Am2626 wrote:dice wrote:Am2626 wrote:
Yes success is judged by titles not mediocrity. Without lucking into Rose Paxson’s best constructed team would have a ceiling of the second round. That’s the definition of being average. Now he is just bad as the game and new era has passed him by.
false. derrick rose's injury cost this team further success. substitute any combination of players into rose's salary slot and this team likely sees at least one more ECF appearance, if not finals. hell, they SHOULD have beaten lebron's cavs in 2015, but derrick was bad in the series
but you're right. the payton/kemp sonics, the cavs of the '80s, barkley's suns, drexler's blazers, reggie's pacers, the knicks of the '90s and the stockton/malone jazz clubs were all mediocre. no titles for them!
All the teams you mentioned played in the Finals. They also got beat by the greatest player to ever play. Paxson’s teams have a combined 1 Eastern Conference Finals appearance. Not anything similar. Those teams accomplished a lot more. You want to make a fair comparison then compare Paxson to the Atlanta Hawks teams of the 90’s and 2000’s that never got past the second round.
so it's not actually about championships but who you lose to? ummm...the bulls lost to lebron james a number of times there
Stop making excuses that Rose’s contract prevented Paxson from building a championship caliber team. Nothing he has done suggests that.
completely ignorant comment. first of all, you just got finished saying that what you had said previously about championships being all that matter was not really what you were saying. now you're again switching back to the "championship caliber" argument! whatever's convenient, i guess...
secondly, a blind monkey could have throw darts at a free agent dartboard with the derrick rose money and significantly upgraded an already strong roster. and you have it ass-backwards on paxson. nothing he has done in the free agency market suggests that he COULDN'T have made those upgrades. boozer, gasol, dunleavy, korver, brewer...all significant contributors to those bulls teams, all paxson free agent signings. just because paxson couldn't land lebron james doesn't mean he was incompetent in free agency. and that's the insinuation you're feebly trying to make
i already pointed out that lebron's heat and cavs teams had similar payrolls. the difference was that the heat and cavs were paying a big chunk of that to lebron james while the bulls were paying it to an injured derrick rose. and yet the bulls were STILL competitive. that's a tribute to john paxson. huge, HUGE structural disadvantage