KevinMcreynolds wrote:cdubbz wrote:KevinMcreynolds wrote:
Lonzo is a top 3 pick that is still a below average point guard in his 3rd year, and Lamelo has had a 10x more dysfunctional road to the NBA. This kid's game is full of talent, but you can tell there is zero formal coaching mixed in there. He's going to have a steep learning curve in the NBA.
Lonzo is 22yo lol. He’s been injured a whole lot and this Pelicans team he has been thriving.
And what is ‘formal coaching’ nowadays anyways? Mike D’Antoni is running an offense that the Ball brothers were doing in high school. Times have changed.
Formal coaching would be something like Paschall got from Jay Wright, which obviously made him an instant success in the NBA. But that's an extreme case of 4 years from the best coach. But even looking at 2 year guys like Toppin and Haliburton, or guys that play a year under coach K, etc...their games are so much more refined than a kid like Lamelo.
I think what's getting lost in all this is we're talking about taking Lamelo with a potential top 3 pick and putting him on a team that will be contending next year. If we were rebuilding and had a late lottery pick or something, I'd be perfectly fine with taking a shot, but no way in hell I'm I taking on a project like him.
Agree to disagree. It’s wild talking “refined” games for 18-20 year olds as if they can’t get coached after that. Look at guys like Giannis & Embiid who started hooping late. Their first formal coaching was probably the NBA.
Basically. Lamelo Ball doubters will see that he is truly talented.




















