today than he was at his peak in Utah.

Return to Boston Celtics