I have no idea if it did or not. He only spent half a season here. But Russell's situation might have been different regardless, considering he had just come off from a successful campaign the year before of helping the Nets go to the playoffs. So it's not like he had to be rehabilitated in any way. The only goal the Warriors probably had with him, after Steph's injury, was just to make sure he didn't become an untradeable contract.BullyKing wrote:killmongrel wrote:Woody Allen wrote:Apart from what Texas Chuck said, GSW fans, please stop with the narrative that Wiggins is suddenly not an awful player just because he's on the Warriors.
I hated the trade, but if the Warriors turn him into a solid role player, then he's all of a sudden not an awful player.
You can't compare Minnesota's losing culture to that of the Warriors.
How did the Warriors culture improve Russell?
With that said, again, as long as the Warriors can turn and keep Wiggins looking like a good role player, then that means he's not an awful player. Small sample size so far. So it's about how he looks the rest of the way, especially next season with Steph and Klay, if he's still here.