ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XXVII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,365
And1: 2,728
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1421 » by Kanyewest » Mon Feb 10, 2020 10:07 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
I think this is looking at this way too over simplistically. It’s scary how a lot of the Bernie support and fanaticism behind him mirror the support of Labor and lead up to the UK election. Labor is undoubtedly better than the Conservative party and anyone who voted for Brexit is an idiot but Boris Johnson managed to turn the election into a single issue Get Brexit done and completely obliterated Labor strongholds that had existed for decades. I see the same problem with the myopic view of Bernie that just because he’s pro union it assumes other Republicans, Independents and Democrats will vote for him, it’s wrong. I’ll give you an anecdote that shows why this thinking is wrong. I listened to a podcast that spoke with fracking workers in Pennsylvania about Bernie and Elizabeth’s blanket ban on fracking. Long story short the workers in this industry were against a blanket ban, but not higher environmental standards and the very Progressive far left mayor of the town was against it as well. The interviewed Democratic voters that work in fracking and all of them said they’d either sit out the election or vote for Trump if Bernie or Warren were the nominee. Granted this is a small sample size and they could just be lying, but this highlights the problem of rhetoric without a plan. Sure it makes for great sound bites and retweets to say you’re going to go after the healthcare industry because of greedy CEOs but it ignores the real fear from the millions of people in the field who aren’t CEO’s that worry about losing their jobs.

People are often think in their own self interests so Bernie’s policies sound great until you put them against a framework that goes against their self interest. So I’m sure there are a lot of people are 100% behind the idea of free college but even some very Progressive people would balk at the idea of giving universal healthcare to undocumented immigrants. Bernie and his policies have not really been tested. Elizabeth Warren took a hit when you actually put numbers behind her Medicare 4 all plan. What happens when Bernie’s plan actually get scrutinized? The general is not the place to start scrutinizing his policies because they take a lot of nuance to understand. For an election like this you need someone who is flexible and can pivot, not remain rigid in his beliefs. Mike Bloomberg has built a strong election infrastructure and has pledged to spend a billion dollars to defeat Trump, but I heard Bernie’s senior advisor say on tv that they wouldn’t take any help from him which is about the dumbest thing you can do. Democrats need to win up and down the ballot so it’s bigger than just a Bernie Sanders.


I talked to an economist and he constantly views Corbyn in a very unfavorable light. While this election was in some ways a referendum on Brexit - Corbyn himself in the past was for Brexit and wasn't really pushing against Brexit in his re-election campaign. Also Corbyn net approval rating is negative 50(!).


The same way that the UK election wasn’t about policy, neither will this upcoming election. While I agree with Bernie’s economic policies it’s much harder to get the rest of the country on board because it will require a massive investment and it will require taxes to go up on everyone unless you increase the deficit. Trump is going to run on the economy and that’s where he’s strongest. Bernie’s policies are great in a vacuum but when you place them up against a set up criteria it’s a different story.


Agreed. It could be tough for any candidate especially if there is foreign interference again and an incumbent president hasn't lost since 1992.

That being said, Trump ran against a very similar economy in 2016 so he's vulnerable in the same ways in that there is wage stagnation among middle class voters. In the same economy in 2018, Trump lost a of the seats in the midterm election. Granted there were many moderate democrats- but hopefully these same Democrats will support whoever the nominee is especially since most of the party thinks Trump should be impeached.

I do believe the concerns for Sanders that you are addressing are real enough (for instance maybe Sanders becomes a one term president). But it may not hurt him against Trump- right now to me this is a big unknown and uncertainty. While Sanders would certainly struggle in a general election in the past, younger voters do no not have the negative impression of Sanders being a Democratic socialist as they look at is like a European country. However, older voters may view it more negatively as communist and anti-captalist.

Sanders may also not draw as many college educated voters as Warren/Pete; but if the choice is between Sanders and Trump- perhaps these voters would be more likely to vote for Sanders anyways at least that's how I would hope it plays.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,798
And1: 20,371
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1422 » by dckingsfan » Mon Feb 10, 2020 10:20 pm

Kanyewest wrote:I'm right now reading Blowout by Rachel Maddow- halfway through- and I have a pretty unfavorable view of fracking in respects to climate change.

Yeah, natural gas was supposed to be a bridge fuel and then go away.

See this article but note the date:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/natural-gas-really-better-coal-180949739/

But now you can find a lot of articles that show it is only marginally better.

We need a better plan. My thoughts (your eyes should roll in the back of your head now).

1) Reduce CO2 and other gas emissions through a series of taxes, rebates and other programs (like CA's you have to have solar with new construction.
2) Aggressively fund CCUS technology and the boring stuff (planting trees and cover crops).
3) Have a resilience mitigation plan (because we aren't going to avoid the freight train that is 2C).
4) Have a climate change based trade plan.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,091
And1: 24,413
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1423 » by Pointgod » Tue Feb 11, 2020 1:32 am

FAH1223 wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Zonkerbl wrote:I don't know about swing state but the rust belt states that Trump surprisingly won are all hardcore pro-union and that is Bernie's core constituency. Trump only won over the ex-union guys because the Dems abandoned them. Bernie can recapture those voters in a heartbeat.

Florida? Colorado? Arizona? Not so sure how he'd do there. But don't be surprised if he turns Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania blue again.

Worth pointing out that the Republicans won a two year one party dictatorship by holding their noses and voting for Trump. If only the Dems had that kind of discipline, THEY'D NEVER LOSE. Except they should be supporting candidates that bring out the African American vote, not the union vote imho.


I think this is looking at this way too over simplistically. It’s scary how a lot of the Bernie support and fanaticism behind him mirror the support of Labor and lead up to the UK election. Labor is undoubtedly better than the Conservative party and anyone who voted for Brexit is an idiot but Boris Johnson managed to turn the election into a single issue Get Brexit done and completely obliterated Labor strongholds that had existed for decades. I see the same problem with the myopic view of Bernie that just because he’s pro union it assumes other Republicans, Independents and Democrats will vote for him, it’s wrong. I’ll give you an anecdote that shows why this thinking is wrong. I listened to a podcast that spoke with fracking workers in Pennsylvania about Bernie and Elizabeth’s blanket ban on fracking. Long story short the workers in this industry were against a blanket ban, but not higher environmental standards and the very Progressive far left mayor of the town was against it as well. The interviewed Democratic voters that work in fracking and all of them said they’d either sit out the election or vote for Trump if Bernie or Warren were the nominee. Granted this is a small sample size and they could just be lying, but this highlights the problem of rhetoric without a plan. Sure it makes for great sound bites and retweets to say you’re going to go after the healthcare industry because of greedy CEOs but it ignores the real fear from the millions of people in the field who aren’t CEO’s that worry about losing their jobs.

People are often think in their own self interests so Bernie’s policies sound great until you put them against a framework that goes against their self interest. So I’m sure there are a lot of people are 100% behind the idea of free college but even some very Progressive people would balk at the idea of giving universal healthcare to undocumented immigrants. Bernie and his policies have not really been tested. Elizabeth Warren took a hit when you actually put numbers behind her Medicare 4 all plan. What happens when Bernie’s plan actually get scrutinized? The general is not the place to start scrutinizing his policies because they take a lot of nuance to understand. For an election like this you need someone who is flexible and can pivot, not remain rigid in his beliefs. Mike Bloomberg has built a strong election infrastructure and has pledged to spend a billion dollars to defeat Trump, but I heard Bernie’s senior advisor say on tv that they wouldn’t take any help from him which is about the dumbest thing you can do. Democrats need to win up and down the ballot so it’s bigger than just a Bernie Sanders.


Bernie's advisor says they don't need the money or the help cause they don't. But they aren't opposed to Bloomberg doing what he wants to destroy Trump or help Dems down ballot.

Bernie is going to be able to raise the money needed for a general election campaign.

On fracking, Bernie has repeatedly said that people who work in fossil fuel industry ain't his enemy. He doesn't want to destroy livelihoods. He wants to get climate items done. His plans aren't going to be law. Its Overton Window shifting.


In terms of not taking help from Bloomberg that’s insane. Elizabeth Warren has it right. Stay off corporate money in the primaries but take all the help you can get to rid the country of Trump because that’s more important than anything else. Trump has 1 billion dollar war chest, an incumbency advantage, has spent way more money on digital advertising than the next closest person and will use foreign interference to rig the election. For Bernie to raise a billion dollars based on his current average donation he’d need roughly every single person who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 to donate to him. Even if he can reach this lofty goal, why not double your war chest? People are complicated and my fear with Bernie’s inflexibleness is that money gets diverted to down ballot races and you end up with a Democratic Senate and House but Trump is still President which is an unmitigated disaster.

And in terms of fracking. Again I don’t necessarily disagree with his stance but a blanket ban of fracking is going to put those people out of work. You can say all you want that the workers aren’t the enemy but the cold hard facts remain.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,091
And1: 24,413
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1424 » by Pointgod » Tue Feb 11, 2020 1:50 am

Kanyewest wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:
I talked to an economist and he constantly views Corbyn in a very unfavorable light. While this election was in some ways a referendum on Brexit - Corbyn himself in the past was for Brexit and wasn't really pushing against Brexit in his re-election campaign. Also Corbyn net approval rating is negative 50(!).


The same way that the UK election wasn’t about policy, neither will this upcoming election. While I agree with Bernie’s economic policies it’s much harder to get the rest of the country on board because it will require a massive investment and it will require taxes to go up on everyone unless you increase the deficit. Trump is going to run on the economy and that’s where he’s strongest. Bernie’s policies are great in a vacuum but when you place them up against a set up criteria it’s a different story.


Agreed. It could be tough for any candidate especially if there is foreign interference again and an incumbent president hasn't lost since 1992.

That being said, Trump ran against a very similar economy in 2016 so he's vulnerable in the same ways in that there is wage stagnation among middle class voters. In the same economy in 2018, Trump lost a of the seats in the midterm election. Granted there were many moderate democrats- but hopefully these same Democrats will support whoever the nominee is especially since most of the party thinks Trump should be impeached.

I do believe the concerns for Sanders that you are addressing are real enough (for instance maybe Sanders becomes a one term president). But it may not hurt him against Trump- right now to me this is a big unknown and uncertainty. While Sanders would certainly struggle in a general election in the past, younger voters do no not have the negative impression of Sanders being a Democratic socialist as they look at is like a European country. However, older voters may view it more negatively as communist and anti-captalist.

Sanders may also not draw as many college educated voters as Warren/Pete; but if the choice is between Sanders and Trump- perhaps these voters would be more likely to vote for Sanders anyways at least that's how I would hope it plays.


All good points but a lot of Sander’s negatives brushed off too easily. It’s not just older voters that have issues with socialism but it’s huge issue with Latino voters. Especially if you’re trying to win Florida, good luck convincing Central and South Americans to vote for a socialist. despite Trump’s overwhelming racism, he’s already targeting Latino voters and I would not be surprised to see his share of the Latino vote increase in 2020.

You bring up the midterm elections, but what a lot of people who are further left ignore is that they were won in the suburbs by capturing alot of previous Trump voters, it was a majority of moderates that flip red districts to blue. It wasn’t more Progressive candidates. Democrats need to keep those suburbs and my worry is that Bernie won’t be flexible enough in the general to pivot and keep those voters engaged or they simply vote down ticket and leave the top open.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,288
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1425 » by FAH1223 » Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:47 am

Pointgod wrote:
In terms of not taking help from Bloomberg that’s insane. Elizabeth Warren has it right. Stay off corporate money in the primaries but take all the help you can get to rid the country of Trump because that’s more important than anything else. Trump has 1 billion dollar war chest, an incumbency advantage, has spent way more money on digital advertising than the next closest person and will use foreign interference to rig the election. For Bernie to raise a billion dollars based on his current average donation he’d need roughly every single person who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 to donate to him. Even if he can reach this lofty goal, why not double your war chest? People are complicated and my fear with Bernie’s inflexibleness is that money gets diverted to down ballot races and you end up with a Democratic Senate and House but Trump is still President which is an unmitigated disaster.

And in terms of fracking. Again I don’t necessarily disagree with his stance but a blanket ban of fracking is going to put those people out of work. You can say all you want that the workers aren’t the enemy but the cold hard facts remain.


Assuming Bloomberg isn't the nominee, his organization is going to basically operate as a SuperPAC running anti-Trump ads and registering voters and helping down ballot.

I think that is a big help to any Dem nominee. Bernie would do his thing with his donor base. Their strategy in the general is that they don't need to switch it up, they'll have the resources. They have more donors than Trump and they've gotten 6 million contributions already. This is something we haven't seen since Obama 2008.

I imagine Bernie is going to pivot on a transition to things like fracking. He is against it but as you said, his team will have to deliver a flexible path forward. I think things like this are going to be easily navigated.

Bernie's career in the House of Representatives and the US Senate shows a guy who advocates what he believes but operates pretty pragmatically. Same as when he was Mayor of Burlington.
Image
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,288
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1426 » by FAH1223 » Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:52 am

Pointgod wrote:
All good points but a lot of Sander’s negatives brushed off too easily. It’s not just older voters that have issues with socialism but it’s huge issue with Latino voters. Especially if you’re trying to win Florida, good luck convincing Central and South Americans to vote for a socialist. despite Trump’s overwhelming racism, he’s already targeting Latino voters and I would not be surprised to see his share of the Latino vote increase in 2020.

You bring up the midterm elections, but what a lot of people who are further left ignore is that they were won in the suburbs by capturing alot of previous Trump voters, it was a majority of moderates that flip red districts to blue. It wasn’t more Progressive candidates. Democrats need to keep those suburbs and my worry is that Bernie won’t be flexible enough in the general to pivot and keep those voters engaged or they simply vote down ticket and leave the top open.


Bernie is going to be polling dead even with Trump in FL.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/fl/florida_trump_vs_sanders-6842.html

In terms of Latinos, Bernie has invested a lot of money and time in the Latino vote. He is trying to expand the electorate in the primary which would serve well in the general. He has Chuck Rocha as an advisor who knows what he's doing within the Latino communities in the western states, the midwest, and the south. You'll see this throughout the primary. I think we're generalizing the Latino community a bit much too. The Dems will get 65-70% of the Latino vote in the general election. The task is TURNING THEM OUT.

The conservative Cubans and Venezuelans in FL won't vote for him, sure. But Puerto Ricans will vote for Bernie as he's been a strong voice against Trump's disrespect of the island and the disastrous debt put on it and the response to Hurricane Maria.

Also, we have 4 million Latino kids who have turned 18 since 2016. Who is killing it with Gen-Z? Bernard Sanders.
Image
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,585
And1: 3,014
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1427 » by pancakes3 » Tue Feb 11, 2020 4:40 am

god i hope dems flip FL bc that means not having to pander to flyover idiots who can't help but vote against their own interests in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ohio but FL's been pretty flagrant and effective in their voter suppression.
Bullets -> Wizards
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,585
And1: 3,014
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1428 » by pancakes3 » Tue Feb 11, 2020 4:42 am

Read on Twitter
Bullets -> Wizards
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,306
And1: 11,512
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1429 » by Wizardspride » Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:53 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
All good points but a lot of Sander’s negatives brushed off too easily. It’s not just older voters that have issues with socialism but it’s huge issue with Latino voters. Especially if you’re trying to win Florida, good luck convincing Central and South Americans to vote for a socialist. despite Trump’s overwhelming racism, he’s already targeting Latino voters and I would not be surprised to see his share of the Latino vote increase in 2020.

You bring up the midterm elections, but what a lot of people who are further left ignore is that they were won in the suburbs by capturing alot of previous Trump voters, it was a majority of moderates that flip red districts to blue. It wasn’t more Progressive candidates. Democrats need to keep those suburbs and my worry is that Bernie won’t be flexible enough in the general to pivot and keep those voters engaged or they simply vote down ticket and leave the top open.


Bernie is going to be polling dead even with Trump in FL.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/fl/florida_trump_vs_sanders-6842.html

In terms of Latinos, Bernie has invested a lot of money and time in the Latino vote. He is trying to expand the electorate in the primary which would serve well in the general. He has Chuck Rocha as an advisor who knows what he's doing within the Latino communities in the western states, the midwest, and the south. You'll see this throughout the primary. I think we're generalizing the Latino community a bit much too. The Dems will get 65-70% of the Latino vote in the general election. The task is TURNING THEM OUT.

The conservative Cubans and Venezuelans in FL won't vote for him, sure. But Puerto Ricans will vote for Bernie as he's been a strong voice against Trump's disrespect of the island and the disastrous debt put on it and the response to Hurricane Maria.

Also, we have 4 million Latino kids who have turned 18 since 2016. Who is killing it with Gen-Z? Bernard Sanders.

I hope you're right.

You have alot more faith young in the younger generation than I do.

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,798
And1: 20,371
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1430 » by dckingsfan » Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:35 pm

Wizardspride wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
Pointgod wrote:All good points but a lot of Sander’s negatives brushed off too easily. It’s not just older voters that have issues with socialism but it’s huge issue with Latino voters. Especially if you’re trying to win Florida, good luck convincing Central and South Americans to vote for a socialist. despite Trump’s overwhelming racism, he’s already targeting Latino voters and I would not be surprised to see his share of the Latino vote increase in 2020.

You bring up the midterm elections, but what a lot of people who are further left ignore is that they were won in the suburbs by capturing alot of previous Trump voters, it was a majority of moderates that flip red districts to blue. It wasn’t more Progressive candidates. Democrats need to keep those suburbs and my worry is that Bernie won’t be flexible enough in the general to pivot and keep those voters engaged or they simply vote down ticket and leave the top open.

Bernie is going to be polling dead even with Trump in FL.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/fl/florida_trump_vs_sanders-6842.html

In terms of Latinos, Bernie has invested a lot of money and time in the Latino vote. He is trying to expand the electorate in the primary which would serve well in the general. He has Chuck Rocha as an advisor who knows what he's doing within the Latino communities in the western states, the midwest, and the south. You'll see this throughout the primary. I think we're generalizing the Latino community a bit much too. The Dems will get 65-70% of the Latino vote in the general election. The task is TURNING THEM OUT.

The conservative Cubans and Venezuelans in FL won't vote for him, sure. But Puerto Ricans will vote for Bernie as he's been a strong voice against Trump's disrespect of the island and the disastrous debt put on it and the response to Hurricane Maria.

Also, we have 4 million Latino kids who have turned 18 since 2016. Who is killing it with Gen-Z? Bernard Sanders.

I hope you're right.

You have alot more faith young in the younger generation than I do.

Come out and walk with me in Houston. I run into a LOT of young Hispanics. I just can't get them to register to vote.

When I talk to them - they indeed are against Trump - but not enough to actually vote.
Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,046
And1: 4,739
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1431 » by Zonkerbl » Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:36 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:Bernie is going to be polling dead even with Trump in FL.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/fl/florida_trump_vs_sanders-6842.html

In terms of Latinos, Bernie has invested a lot of money and time in the Latino vote. He is trying to expand the electorate in the primary which would serve well in the general. He has Chuck Rocha as an advisor who knows what he's doing within the Latino communities in the western states, the midwest, and the south. You'll see this throughout the primary. I think we're generalizing the Latino community a bit much too. The Dems will get 65-70% of the Latino vote in the general election. The task is TURNING THEM OUT.

The conservative Cubans and Venezuelans in FL won't vote for him, sure. But Puerto Ricans will vote for Bernie as he's been a strong voice against Trump's disrespect of the island and the disastrous debt put on it and the response to Hurricane Maria.

Also, we have 4 million Latino kids who have turned 18 since 2016. Who is killing it with Gen-Z? Bernard Sanders.

I hope you're right.

You have alot more faith young in the younger generation than I do.

Come out and walk with me in Houston. I run into a LOT of young Hispanics. I just can't get them to register to vote.

When I talk to them - they indeed are against Trump - but not enough to actually vote.


Have you asked why? Is it just apathy? Fear of voter records being targeted by ICE? What?
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.
I_Like_Dirt
RealGM
Posts: 36,057
And1: 9,437
Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Location: Boardman gets paid!

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1432 » by I_Like_Dirt » Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:03 pm

dckingsfan wrote:Come out and walk with me in Houston. I run into a LOT of young Hispanics. I just can't get them to register to vote.

When I talk to them - they indeed are against Trump - but not enough to actually vote.


Hispanics and Asians have the potential to absolutely change American politics in some rather unpredictable ways, except they don't vote so much.
Bucket! Bucket!
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,798
And1: 20,371
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1433 » by dckingsfan » Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:25 pm

I_Like_Dirt wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:Come out and walk with me in Houston. I run into a LOT of young Hispanics. I just can't get them to register to vote.

When I talk to them - they indeed are against Trump - but not enough to actually vote.

Hispanics and Asians have the potential to absolutely change American politics in some rather unpredictable ways, except they don't vote so much.

Yeah - and it is fascinating to talk with them - they have their own priorities and yet - they just don't and won't vote.

~ 51 million eligible Americans are still not registered to vote (~ one in four eligible persons)
~30 percent of African Americans
~40 percent of Hispanic Americans
~45 percent of Asian Americans
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,346
And1: 6,719
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1434 » by TGW » Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:39 pm

I_Like_Dirt wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:Zero chance of that - his supporters are framing her as a comparatist war monger...



Warren's supporters seem to be the most flexible, which is where I draw some of the conclusions that she'd have the best chance. It's hurting her right now, though, as Bernie's supporters are branding her as alt right and moderates seem to view her the same way they view Bernie.


:crazy:

Some of you guys need to turn off cable news.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,091
And1: 24,413
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1435 » by Pointgod » Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:59 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
All good points but a lot of Sander’s negatives brushed off too easily. It’s not just older voters that have issues with socialism but it’s huge issue with Latino voters. Especially if you’re trying to win Florida, good luck convincing Central and South Americans to vote for a socialist. despite Trump’s overwhelming racism, he’s already targeting Latino voters and I would not be surprised to see his share of the Latino vote increase in 2020.

You bring up the midterm elections, but what a lot of people who are further left ignore is that they were won in the suburbs by capturing alot of previous Trump voters, it was a majority of moderates that flip red districts to blue. It wasn’t more Progressive candidates. Democrats need to keep those suburbs and my worry is that Bernie won’t be flexible enough in the general to pivot and keep those voters engaged or they simply vote down ticket and leave the top open.


Bernie is going to be polling dead even with Trump in FL.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/fl/florida_trump_vs_sanders-6842.html

In terms of Latinos, Bernie has invested a lot of money and time in the Latino vote. He is trying to expand the electorate in the primary which would serve well in the general. He has Chuck Rocha as an advisor who knows what he's doing within the Latino communities in the western states, the midwest, and the south. You'll see this throughout the primary. I think we're generalizing the Latino community a bit much too. The Dems will get 65-70% of the Latino vote in the general election. The task is TURNING THEM OUT.

The conservative Cubans and Venezuelans in FL won't vote for him, sure. But Puerto Ricans will vote for Bernie as he's been a strong voice against Trump's disrespect of the island and the disastrous debt put on it and the response to Hurricane Maria.

Also, we have 4 million Latino kids who have turned 18 since 2016. Who is killing it with Gen-Z? Bernard Sanders.


Based on the poll that you that you linked, Biden is the only candidate that clearly beats out Trump in Florida while Bernie is tied. It’s encouraging that Bernie has engaged Hispanic voters but you don’t understand the sheer amount of misinformation that the Republicans are going to spread. Like dckingsfan has said, registration and turnout is hard. Looking back at the midterms there is clear path through the suburbs and the more people are exposed to Bernie’s policies the I think the more he’ll have to rely on the youth turnout to win. Like I’ve said, any candidate with the full backing of the Democrats can win, but I think that gets exponentially harder as you move to Warren and Bernie.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,091
And1: 24,413
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1436 » by Pointgod » Tue Feb 11, 2020 4:04 pm

I_Like_Dirt wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:Come out and walk with me in Houston. I run into a LOT of young Hispanics. I just can't get them to register to vote.

When I talk to them - they indeed are against Trump - but not enough to actually vote.


Hispanics and Asians have the potential to absolutely change American politics in some rather unpredictable ways, except they don't vote so much.


And the wild thing is that a lot of them would identify with certain policies of the Republican. Amazing that if the Republican Party wasn’t so insanely racist they’d be able to shut out Democrats out of politics for generations.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,365
And1: 2,728
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1437 » by Kanyewest » Tue Feb 11, 2020 5:08 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
The same way that the UK election wasn’t about policy, neither will this upcoming election. While I agree with Bernie’s economic policies it’s much harder to get the rest of the country on board because it will require a massive investment and it will require taxes to go up on everyone unless you increase the deficit. Trump is going to run on the economy and that’s where he’s strongest. Bernie’s policies are great in a vacuum but when you place them up against a set up criteria it’s a different story.


Agreed. It could be tough for any candidate especially if there is foreign interference again and an incumbent president hasn't lost since 1992.

That being said, Trump ran against a very similar economy in 2016 so he's vulnerable in the same ways in that there is wage stagnation among middle class voters. In the same economy in 2018, Trump lost a of the seats in the midterm election. Granted there were many moderate democrats- but hopefully these same Democrats will support whoever the nominee is especially since most of the party thinks Trump should be impeached.

I do believe the concerns for Sanders that you are addressing are real enough (for instance maybe Sanders becomes a one term president). But it may not hurt him against Trump- right now to me this is a big unknown and uncertainty. While Sanders would certainly struggle in a general election in the past, younger voters do no not have the negative impression of Sanders being a Democratic socialist as they look at is like a European country. However, older voters may view it more negatively as communist and anti-captalist.

Sanders may also not draw as many college educated voters as Warren/Pete; but if the choice is between Sanders and Trump- perhaps these voters would be more likely to vote for Sanders anyways at least that's how I would hope it plays.


All good points but a lot of Sander’s negatives brushed off too easily. It’s not just older voters that have issues with socialism but it’s huge issue with Latino voters. Especially if you’re trying to win Florida, good luck convincing Central and South Americans to vote for a socialist. despite Trump’s overwhelming racism, he’s already targeting Latino voters and I would not be surprised to see his share of the Latino vote increase in 2020.

You bring up the midterm elections, but what a lot of people who are further left ignore is that they were won in the suburbs by capturing alot of previous Trump voters, it was a majority of moderates that flip red districts to blue. It wasn’t more Progressive candidates. Democrats need to keep those suburbs and my worry is that Bernie won’t be flexible enough in the general to pivot and keep those voters engaged or they simply vote down ticket and leave the top open.


Florida presents some interesting challenges. Andrew Gillum was a progressive, Bernie even campaigned for him (although the NYTimes called him a Washington insider because of lobbying) and ended up losing to DeSantis who called Gillum a monkey. After the 2000 election, I can't help but feeling that Florida can't be counted upon unless it's a blowout election.

I wonder if Gillum ran into similar problems as Ben Jealous who didn't seem to have enough money to give out signs. Although Hogan was a more traditional Republican and an incumbent.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1438 » by Ruzious » Tue Feb 11, 2020 5:23 pm

Klobuchar came up with potentially the best bumpersticker slogan when she said bumpersticker slogans are not the answer.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,288
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1439 » by FAH1223 » Tue Feb 11, 2020 5:39 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Based on the poll that you that you linked, Biden is the only candidate that clearly beats out Trump in Florida while Bernie is tied. It’s encouraging that Bernie has engaged Hispanic voters but you don’t understand the sheer amount of misinformation that the Republicans are going to spread. Like dckingsfan has said, registration and turnout is hard. Looking back at the midterms there is clear path through the suburbs and the more people are exposed to Bernie’s policies the I think the more he’ll have to rely on the youth turnout to win. Like I’ve said, any candidate with the full backing of the Democrats can win, but I think that gets exponentially harder as you move to Warren and Bernie.


Bro, I know exactly what the GOP is going to be doing.

Which is why from my lenses, I see the Sanders campaign as the only campaign with the scale and operation to fight back. Warren sort of has elements of it but her digital arm isn't big as Bernie's.

dckingsfan wrote:You have alot more faith young in the younger generation than I do.

Come out and walk with me in Houston. I run into a LOT of young Hispanics. I just can't get them to register to vote.

When I talk to them - they indeed are against Trump - but not enough to actually vote.[/quote]

Its a huge gamble by the Bernie Sanders campaign to get the non-voter to voter. But it is the largest swing voter if you think about it.

If it works in the Dem primary, its a game changer.

If it doesn't work that well and Bernie wins the nomination like a normie Dem, then I think their strategy shifts a bit.
Image
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXVII 

Post#1440 » by gtn130 » Tue Feb 11, 2020 5:41 pm

Read on Twitter


Democracy is 100000000% over

Return to Washington Wizards