jcsunsfan wrote:Fools gold on second round picks. They are the real lottery tickets of the NBA. The he chances of them turning into something are so small. It is wrongheaded to consider filling the bench with them. This team needs competent vets.
Even first round picks are hit and miss. I would trade right out of this draft for a good veteran player.
That's totally cool man! As that's your choice to feel that way, And as such, I'll respect your opinion. However, I really think gou really might be potentially underestimating the intrinsic value of these players as not only unguaranteed contracts, But also as potential solid to high end contributors and if they're actually developed well by the team drafting them. And if/ when they manage to produce/contribute, Then they could become of optimal value as potential trade chips to cash strapped teams looking for a boost in terms of production, contribution, etc. And again, The cost and overall contractual obligation tied to these 2nd round prospects is minimal at best. So thusly, The risk is minimal too. They also represent roster spots that can be filled cheaply on the fly by hardcapped teams with injuries, As to not incure potential penalties for not maintaining a full roster, etc.
Additionally, No one at any time is or has implied that you couldn't still fill your roster with veterans, Which of course would be an optimal solution. However, As this season has shown us, No one team is exempt from potential decimating injuries throughout their roster. So having these players at the ready ( being developed in the G league) to be called upon if needed is a definite benefit to any team throughout the season. And again, These players can be developed in the teams affiliate G league team under normal circumstances, Or until ready to be called up. So really, they wouldn't be taking available roster spots away from potential veteran players now would they.
And lastly, To your point about draft picks being hit and miss, Honestly........... I hear this narrative too often. And really, Such risks are again minimalized, IF ONLY a team invests in having an actual competent scouting staff and quality player development personnel. You see the top teams that do well with young players being successful by utilizing the draft in this manner and by following this blueprint. The poor teams that miss more than they hit on prospects are a direct reflection of poorly run, inept front offices, And cheap owners that put forth the money to actually bring in top tier or high quality personnel. I mean how many players over the last 10 years have we either passed on in the draft, or drafted, and then let go to other teams, Onlybto see them garner much better results and or production from the same players???
It's really not that hard to identify the origin of our problems with the draft, And player development too. OKC, Memphis, Boston, Denver, Miami, San Antonio all seem to consistently identify quality players in the draft. Your results will be determined by your overall effort and time put in, when it comes to the draft. Just keep a realistic perspective of your expectations, and do your homework on the prospects in your draft range. Track their statistics and match the best positional fit. If you put in the proper time and effort, it doesn't really have to be a crap shoot.
